Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.
The San Leandro Finance Committee held a rescheduled regular meeting to review the Fiscal Year 2026 Preliminary Year-End Financial and Performance Measures Report as of June 30, 2026. The agenda and minutes date the meeting as Wednesday, September 30, 2026, at 5:30 PM in the City Council Chambers at 835 East 14th Street, with adjournment at 6:57 PM; the meeting timestamp provided for this summary is October 6, 2026 at 13:30 UTC. Present were Mayor González, Vice Mayor Viveros-Walton, and Councilmember Aguilar. Staff emphasized that the results are preliminary pending final adjustments and the annual audit. The committee asked questions and accepted the presentation.
The finance committee of the San IM City Council today is Wednesday, September 30th, 2026. Or we please call the role. Mayor Gonzalez. Present. Vice Mayor Vivero Salton. Present. Councilmember Victoria Agia. Present. And would you please read your answer? After each agenda item is presented, the mayor will ask for committee member comments and then take public comment. You'll have two minutes for your comment. Account down timer will appear for the convenience of the speaker and attendees. Well that we'll go to item two eight of our agenda, which is the fiscal year 2026 preliminary year and financial performance measures report. We've got assistant finance director for which you're still here to present. Okay. I do want to emphasize preliminary. We are still working through final adjustments, and we will also still need to undergo our annual audit. We anticipate the annual audit to come before committing at the beginning of the next calendar year. Ah, there we go. Okay. So first we want to take a look at our general fund revenue. And the first thing I'm going to do is just get us oriented to the slides. On the left, we have our general fund revenue categories. And then if we go from left to right or in column of B, what you see between B and C are fiscal year 25 actuals and fiscal year 26 actuals, and then D shows a year over year comparison. If we take a look at the box, columns E through G, we've got our amended budget as well as the actuals and how we did compare budget to actuals. And first thing to note is a favorable picture from a budget perspective, it was favorable. And when we look at our trend year over year, also favorable. Looking at again the comparison between 25 and fiscal year 26. We um were uh saw an increase of about 2%, so 150.2 million in overall revenue compared to actual uh 147.7 in fiscal year 25. And um just saying here on the year over year trend or um a minute, uh looking at columns B through D. Just a few things to note. Um, we'll take a look at our um major revenue categories in uh the next uh slide, but overall again uh looking pretty consistent uh year over year. Uh some revenue sources such as uh utility user tax. You sometimes may see a slight fluctuation based on uh the timing of when we receive remittances, uh, and we also um have uh just some declining uh sources there, such as cable TV. Um other than that, things looked uh pretty uh straightforward, and then in the other tax category, um, you'll see a year over year change with 15 percent, and that was largely um related to transient occupancy tax and an increase there. So um, if we uh take a look at the um revenue categories that are not tax related, uh saw a pretty significant year-over-year increase in charges for services, primarily related to the study implementation as well as um increased regulation programming uh interest and property income down a bit, but uh still very positive related to the interest um that we've been receiving over the last two year, very uh robust interest rate returns. And then we also do have a little bit of an anomaly here under fines, fees, and forgoters and uh a negative uh two percent in uh sorry I think it's 200,000 in um fiscal year 26, and that's related to um an adjustment for um code enforcement citations, community development was able to work with the property owners for voluntary compliance, and we were able to reverse some of those citations, and then uh down the license and permits again. And then down to licensing permits again, looking at fee study implementation in that year over year increase primarily as well as everything cannabis permit. So that takes care of the largest variances again year to year, but overall positive 2% increase. Again, positive overall 1% increase.2 million versus the budget of 149.4, and again, very preliminary but uh positive. And uh we talked a little bit about utility users tax, um, how we have a little bit of a declining source and cable TV, and then also how sometimes those receipts can lag a bit based on the remittance timeline. Property transfer tax, 84%. I'll go into a little more detail on the next slide. Um, and other than that, looking um pretty um you know consistent between budget and actuals. We've already talked a little bit about interest rates, um looking uh looking like it's lower year to year a little bit, but definitely favorable compared to budget due to those robust interest rates for the year and um intergovernmental seeing an increase there due to FEMA reimbursements.