STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
This meeting of the San Francisco Police Commission on September 2, 2026, included discussion of crime trends, disciplinary actions, policy updates, and a major debate on drone surveillance policy (DGO 1012). Commissioners voted on consent calendar items, minutes, and rescinding outdated general orders. The meeting drew significant public comment on community safety, police accountability, and surveillance concerns.
President Clay would like to take roll? Yes, please. Commissioner Lowe. Here. Commissioner Scott. Here. Commissioner Liang. Here. Commissioner Benedict. Here. And Commissioner Elias is here. Commissioner Vice President Techy. Yeah. Right, President Clay, you have a quorum. Also with us tonight, we have Chief Lou from the San Francisco Police Department and Executive Director Paul Henderson from the Department of Police Accountability. Thank you, Sergeant. Welcome, ladies and gentlemen, to our September 2nd meeting of the police commission. This time we will begin our meeting. Sorry. Line item one, general public comment. At this time, the public is now welcome to address the Commission for up to two minutes on items that do not appear on tonight's agenda but are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the police commission. Under police commission rules of order, during public comment, neither police or DPA personnel nor commissioners are required to respond by to questions by the public, but they may provide a brief response. Alternatively, you may submit public comment in either of the following ways. Email the Secretary of the Police Commission at SFPD.commission at SFgov.org or written comments may be sent via U.S. Postal Service to the public safety building located at 1245 Third Street, San Francisco, California, 94158. If you would like to make public comment, please approach the podium. Good evening. I want to thank you for having us here. As I said in some emails over the last two weeks, we would like to have the issues of Southern Station agendized at some point in the near future. We did receive word today from station captain Hurley that next Wednesday night we will have a discussion with her on upcoming plans for Southern. So I'm pleased to report that. Thank you. Commissioners, my name is Sean Auckland. I'm also with SOMO West Neighborhood Association. Last November you voted here in this room to expand Southern District's boundaries. You did that with clear assurances to our community that a staffing plan would be in place well before the new lines take effect. That was your decision, and it takes effect in just 29 days. Last week, our district captain told us at our neighborhood meeting what that plan amounts to. Southern is getting, in her words, one additional officer and losing four to transfers. That's a net loss of three going into the largest workload increase that our district has ever absorbed. Market Street, all of Market Street. 31,000 more calls per year. We are not guessing at what that produces. For 11 straight months that we've been tracking, Southern's priority B response times have been longer than the citywide median, inequitably longer, never less than 30 percent longer. In December, it was 92 percent, almost twice the citywide median. Last month, the last 30 days, August, 41 percent longer. That comparison is to the city's own median. So the citywide staffing crisis is already on both sides of it. It's irrelevant. What's left is officer allocation, and that is a choice.