STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
Speaker numbers apply only to this recording. Names come from transcript evidence. “Possibly” marks uncertain attribution.
The Rules Committee of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors met on November 2, 2026, at 6:00 PM UTC, chaired by Supervisor Shimon Walton, with committee members President Rafael Mandelman and Vice Chair Steven Shiro (referred to as Cheryl in the voting record). Clerk Victor Young managed the proceedings. The committee considered four agenda items: appointments to city boards and acceptance of the SFMTA's 2026 Biennial Surveillance Report. All items were approved unanimously and are expected to appear on the Board of Supervisors' November 10, 2026, agenda.
Principal Business Analyst Nabil Arnaut presented the mandated report covering six surveillance technologies. Notable findings:
During discussion, Vice Chair Shiro inquired about program costs. Monica Geecy, red-light camera program manager, clarified that the program is not revenue-positive: citation revenue goes to the state, and the city receives only traffic school fees. The program's annual operating cost is approximately $1.2 million, and capital installation costs about $500,000 per camera. President Mandelman acknowledged the high cost but supported the safety benefits.
One speaker, John Ellis (member of the Supportive Housing Providers Network Resident Advisory Board, speaking in his individual capacity), questioned whether the city could bring AI data management in-house to avoid exploiting data outside city control, expressing a desire for accountability and safety. No further public comments were made on other items.
All appointments and the report will be forwarded to the full Board of Supervisors.
Good morning and welcome to our November 2nd, 2026 rules committee meeting. I'm your chair supervisor Shimon Walton. I'm joined by committee member President Rafael Mandelman, soon to be joined by Vice Chair Steven Shiro. Our clerk today is Victor Young, and I want to thank Jamie Eshevery with SFGov TV for making sure that this meeting is publicized and made available for the public. Mr. Clerk, do we have any announcements? Yes, public comment will be taken on each item on this agenda when your item of interest comes up and public comment is called. Please line up to speak on your right. Alternatively, you may submit public comment in writing in either of the following ways. Email them to myself, the rules committee clerk at VICTOR.yo N G at sfgov.org. If you submit public comment via email, it'll be included as part of the file. You may also send your written comments to us via US mail. Our office address is City Hall, one Dr. Carlton B. Goodlit Place, room 244, San Francisco, California, 94102. Please make sure to silence all cell phones and electronic devices. Items acted upon today are expected to appear on the Board of Supervisors agenda of November 10th, unless otherwise stated. That completes the initial announcements. Thank you so much, Mr. Clerk. Would you please call item number one? Item number one is the hearing to consider appointing one member term ending September 6th, one member term ending September 4th, 200. Excuse me. Uh one member term ending September 6, 2027, one member term ending September 4, 2028, and two members' terms ending September 3rd, 2029 to the assessment appeals board number one. Thank you so much. And I will one say thank you for everyone who submitted applications. Please take about two minutes to tell us about yourself, why you want to serve. And first up is Karina Mitchell. Victor. And in my own practice, I've appraised properties, all property types in the city, almost all locations, but while on the AAB, I've had this unique opportunity to use my own experience to help AAB reach supported, reasonable decisions. As you know, AAB is composed of professionals from different professional backgrounds, each of each who bring unique skills and perspectives. I've enjoyed working with the commissioners, the other commissioners, and the clerk, and believe the diversity of the board results in better analysis and decisions. Um a use permit in Golden Gate Park for one weekend out of the year to 500 unit brand new apartment buildings to a new condominium project where we had the value with a defect, possibly leaning, where we had value after the notice of the defect and then after the news of the fix. Um I've seen development land in Mission Bay, which has now become the chief center, all of which I'm grateful to have had the opportunity, and um am grateful to continue to serve. Thank you so much. I don't see anyone with questions, so we will go to Steven Wasserman. Um echo a lot of what uh Karina just mentioned. Uh, my experience goes back now over 30 years, and I hate doing that math, but nonetheless, here we are. Uh, as a commercial real estate uh in San Francisco. Uh this