San Jose Historic Landmarks Commission Meeting – November 13, 2024
STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
San Jose Historic Landmarks Commission Meeting – November 13, 2024
The San Jose Historic Landmarks Commission (HLC) met on November 13, 2024, with four commissioners present (Commissioners Galandari, Camuso, Arnold, Vice Chair Royer, and Chair Bain) achieving a quorum. The meeting included a planning referral for the proposed demolition of a candidate city landmark at 380 North First Street, a presentation on the draft San Jose Eichler Neighborhood Objective Design Standards, and open forum items.
Consent Calendar
- No items were presented for the consent calendar.
Public Comments & Testimony
Item 3: 380 North First Street Residential Project
- Ben Leach (Preservation Action Council of San Jose) expressed support for the candidate city landmark determination and appreciated the opportunity to comment during the EIR period. He requested that the EIR document the impediments to adaptive reuse and suggested that the brick facade of the new building be brought down to the pedestrian level to better complement the adjacent historic building.
- Mike Sodergren (member of the public) questioned why the project had not been reviewed by the Design Review Subcommittee and suggested that a condition of approval could include funding for a full mid-century survey. He also requested more detailed explanations of financial infeasibility.
Item 5: San Jose Eichler Neighborhood Objective Design Standards
- Daniel Rosenberg (Fairhaven Eichler neighborhood resident) expressed concern that the draft standards allow second stories, which conflict with his neighborhood’s CC&Rs that prohibit them. He asked for language advising homeowners to check their CC&Rs and noted that if the standards do not match their restrictions, their neighborhood might forgo historic designation.
- Ben Leach (HPACS) praised the document and recommended citing state laws regarding ADUs and GADUs. He also asked about the threshold for adding other Eichler neighborhoods to the Historic Resources Inventory.
- Sally Zarnowitz (Fair Glens Addition resident, co-chair of the preservation committee) thanked staff and the consultant, noting that the community meeting had good outreach. She suggested that the standards make clear that projects not meeting the standards go to a public hearing, which would incentivize compliance.
- Mike Sodergren noted the unique design of Eichler homes and praised the guidelines. He expressed concern about enclosing carports with garage doors, which he said would be damaging to the public view, and noted that shallow lots limit second-story setbacks.
Discussion Items
Item 3: 380 N First Street – Planning Referral (File H23-007, ER23-075)
- Staff (Cora McNaughton, New Nguyen) presented the project: a proposal to demolish a 12,000-square-foot 1964 office building (candidate city landmark designed by Conrad Stiber in the New Formalism style) and build a 7-story, 118-unit apartment building with 6 very low-income units and a density bonus. The draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) identified significant unavoidable impacts to the historic resource. Five alternatives were considered: no project, relocation (rejected due to damage), preservation of the existing building with a 12-story tower (providing ~108 units), and a reduced-density preservation alternative (~84 units). The project applicant (Tag of Studio T Square) presented renderings and argued that the preservation alternative is infeasible due to building code requirements (e.g., fire separation) and financial constraints (high-rise construction would be more expensive). Commissioner questions explored compliance with historic adjacency design guidelines, the number of units achievable under preservation (applicant said 59 rather than 84 due to code), and the financial feasibility of alternatives. Several commissioners (including Vice Chair Royer, Commissioner Arnold, and Chair Bain) expressed a strong preference for preserving the existing building and requested further analysis of feasibility and incentives for adaptive reuse.
Item 5: San Jose Eichler Neighborhood Objective Design Standards (DP 24-012)
- Staff (Dana Peake Edwards) presented the draft standards, developed with input from the Fair Glens Addition Preservation Committee and consultant Paige & Turnbull. The standards are intended to provide measurable, verifiable criteria for exterior changes to Eichler homes listed on the Historic Resources Inventory, replacing the generic “Your Old House” guidelines. The document covers roofs, cladding, carports, additions, setting, infill construction, and guidance for ministerial projects like ADUs and solar panels. The comment period closed November 8, 2024; final adoption by City Council is expected in February or March 2025. Commissioners expressed strong support for the draft, citing its clarity, organization, and specificity. Concerns raised included the need for homeowner education about the standards, the treatment of second stories (allowed but with setbacks), and how non-contributing properties are handled.
Key Outcomes
- 380 N First Street: The commission will forward its comments to the City Council, recommending further analysis of preservation alternatives, including financial feasibility and potential incentives for adaptive reuse. The commission also requested that a full mid-century survey be considered and that the Design Review Subcommittee review similar projects earlier in the process. No formal vote was taken.
- Eichler Objective Design Standards: The commission unanimously approved a motion (by Vice Chair Royer, seconded by Commissioner Camuso) to support the draft standards and recommend City Council adoption. The commission also suggested adding language to direct homeowners to check CC&Rs and noting that projects not meeting standards would require a public hearing.
- Future Agenda Items: The commission agreed to place on a future agenda two topics: (1) a proposal for a financial hardship review process for demolitions of historic resources, and (2) development of incentives for adaptive reuse of historic buildings, which could be recommended to the City Council.
- Open Forum: Updates were provided on the Grace Baptist Church designation celebration (November 30) and the relocation of the Ichi Sakaway House to History Park. Commissioner Arnold suggested adding street signage for the newly designated Shiley Alameda landmark district, which will be discussed at a future meeting.
- Commission Vacancies: Applications for commission seats closed at the end of September; status will be checked.
- Next Meeting: December 4, 2024.
Meeting Transcript
We will review how the public may provide comment during today's session. Commissioner Galandari. Present. Commissioner Camuso. Present. Commissioner Arnold. Vice Chair Royer. Present. And Chair Bain. So there is a quorum. We have four, and we can proceed. The procedure for this hearing is as follows. After the staff report, applicants and appellants may make a five-minute presentation. I will be a stickler on time as we have several items on the agenda. If you wish to speak on an item, complete a card and place it. You can bring it to uh historic preservation officer Peak Edwards. When I receive your card, I will call you forward. Each speaker will be given up to two minutes for public testimony. And speakers using a translator will have up to four minutes. At the discretion of the chair, the time allotted to each speaker may be changed depending on the number of items on the agenda, the number of speakers and other factors. Speakers using a translator will have double the time allotted. After the public testimony, the applicant may make closing remarks for up to an additional five minutes. Response to the commissioner questions will not reduce the speaker's time allowance. The public hearing will then be closed, and the actual historic landmarks commission will take action on the item. Commission may request staff to respond to the public testimony, ask staff questions and discuss the item. If a commissioner would like to address a topic to be addressed under the one of good and welfare items, please contact planning staff in advance of the commission meeting. All public records relating to an open session item on the agenda, which are not exempt from disclosure pursuant to the California Public Records Act that are distributed to a majority of the legislative body will be available for public by emailing planning support staff at San Jose California.gov at the same time that the public records are distributed or made available to the legislative body. Yeah. Before we begin, I want to remind the Historic Landmarks Commission members and members of the public to follow our code of conduct at all at the meetings. This includes commenting on the specific agenda item only, addressing the full body. Public speakers will not engage in a conversation with the commissioners or staff. All members of the historic landmarks commission, staff and public, are expected to refrain from abusive language. Repeated failure to comply with the code of conduct, which will disturb, disrupt, or impede the orderly conduct of the meeting, may result in removal from the meeting. This meeting of the historic landmarks commission will now come to order. Our first item is item one, deferrals. There are no items. We go to item number two, consent calendar. Again, we find no items. Item number three, public hearings, again, no items. Our next item is item number four, planning referrals. A file number H 23-007 and ER23-075. A site development permit to demolish the existing office building and surface parking lot on line on site to construct a new seven-story apartment building, approximately totaling approximately 11,001 square feet with 118 rental units. Six of the units will be reserved for very low-income households on approximately a 0.48 gross acre lot. Our project managers are Cora McNaughton and New Nguyen. Shall I read the recommendation or shall will you be reading it? I can. Okay. The recommendation is to receive public comment and provide recommendations regarding information to be included in the analysis of the proposed 380 North First Street residential project. Located at 380 North First Street, APN 24944088. Under the city policy city council policy and the preservation of historic landmarks.
openpublica.com