OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/San Leandro, California/City Council
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

San Leandro Facilities and Transportation Commission Meeting - October 27, 2026

City Council — Tuesday, October 27, 2026
BodySan Leandro, California
SessionCity Council
DateTuesday, October 27, 2026
StatusNEW · FILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:27:57

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Speaker 1

0:04

Perfect.

0:05

It's 403, and I'm calling to order the meeting of the San Leandro Facilities and Transportation Commission.

0:11

Today is Thursday, October 8th, 2026, and we are here at City Hall in the City Council Chambers.

0:18

Madam Clerk, would you please take roll?

Speaker 2

0:21

Council Member Bull is absent.

0:24

Councilmember Aguilar.

Speaker 1

0:29

Present.

Speaker 2

0:30

Mayor González.

Speaker 1

0:31

Present as

Unassigned speaker

0:32

well.

Speaker 1

0:33

And Madam Clerk, would you please make your announcement?

Speaker 2

0:36

After each agenda item is presented, the mayor will ask for committee member comments and then take public comment.

0:41

If you like to speak during public comment, please complete a speaker card and submit it to the clerk before the item is heard.

0:47

Members of the public will have two minutes to share their comments.

Speaker 1

0:51

Thank you.

Unassigned speaker

0:52

So

Speaker 1

0:52

at this point in time, we're going to take public comment on items that are not on our agenda today.

Unassigned speaker

0:58

So

Speaker 1

0:59

do we have any speakers for items that are not on our agenda?

Speaker 2

1:03

I have one member, Joel Stewart.

Speaker 1

1:06

Okay, please proceed.

Unassigned speaker

1:10

Hello.

Unassigned speaker

1:13

Is

Speaker 3

1:13

this on?

1:14

Can you hear

Unassigned speaker

1:15

me?

Speaker 3

1:15

Um I'm following up on last month's meeting about the golf course, which was held at the golf course.

1:21

And I'm hoping you don't forget about the golf course until next year.

1:25

Um I'd like to see you do something that helps the city, the residents in the community regarding the golf course.

1:32

Um the consultants report, which I discussed last month, lays out a path for improvement.

1:38

We know the city has spent four million dollars in the last couple of years on repairs, and the consultant's report estimated the course needs another five to eight million dollars.

1:48

Uh I'd like to suggest that this committee ask Vincente and Mike to issue an RFP so the city can see what your options

Unassigned speaker

1:58

are.

Speaker 3

1:58

It will not cost much, if anything, and is non-binding.

Unassigned speaker

2:02

Uh

Speaker 3

2:02

the current contract has an exit clause that allows the city to give 60 days notice to the current management company.

2:10

To me, this current company that manages the golf course, American golf, has embarrassed the city and hurt the reputation of the golf course.

2:19

The city can do much better and elevate the course to be one of the best golf courses, public golf courses in the state.

2:26

And for full disclosure,

Unassigned speaker

2:28

uh

Speaker 3

2:28

my partner and I are willing to invest up to five million dollars on the golf course.

2:33

And I think I've told that to Janelle, and I've told that to Mike.

2:36

And so anyway, the city can do much, much better with a better improved golf course.

2:42

It's going to help the city.

2:44

Your current revenue is about a million dollars a year net revenue to the city, and we think, which I've showed Mike and Vincente, can probably be two million dollars a year net revenue to the city.

2:56

So

Unassigned speaker

2:57

I

Speaker 3

2:57

mean, the four million dollars that you've spent, we talked about it last month, you know.

3:02

Uh it was because of this management company has run this golf course into the ground.

Unassigned speaker

3:10

So

Speaker 3

3:10

again, I'd like you to take action, issue an RFP that's non-binding and see what's out

Unassigned speaker

3:16

there.

Speaker 1

3:25

That's all that we have.

3:26

Okay, thank you.

3:26

So with that, we will close public comment on non-agenda items and move to our next agenda item, which is an first 3A and an update on Casa Peralta.

3:40

And to have that discussion, we will be led by Library Director Brian Simons.

Speaker 4

3:46

Thank you.

3:46

Good evening, committee members.

3:48

Uh Brian Simons, Library Director.

Unassigned speaker

3:52

There

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Engineering And Infrastructure█████████████████████████████████████37%
Historical Preservation████████████12%
Public Comments████████8%
Parks and Recreation███████7%
Zoning Code Changes██████6%
Transportation Safety██████6%
Community Engagement█████5%
Public Works█████5%
Economic Development███3%
Summary of Proceedings

San Leandro Facilities and Transportation Commission Meeting - October 27, 2026

The San Leandro Facilities and Transportation Commission met on October 27, 2026, to discuss updates on Casa Peralta and the East Bay Greenway project. The meeting included public comments on the golf course and Casa Peralta, staff presentations on structural assessments and project costs, and a consensus to explore relinquishing ownership of Casa Peralta. The East Bay Greenway groundbreaking was announced for the following week.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Joel Stewart (member of the public) spoke on the golf course, urging the commission to issue a non-binding RFP to explore options. He disclosed that his partner and he are willing to invest up to $5 million in the golf course. He stated the current management (American Golf) has hurt the course's reputation and that current net revenue to the city is about $1 million per year, potentially achievable to $2 million.
  • Evelyn Gonzalez (President of the San Leandro Historical Society) expressed concern about Casa Peralta's condition and criticized the city's lack of understanding of its history. She requested the city gift the property back to the family or to a nonprofit willing to save it, citing that donors are concerned the city will not use funds for repairs.
  • Pearl Johnston (private citizen) shared personal history with Casa Peralta, emphasizing its irreplaceable historical value and urging the community to save it rather than demolish it. She suggested using the property as an event center for revenue.
  • R Johnson (private citizen) opposed adaptive reuse that would only preserve elements, stating that keeping only walls is not an option. He noted he had posted on Facebook about the issue.
  • Angela Marau (private citizen) expressed anger over the city's negligence, accusing the city of deliberate inaction. She demanded line-item explanations for cost increases and urged immediate use of the remaining $1.3 million in the CIP budget for urgent repairs.
  • Juniper Bacon (private citizen, first time speaker) asked whether the city has contacted the Brooks family to amend the gift grant deed and transfer to an organization like the Historical Society. She called for preserving the property's historical significance.
  • Karen Diaz (private citizen) was appalled that the city had not maintained the house, stating the city must find proper caretakers and not discuss demolition. She noted a separate donation for a bridge renovation.

Discussion Items

  • Casa Peralta Update: Library Director Brian Simons presented the history of Casa Peralta, built in 1901, donated to the city in 1971, and currently red-tagged due to structural unsafety. He outlined four options: renovation (estimated $15 million including soft costs), adaptive reuse (e.g., botanical garden), public-private partnership, or relinquishing ownership. Chief Building Official Mike Jeffrey described structural deterioration, yellow-tagging in May 2026, and red-tagging in August 2026 due to falling debris and safety hazards. He noted that the 2016 ARG report was superficial and that the true cost of renovation could be higher due to the "iceberg effect." Public Works Director Sheila Marquises explained cost escalation from $5.7 million (2016 estimate) to about $10 million today, with soft costs potentially adding another $5 million. The current CIP account has $1.3 million remaining. Councilmember Aguilar expressed support for relinquishing ownership to the Brooks family or a capable nonprofit, stating the city has not prioritized the property for 40 years. Mayor Gonzalez concurred, emphasizing the goal of preserving the house through transfer rather than demolition. The commission reached consensus to explore legal options for relinquishment.
  • East Bay Greenway Update: Matt Bomberg (ACTC principal transportation engineer) presented the project, a 10.5-mile regional trail from Lake Merritt to Bayfair, with the San Leandro Boulevard package starting construction soon. The project includes shared-use paths, protected bike lanes, pedestrian crossing upgrades, bus stop improvements, and landscaped medians. Construction is estimated at 275 working days, with work limited to a couple of blocks at a time (3-4 weeks per zone). A groundbreaking ceremony is scheduled for the following Wednesday at the Boys & Girls Club. Councilmember Aguilar praised the comprehensive communication plan (door hangers, website, hotline) and asked about anticipated challenges; the team cited unforeseen underground utilities and public communication as key challenges. Mayor Gonzalez emphasized the importance of the city's website linking to the project page for resident inquiries.

Key Outcomes

  • No formal votes were taken, but the commission directed staff to explore legal options for relinquishing Casa Peralta, with preference for returning the property to the Brooks family or transferring to a nonprofit preservation entity, with the goal of preserving the historic house.
  • The East Bay Greenway groundbreaking was acknowledged, with construction to begin shortly. The commission expressed appreciation for the communication plan and encouraged continued coordination between city staff and ACTC.

Meeting Transcript

Perfect. It's 403, and I'm calling to order the meeting of the San Leandro Facilities and Transportation Commission. Today is Thursday, October 8th, 2026, and we are here at City Hall in the City Council Chambers. Madam Clerk, would you please take roll? Council Member Bull is absent. Councilmember Aguilar. Present. Mayor González. Present as well. And Madam Clerk, would you please make your announcement? After each agenda item is presented, the mayor will ask for committee member comments and then take public comment. If you like to speak during public comment, please complete a speaker card and submit it to the clerk before the item is heard. Members of the public will have two minutes to share their comments. Thank you. So at this point in time, we're going to take public comment on items that are not on our agenda today. So do we have any speakers for items that are not on our agenda? I have one member, Joel Stewart. Okay, please proceed. Hello. Is this on? Can you hear me? Um I'm following up on last month's meeting about the golf course, which was held at the golf course. And I'm hoping you don't forget about the golf course until next year. Um I'd like to see you do something that helps the city, the residents in the community regarding the golf course. Um the consultants report, which I discussed last month, lays out a path for improvement. We know the city has spent four million dollars in the last couple of years on repairs, and the consultant's report estimated the course needs another five to eight million dollars. Uh I'd like to suggest that this committee ask Vincente and Mike to issue an RFP so the city can see what your options are. It will not cost much, if anything, and is non-binding. Uh the current contract has an exit clause that allows the city to give 60 days notice to the current management company. To me, this current company that manages the golf course, American golf, has embarrassed the city and hurt the reputation of the golf course. The city can do much better and elevate the course to be one of the best golf courses, public golf courses in the state. And for full disclosure, uh my partner and I are willing to invest up to five million dollars on the golf course. And I think I've told that to Janelle, and I've told that to Mike. And so anyway, the city can do much, much better with a better improved golf course. It's going to help the city. Your current revenue is about a million dollars a year net revenue to the city, and we think, which I've showed Mike and Vincente, can probably be two million dollars a year net revenue to the city. So I mean, the four million dollars that you've spent, we talked about it last month, you know. Uh it was because of this management company has run this golf course into the ground. So

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com