OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/San Jose, California/Planning Commission
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

San Jose Planning Director's Hearing - October 5, 2026: Approval of Cambrian Park Mixed Use Village Phasing Plan

Planning Commission — Monday, October 5, 2026
BodySan Jose, California
SessionPlanning Commission
DateMonday, October 5, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 35:27

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Speaker 1

0:01

Okay, good morning, everybody.

0:03

We are calling to order the planning director's hearing of September 30th, 2026.

0:08

My name is Martina Davis, and I'm the hearing officer for today's agenda on behalf of and delegated by the director of planning building and code enforcement, Christopher Burton.

0:18

This meeting is being held via Zoom conference call.

0:21

Members of the public may participate by following instructions listed on page two of the agenda.

Unassigned speaker

0:26

If

Speaker 1

0:26

you'd like to provide public comment, you have two methods to do so.

0:30

For participants who joined electronically and have audio input available on their computer or smartphone, they can use the raised hand feature in Zoom during the agenda item they would like to speak to or click star nine on their phone.

0:42

Remember to keep your raised hand feature on until planning staff identifies your turn to speak.

0:48

During the meeting, if you uh would prefer to call or don't have a smartphone, uh, please call 408 535 8517 or email planning support staff at San Jose CA.gov and identify your name that's listed in Zoom, the phone number that you'll call into Zoom with, and what item or items you'd like to comment

Unassigned speaker

1:09

on.

Speaker 1

1:10

All members from the public will remain on mute until their individual item identifies they would like to speak and they are unmuted.

1:17

Planning support staff will identify you by name when it is your turn to speak.

1:21

At that time, you will be unmuted and can provide comment for the allotted uh time.

1:26

If you exceed your allotted time, you may uh be muted.

1:29

So we can move on to the next uh speaker.

1:33

Please note the following.

1:35

Um, the hearing procedure and order of input will be as follows.

1:40

I will identify each project on the agenda for items on the consent calendar.

1:44

I'll ask if anyone wishes to speak on them.

1:46

Um, if a separate discussion is warranted, I'll move it to the public hearing portion of the agenda.

1:51

If it's separate discussions not needed, it will remain on consent calendar.

1:55

For items listed under public hearing, I will ask staff to provide a brief report.

2:00

Their applicant or representative who wishes to speak on the item will have up to five minutes to speak and should identify themselves by stating their name for the record.

2:09

After the applicant or their representative has spoken, any member of the public who wishes to speak on the item may provide testimony up to two minutes per speaker, either for or against the project.

2:19

All members of the public should identify their name for the record, although this is not required.

2:24

Following comments from the public, the applicant may make additional remarks for up to five minutes.

2:29

I will then close the public hearing and I may ask staff for their questions, respond to comments made by the applicant or the public, or further discuss the item.

2:37

I will then take action on the item.

2:40

If you challenge these land use decisions in court, uh you may be limited to raising only though those issues you or someone else raised at this public hearing in written uh or in written correspondence delivered to the city at or prior to the public hearing.

2:57

The planning director's actions on agenda items will be final when the permit is signed and mailed, unless the permit or environmental clearance determination is appealed.

Unassigned speaker

3:06

The

Speaker 1

3:06

planning director's actions on the permits are appealable in accordance with the requirements of Title 20 of the Municipal Code, which is a zoning ordinance.

3:13

The planning director's actions on environmental review for permits under the California Environmental Quality Act or CEQA are separately appealable under uh in accordance with the requirements of Title 21 of the municipal code.

3:25

Before we begin, I want to remind uh members of the public to follow our code of conduct at meetings.

3:30

This includes commenting on the specific agenda item only.

3:33

Public speakers will not engage in conversation with the hearing officer or staff.

3:37

The hearing officer, staff, and the public are expected to refrain from abusive language.

3:42

Repeated failure to comply with the code of conduct, which will disturb, disrupt, or impede orderly conduct of this meeting, may result in removal from this meeting.

3:50

The meeting of the director's hearing will now come to order.

3:55

Okay, so the first item on our agenda is deferrals.

4:00

Um scroll down to that deferral.

4:04

So this is if we are scheduling to defer any uh items this morning to a future meeting date, would be moved to this portion of the agenda.

4:11

Um, there is an opportunity for folks to speak on deferrals.

4:16

Um, however, uh we have no items.

4:20

That said, I will now open the public hearing.

4:22

Uh, if anyone would like to speak on no items for deferral.

4:26

Raise your hands.

4:30

Okay, seeing no hands raised, matter of deferral is now closed.

4:34

We're going to do a similar thing for our consent calendar.

4:37

There's no separate discussions of individual items on the consent calendar.

4:42

Um, actually, in this case, because there are no items on the consent calendar.

4:47

Uh, I'm not going to open the public hearing, and we will move on to the public hearing portion of the agenda.

Unassigned speaker

5:00

Okay, so with that, we have Plan Development Permit 2007 and Environmental Review ER26018.

Unassigned speaker

5:04

It's

Speaker 1

5:05

Plan Development Permit Amendment to allow implementation of a master plan development phasing plan on an approximately 18.13 gross acre site, including a state density bonus application restricting 28 units as affordable to moderate income households and 22 units as affordable to very low income households, and requesting incentive to remove the phasing requirement that states the commercial component must be constructed before or concurrently with the residential component.

5:32

No changes to the land use number of residential units or total square footage of commercial use are proposed from the previously approved permit, which is file PD 2007.

5:43

This is located at the corner of Union Avenue and Camden Avenue, 14200 and 14420 Union Avenue.

5:52

This is in Council District 9, and the CEQA is a determination of consistency with the final environmental impact report for the Cambrian Park Mixed Use Village Project.

6:03

With that, I will ask staff if you would like to make your report.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Affordable Housing████████████████████████████████32%
Procedural██████████████████████22%
Urban Planning████████████████████20%
Public Comment██████████████14%
Labor Standards████████8%
Environmental Regulation████4%
Summary of Proceedings

San Jose Planning Director's Hearing - October 5, 2026: Approval of Cambrian Park Mixed Use Village Phasing Plan

Note: The transcript of this hearing states the meeting was held on September 30, 2026, but the provided date is October 5, 2026. This summary uses the given date of October 5, 2026, and notes the discrepancy.

The hearing, conducted via Zoom by Hearing Officer Martina Davis, considered a single agenda item: a Plan Development Permit Amendment (PDA 2007-01 and ER26018) for the Cambrian Park Mixed Use Village project. The amendment sought to implement a master plan phasing plan and a state density bonus to adjust the sequencing of development, allowing residential construction to proceed before commercial components. After staff presentation, applicant remarks, and public testimony, the hearing officer approved the amendment, citing legal requirements under the state density bonus law.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Carl (nearby resident): Expressed full support for the project and urged it to proceed quickly. Expressed mild concern that the sequencing might be a way to avoid building the commercial component in a high-interest-rate environment.
  • Moria (Todd Way resident): Opposed the amendment, preferring the originally approved order of construction. Stated she would prefer any delay to the project.
  • Peter (Friends of Cambridge Plaza): Representing a group of about 1,000 members, opposed the amendment as written. Key concerns: the central community park and access to the phase four (mixed-use) building are scheduled too late, and the park should be fully built in phase one.
  • Nicole Gordillo (Field Representative, North Coast State Carpenters Union, Local 405): Expressed support for the project but urged that strong labor standards (healthcare, livable wages, state-certified apprenticeship programs) be included. Noted that the developer has not yet committed to such standards, and requested the committee ensure the project is built responsibly with these investments.

Discussion Items

  • Staff Presentation (Laura, Planning Staff): Provided detailed background. The original Plan Development Permit (PD 20-007) was approved in November 2022 for a mixed-use village on 18.13 acres at Union and Camden Avenues (Council District 9). The approved development includes: a mixed-use building (ground-floor retail/restaurant, 305 apartments), a hotel, an assisted living facility with 50 senior independent living units, 25 townhouse condos, and 48 single-family homes (total 428 residential units), plus parks/open space and parking. The city had conditioned 50 affordable housing units. The current amendment proposes a phasing plan (Phase 1A: single-family homes; Phase 1B: townhomes; Phase 2: utilities; Phase 3: assisted living; Phase 4: mixed-use building; Phase 5: hotel) and uses the state density bonus law: 28 units affordable to moderate-income (80-120% AMI) and 22 units to very low-income (30-50% AMI). The project qualifies for one incentive: removal of the condition requiring commercial construction before or concurrent with residential. No changes to land use, unit count, or commercial square footage. CEQA: determination of consistency with the final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) for the Cambrian Park Mixed Use Village Project. Staff recommended approval.
  • Applicant Presentation (Marc Records, on behalf of owner): Confirmed the project scope is unchanged. Argued the phasing plan creates logical sequencing with proportional infrastructure improvements (on-site and off-site) tied to each phase. Provided timeline: community meeting and park design charrette in 2027, demolition likely end of 2027 or Q1 2028, followed by construction of first phase. Accepted proposed conditions and requested approval.
  • Hearing Officer Question: Asked why the central community park cannot be built entirely in Phase 1. Applicant responded that construction logistics (lay-down areas, need for ring road, risk of tearing up completed park during later phases) make full park delivery infeasible early; Phase 1 will include a substantial portion of park area, and the remainder will be built when the mixed-use building (Phase 4) is constructed.

Key Outcomes

  • Decision: Hearing Officer Martina Davis approved the Plan Development Permit Amendment (PDA 2007-01) and the determination of consistency with the Cambrian Park Mixed Use Village FEIR (ER26018). The decision was based on the state density bonus law, which requires approval if the amendment (1) reduces the cost of providing affordable units (shown by no longer tying extensive infrastructure costs solely to the first phase), (2) is not contrary to state or federal law, and (3) does not create an imminent public health or safety hazard. The officer stated she was bound to approve under these criteria.
  • Recommendation: The hearing officer commended the applicant for reaching a labor agreement and encouraged continued use of a skilled and trained workforce throughout the project.
  • Appeal Rights: The decision is final when the permit is signed and mailed, unless appealed under Title 20 (zoning) or Title 21 (CEQA) of the San Jose Municipal Code.

Meeting Transcript

Okay, good morning, everybody. We are calling to order the planning director's hearing of September 30th, 2026. My name is Martina Davis, and I'm the hearing officer for today's agenda on behalf of and delegated by the director of planning building and code enforcement, Christopher Burton. This meeting is being held via Zoom conference call. Members of the public may participate by following instructions listed on page two of the agenda. If you'd like to provide public comment, you have two methods to do so. For participants who joined electronically and have audio input available on their computer or smartphone, they can use the raised hand feature in Zoom during the agenda item they would like to speak to or click star nine on their phone. Remember to keep your raised hand feature on until planning staff identifies your turn to speak. During the meeting, if you uh would prefer to call or don't have a smartphone, uh, please call 408 535 8517 or email planning support staff at San Jose CA.gov and identify your name that's listed in Zoom, the phone number that you'll call into Zoom with, and what item or items you'd like to comment on. All members from the public will remain on mute until their individual item identifies they would like to speak and they are unmuted. Planning support staff will identify you by name when it is your turn to speak. At that time, you will be unmuted and can provide comment for the allotted uh time. If you exceed your allotted time, you may uh be muted. So we can move on to the next uh speaker. Please note the following. Um, the hearing procedure and order of input will be as follows. I will identify each project on the agenda for items on the consent calendar. I'll ask if anyone wishes to speak on them. Um, if a separate discussion is warranted, I'll move it to the public hearing portion of the agenda. If it's separate discussions not needed, it will remain on consent calendar. For items listed under public hearing, I will ask staff to provide a brief report. Their applicant or representative who wishes to speak on the item will have up to five minutes to speak and should identify themselves by stating their name for the record. After the applicant or their representative has spoken, any member of the public who wishes to speak on the item may provide testimony up to two minutes per speaker, either for or against the project. All members of the public should identify their name for the record, although this is not required. Following comments from the public, the applicant may make additional remarks for up to five minutes. I will then close the public hearing and I may ask staff for their questions, respond to comments made by the applicant or the public, or further discuss the item. I will then take action on the item. If you challenge these land use decisions in court, uh you may be limited to raising only though those issues you or someone else raised at this public hearing in written uh or in written correspondence delivered to the city at or prior to the public hearing. The planning director's actions on agenda items will be final when the permit is signed and mailed, unless the permit or environmental clearance determination is appealed. The planning director's actions on the permits are appealable in accordance with the requirements of Title 20 of the Municipal Code, which is a zoning ordinance. The planning director's actions on environmental review for permits under the California Environmental Quality Act or CEQA are separately appealable under uh in accordance with the requirements of Title 21 of the municipal code. Before we begin, I want to remind uh members of the public to follow our code of conduct at meetings. This includes commenting on the specific agenda item only. Public speakers will not engage in conversation with the hearing officer or staff. The hearing officer, staff, and the public are expected to refrain from abusive language. Repeated failure to comply with the code of conduct, which will disturb, disrupt, or impede orderly conduct of this meeting, may result in removal from this meeting. The meeting of the director's hearing will now come to order. Okay, so the first item on our agenda is deferrals. Um scroll down to that deferral. So this is if we are scheduling to defer any uh items this morning to a future meeting date, would be moved to this portion of the agenda. Um, there is an opportunity for folks to speak on deferrals. Um, however, uh we have no items. That said, I will now open the public hearing. Uh, if anyone would like to speak on no items for deferral. Raise your hands. Okay, seeing no hands raised, matter of deferral is now closed. We're going to do a similar thing for our consent calendar.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com