OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/San Leandro, California/City Council
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

San Leandro Finance Committee FY 2026 Preliminary Year-End Report Meeting - October 6, 2026

City Council — Tuesday, October 6, 2026
BodySan Leandro, California
SessionCity Council
DateTuesday, October 6, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:26:49

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Speaker 1

0:02

The finance committee of the San IM City Council today is Wednesday, September 30th, 2026.

0:09

Or we please call the role.

Speaker 2

0:11

Mayor Gonzalez.

Unassigned speaker

0:15

Present.

Unassigned speaker

0:16

Vice

Speaker 2

0:17

Mayor Vivero Salton.

0:18

Present.

0:19

Councilmember Victoria Agia.

Speaker 1

0:21

Present.

Unassigned speaker

0:22

And

Speaker 1

0:23

would you please read your answer?

Speaker 2

0:25

After each agenda item is presented, the mayor will ask for committee member comments and then take public comment.

0:30

You'll have two minutes for your comment.

0:32

Account down timer will appear for the convenience of the speaker and attendees.

Unassigned speaker

0:38

Well

Speaker 1

0:38

that we'll go to item two eight of our agenda, which is the fiscal year 2026 preliminary year and financial performance measures report.

0:46

We've got assistant finance director for which you're still here to present.

Speaker 3

1:04

Okay.

1:16

I do want to emphasize preliminary.

1:19

We are still working through final adjustments, and we will also still need to undergo our annual audit.

1:26

We anticipate the annual audit to come before committing at the beginning of the next calendar year.

1:43

Ah, there we go.

1:45

Okay.

1:46

So first we want to take a look at our general fund revenue.

1:50

And the first thing I'm going to do is just get us oriented to the slides.

1:54

On the left, we have our general fund revenue categories.

1:58

And then if we go from left to right or in column of B, what you see between B and C are fiscal year 25 actuals and fiscal year 26 actuals, and then D shows a year over year comparison.

2:17

If we take a look at the box, columns E through G, we've got our amended budget as well as the actuals and how we did compare budget to actuals.

2:29

And first thing to note is a favorable picture from a budget perspective, it was favorable.

2:36

And when we look at our trend year over year, also favorable.

2:42

Looking at again the comparison between 25 and fiscal year 26.

2:48

We um were uh saw an increase of about 2%, so 150.2 million in overall revenue compared to actual uh 147.7 in fiscal year 25.

3:03

And um just saying here on the year over year trend or um a minute, uh looking at columns B through D.

3:12

Just a few things to note.

3:13

Um, we'll take a look at our um major revenue categories in uh the next uh slide, but overall again uh looking pretty consistent uh year over year.

3:26

Uh some revenue sources such as uh utility user tax.

3:30

You sometimes may see a slight fluctuation based on uh the timing of when we receive remittances, uh, and we also um have uh just some declining uh sources there, such as cable TV.

3:44

Um other than that, things looked uh pretty uh straightforward, and then in the other tax category, um, you'll see a year over year change with 15 percent, and that was largely um related to transient occupancy tax and an increase there.

3:59

So um, if we uh take a look at the um revenue categories that are not tax related, uh saw a pretty significant year-over-year increase in charges for services, primarily related to the study implementation as well as um increased regulation programming

Unassigned speaker

4:20

uh

Speaker 3

4:20

interest and property income down a bit, but uh still very positive related to the interest um that we've been receiving over the last two year, very uh robust interest rate returns.

Unassigned speaker

4:35

And then we also do have a little bit of an anomaly here under fines, fees, and forgoters and uh a negative uh two percent in uh sorry I think it's 200,000 in um fiscal year 26, and that's related to um an adjustment for um code enforcement citations, community development was able to work with the property owners for voluntary compliance, and we were able to reverse some of those citations, and then uh down the license and permits again.

Speaker 3

5:04

And then down to licensing permits again, looking at fee study implementation in that year over year increase primarily as well as everything cannabis permit.

5:18

So that takes care of the largest variances again year to year, but overall positive 2% increase.

5:30

Again, positive overall 1% increase.2 million versus the budget of 149.4, and again, very preliminary but uh positive.

5:46

And uh we talked a little bit about utility users tax, um, how we have a little bit of a declining source and cable TV, and then also how sometimes those receipts can lag a bit based on the remittance timeline.

6:02

Property transfer tax, 84%.

6:05

I'll go into a little more detail on the next slide.

6:07

Um, and other than that, looking um pretty um you know consistent between budget and actuals.

6:16

We've already talked a little bit about interest rates, um looking uh looking like it's lower year to year a little bit, but definitely favorable compared to budget due to those robust interest rates for the year and um intergovernmental seeing an increase there due to FEMA reimbursements.

6:39

So with that move on to the next limit.

6:44

So general fund revenue budgets versus actuals, and here we have our major tax groups, we've got our property tax.

6:51

Um right in line with our long-term trend, 3%, larger largely driven by our secured tax related to real property.

7:02

So when we look at that, we're um when we see 3%, we're looking at that 2% CPI that we typically get and a little bit of growth that we was received when we have turnover in uh properties andor land improvements.

7:17

Sales tax, um, we did need to decrease the um sales tax projection by um two and a half million, I believe, at um roughly at the beginning of uh the wasn't beginning, it was I think our mid-year budget, um which was April 6th, uh council adopted that.

7:38

And um, but when we look at where we're at overall, we we ended up more favorably there, still um looking at um consumers spending more on services and uncertain economy that's overall impacting that uh category.

7:53

Utility users uh tax we've already talked about, and then franchise fees largely driven by rep use um uh franchise fees and contract reimbursements as well as recycling, and then the property transfer tax um lagging a little bit compared to the projection looking at uh the high interest rates impacting uh the willingness for for um property potential property um buyers to make purchases as well as um then resulting in limited housing supply for turnover and again looking at the overall uncertain um economy impacting property transfer tax in other revenue.

8:40

We have um all of our other taxes, so we've got business license, we've got um our emergency uh communications, we've got charges for service and and all of those categories, and what you see there is again just a recap of what we saw on the other slide where um is looking uh pretty favorable and it's compared to budget next slide.

9:08

This is the same, but it shows it in a percentage format.

Unassigned speaker

9:13

So

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Budget█████████████████████████████████████████████49%
Public Services██████████████████████24%
Public Works████████9%
Parks and Recreation███████8%
Waste Management████4%
Procedural███3%
Pending Litigation██2%
Public Safety█1%
Summary of Proceedings

San Leandro Finance Committee FY 2026 Preliminary Year-End Report Meeting - October 6, 2026

The San Leandro Finance Committee held a rescheduled regular meeting to review the Fiscal Year 2026 Preliminary Year-End Financial and Performance Measures Report as of June 30, 2026. The agenda and minutes date the meeting as Wednesday, September 30, 2026, at 5:30 PM in the City Council Chambers at 835 East 14th Street, with adjournment at 6:57 PM; the meeting timestamp provided for this summary is October 6, 2026 at 13:30 UTC. Present were Mayor González, Vice Mayor Viveros-Walton, and Councilmember Aguilar. Staff emphasized that the results are preliminary pending final adjustments and the annual audit. The committee asked questions and accepted the presentation.

Discussion Items

  • Item 2.A (26-406) - Fiscal Year 2026 Preliminary Year-End Financial and Performance Measures Report: Assistant Finance Director Felicia Silva presented the report. She noted the annual audit is expected to come to the City Council at the beginning of the next calendar year, with final results anticipated around February.
  • General fund revenue: Preliminary FY26 general fund revenues totaled approximately $150.2 million, up about 2% from $147.7 million in FY25 and favorable compared to the amended budget of $149.4 million. Growth was driven partly by property tax, charges for services from fee study implementation, increased regulation and programming, and strong interest earnings. Utility users tax declined about 5% year-over-year due to declining cable and telephone revenue and remittance timing. Fines, fees, and forfeitures showed a large negative variance of roughly $200,000, mainly from reversed code enforcement citations after voluntary compliance. Transient occupancy tax drove a 15% increase in the other tax category. Property transfer tax lagged projections at about 84% of budget, attributed to high interest rates and limited housing supply and turnover.
  • General fund expenditures: The total authorized amended budget was $165.6 million, with preliminary expenditures of $154.3 million and a remaining balance of $11.3 million, representing about 93% expended. Staff said carryover requests for ongoing initiatives will come before the committee and council later in the calendar year. Staff also acknowledged an error in the percentage column on one expenditure slide and committed to correcting or republishing the slide; columns showing budget and actual amounts were stated to be accurate.
  • Enterprise funds, internal service funds, and parking fund: The combined revenue budget was about $61 million, with preliminary revenues of about $69.1 million. Combined expenditures were about $121.8 million, largely tied to the Water Pollution Control Plant capital plan adopted by the council. Shoreline Enterprise revenue includes activity related to bankruptcy proceedings and is subject to reconciliation.
  • Performance measures highlights:
    • City Manager's Office: employee engagement increased 60% versus a 5% target; liability and tort claims resolved within 180 days was below target; sewer system cleaning exceeded the 80% target when reclaimed sewer network miles were included.
    • Finance: meeting the statutory state submission deadline with no audit findings is still pending; FY25 achieved that target. ERP milestones were met, but bank reconciliations did not reach the 75% target.
    • Information Technology: customer satisfaction was 96% against a 93% target.
    • Library: annual library visits greatly exceeded the target of 292, and circulation of physical and electronic items increased; library service cuts included no Sunday hours and reduced Monday hours in FY26, plus the near-full-year closure of the Mulford branch for renovation.
    • Recreation and Parks: annual recreation program registrations reached 12,989 against a 12,100 target. Facility rental hours missed target due to closure of Activity Room C at the Marina Community Center and delays activating court and gym reservations. Driving range buckets sold were 123,000 against a 131,000 target due to wet fall and winter conditions.
    • Human Services: 7,513 individuals were served through community agency program funding, exceeding a revised target; the initial target had been 575. Flex rides exceeded the 5% annual growth target through enhanced outreach.
    • Public Works: illegal dumping cleanups were at 98% versus a 95% target, excluding encampments; traffic signal outages resolved within one business day were at 100% versus a 95% target.
    • Community Development: building division plan checks completed within 10 days exceeded the 75% target; commercial incentive funds supported 6 businesses against a target of 3.
    • Fire: emergency response time for the first unit under five minutes beat the 90% target by one percentage point.
    • Police: officer hiring reached 7 of 12 quarterly officer goal for the year, and annual bias training was completed.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • There were no public comments. The mayor closed public comment with no speakers present.

Key Outcomes

  • The Finance Committee accepted the Fiscal Year 2026 Preliminary Year-End Financial and Performance Measures Report as informational.
  • Staff committed to correcting the expenditure slide percentage table and to considering future metric refinements, including presenting more detail on utility users tax and property transfer tax, segmenting liability claims by size, adding graffiti metrics, tightening cleanup timelines, and providing time-series data for performance measures.
  • Committee members also discussed the need for consistent budget terminology distinguishing authorized/approved actions from appropriations and encumbrances.
  • No formal motions or recommendations were made; the report will return to the City Council with final audited results.

Meeting Transcript

The finance committee of the San IM City Council today is Wednesday, September 30th, 2026. Or we please call the role. Mayor Gonzalez. Present. Vice Mayor Vivero Salton. Present. Councilmember Victoria Agia. Present. And would you please read your answer? After each agenda item is presented, the mayor will ask for committee member comments and then take public comment. You'll have two minutes for your comment. Account down timer will appear for the convenience of the speaker and attendees. Well that we'll go to item two eight of our agenda, which is the fiscal year 2026 preliminary year and financial performance measures report. We've got assistant finance director for which you're still here to present. Okay. I do want to emphasize preliminary. We are still working through final adjustments, and we will also still need to undergo our annual audit. We anticipate the annual audit to come before committing at the beginning of the next calendar year. Ah, there we go. Okay. So first we want to take a look at our general fund revenue. And the first thing I'm going to do is just get us oriented to the slides. On the left, we have our general fund revenue categories. And then if we go from left to right or in column of B, what you see between B and C are fiscal year 25 actuals and fiscal year 26 actuals, and then D shows a year over year comparison. If we take a look at the box, columns E through G, we've got our amended budget as well as the actuals and how we did compare budget to actuals. And first thing to note is a favorable picture from a budget perspective, it was favorable. And when we look at our trend year over year, also favorable. Looking at again the comparison between 25 and fiscal year 26. We um were uh saw an increase of about 2%, so 150.2 million in overall revenue compared to actual uh 147.7 in fiscal year 25. And um just saying here on the year over year trend or um a minute, uh looking at columns B through D. Just a few things to note. Um, we'll take a look at our um major revenue categories in uh the next uh slide, but overall again uh looking pretty consistent uh year over year. Uh some revenue sources such as uh utility user tax. You sometimes may see a slight fluctuation based on uh the timing of when we receive remittances, uh, and we also um have uh just some declining uh sources there, such as cable TV. Um other than that, things looked uh pretty uh straightforward, and then in the other tax category, um, you'll see a year over year change with 15 percent, and that was largely um related to transient occupancy tax and an increase there. So um, if we uh take a look at the um revenue categories that are not tax related, uh saw a pretty significant year-over-year increase in charges for services, primarily related to the study implementation as well as um increased regulation programming uh interest and property income down a bit, but uh still very positive related to the interest um that we've been receiving over the last two year, very uh robust interest rate returns. And then we also do have a little bit of an anomaly here under fines, fees, and forgoters and uh a negative uh two percent in uh sorry I think it's 200,000 in um fiscal year 26, and that's related to um an adjustment for um code enforcement citations, community development was able to work with the property owners for voluntary compliance, and we were able to reverse some of those citations, and then uh down the license and permits again. And then down to licensing permits again, looking at fee study implementation in that year over year increase primarily as well as everything cannabis permit. So that takes care of the largest variances again year to year, but overall positive 2% increase. Again, positive overall 1% increase.2 million versus the budget of 149.4, and again, very preliminary but uh positive. And uh we talked a little bit about utility users tax, um, how we have a little bit of a declining source and cable TV, and then also how sometimes those receipts can lag a bit based on the remittance timeline. Property transfer tax, 84%. I'll go into a little more detail on the next slide. Um, and other than that, looking um pretty um you know consistent between budget and actuals. We've already talked a little bit about interest rates, um looking uh looking like it's lower year to year a little bit, but definitely favorable compared to budget due to those robust interest rates for the year and um intergovernmental seeing an increase there due to FEMA reimbursements.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com