OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

San Francisco Rules Committee Meeting – September 16, 2024

Rules CommitteeMonday, September 16, 2024
BodySan Francisco, California
SessionRules Committee
DateMonday, September 16, 2024
StatusFILED
Video Record

STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE

Transcript — Verbatim
0:03

Good morning, everyone.

0:05

This meeting will come to order.

0:06

Yes, it will be.

0:07

Welcome to the September 16, 2024 regular meeting of the Rules Committee.

0:11

I'm Supervisor Asha Safai, the acting chair of the rules committee.

0:16

I'm joined by President of the Board of Supervisors, Aaron Peskin.

0:19

I'd like to entertain a motion first before we begin to excuse uh Supervisor Shaman Walton from today's meeting.

0:26

Yes, on the motion to uh excuse Supervisor Walton on that motion.

0:33

Uh member Peskin.

0:34

I.

0:35

Peskin aye.

0:37

Uh Vice Chair Safai.

0:40

I.

0:40

Safai aye.

0:42

The motion passes with uh Supervisor Walton being excused.

0:47

Great.

0:48

I'd also like to recognize us upgov TV, uh, Jamie Echeveria or Jaime and our clerk today, Victor Young, for always being on point.

0:59

Uh Mr.

0:59

Clerk, can you call the first item?

1:02

Uh can I make some announcements before we start?

1:06

I'd like to make some announcements before we begin.

1:08

Yes, uh public comment will be taken on each item on today's agenda.

1:12

When your item of interest comes up in public comment is called, please line up to speak uh on your right.

1:17

Alternatively, you may submit public comment in writing in either of the following ways.

1:21

Email them to myself, the rules committee clerk at VICTOR.yo N G at SFgov.org.

1:28

If you submit public comment via email, it'll be forwarded to the supervisors and included as part of the file.

1:34

You may also send your written comment via U.S.

1:37

mail to our office in City Hall when Dr.

1:39

Carlton B.

1:40

Goodlit Place, room 244, San Francisco, California 94102.

1:44

Please make sure to silence all cell phones and electronic devices.

1:48

Items acted upon today are expected to appear on the Board of Supervisors' agenda of September 24th, 2024, unless otherwise state it.

1:57

The first item on our agenda is item number one.

2:00

Warrens approving the police department's inventory and policy related to the use of unassisted aerial vehicles or drones and making findings consistent with the criteria in state law.

2:13

Great.

2:13

Uh last week we continued this item uh to make uh time for President Peskin to join us as he was unable to make last week's meeting.

2:23

I know we have representatives from the San Francisco Police Department joining us this morning.

2:27

Thank you for coming back today.

2:29

Um can you come to the podium?

2:31

I think uh Supervisor Peskin probably has some questions to begin, or you want to talk about some of the amendments that have been changed or some of the changes that will happen.

2:41

Please please proceed.

2:43

Thank you, Acting Chair Safai and President Peskin.

2:46

Also, thank you to you and your staff for working with us over the last week.

2:50

Uh the police department would like to propose some amendments to the drone policy based on your feedback, questions we've received, and concerns from members of the public.

3:00

So if it's all right with you, I'll just read those aloud.

3:02

Yeah, please.

3:04

So in addition to what's existing in our drone policy, we'd like to add prohibitions and restrictions to read department-owned UASs, there, which are drones, their accessories or features and functionalities shall not be used for one, the purpose of infringing on the lawful exercise of rights protected by the First Amendment, two, for a non-law enforcement related matter, three, in an unsafe matter or in violation of any applicable laws, rules, or regulations.

3:35

Four, the UAS shall not be equipped with weapons of any kind.

3:39

Five, the UAS shall not be a force option.

3:42

When the UAS is being flown, operators will take steps to ensure the camera is focused on the areas necessary to the mission and to minimize the inadvertent collection of data about uninvolved persons or places.

3:53

Operators and observers shall take reasonable precautions, such as turning imaging devices away to avoid inadvertently recording or transmitting images of areas where there is a reasonable expectation of privacy unless authorized by law.

4:08

In addition to that, we'd like to add a data retention section to the policy to read one.

4:15

Upon completion of each UAS mission, the digital media evidence or DME shall be reviewed and evaluated for evidentiary value.

4:23

All DME shall be uploaded into the department's digital evidence database.

4:28

A, if DME is found to have no evidentiary value, it is not relevant as it is not relevant to a criminal, civil, or administrative matter.

4:37

Data may be deleted within 30 days.

4:40

And B, if DME is found to have evidentiary value, as it is related to a criminal, civil or administrative manner matter, it shall be retained for a minimum of 2.5 years and in accordance with federal state laws and regulations.

5:00

Two, UAS recorded data will not be collected, disseminated, or retained solely for the purpose of monitoring activities protected by the U.S.

5:05

Constitution, such as the First Amendment's protections of religion, speech, press, assembly, and redress of grievances, for example, protests and demonstrations.

5:14

And three, pursuant to SF admin code 96i.2 subsection E.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Procedural██████████████████████████26%
Transportation██████████████████18%
Public Works██████████████14%
Urban Forestry████████████12%
Public Safety████████8%
Public Comment███████7%
Homelessness█████5%
Public Education████4%
Personnel Matters███3%
Summary of Proceedings

Rules Committee Regular Meeting – September 16, 2024

The Rules Committee of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors convened on September 16, 2024, with Acting Chair Supervisor Asha Safai and President Aaron Peskin present. Supervisor Shamann Walton was excused. The committee took up the Police Department's drone policy, a proposed library branch site, mayoral appointments to the Public Works Commission and SFMTA Board, and Urban Forestry Council appointments. All items were advanced to the full board, some with amendments or without recommendation.

Drone Policy (Item 1)

  • The San Francisco Police Department presented amendments to its Unassisted Aerial Vehicle policy, adding prohibitions on use that infringes First Amendment rights, non-law-enforcement purposes, unsafe operation, equipping drones with weapons, and using drones as a force option.
  • The policy would require drone operators to minimize inadvertent recording and maintain data retention rules: digital media without evidentiary value may be deleted within 30 days; evidence with evidentiary value must be retained for at least 2.5 years; and public footage cannot be retained longer than 30 days unless a sworn captain determines an open criminal investigation requires it.
  • Supervisor Peskin said he was prepared to make the amendments, and Acting Chair Safai requested a future update on drone operator staffing and deployments.
  • Public comment: H. Brown expressed strong support, urging rapid training of operators and citing drones' potential for disaster response. Jordan opposed the policy, arguing that safeguards would not prevent police misuse and calling the expenditure unjustified.

New Library Branch Site (Item 2)

  • Supervisor Safai introduced an ordinance requiring that the new library branch serving the Ocean View, Merced Heights, Ingleside, and Lake View neighborhoods be built on the city-owned parcel at 100 Orizaba Avenue, subject to environmental review and other approvals. An amendment allowed an alternative: expanding the existing Ocean View Branch at 345 Randolph Street onto an adjacent parcel.
  • Supervisor Peskin requested the item go to the full board without recommendation while he gathered more information.
  • Public comment: Josh asked for an amendment referencing the 2021 Climate Action Plan's tree preservation policy; another speaker urged preserving existing trees on the site for habitat.

Public Works Commission Appointment (Item 3)

  • Eleanor Blume, an attorney and Sunset District resident, was nominated. She addressed sidewalk maintenance, staffing, and the department's recovery from a difficult period.
  • Supervisor Safai highlighted Public Works' historic vacancy rate of 20–30% in operations and encouraged Blume to prioritize it.
  • Public comment: H. Brown asked for a public restroom near the Armory; Jordan opposed the nomination, asserting Blume was a mayoral appointee without an equity lens and raising concerns about street sweeps.
  • The committee voted to amend the motion by removing the word rejecting and forwarding the nomination with a positive recommendation.

MTA Board Appointment (Item 4)

  • Mike Chen, nominee for the Municipal Transportation Agency Board of Directors, described his meetings with Chinatown groups and addressed concerns from the previous hearing. He expressed support for transit operators and said vehicular towing should be a last resort with meaningful alternatives and public consultation.
  • Supervisor Safai asked about proposed changes to no-overnight-sleeping restrictions; Chen agreed that changes should include notice and opportunities for public input.
  • Public comment: H. Brown supported Chen and requested a bike lane safety improvement; Jordan opposed Chen, arguing he was a political appointee and criticized his positions; Robin Pam (Kids Safe SF), Peter Beldon (Sierra Club), and Lian Chang spoke in favor, citing Chen's advisory committee record.
  • The committee voted to amend the motion to delete rejecting and forwarded the nomination with a positive recommendation.

Urban Forestry Council Appointments (Item 5)

  • The committee considered seven appointments to the Urban Forestry Council. Coordinator Jesus Lazano described the candidates; three applicants spoke.
  • Pamela Nagel, seeking reappointment, noted the urban forest is shrinking and expressed a goal to increase council visibility.
  • Joshua Clipp, applicant for seat 6, described his work on Mission Verde and securing a nearly quarter-million-dollar tree-planting fee from UCSF.
  • Antonio Moreno, applicant for seat 7, spoke of his restoration work with the Bonnie Shirk Foundation in the Excelsior.
  • The committee appointed Morgan Basset Favel (seat 1), Carla Nagy (seat 2), Pamela Nagel (seat 3), Edgar Sochi Flores (seat 4), Caroline Scanlan (seat 5), Joshua Clipp (seat 6), and Antonio Moreno (seat 7), including residency waivers for seats 1 and 5.

Key Outcomes

  • All votes passed without objection, with Supervisor Walton excused.
  • The drone policy item was forwarded to the full board as a committee report as amended.
  • The library branch ordinance was forwarded without recommendation.
  • The Public Works and MTA nominations were forwarded with amendments removing rejection language and positive recommendations.
  • The Urban Forestry Council appointments were approved.

Meeting Transcript

Good morning, everyone. This meeting will come to order. Yes, it will be. Welcome to the September 16, 2024 regular meeting of the Rules Committee. I'm Supervisor Asha Safai, the acting chair of the rules committee. I'm joined by President of the Board of Supervisors, Aaron Peskin. I'd like to entertain a motion first before we begin to excuse uh Supervisor Shaman Walton from today's meeting. Yes, on the motion to uh excuse Supervisor Walton on that motion. Uh member Peskin. I. Peskin aye. Uh Vice Chair Safai. I. Safai aye. The motion passes with uh Supervisor Walton being excused. Great. I'd also like to recognize us upgov TV, uh, Jamie Echeveria or Jaime and our clerk today, Victor Young, for always being on point. Uh Mr. Clerk, can you call the first item? Uh can I make some announcements before we start? I'd like to make some announcements before we begin. Yes, uh public comment will be taken on each item on today's agenda. When your item of interest comes up in public comment is called, please line up to speak uh on your right. Alternatively, you may submit public comment in writing in either of the following ways. Email them to myself, the rules committee clerk at VICTOR.yo N G at SFgov.org. If you submit public comment via email, it'll be forwarded to the supervisors and included as part of the file. You may also send your written comment via U.S. mail to our office in City Hall when Dr. Carlton B. Goodlit Place, room 244, San Francisco, California 94102. Please make sure to silence all cell phones and electronic devices. Items acted upon today are expected to appear on the Board of Supervisors' agenda of September 24th, 2024, unless otherwise state it. The first item on our agenda is item number one. Warrens approving the police department's inventory and policy related to the use of unassisted aerial vehicles or drones and making findings consistent with the criteria in state law. Great. Uh last week we continued this item uh to make uh time for President Peskin to join us as he was unable to make last week's meeting. I know we have representatives from the San Francisco Police Department joining us this morning. Thank you for coming back today. Um can you come to the podium? I think uh Supervisor Peskin probably has some questions to begin, or you want to talk about some of the amendments that have been changed or some of the changes that will happen. Please please proceed. Thank you, Acting Chair Safai and President Peskin. Also, thank you to you and your staff for working with us over the last week. Uh the police department would like to propose some amendments to the drone policy based on your feedback, questions we've received, and concerns from members of the public. So if it's all right with you, I'll just read those aloud. Yeah, please. So in addition to what's existing in our drone policy, we'd like to add prohibitions and restrictions to read department-owned UASs, there, which are drones, their accessories or features and functionalities shall not be used for one, the purpose of infringing on the lawful exercise of rights protected by the First Amendment, two, for a non-law enforcement related matter, three, in an unsafe matter or in violation of any applicable laws, rules, or regulations. Four, the UAS shall not be equipped with weapons of any kind. Five, the UAS shall not be a force option. When the UAS is being flown, operators will take steps to ensure the camera is focused on the areas necessary to the mission and to minimize the inadvertent collection of data about uninvolved persons or places.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com