Historic Landmarks Commission Meeting - June 6, 2025
STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
Historic Landmarks Commission Meeting - June 6, 2025
The San Jose Historic Landmarks Commission (HLC) held a regular meeting on June 6, 2025. The agenda included receiving final historic resource surveys for two urban villages, adding two properties to the city's Historic Resource Inventory (HRI), a demonstration of a public city landmarks map, and the election of new officers for the 2025-2026 term. Commissioners engaged in a significant debate over the designation of mid-century strip malls as historic resources and their implications for housing development.
Public Comments & Testimony
- Item 5B (HRI Additions): Mike Sodergrin of PAC San Jose expressed general support for the proposed additions but urged the commission to consider long-term stewardship for preserved sites, noting a high risk of loss for "mothballed" properties.
- Item 5A (Urban Village Surveys): Sodergrin welcomed the historic surveys as a tool to give the development community early clarity on potential review requirements and to document the cultural history of the neighborhoods through community outreach.
- Open Forum (Item 7): Sodergrin reported on research from a historic grant concerning the Temple Laundry/IBM building. He cautioned that the commission should conduct physical building inspections rather than relying solely on existing reports, as the structure was in better condition than documented.
Discussion Items
5A: East Side Alum Rock and Saratoga Urban Villages Historic Resource Surveys
- Presentation: Staff (Dana) and consultant Stacey Farr (Architectural Resources Group) presented the final surveys. The survey areas covered 332 total parcels (108 in East Side Alum Rock, 224 in Saratoga). Reconnaissance surveys identified 17 properties in Alum Rock and 24 in Saratoga for intensive study.
- Findings: A total of 22 historic resources were identified (11 per survey area). Most were determined eligible for the California Register and as candidate City Landmarks based on architecture. In Alum Rock, historic resources included Calvary Cemetery and Peter's Bakery. In Saratoga, the resources included several mid-century modern strip commercial buildings.
- Commissioner Discussion: Commissioner Galendari expressed strong concern that designating "cookie-cutter" strip malls as historic resources would create unnecessary obstacles for housing development and prolong CEQA review during a housing crisis. She urged a "second look" at these determinations. Commissioners Camuso and Bane countered, arguing that these strip malls represent a distinct and significant era of commercial architecture and neighborhood history and that identifying resources proactively aids developers by providing upfront clarity on constraints. A staff member noted the cost and feasibility of programmatic CEQA clearance for these sites.
- Outcome: The commission received the report as information. No properties were added to the HRI at this meeting. The survey findings will be incorporated into the Urban Village planning process.
5B: Modifications to the San Jose Historic Resource Inventory
- Proposal: Staff recommended adding two previously documented properties to the HRI: a fruit dehydrator shed at Perimeter Road (carved out of a Costco development) and a stable relocated to 490 Park Avenue.
- Discussion: Both properties were preserved as conditions of prior development approvals. Commissioners questioned the long-term security and maintenance of the fenced fruit dehydrator shed, explicitly asking about protection from fire. Staff acknowledged the liability concern and stated that stewardship discussions between the HOA and the builder were ongoing.
- Decision: The commission voted 5-0 to add both properties to the HRI.
8B: Election of Chair and Vice Chair
- The commission elected Vice Chair Royer as Chair and Commissioner Galendari as Vice Chair for the 2025-2026 term.
8F: Good and Welfare
- Ben Leach of PAC San Jose provided an extended demonstration of the organization's publicly accessible City Landmarks website, an interactive map and filter system designed to help the public and officials identify and learn about designated historic resources.
Key Outcomes
- HRI Additions Approved: The commission voted 5-0 (with Commissioners Arnold and Binewal absent) to add the Perimeter Road fruit dehydrator shed and the 490 Park Avenue stable to the Historic Resources Inventory.
- Surveys Received: The East Side Alum Rock and Saratoga Urban Villages Historic Resource Surveys were formally received. No designations were enacted; the findings will inform upcoming Urban Village planning.
- Officers Elected: Vice Chair Royer was elected Chair, and Commissioner Galendari was elected Vice Chair for 2025-2026.
- Minutes Approved: The action minutes from the May 7, 2025 meeting were unanimously approved.
Meeting Transcript
Welcome to the Historic Landmarks Commission meeting. Following roll call during our summary of hearing procedure. I will review how the public may provide comment during today's session. Roll call. Commissioner Cowen. Yes, sir. Here. Commissioner Camuso. Present. Commissioner Gallandari. Present. Commissioner Binewal. Commissioner Arnold. Vice Chair Royer. Present. And sure Bayman president. The procedure, we are in a quorum. The procedure for this hearing is as follows. After the staff report, applicants and opponents may make a five minute presentation. If you wish to speak on an item, complete a card. You want to show them the card or there is a card. Anyway, uh bring it to our historic preservation officer Peak Edwards, who's sitting on my right. And when I receive your speaker card, I'll call you forward. Each speaker will have up to two minutes to make public testimony. And speakers using a translator will be given up to four minutes. At the discretion of the chair, the time allotted to each speaker may be changed depending on the number of items on the agenda, the number of speakers, and other factors. Speaker speakers using a translator will have double the time allotted. After the public testimony, the applicant may make closing remarks for up to five minutes. May ask questions of the speakers. Response to commissioner questions will not reduce the speaker's time allowance. The public hearing will then be closed, and the historic landmarks commission will take action on the item. The commission may request staff to respond to public testimony, ask staff questions, and discuss the item. If a commissioner would like a topic to be addressed under one of the good welfare items, please contact planning staff in advance of the commission meeting. All public records relating to an open session item on the agenda, which are not exempt from disclosure pursuant to the public uh California Public Records Act that are distributed to a majority of the legislative body will be available for the public by emailing planning support staff at San Jose California.gov. At the same time that the public records are distributed or made available to the legislative body. Before we begin, I want to remind the historic landmarks commission members and members of the public to follow our code of conduct at meetings. This includes commenting on the specific agenda item only and addressing the full body. Public speakers will not engage in conversation with commissioners or staff. All members of the Historic Landmarks Commission staff and the public are expected to refrain from abuse of language. Repeated failure to comply with the code of conduct, which will disturb, disrupt, or impede the orderly conduct of this meeting may result in removal from the move. The meeting of the historic landmarks committee will now come to order. And guess what? For number four planning referrals, we have no items. So that leaves us with item number five general business. The first item on that agenda is 5A, East Side Allen Rock and Saratoga Urban Villages Historic Resources Survey. And the recommendation is that we receive the East Side Alum Rock and Saratoga Urban Villages Historic Resource Survey Final Document and Presentation of Finding by the Architectural Resources Group. Sure, I'll just say uh just a real quick introduction. Um, so I'm thrilled that this item is finally coming to you all because um the process was started in January 2024, um, where we were requesting proposals from our pre qualified um consultant list. Um, and then we weren't able to execute the um service order until May 2024. So it's been a long time coming.
openpublica.com