OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Santa Rosa, California/City Council
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Public Safety Subcommittee Regular Meeting - October 13, 2026

City Council — Tuesday, October 13, 2026
BodySanta Rosa, California
SessionCity Council
DateTuesday, October 13, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:22:07

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Speaker 1

9:10

Good morning.

9:11

I'd like to ask the interpreter currently on the Spanish channel to commence interpretation of the meeting.

9:16

For those just joining the meeting, live interpretation in Spanish is available and members of the public or staff wishing to listen in Spanish can join the Spanish channel by clicking on the interpretation icon in the zoom toolbar.

9:28

It looks like a globe.

Speaker 2

10:35

Uh yeah, ustedes uh se unan al canal wouldn't silenciar el audio original para escuchar la muchas gracias.

10:45

Estamos asusar.

10:47

Thank you very much.

10:48

Back to

Unassigned speaker

10:48

you.

Speaker 3

10:50

All right, thank you very much.

10:52

Let's go ahead and call this meeting to order at nine.

Speaker 2

10:56

Sorry about that.

Speaker 3

10:57

All good.

11:00

Let's call this meeting to order at 901 a.m.

11:02

Uh, Madam Recording Secretary, can you take the role, please?

Speaker 4

11:06

Thank you, Councilmember McDonald.

11:08

Here, Councilmember Fleming.

11:10

Vice Mayor Krepki.

11:12

Let the record reflect all subcommittee members are present.

Speaker 3

11:15

Thank you very much.

11:16

Uh, we have no remote participation today.

11:18

Um, no announcements, I believe, from staff.

11:21

Um, so we'll move on to item four, approval of minutes.

11:24

Do either of my colleagues have any uh edits or additions to the minutes.

11:30

Seeing none, we will adopt those as submitted, and we'll move on to item five, public comment on non-agenda matters.

11:37

This is the public's opportunity to take three minutes to speak on anything that is not agendized today.

11:43

Is there if you would like to speak, please move to one of the podiums and you will have three minutes.

Speaker 5

11:59

I'm a mother of three young children and live in Santa Rosa Junior College neighborhood here in Santa Rosa.

12:05

Over the past couple of years, I've noticed what feels like a significant increase in aggressive, erratic, and threatening behavior in our neighborhood.

12:11

I'm not talking about people simply experiencing homeless homelessness or panhandle handling.

12:16

I'm talking about people screaming at strangers, acting aggressively and behaving so unpredictably that residents fear for their safety.

12:23

I've witnessed enough of these encounters that I had begun to worry it was only a matter of time before my children and I were directly confronted.

12:30

Unfortunately, that's exactly what happened.

Unassigned speaker

12:33

At

Speaker 5

12:33

7 30 in the morning, I was walking to get coffee with my three-year-old son and my ten month old baby.

12:38

When a woman came around the corner, approached us and demanded that we turn around.

12:43

As I backed away, she began screaming at me horrific profanities at my children and I.

12:49

She reached into my baby's stroller and threatened and attempted to take him.

13:03

All I could do is scream for help.

13:05

Thankfully, a man driving it in a truck witnessed the altercation, stopped and scared this woman away.

13:11

My children's safety depended on a stranger happening to drive by at exactly the right moment.

13:16

As we walked home, both my three-year-old son and I were crying, and he kept asking me, why wasn't that lady our friend?

13:23

Why did that lady want to take our baby?

13:25

Those are questions I should never have to answer to a three-year-old.

13:29

When a police officer was processing collecting items to process DNA related to this, he told me these problems have become significantly worse in the JC neighborhood, and he recommended that residents carry a taser or pepper spray when walking through the neighborhood.

13:45

When the police officer recommends a mother to carry a self-defense weapon at 7 30 in the morning to walk through her own neighborhood, something's seriously wrong.

13:52

After sharing my experience on Facebook and next door, I began hearing from other mothers similar concerns.

13:59

Mothers afraid to shop at their neighborhood grocery store.

14:02

Mothers paying extra to have groceries delivered to avoid confrontations, and families avoiding certain streets during daylight hours.

14:10

Residents are describing aggressive encounters, public drug use, indecent exposure, and unpredictable behavior.

14:18

This is and this isn't just a residential area.

14:21

We have our middle school, high school, and junior college, children and young adults walking these streets every day, potentially encountering severe substance abuse, aggressive behavior, threatening confrontations.

14:32

So what are we going to do to protect them?

14:34

Families changing how they live shouldn't be the answer.

14:37

So I have several questions.

14:39

What is the city's actual plan to address escalating aggression and disorderly behavior in residential neighborhoods, particularly around our schools?

14:47

How are these indecent in incidents being tracked?

14:51

And what does the data show over the past several years?

Unassigned speaker

14:54

When service was service facilities are approved or expanded near family neighborhoods and schools, how is the public safety impacts evaluated?

Speaker 5

15:03

What safeguards are going to be required?

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Public Safety██████████████████18%
Cannabis Regulation██████████████14%
RV Parking Regulation████████████12%
RV Parking Management██████████10%
Public Comment██████████10%
Fire Department Funding████████8%
Gun Violence Prevention███████7%
Personnel Matters███████7%
Fire Safety█████5%
Summary of Proceedings

Public Safety Subcommittee Regular Meeting - October 13, 2026

The Public Safety Subcommittee of the Santa Rosa City Council met on October 13, 2026, at 9:01 AM in City Hall Council Chamber. The meeting covered proposed new ordinances and amendments related to recreational vehicles (RVs), panhandling, vehicle sideshows, and open flames in parks, along with departmental updates from police and fire. The subcommittee recommended all four proposals move to the full City Council for adoption. The meeting adjourned at 10:12 AM.

Consent Calendar

  • Unanimously approved the July 28, 2026 regular meeting minutes as submitted.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Public Comment (Non-Agenda): A mother of three young children described a traumatic encounter in the Junior College neighborhood where a woman screamed at her and reached into her baby's stroller. She reported that a police officer later advised residents to carry pepper spray or tasers. She called for a city plan to address escalating aggression, better tracking of incidents, and evaluation of public safety impacts when service facilities are approved near schools. The subcommittee noted it could not respond directly due to the Brown Act but offered to have the police chief follow up.

Discussion Items

  • Presentation on Proposed Ordinance and Ordinance Amendments:
    • RV Ordinance: Staff proposed prohibiting RV parking on residential streets, limiting parking in commercial areas to 7:30 AM–10 PM (except for loading/unloading with a 72-hour exemption and 24-hour emergency repairs), and banning parking within 30 feet of intersections, in parks, public squares, alleyways, and city-owned lots. Over 940 RV-related calls were logged in the past year. Many other California cities have similar ordinances.
    • Panhandling Ordinance Amendment: Staff proposed adding prohibitions on panhandling in center medians of roadways and at gas stations/fuel pumps. Existing ordinance already covers aggressive panhandling at ATMs, transit stops, building entrances, etc. Over 100 panhandling calls in the past year (underreported), with a noted correlation between panhandling locations and pedestrian-involved collisions.
    • Sideshow Ordinance Amendment: Proposed removing the prohibition on spectators due to Ninth Circuit case law protecting spectators' First Amendment rights. No major sideshows in Santa Rosa in recent years.
    • Open Flames in Parks Ordinance: Proposed defining permissible fires in parks (e.g., using fixed facilities, personal barbecues with charcoal/propane) and prohibiting fires during red flag warnings or when the fire chief determines a public safety threat.
  • Subcommittee Questions and Comments: Councilmembers asked about the RV definition (vehicles designed for human habitation, excluding utility trailers), enforcement reliance on officer discretion, education-first approaches, linking panhandlers to resources (resource pamphlets, co-response teams), and the need to address cruising/loud vehicles. Councilmember McDonald requested further review of panhandling in parking lots (existing ordinance covers private lots). Councilmember Fleming emphasized balancing quality of life with humane treatment and flagged illegal dumping from RVs. All three members supported moving the proposals to the full council.
  • Police Department Update (Chief Cregan):
    • Gun Buyback: 583 firearms collected (including 17 assault weapons, 15 ghost guns), funded by $50,000 from the Santa Rosa Police Foundation. No city funds used.
    • Truck-or-Treat: Scheduled for October 29, 4–8 PM at Sonoma County Fairgrounds, with city department competitions.
    • E-bike Education and Enforcement: Two community meetings announced (October 15 at Piner High, October 22 at Maria Carillo High) to address e-bike and e-moto safety, especially in Rincon Valley and Coffee Park.
    • Staffing Crisis: 10 police officer vacancies, 14 unstaffed beats, resulting in slower response times and reduced proactive patrols. Six specialty team positions unfilled. Recruitment efforts include considering lateral hiring bonuses (previously a $25,000 pilot).
  • Fire Department Update (Chief Westrope):
    • Facilities: Fire Station 8 (Roseland) weatherproofed, expected June 2027 completion. Fire Station 9 (Southeast) escrow closing October 26–27; temporary facilities being considered. Permanent Fire Station 11 funded via debt service transfer and development fees.
    • Fleet: All five Type 1 fire engines from FY22 in service; one ladder truck ordered (expected 2028); four more engines ordered.
    • Rescue Task Force: Since July 2026, Rescue 1 responded to 329 calls and squads to 573 calls. A new Special Operations Captain will build regional partnerships. The program fills a gap (no staffed heavy rescue between San Francisco/Oakland and the state line).

Key Outcomes

  • The subcommittee unanimously recommended that the City Council adopt all four ordinance proposals (RV parking, panhandling amendments, sideshow amendment, and open flames in parks).
  • Staff will incorporate council feedback (e.g., on officer discretion, resource linkage, and possible environmental amendments for illegal dumping) before presenting to the full council.
  • The police chief will follow up with the public commenter on specific questions and data requests.

Meeting Transcript

Good morning. I'd like to ask the interpreter currently on the Spanish channel to commence interpretation of the meeting. For those just joining the meeting, live interpretation in Spanish is available and members of the public or staff wishing to listen in Spanish can join the Spanish channel by clicking on the interpretation icon in the zoom toolbar. It looks like a globe. Uh yeah, ustedes uh se unan al canal wouldn't silenciar el audio original para escuchar la muchas gracias. Estamos asusar. Thank you very much. Back to you. All right, thank you very much. Let's go ahead and call this meeting to order at nine. Sorry about that. All good. Let's call this meeting to order at 901 a.m. Uh, Madam Recording Secretary, can you take the role, please? Thank you, Councilmember McDonald. Here, Councilmember Fleming. Vice Mayor Krepki. Let the record reflect all subcommittee members are present. Thank you very much. Uh, we have no remote participation today. Um, no announcements, I believe, from staff. Um, so we'll move on to item four, approval of minutes. Do either of my colleagues have any uh edits or additions to the minutes. Seeing none, we will adopt those as submitted, and we'll move on to item five, public comment on non-agenda matters. This is the public's opportunity to take three minutes to speak on anything that is not agendized today. Is there if you would like to speak, please move to one of the podiums and you will have three minutes. I'm a mother of three young children and live in Santa Rosa Junior College neighborhood here in Santa Rosa. Over the past couple of years, I've noticed what feels like a significant increase in aggressive, erratic, and threatening behavior in our neighborhood. I'm not talking about people simply experiencing homeless homelessness or panhandle handling. I'm talking about people screaming at strangers, acting aggressively and behaving so unpredictably that residents fear for their safety. I've witnessed enough of these encounters that I had begun to worry it was only a matter of time before my children and I were directly confronted. Unfortunately, that's exactly what happened. At 7 30 in the morning, I was walking to get coffee with my three-year-old son and my ten month old baby. When a woman came around the corner, approached us and demanded that we turn around. As I backed away, she began screaming at me horrific profanities at my children and I. She reached into my baby's stroller and threatened and attempted to take him. All I could do is scream for help. Thankfully, a man driving it in a truck witnessed the altercation, stopped and scared this woman away. My children's safety depended on a stranger happening to drive by at exactly the right moment. As we walked home, both my three-year-old son and I were crying, and he kept asking me, why wasn't that lady our friend? Why did that lady want to take our baby? Those are questions I should never have to answer to a three-year-old. When a police officer was processing collecting items to process DNA related to this, he told me these problems have become significantly worse in the JC neighborhood, and he recommended that residents carry a taser or pepper spray when walking through the neighborhood. When the police officer recommends a mother to carry a self-defense weapon at 7 30 in the morning to walk through her own neighborhood, something's seriously wrong. After sharing my experience on Facebook and next door, I began hearing from other mothers similar concerns. Mothers afraid to shop at their neighborhood grocery store. Mothers paying extra to have groceries delivered to avoid confrontations, and families avoiding certain streets during daylight hours. Residents are describing aggressive encounters, public drug use, indecent exposure, and unpredictable behavior.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com