OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/San Jose, California/City Council
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

City of San José Joint Rules and Open Government Committee and Committee of the Whole Meeting - September 23, 2026

City Council — Wednesday, September 23, 2026
BodySan Jose, California
SessionCity Council
DateWednesday, September 23, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 14:51

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it
0:20

It is two o'clock uh this afternoon, Tuesday, September 29th, and this is the uh um joint meeting of the rules and open government committee uh and committee as a whole.

0:33

Can you please call the roll?

0:37

Foley here, commit here, cohen absent.

0:40

We have a quorum.

0:41

Thank you very much.

0:42

Uh moving on to our first uh uh review of the agenda of September 29th.

0:56

Uh we have uh 9 30 closed session, 1 30 regular session, no evening meeting.

1:04

Moving on to uh consent item starting on page five, six points to seven eight, and ending in eight, uh strategic support, um the city manager's office of economic development and cultural affairs audit report.

1:24

Um moving on, going on to item on page nine, uh temporary moratorium and status report of uh ballot measure T.

1:36

Um, also we have uh 5.1 actions related to San Jose um uh airport terminal elevator replacement.

1:46

Uh page 10 is uh parking meter, garage rates and hours.

1:52

Page 11.

1:53

We have um item 6.1 to the agreement of County Santa Clara for participation in household hazardous waste collection, nothing under 789, and item number 10 is to be heard immediately after consent, and there's no other land use.

2:12

There is a joint uh city of San Jose financing authority agenda, and that's it.

2:20

Is there a public comment?

2:22

Yes, as a reminder, speakers must comply with the city's code of conduct for public meetings.

2:26

Please direct comments with the body, limit your marks of the agenda item and observe the time limit.

2:31

Conduct that materially disrupts a meeting or interferes with others' ability to participate, may result in muting or removal as authorized by law.

2:38

Brian good afternoon.

2:51

Um the meeting yesterday I walked online was really well done, so thank you for all your hard work on the agenda item.

2:57

Uh obviously uh looking to raise the um fees for um the parking in downtown is gonna create some interest.

3:07

I understand why you're due, and it is cheaper down there, and even if you raise it, it's cheaper than it is in some other places.

3:13

So I think that's a good reason to do it, but then I would think you should listen to what the people say that work down there because that might affect them.

3:21

Uh, there's also a major policy.

3:23

Anyways, I'm gonna give this, I'll email it too, but I didn't have time to do it this morning.

3:28

And that's it, thank you.

3:30

Moving on to virtual speakers, Ruthie, followed by call in user one.

3:38

Yes, good afternoon.

3:40

This is a question I have about the 10 6 agenda, so I don't know if it's I should speak later or now.

3:48

But the my question is sorry, Ruthie, we will be taking that agenda item next, so you can call back again.

3:56

Thank you.

3:58

Call in user one.

4:07

First of all, your parking meters, half of them don't work.

4:11

Okay, steals your money.

4:13

So screens on them don't work, they're faded, or you can't see with the sunlight.

4:20

I mean, I know they're solar panel powered.

4:22

Isn't that wonderful?

4:24

But you guys keep messing with the parking down there and take a look at the ghost town that you have with zombies walking around.

4:33

Disgusting.

4:35

You want to have sales tax revenue?

4:36

Well, how are you gonna have sales tax revenue with empty storefront?

4:40

They're gonna be even emptier with with these parking uh restrictions and the parking tickets.

4:47

I mean, people don't even want to go down there already, and you're gonna make it work.

4:52

You're gonna make it higher, you're gonna make it more complicated, you're gonna extend the hours.

4:57

Don't you want people to go down there at all?

5:00

The I'll tell you what, the parking should be free.

5:03

All right, and downtown San Jose is so bad, it should be free.

5:09

Back to the committee.

5:10

Thank you so much.

5:12

And is there a motion?

5:13

And there's an ad sheet.

5:15

Move for approval with the ad sheet.

5:17

Second.

5:18

Thank you.

5:18

Um let's vote.

5:23

That motion passes.

5:25

Thank you very much.

5:26

Uh moving on to item number two, review of October 6 draft agenda.

5:38

We have 9 30 closed session, 1 30 open session, regular session, and we start consent on page five.

5:46

Going on to six seven, ending in seven.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Public Comment████████████████████████████████32%
Parking██████████████████████████26%
Procedural███████████11%
Transportation█████████9%
Public Safety████████8%
Illegal Dumping████████8%
Affordable Housing██████6%
Summary of Proceedings

City of San José Joint Meeting of the Rules and Open Government Committee and Committee of the Whole

The City of San José held a joint hybrid meeting of the Rules and Open Government Committee and the Committee of the Whole on September 23, 2026, in Council Chambers and virtually. The committee reviewed upcoming City Council agendas, approved routine consent items, and heard public testimony. Roll call showed Vice Mayor Pam Foley and Councilmember Rosemary Kamei present; Chair David Cohen was absent. A quorum was present.

Note: The agenda lists the meeting as Wednesday, September 23, 2026, at 2:00 p.m.; the raw transcript's opening announcement says Tuesday, September 29th. This summary uses the supplied meeting date of September 23, 2026.

Consent Calendar

  • Approved the Public Record for September 10-17, 2026, and ordered it received and filed.
  • Authorized travel and acceptance of travel payments for Mayor Mahan and Mayor's Chief Communications and Public Information Officer Tasha Dean to attend Teach For America's 35th Anniversary Summit on October 3, 2026. Also authorized Mayor's Chief of Staff Sarah Zárate to participate in the Bloomberg Center for Cities at Harvard University Project on Municipal Innovation convening, funded by Bloomberg Philanthropies, October 7-9, 2026. Both items were placed on the September 29, 2026 City Council agenda.
  • Approved a $500 District 1 San Jose Sharks Community Fund grant to the California Association of Local Agency Formation Commissions (CALAFCO) for its annual CALAFCO Conference on October 21-23, 2026, and leadership development programs; the item was placed on the September 29, 2026 City Council agenda.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Brian expressed support for raising downtown parking fees, saying downtown remains cheaper than other places even after an increase, but urged the City to listen to people who work downtown and raised a broader policy concern.
  • A caller opposed the parking fee and enforcement changes, saying half of downtown parking meters do not work, downtown storefronts are empty, and parking in downtown San Jose should be free.
  • Ruthie asked what item the planning department would bring back on the October 6 agenda related to the August 18 discussion of the General Plan and housing element, sometimes called missing middle, and asked for the specific date and time.
  • Jordan Moldow, District 3, asked the same question; noted an expected PBCE work plan discussion on October 6; asked staff for the current expected date. Moldow also raised the upcoming item on regulation of personal delivery devices and city right-of-way, said he participated in BPAC and online discussions, and hoped the staff report would summarize what was discussed in VPAC and in public workshops.
  • A caller criticized repeated agenda deferrals and long evening council meetings, saying the public is frustrated by items being delayed.
  • During the consent calendar, Brian spoke about the Zogg fire, named Elena McLead, Fayla McLead, Karen King, and Kenneth Lawson as people who died, criticized the utility's and CPUC's handling of the final report, said the utility paid $50 million but that the public ultimately paid it, and objected to such matters being on consent calendars.
  • A caller urged the City to fight PG&E, saying all politics is local; the presiding officer responded that no PG&E consent item was on this agenda.
  • In open forum, Brian asked people to drive slower, citing deaths and serious injuries from car accidents and his own experience being hit while walking and biking.
  • Another caller thanked Councilmember Pam Foley for recognizing the situation on a street identified in the transcript as 'Speak Lane,' called accumulating piles on the street a hazard, asked for weekly cleanups rather than monthly cleanups, and warned that an accident there could create city and taxpayer liability.

Discussion Items

  • Review of the September 29, 2026 final agenda: the committee reviewed a 9:30 a.m. closed session and 1:30 p.m. regular session with no evening meeting. Consent items included a strategic support item on the City Manager's Office of Economic Development and Cultural Affairs audit report; a temporary moratorium and status report on ballot measure T; actions related to San Jose airport terminal elevator replacement; parking meter, garage rates and hours; an agreement with the County of Santa Clara for household hazardous waste collection; no items under sections 7-9; item 10 heard immediately after consent; no other land use; and a joint City of San José Financing Authority agenda.
  • Review of the October 6, 2026 draft agenda: the committee reviewed a 9:30 a.m. closed session and 1:30 p.m. open session. Consent items were scheduled from page 5 through page 7, with no strategic support or public safety items; a transportation-related item on page 8 covered actions related to regulation of personal delivery devices and city right-of-way. Other items included an affordable housing development at 1510 North First Street, actions related to arena hotel redevelopment and the HomeKey program, and no land use items.
  • Staff responded that the planning policy prioritization item originally scheduled for October 6 needed two additional weeks for staff capacity and outreach to ACDC, and is currently on the horizon report for October 20.
  • Vice Mayor Foley moved approval of the October 6 draft agenda and noted that there is no council meeting in two weeks, which is why the item is pushed out further.

Key Outcomes

  • Motion to approve the September 29, 2026 final agenda with the add sheet passed.
  • Motion to approve the October 6, 2026 draft agenda passed.
  • Motion to approve the consent calendar passed.
  • The planning policy prioritization item was moved from October 6 to the October 20 horizon report.
  • The travel authorization items and CALAFCO grant were placed on the September 29, 2026 City Council agenda.
  • The transcript records adjournment at 2:14 p.m.

Meeting Transcript

It is two o'clock uh this afternoon, Tuesday, September 29th, and this is the uh um joint meeting of the rules and open government committee uh and committee as a whole. Can you please call the roll? Foley here, commit here, cohen absent. We have a quorum. Thank you very much. Uh moving on to our first uh uh review of the agenda of September 29th. Uh we have uh 9 30 closed session, 1 30 regular session, no evening meeting. Moving on to uh consent item starting on page five, six points to seven eight, and ending in eight, uh strategic support, um the city manager's office of economic development and cultural affairs audit report. Um moving on, going on to item on page nine, uh temporary moratorium and status report of uh ballot measure T. Um, also we have uh 5.1 actions related to San Jose um uh airport terminal elevator replacement. Uh page 10 is uh parking meter, garage rates and hours. Page 11. We have um item 6.1 to the agreement of County Santa Clara for participation in household hazardous waste collection, nothing under 789, and item number 10 is to be heard immediately after consent, and there's no other land use. There is a joint uh city of San Jose financing authority agenda, and that's it. Is there a public comment? Yes, as a reminder, speakers must comply with the city's code of conduct for public meetings. Please direct comments with the body, limit your marks of the agenda item and observe the time limit. Conduct that materially disrupts a meeting or interferes with others' ability to participate, may result in muting or removal as authorized by law. Brian good afternoon. Um the meeting yesterday I walked online was really well done, so thank you for all your hard work on the agenda item. Uh obviously uh looking to raise the um fees for um the parking in downtown is gonna create some interest. I understand why you're due, and it is cheaper down there, and even if you raise it, it's cheaper than it is in some other places. So I think that's a good reason to do it, but then I would think you should listen to what the people say that work down there because that might affect them. Uh, there's also a major policy. Anyways, I'm gonna give this, I'll email it too, but I didn't have time to do it this morning. And that's it, thank you. Moving on to virtual speakers, Ruthie, followed by call in user one. Yes, good afternoon. This is a question I have about the 10 6 agenda, so I don't know if it's I should speak later or now. But the my question is sorry, Ruthie, we will be taking that agenda item next, so you can call back again. Thank you. Call in user one. First of all, your parking meters, half of them don't work. Okay, steals your money. So screens on them don't work, they're faded, or you can't see with the sunlight. I mean, I know they're solar panel powered. Isn't that wonderful? But you guys keep messing with the parking down there and take a look at the ghost town that you have with zombies walking around. Disgusting. You want to have sales tax revenue? Well, how are you gonna have sales tax revenue with empty storefront? They're gonna be even emptier with with these parking uh restrictions and the parking tickets. I mean, people don't even want to go down there already, and you're gonna make it work. You're gonna make it higher, you're gonna make it more complicated, you're gonna extend the hours. Don't you want people to go down there at all? The I'll tell you what, the parking should be free. All right, and downtown San Jose is so bad, it should be free. Back to the committee. Thank you so much. And is there a motion?

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com