OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/San Jose, California/City Council
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

San José Rules Committee & Committee of the Whole Joint Meeting – September 16, 2026

City Council — Wednesday, September 16, 2026
BodySan Jose, California
SessionCity Council
DateWednesday, September 16, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 20:31

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it
0:27

2 o'clock, so we're gonna call today's meeting of the rules and open government committee to order.

0:30

So let's start with roll call, please.

0:32

Candelas here.

0:33

Duan absent foley.

0:35

Come here.

0:36

Cohen.

0:37

Here.

0:37

We have a corn.

0:39

Great.

0:39

Uh we are going to start with the review of Tuesday, September 22nd council meeting with a 9 30 closed session and 1 30 regular session.

0:50

Consent starts on page five.

0:54

And continues on page six and page seven.

0:59

In section three, we have the 2026 IGR report.

1:03

The uh status of open audit recommendations and our annual employee turnover audit report, or just our annual employee turnover audit report.

1:12

Section six stormwater management annual report.

1:18

And eight point two is our consolidated annual performance and evaluation report.

1:24

No land use.

1:26

Do we have any public comment?

1:28

Brian.

1:49

Sorry, it didn't show up.

1:52

Um can you hear me okay?

1:53

Yes.

1:55

Okay, I wanted to talk about the uh e-comment section on page three and page four, and you go to the legislatar section uh on the city calendar, and there is no e-comment.

2:07

I called the the um the um clerk's office, and they were very, very, very nice.

2:16

I must commend them.

2:16

They were very, very nice.

2:18

Person I talked to.

2:19

And he said he was gonna talk.

2:20

I just thought I'd mention it rules and com rules uh too.

2:24

That um I used to use the e-comments a lot.

2:26

They haven't been on there for a while, and they haven't been able to be used for a while.

2:30

And just thought maybe you should either update the agenda or have people have access to those.

2:35

Thank you.

2:37

Back to committee.

2:38

Okay, move approval, second.

2:42

All right, I don't see any other comments, so let's vote.

2:47

The motion carries 4-0.

2:48

And now we'll do our first review of the council meeting for September 29th.

2:53

That one has a 9 30 closed session and a 130 regular session.

2:57

And consent starts on page five and continues on pages six and seven.

3:10

Section three, the city man the uh economic development and cultural affairs performance measures audit report, the status report of measure T.

3:22

Temporary the return of the temporary moratorium related to detention and custodial facilities, and section five elevator replacement project at the airport, parking meter and garage rate hours, uh uh rates and hours, section six, first amendment with Santa Clara County for the household hazardous waste program, and one item on land use consent.

3:48

Oh, it looks like there's also a joint city and financing authority item for wastewater commercial paper program that will be heard.

3:59

Um I don't know when this one's gets heard.

4:02

Is it heard right after closed, or is it we'd actually like to hear it right after consent?

4:06

Because we'll get there.

4:07

That's what I meant.

4:08

Right after consent.

4:08

Okay, so this one will be heard right after consent is joint council financing authority meeting.

4:14

All right, do we have a public comment?

4:15

Yes, but as a reminder, speakers must comply with the city's code of conduct for public meetings.

4:20

Please direct comments of the body, layman three marks of the agenda item and observe the time limit.

4:24

Conduct that materially disrupts the meeting or interferes with others' ability to participate, may result in muting or removal as authorized by a law.

4:31

Please go ahead and speak, Brian, followed by calling user one.

4:41

Yeah, just to let you know that mute thing isn't showing up is quick.

4:45

Um that one, I I'm looking forward to when when you say after consent, that's the consent here, and then you have that meeting with those people right in the same uh at the diet there in the main main meeting room.

4:59

Is that okay?

5:00

That's all I have on that one.

5:01

Thank you.

5:04

Call in user one.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Procedural█████████████████████████████████████████████52%
Public Safety█████████████████████████████34%
Labor Standards█████6%
Economic Development████5%
Parking███3%
Summary of Proceedings

San José Rules and Open Government Committee and Committee of the Whole Joint Meeting – September 16, 2026

The Rules and Open Government Committee (ROGC) and Committee of the Whole met jointly on September 16, 2026, at 2:00 PM for a 20‑minute hybrid session. The committee reviewed upcoming council agendas, approved four consent calendar items, and directed staff to study self‑checkout safety standards. All votes were unanimous (4‑0, with one member absent).

Consent Calendar

  • Public Record (Sept 3‑10, 2026): Received and filed unanimously.
  • Free Use of Janet Gray Hayes Rotunda (Nov 19, 2026): Approved for the Santa Clara County Association of Realtors (SCCAOR) Fall General Membership Meeting, sponsored by Council District 9. The item was placed on the October 6, 2026 City Council agenda for action.
  • Retroactive Approval – Santos Family Car Show (Sept 5, 2026): Sponsored by Council District 4, approved retroactively and placed on the September 22, 2026 Council agenda.
  • Retroactive Approvals – Council District 5 Events: Six events (Back to School Bash, National Night Out, Lowrider Day, Mexican Independence Day El Grito, Mexican Flag Raising, and Tower/Rotunda Lighting) were retroactively approved and placed on the September 22, 2026 Council agenda.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • E‑Comment Functionality: A commenter (Brian) noted the absence of e‑comment on the city calendar and asked for either an agenda update or restoration of the feature.
  • Consent Calendar – Rotunda Use: A caller criticized providing free use of city space to the real estate association, calling it “corporate welfare” while parking meters remain broken.
  • Self‑Checkout Safety Standards:
    • Yvonne Savedra (UFCW Local 5, 35‑year Lucky’s employee) thanked the council members for addressing self‑checkout issues. She stated that technology must support workers and customers, and that one employee should not be expected to monitor several stations, assist customers, respond to machine issues, unlock merchandise, and confront theft simultaneously. She emphasized that adequate staffing is a tool to combat retail theft.
    • Chris Bontan (UFCW Local 5, 36‑year Lucky’s employee) presented data: self‑checkout machines have a shrink rate of 3.5% (16 times higher than traditional lanes at 0.21%); roughly 33% of retail transactions occur through SCO; San Jose’s grocery/retail/pharmacy sales are between $2.6‑$3.1 billion. He noted that in California, sales tax does not apply to certain items (e.g., baby formula, cooking wine, energy bars).
    • Call‑in speakers described unsafe conditions at a Safeway on Almaden and Cherry Avenue, citing a homeless encampment, aggressive panhandling, overwhelmed workers, and locked‑up merchandise. One speaker asserted that retail theft and lack of enforcement make shopping difficult for law‑abiding customers.
  • Open Forum: A commenter expressed concern about the fairness of upcoming elections. Another called for removal of red‑light and speed cameras, and requested street sweeping of leaf piles on Cherry Avenue.

Discussion Items

  • Self‑Checkout Safety Standards for Grocery and Drug Retail Stores (Item C‑1, 26‑324): Co‑authored by Council Members Candelas and Cohen. Council Member Candelas introduced the item, explaining that seniors in his district find self‑checkout frustrating and that retail theft is a growing concern (citing a nearly 14% increase in shoplifting in California in 2024, 50% higher than 2019). The memo calls for: (1) directing the City Manager to review policy approaches (including elements from ordinances in Long Beach, Costa Mesa, and Santa Ana) and return with options before the FY2027‑2028 priority‑setting process; (2) engaging the County of Santa Clara’s Office of Labor Standards Enforcement on worker safety partnerships. The committee moved the item to workload analysis, with a return to the Rules Committee in two weeks.

Key Outcomes

  • Approval of Future Council Agendas: The September 22, 2026 final agenda and September 29, 2026 draft agenda were approved unanimously (4‑0) after public comment.
  • Consent Calendar Approval: All four items were approved as a block by a 4‑0 vote.
  • Self‑Checkout Directive: The motion to direct the City Manager to analyze self‑checkout staffing and safety standards, and to partner with the County, passed 4‑0. The item will return to the Rules Committee in two weeks.
  • Adjournment: The meeting adjourned at 2:20 PM.

Meeting Transcript

2 o'clock, so we're gonna call today's meeting of the rules and open government committee to order. So let's start with roll call, please. Candelas here. Duan absent foley. Come here. Cohen. Here. We have a corn. Great. Uh we are going to start with the review of Tuesday, September 22nd council meeting with a 9 30 closed session and 1 30 regular session. Consent starts on page five. And continues on page six and page seven. In section three, we have the 2026 IGR report. The uh status of open audit recommendations and our annual employee turnover audit report, or just our annual employee turnover audit report. Section six stormwater management annual report. And eight point two is our consolidated annual performance and evaluation report. No land use. Do we have any public comment? Brian. Sorry, it didn't show up. Um can you hear me okay? Yes. Okay, I wanted to talk about the uh e-comment section on page three and page four, and you go to the legislatar section uh on the city calendar, and there is no e-comment. I called the the um the um clerk's office, and they were very, very, very nice. I must commend them. They were very, very nice. Person I talked to. And he said he was gonna talk. I just thought I'd mention it rules and com rules uh too. That um I used to use the e-comments a lot. They haven't been on there for a while, and they haven't been able to be used for a while. And just thought maybe you should either update the agenda or have people have access to those. Thank you. Back to committee. Okay, move approval, second. All right, I don't see any other comments, so let's vote. The motion carries 4-0. And now we'll do our first review of the council meeting for September 29th. That one has a 9 30 closed session and a 130 regular session. And consent starts on page five and continues on pages six and seven. Section three, the city man the uh economic development and cultural affairs performance measures audit report, the status report of measure T. Temporary the return of the temporary moratorium related to detention and custodial facilities, and section five elevator replacement project at the airport, parking meter and garage rate hours, uh uh rates and hours, section six, first amendment with Santa Clara County for the household hazardous waste program, and one item on land use consent. Oh, it looks like there's also a joint city and financing authority item for wastewater commercial paper program that will be heard. Um I don't know when this one's gets heard. Is it heard right after closed, or is it we'd actually like to hear it right after consent? Because we'll get there. That's what I meant. Right after consent. Okay, so this one will be heard right after consent is joint council financing authority meeting. All right, do we have a public comment?

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com