OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/San Jose, California/City Council
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Joint Rules and Open Government Committee Meeting - October 7, 2026

City Council — Wednesday, October 7, 2026
BodySan Jose, California
SessionCity Council
DateWednesday, October 7, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 25:47

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Speaker 1

0:05

It's two o'clock, so we're going to call today's meeting of the rules and open government committee to order, and we'll start with roll call, please.

Speaker 2

0:10

Candelas.

Speaker 1

0:11

Here.

Speaker 2

0:12

Duan.

Speaker 1

0:13

Here.

0:14

Foley.

Unassigned speaker

0:14

Here.

Speaker 2

0:15

Come absent going.

Speaker 1

0:16

Here.

Speaker 2

0:16

We have a quorum.

Speaker 1

0:18

Great.

0:18

We have no meeting on the 13th, and we will have our first and our first review for the agenda on October 20th.

Unassigned speaker

0:30

It

Speaker 1

0:30

has a 9 30 closed session, 1 30 regular session, and recommended cancellation of the evening session.

0:36

And consent starts on page five and ends on page six.

0:42

In section three, we have the city manager's annual report.

0:55

And the vacation of a portion of Spring Street.

0:59

Section 4, the IPA year end report.

1:02

Section 8, our citywide work plan prioritization.

1:07

And we have a couple items in land use.

1:10

One is an early consideration for a general plan amendment on race street, and the other is

Unassigned speaker

1:16

an

Speaker 1

1:16

administrative hearing on an appeal for a project on West San Carlos.

1:21

And actually, they have three items on land use.

1:23

There's also an administrative hearing on an appeal for 300 hold your way.

1:28

Do we have any public comment?

Speaker 2

1:30

No public comment.

1:30

And we also have an ad sheet.

Unassigned speaker

1:32

Oh,

Speaker 1

1:32

yes, there is an ad sheet as well.

Speaker 3

1:34

Move approval with the ad sheet.

1:35

Second.

Speaker 1

1:36

Okay.

1:37

Hi, this is Tony.

1:39

Comment.

1:39

So

Speaker 4

1:41

I'm over

Speaker 1

1:41

here.

Speaker 4

1:42

I would like to request on the civil service interviews that we do a to be heard last, not before four, so we can tell them like to get here at four instead of sitting here for hours.

Speaker 1

1:53

Yes.

1:53

Um based on what I see on the agenda, it's very unlikely it will be before four o'clock.

1:58

I mean so

Speaker 4

1:59

but I wanted to at least

Unassigned speaker

2:00

make

Speaker 1

2:00

sure lock it

Speaker 4

2:02

down.

Unassigned speaker

2:03

Well,

Speaker 1

2:03

I'll leave that up to the maker of the motion.

2:05

I know that she prefers not to be so time certain on these things because if we finish early, having a gap is problematic.

Unassigned speaker

2:11

But

Speaker 1

2:11

it does look like with our work plan prioritization item.

2:14

I mean, I think that's two hours for sure.

2:17

Yeah, that's okay.

Speaker 4

2:17

So I don't think

Unassigned speaker

2:20

I

Speaker 3

2:20

don't think we need to say not before four because based on this agenda, if it's the last thing we're heard, we've got a couple of appeals.

2:29

We've got a lot of things that it may be not be until six or seven.

2:34

We don't know.

2:35

But I don't think we need to say that.

2:37

All

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Retail█████████████████████████████████████████████76%
Procedural████████████21%
Land Use██3%
Summary of Proceedings

Joint Rules and Open Government and Committee of the Whole Meeting - October 7, 2026

The committee reviewed the draft agenda for October 20, 2026, approved a consent calendar of routine items, and discussed a proposal to study self-checkout safety and staffing standards for grocery and drug retail stores. Public testimony from retail representatives raised concerns about costs, customer preferences, and negative impacts from similar ordinances. The committee approved directing the City Manager to review policy options and return with an informational memo.

Consent Calendar

  • Approved four items unanimously: receiving the public record (September 24 – October 1, 2026); setting a joint special meeting with Santa Clara Valley Water District on October 13, 2026 (1:00 p.m. – 3:00 p.m.); approving the Auditor’s monthly report for September 2026; and approving a proclamation, flag raising, and lighting for Taiwan Retrocession Day as a city-sponsored special event, with funds and donations accepted.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Multiple speakers representing retailers and business groups (California Retailers Association, Sprouts Farmers Market, Safeway, Silicon Valley Leadership Group, San Jose Chamber of Commerce, California Grocers Association, Tawa Supermarkets) urged the committee not to pursue an ordinance. Key points:
    • Customers value the speed, privacy, and convenience of self-checkout; eliminating it could drive consumers to online shopping or neighboring jurisdictions.
    • Grocery stores operate on thin margins (about 1.7%); increased staffing costs could double self-checkout operating costs, leading to higher prices or store closures.
    • Long Beach’s experience showed that similar regulations led to reduced self-checkout lanes, longer transaction times, lower customer satisfaction, and no reduction in theft.
    • Theft is already addressed through multiple layers of technology and trained staff; adding more attendants would not stop offenders who bypass checkouts altogether.
    • A private right of action would expose retailers to litigation.
  • Councilmember Candelas acknowledged letters from grocery associations and expressed willingness to engage with stakeholders.

Discussion Items

  • Self-Checkout Safety Standards: Referred from September 16, 2026, the memo (co-authored by Councilmembers Candelas and Cohen) proposed directing the City Manager to review policy approaches from other jurisdictions, engage Santa Clara County on worker safety partnerships, and return with policy options, scope, and implementation considerations before the FY2027-2028 priority-setting process.
    • Councilmember Candelas supported studying the issue to develop data-driven policy and collaborate with stakeholders.
    • Councilmember Doan noted concerns but agreed further study was warranted, adding that no one had reached out to his office regarding opposition.
    • Vice Mayor Foley opposed, stating she was skeptical the study would lead to an ordinance rather than a memo, and worried about cost increases for consumers and harm to brick-and-mortar stores.
    • Chair Cohen clarified that the action requested only an informational memo (not an ordinance), which would help inform future council decisions and constituent conversations.

Key Outcomes

  • Draft Agenda Approved: The committee approved the draft agenda for October 20, 2026, with an ad sheet added. Councilmember Candelas requested that civil service interviews be scheduled to be heard last (not before 4 p.m.); the chair noted it likely would not occur before 4 p.m. due to a heavy agenda but did not set a time certain.
  • Self-Checkout Study Approved: The motion to direct the City Manager to review self-checkout safety and staffing policy approaches and return with options passed. Vice Mayor Foley expressed her opposition; no formal roll call was recorded, but the motion carried with one stated dissenting vote.
  • The meeting adjourned at 2:25 p.m.

Meeting Transcript

It's two o'clock, so we're going to call today's meeting of the rules and open government committee to order, and we'll start with roll call, please. Candelas. Here. Duan. Here. Foley. Here. Come absent going. Here. We have a quorum. Great. We have no meeting on the 13th, and we will have our first and our first review for the agenda on October 20th. It has a 9 30 closed session, 1 30 regular session, and recommended cancellation of the evening session. And consent starts on page five and ends on page six. In section three, we have the city manager's annual report. And the vacation of a portion of Spring Street. Section 4, the IPA year end report. Section 8, our citywide work plan prioritization. And we have a couple items in land use. One is an early consideration for a general plan amendment on race street, and the other is an administrative hearing on an appeal for a project on West San Carlos. And actually, they have three items on land use. There's also an administrative hearing on an appeal for 300 hold your way. Do we have any public comment? No public comment. And we also have an ad sheet. Oh, yes, there is an ad sheet as well. Move approval with the ad sheet. Second. Okay. Hi, this is Tony. Comment. So I'm over here. I would like to request on the civil service interviews that we do a to be heard last, not before four, so we can tell them like to get here at four instead of sitting here for hours. Yes. Um based on what I see on the agenda, it's very unlikely it will be before four o'clock. I mean so but I wanted to at least make sure lock it down. Well, I'll leave that up to the maker of the motion. I know that she prefers not to be so time certain on these things because if we finish early, having a gap is problematic. But

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com