OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/San Jose, California/City Council
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Joint Rules and Open Government Committee Meeting - September 30, 2026

City Council — Wednesday, September 30, 2026
BodySan Jose, California
SessionCity Council
DateWednesday, September 30, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 56:21

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Speaker 1

0:32

Okay, it is now two o'clock, so we're going to call the um whatever today's date is September 30th meeting of the rules and open government committee to order.

Unassigned speaker

0:40

Uh

Speaker 1

0:40

we'll start with roll call, please.

Speaker 2

0:42

Candelas.

Speaker 1

0:43

Here.

Speaker 2

0:43

Duan.

Speaker 1

0:44

Here.

Speaker 2

0:44

Foley.

Unassigned speaker

0:45

Here.

Speaker 2

0:45

Come?

Unassigned speaker

0:46

Here.

Speaker 2

0:46

Cohen.

Speaker 1

0:47

Here.

Speaker 2

0:47

We have a quorum.

Speaker 1

0:48

Thank you so much.

0:49

We will uh just uh comment on today's agenda since we have two items that are um on the same topic.

0:58

We will combine items um C2 and C three into one item for the purpose of this meeting today.

1:07

Um and otherwise we'll proceed with the agenda and start with the review, final review of uh next week's council meeting for October 6th.

Unassigned speaker

1:18

The

Speaker 1

1:19

council meeting is scheduled to have 9:30 closed session and a 130 regular session and consent starts on page five and continues on page six.

1:31

We have um section five, personal delivery services to deliver devices in the city right of way, and section eight, actions related to affordable housing on North First Street and the Arena Hotel Redevelopment and Home Key Program Transition.

1:48

No land use, and there are two items on the ad sheets.

1:51

Do we have any public comments?

Speaker 2

1:54

Yes.

1:54

Before I call on the public speaker, as a reminder, speakers must comply with the city's code of conduct for public meetings.

2:00

Please direct comments to the body, limit remarks of the agenda item, and observe the time limit.

2:04

Contact that materially disrupts the meeting or interferes with others' ability to participate may result in muting or removal as authorized by law.

2:11

Brian

Speaker 3

2:24

I'm not sure if this is appropriate to do this here, but I was reading through these agendas, and these are hard to do.

2:43

I'm seriously,

Unassigned speaker

2:44

they

Speaker 3

2:45

do a wonderful job, and it's hard.

2:46

And I thought instead of coming up here with my usual 800-page letter, I thought maybe just to say thanks.

Speaker 2

2:53

Before I call on the virtual speakers, I just want to make sure that you're going to speak on item A1.

3:00

Calling on Hansel.

3:10

Hansel.

Unassigned speaker

3:12

All

Speaker 2

3:12

right, back to the committee.

Speaker 1

3:14

Okay, thank you.

3:15

And there is a request from staff to hear item 3 X, the Civil Service Commission interview last.

3:23

So make her the motion can include that in their motion when making a motion now.

Speaker 4

3:29

I will move approval of the agenda with the ad sheet and move the Civil Service Commission interview to the last item on the agenda.

Speaker 5

3:39

Second.

Speaker 1

3:40

All right, we have a motion and a second.

3:42

Any comment or let's vote.

Unassigned speaker

3:47

Okay.

Speaker 1

3:48

That motion carries five zero.

3:50

We do not have a council meeting on October 13th, so we're on to our consent calendar for today.

3:55

There are seven items on consent.

3:57

Do we have public comment?

Speaker 2

3:58

Yes, Brian, please go ahead and make your way to the podium.

Unassigned speaker

4:12

Okay,

Speaker 3

4:13

back to the letters.

4:14

I hope you guys, ladies and gentlemen, get a chance to read this.

4:16

Thank

Unassigned speaker

4:16

you.

Speaker 2

4:17

Back to the committee.

4:19

Move approval.

4:20

Second.

Speaker 1

4:21

Okay.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Privacy███████████████████████████████████████████43%
Procedural█████████████████████21%
Public Comment██████████████████18%
Public Safety██████████10%
Technology and Innovation████████8%
Summary of Proceedings

Joint Rules and Open Government Committee and Committee of the Whole Meeting - September 30, 2026

The Rules and Open Government Committee (ROGC) met jointly with the Committee of the Whole on Wednesday, September 30, 2026, at 2:00 PM in a hybrid format. The committee reviewed the final agenda for the October 6 City Council meeting, approved the consent calendar, discussed a memo on Council transparency and non-disclosure agreements, and combined two related items on Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) data access and safeguards. Extensive public comment was heard, particularly on the ALPR items. All actions were unanimous (5-0).

Consent Calendar

  • The committee approved the consent calendar (7 items) by a 5-0 vote. Items included: receiving the public record (September 17-24, 2026); amending the Public Safety, Finance and Strategic Support Committee work plan to drop a Downtown High-Acuity Referral System status report; reviewing a joint special meeting agenda with the San José/Santa Clara Treatment Plant Advisory Committee; authorizing travel for the Mayor’s Director of Innovation to attend a convening in New York City (October 7-9, 2026); approving free use of the rotunda for the “Conversations for Good 2026” event; approving the District 9 End-of-Term Farewell Celebration as a city council sponsored special event; and retroactively approving the Golden State Valkyries Flag Raising event.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Item C1 (NDA transparency): Brian spoke in support of transparency, urging that public comments be considered. Virtual speaker Jordan argued the policy should apply to all city staff, not just councilmembers, and requested an immediate scope expansion. The committee did not amend the motion.
  • Items C2 & C3 (ALPR safeguards): Over 30 speakers testified, most representing organizations such as Siren, Silicon Valley Democratic Socialists of America, Safety Over Surveillance Coalition, Bay Resistance, and community members. Speakers uniformly urged the city to cover all Flock cameras, cancel the contract with Flock, conduct an independent audit, and hold the police chief accountable. Many cited the egregious breach where an SJPD officer used ALPR data to stalk a domestic violence survivor (his cousin) and noted that the police chief had previously assured the council that data was secure despite an open investigation. Several speakers argued that no amount of regulation can prevent intentional abuse and that mass surveillance violates constitutional privacy rights. A few speakers also linked the issue to ICE surveillance and the need for warrants. No speaker supported the current ALPR system.

Discussion Items

  • C1: Council Transparency and Private Non-Disclosure Agreements – Councilmember Kamei noted the importance of looking at neighboring jurisdictions and possibly including leadership staff. The committee approved the workload analysis, directing staff to return with policy options for full council consideration in early 2027. Motion carried 5-0.
  • C2 & C3: Automated License Plate Reader Data Access and Safeguards – The committee combined the two memos (one from Mayor, Foley, Candelas, Casey; the other from Kamei, Tordillos, Cohen, Mulcahy). Vice Mayor Foley explained that the committee’s role is to send items to staff for workload analysis, not to make final policy decisions; full council will decide on covering cameras, canceling the Flock contract, and independent auditing. Councilmember Duan noted he had initial concerns about a private right of action but acknowledged the Police Officers’ Association had not objected. Councilmember Cohen emphasized the need for multi-factor authentication, criminal penalties for misuse, and independent police auditor oversight. Both memos were directed to staff for a merged workload analysis, to return to the committee in approximately three weeks. Motion carried 5-0.

Key Outcomes

  • Approved the final agenda for the October 6 City Council meeting, moving the Civil Service Commission interview to the end (5-0).
  • Approved the consent calendar (5-0).
  • Directed staff to develop policy options on prohibiting councilmember NDAs related to city business, with a return to council in early 2027 (5-0).
  • Directed staff to merge the two ALPR memos into a single workload analysis and return to the committee within three weeks for further consideration; final policy decisions to be made by the full City Council (5-0).
  • Adjourned at 2:55 PM.

Meeting Transcript

Okay, it is now two o'clock, so we're going to call the um whatever today's date is September 30th meeting of the rules and open government committee to order. Uh we'll start with roll call, please. Candelas. Here. Duan. Here. Foley. Here. Come? Here. Cohen. Here. We have a quorum. Thank you so much. We will uh just uh comment on today's agenda since we have two items that are um on the same topic. We will combine items um C2 and C three into one item for the purpose of this meeting today. Um and otherwise we'll proceed with the agenda and start with the review, final review of uh next week's council meeting for October 6th. The council meeting is scheduled to have 9:30 closed session and a 130 regular session and consent starts on page five and continues on page six. We have um section five, personal delivery services to deliver devices in the city right of way, and section eight, actions related to affordable housing on North First Street and the Arena Hotel Redevelopment and Home Key Program Transition. No land use, and there are two items on the ad sheets. Do we have any public comments? Yes. Before I call on the public speaker, as a reminder, speakers must comply with the city's code of conduct for public meetings. Please direct comments to the body, limit remarks of the agenda item, and observe the time limit. Contact that materially disrupts the meeting or interferes with others' ability to participate may result in muting or removal as authorized by law. Brian I'm not sure if this is appropriate to do this here, but I was reading through these agendas, and these are hard to do. I'm seriously, they do a wonderful job, and it's hard. And I thought instead of coming up here with my usual 800-page letter, I thought maybe just to say thanks. Before I call on the virtual speakers, I just want to make sure that you're going to speak on item A1. Calling on Hansel. Hansel. All right, back to the committee. Okay, thank you. And there is a request from staff to hear item 3 X, the Civil Service Commission interview last. So make her the motion can include that in their motion when making a motion now. I will move approval of the agenda with the ad sheet and move the Civil Service Commission interview to the last item on the agenda. Second. All right, we have a motion and a second. Any comment or let's vote. Okay. That motion carries five zero. We do not have a council meeting on October 13th, so we're on to our consent calendar for today. There are seven items on consent. Do we have public comment?

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com