OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/San Jose, California/City Council
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

San José Rules and Open Government Committee Joint Meeting – October 14, 2026

City Council — Wednesday, October 14, 2026
BodySan Jose, California
SessionCity Council
DateWednesday, October 14, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 9:51

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Speaker 1

0:09

Okay, we are gonna call the meeting to to order at two o'clock for the rules and open government committee uh meeting of October 13th.

0:17

Let's start with roll call, please.

Speaker 2

0:18

Candelas

Speaker 1

0:19

here.

Speaker 2

0:20

The one

Speaker 1

0:20

here

Speaker 2

0:21

fully here come here, coin.

Speaker 1

0:24

Here, and

Speaker 2

0:25

today is

Speaker 1

0:25

the 14th, not the 13th.

0:27

Thank you so much for that uh clarification.

0:30

We're going to start with the review of next week's October 20th council meeting, which has a 9 30 closed session, a 1 30 regular session, and a cancel evening session.

0:40

And consent starts on page five and continues on pages six and seven.

0:50

Then on section three, we have the city manager's annual report.

Unassigned speaker

0:54

The

Speaker 1

0:54

civil service commission interview was scheduled to be heard last the conditional vacation of a portion of Spring Street.

1:02

Section four, we have our IPA annual year end report.

1:07

Section eight, our citywide planning work plan prioritization.

1:11

Uh we have a three items on land use and early consideration general plan amendment and two

Unassigned speaker

1:18

uh

Speaker 1

1:18

land use appeals.

Unassigned speaker

1:20

Do

Speaker 1

1:20

we have any public comments?

Speaker 2

1:22

No public comment.

Speaker 1

1:23

All right, back to the committee.

Speaker 3

1:28

Second.

Unassigned speaker

1:29

All

Speaker 1

1:29

right, we have

Speaker 4

1:30

make a comment.

Speaker 1

1:31

Sure.

1:32

Go ahead.

1:33

Vice Mayor Foley.

Speaker 4

1:35

Thank thank you.

1:36

Um I noticed that we're starting to add in four ceremonials when three had been the policy and the procedure going forward.

1:50

So I would encourage all of the council members, whoever has one, to please stay within the five minutes, and that means including your comments in their comments.

Unassigned speaker

2:00

Thank

Speaker 1

2:00

you.

2:00

We'll have to take that one up with the mayor's office.

2:02

But we could, as a rules committee, I suppose, just strike one of the items.

2:07

But we won't we won't do that today.

2:08

We'll just warn them for the next time.

2:10

Um I think go ahead.

Speaker 3

2:12

I I think Vice Mayor Foley does have a good point.

2:15

You know, some of them have been going a little bit long, and so um uh I also know that the regular person, um Steven is is out, and so uh maybe uh the awareness of the three as usual, but I think uh everybody before warned that I think we should keep it to three.

Speaker 4

2:40

Yeah, I think I think it's important because uh I remember a time one way before I was on council where the ceremonial part would go on and on and on, and uh at some point I wasn't on council when it happened, it got limited to three, which is is beneficial.

2:58

That way we can we're we're here for the meeting, and the the ceremonials are something we add in, but it it's if we stay to our five-minute time frame, it makes

Unassigned speaker

3:13

it

Speaker 4

3:14

much easier.

3:15

But that means we have to stay within our five minutes.

Speaker 3

3:18

There's only one on the meeting following on October 27th.

3:23

Couldn't one of them be moved over?

Speaker 1

3:25

Yeah, I was looking at that, and my assumption is that the mayor's office has not yet completed the um listing all of the ones for the October 27th meeting, but we

Unassigned speaker

3:34

could

Speaker 1

3:34

um ask the mayor's office if there is room on the 27th to move one of these items.

3:40

I don't think all of them are time sensitive, but we could see if one of them can be postponed a week.

Speaker 4

3:46

Yeah, I'll I'll just make note that mine is time sensitive sensitive to next week.

Speaker 1

3:52

Right, I see that one does

Speaker 4

3:54

that way because it's

Unassigned speaker

3:55

you know

Speaker 4

3:56

national disability awareness month was actually happened last month, so okay, just got it in because of that.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Procedural█████████████████████████████████████████████100%
Summary of Proceedings

San José Rules and Open Government Committee and Committee of the Whole Joint Meeting – October 14, 2026

The Rules and Open Government Committee and Committee of the Whole met jointly in a hybrid meeting on Wednesday, October 14, 2026, at 2:00 PM in San José City Council Chambers. The committee reviewed upcoming City Council agendas, approved consent items, discussed ceremonial agenda limits, and agreed to cancel the next week's Rules Committee meeting because a quorum would not be available. The chair initially stated the meeting date as October 13 and was corrected to October 14.

Agenda Reviews

  • October 20, 2026 Final Agenda: The committee reviewed the final agenda, which includes a 9:30 AM closed session, a 1:30 PM regular session, a canceled evening session, the City Manager's annual report, the conditional vacation of a portion of Spring Street, the IPA annual year-end report, the citywide planning work plan prioritization, and land use items including a general plan amendment and two land use appeals.
  • October 27, 2026 Draft Agenda: The committee reviewed the draft agenda, which includes a 9:30 AM closed session, a 1:30 PM regular session, consent items, a vehicle abatement audit, employee group contracts with MEF and IFPTE, amendments to solid waste management Chapter 9.10 and water code Section 15.10, the renaming of Cesar Chavez Park, and a community park departments conversion.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • No public comment was submitted or offered on the agenda reviews, the consent calendar, or during open forum.

Consent Calendar

  • The committee received and filed the Public Record for October 1–8, 2026.
  • The committee approved a $2,500 grant to the Rotary Club of San Jose Foundation for its Enterprise Leadership Conference and placed the item on the October 20, 2026 City Council agenda.
  • The committee retroactively approved travel for Councilmember Cohen to Redondo Beach, California from September 23–25, 2026 for the League of California Cities Expo and excused his absence from the September 23, 2026 Rules and Open Government Committee meeting. The motion was amended to correct the location to Anaheim, California, as noted by the chair.

Discussion Items

  • Vice Mayor Foley noted that the October 20 agenda included four ceremonial items, while the policy and practice has been to limit ceremonials to three. She encouraged council members to keep ceremonial comments within five minutes, including their remarks.
  • Committee members discussed asking the Mayor's Office whether one ceremonial item could be moved to the October 27 agenda. Councilmember Candelas noted that his item was time-sensitive, and the committee agreed to continue the conversation offline.
  • The committee discussed the lack of a quorum for the next Wednesday's Rules Committee meeting because three members would be traveling. The Assistant City Attorney explained that with only two members present, the committee could meet but could not take action, and that virtual participation would not cure the quorum requirement because a quorum must be present in person and within city limits. The committee agreed to cancel the meeting rather than hold a non-actionable session.

Key Outcomes

  • The October 20, 2026 Final Agenda review was approved on a 5–0 vote.
  • The October 27, 2026 Draft Agenda review was approved on a 5–0 vote.
  • The consent calendar, including the Rotary Club grant and the retroactive travel approval with the Anaheim correction, was approved on a 5–0 vote.
  • The committee agreed to cancel the October 21, 2026 Rules Committee meeting due to the lack of a quorum.
  • The meeting adjourned at 2:10 PM.

Meeting Transcript

Okay, we are gonna call the meeting to to order at two o'clock for the rules and open government committee uh meeting of October 13th. Let's start with roll call, please. Candelas here. The one here fully here come here, coin. Here, and today is the 14th, not the 13th. Thank you so much for that uh clarification. We're going to start with the review of next week's October 20th council meeting, which has a 9 30 closed session, a 1 30 regular session, and a cancel evening session. And consent starts on page five and continues on pages six and seven. Then on section three, we have the city manager's annual report. The civil service commission interview was scheduled to be heard last the conditional vacation of a portion of Spring Street. Section four, we have our IPA annual year end report. Section eight, our citywide planning work plan prioritization. Uh we have a three items on land use and early consideration general plan amendment and two uh land use appeals. Do we have any public comments? No public comment. All right, back to the committee. Second. All right, we have make a comment. Sure. Go ahead. Vice Mayor Foley. Thank thank you. Um I noticed that we're starting to add in four ceremonials when three had been the policy and the procedure going forward. So I would encourage all of the council members, whoever has one, to please stay within the five minutes, and that means including your comments in their comments. Thank you. We'll have to take that one up with the mayor's office. But we could, as a rules committee, I suppose, just strike one of the items. But we won't we won't do that today. We'll just warn them for the next time. Um I think go ahead. I I think Vice Mayor Foley does have a good point. You know, some of them have been going a little bit long, and so um uh I also know that the regular person, um Steven is is out, and so uh maybe uh the awareness of the three as usual, but I think uh everybody before warned that I think we should keep it to three. Yeah, I think I think it's important because uh I remember a time one way before I was on council where the ceremonial part would go on and on and on, and uh at some point I wasn't on council when it happened, it got limited to three, which is is beneficial. That way we can we're we're here for the meeting, and the the ceremonials are something we add in, but it it's if we stay to our five-minute time frame, it makes it much easier. But that means we have to stay within our five minutes. There's only one on the meeting following on October 27th.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com