OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Santa Rosa, California/City Council
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Santa Rosa City Council Meeting - October 13, 2026: Bond Training, Housing Funds, Del Valle Drive-Thru Appeal, and Flock Camera Debate

City Council — Tuesday, October 13, 2026
BodySanta Rosa, California
SessionCity Council
DateTuesday, October 13, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 5:01:43

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Speaker 1

0:54

Good afternoon.

0:55

I'd like to ask the interpreter currently on the Spanish channel to commence interpretation of the meeting.

1:00

For those just joining the meeting, live interpretation in Spanish is available, and members of the public or staff wishing to listen in Spanish can join the Spanish channel by clicking on the interpretation icon in the Zoom toolbar.

1:12

It looks like a globe.

1:13

You're on your cell phone or tablet, locate the three dots, top them lightly, and put a check mark on your preferred language.

1:19

Click done to activate and begin the interpretation.

1:22

Once you join the Spanish channel, we recommend you shut off the main audio so you only hear the Spanish interpretation.

1:28

Claudia, will you please restate this in Spanish?

Speaker 2

1:32

Yes.

2:29

Thank you very much.

2:30

Back to you.

Speaker 3

2:32

Welcome everyone.

2:33

The time is three o'clock and we'll call this meeting to order.

2:35

Madam City Click, Clerk, would you please call the role?

Speaker 4

2:38

Thank you, Mayor.

2:38

Councilmember Rogers.

2:40

Councilmember McDonald.

2:41

Here.

2:41

Councilmember Fleming.

2:43

Councilmember Ben Wellows.

2:44

Here.

2:44

Councilmember Alvarez.

Speaker 3

2:46

Present.

Speaker 4

2:46

Vice Mayor O'Krepki.

Speaker 3

2:47

Here.

Speaker 4

2:48

Mayor Stapp.

2:48

Here.

2:49

Let the record show that all council members are present.

Speaker 3

2:51

Thank you very much.

2:52

All right, we will jump right to item 4.1, our study session on the issue issuance of municipal bonds and disclosure responsibilities under federal securities laws.

Speaker 5

3:46

It's been 13 years since we issued a general obligation bond of the city.

3:52

So it's a good time to have a refresher.

4:14

And you've heard from the city manager and myself that the debt strategy and structuring of the city is something that we're looking at.

4:22

We're seeing throughout the city a lot of deferred maintenance needs.

Unassigned speaker

5:00

So we're gonna break this into two parts.

Speaker 6

5:01

We'll spend a little bit of time kind of talking about public finance or bonds one-on-one, and then we'll turn into some of the actual disclosures and obligations that you and the city will have going forward if and when any bonds are actually issued.

5:17

So as Scott mentioned, uh the impetus for this is really that we've got a project coming forward that is going to need to have a substantial amount of funding that will require the issuance of bonds.

5:31

The wastewater enterprise fund, and as you know, is its own business, is looking as part of the rate study to need about 35 million dollars.

5:41

Uh we anticipate and have been working to draft the necessary documents, including the disclosure documents for that.

5:47

Um again, this is not a general fund obligation.

5:50

This is an obligation that will be on the wastewater enterprise fund.

5:54

Um, as part of this, we've really looked at the whole enterprise fund obligations and considered whether or not it made sense to do any restructuring of the existing debt and/or pay down some of the debt to make the overall comprehensive debt service lower, um, benefiting obviously the ratepayers within the system.

6:14

Next slide.

6:16

So let's talk a little bit about what municipal finance is or what bond finance is.

6:20

As Scott mentioned, it's been a while since the city's actually issued any publicly offered debt.

6:25

Um, as you all know, the city has the ability to issue debt differently than how you or I would go out and get a mortgage for buying a house.

6:35

Uh that the debt it has the benefit of being what's considered tax exempt.

6:39

So it comes in at lower interest rates than you or I would have and in looking at something like the mortgage market.

6:46

We also use them and focus on using municipal bonds to primarily fund capital projects.

6:53

So this is not a budget solution strategy.

6:55

This is not intended to deal with any kind of um operational cash flow issues.

7:00

This is really about bricks and mortar type projects.

7:04

Next slide.

7:06

Um, what types of projects might you be considering?

7:08

As Scott mentioned roads are a big one.

7:10

We see a lot of that going up and down California right now with many cities.

7:13

Uh, the utilities, water sewer, refuse, um, power for those that are running CCAs or are having power, and then obviously things like airports and some of the other regional type projects.

Unassigned speaker

7:28

Um,

Speaker 6

7:28

I want to be real clear for everybody in terms of what different types of what we call credits or security structures there are for financing.

7:38

Um, we are going to be considering general fund debt, meaning it's actually part of your budget.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Planning And Zoning███████████████15%
Public Comment████████████12%
Economic Development███████████11%
Transportation Safety█████████9%
Waste Management████████8%
Public Safety███████7%
Procedural██████6%
Public Financing Authority██████6%
Fiscal Sustainability██████6%
Summary of Proceedings

Santa Rosa City Council Regular Meeting – October 13, 2026

The Santa Rosa City Council met on October 13, 2026, starting at 3:00 p.m. with a study session on municipal bond issuance and federal securities law responsibilities. The regular session began at 4:00 p.m. and included proclamations, presentations, a consent agenda, public comment on non-agenda matters, and two public hearings. Key actions included approval of an application for up to $3,046,056 in Permanent Local Housing Allocation (PLHA) funds, and a 6-1 vote (with one abstention) to grant an appeal and approve a Conditional Use Permit for a drive-through at Del Valle Mexican Restaurant, reversing the Planning Commission's denial. Several members of the public spoke in opposition to the city's use of Flock cameras, and Councilmember Alvarez moved to agenda a study session on automatic license plate readers before any contract renewal.

Consent Calendar

  • 13.1: Approved Third Amendment to Purchase Order 170609 with PlanetBids, Inc., extending the term one year and adding $24,122 for a total not to exceed $110,303.46. (Unanimous)
  • 13.2: Adopted Resolution RES-2026-113 authorizing purchase of six 2019 Gillig hybrid transit buses from the Golden Gate Bridge, Highway and Transportation District, with a federal interest not exceeding $1,894,566 and appropriation of $381,102 from the Transit Capital Fund. (Unanimous)
  • 13.3: Adopted Resolution RES-2026-114 authorizing a request for $471,417 in Low Carbon Transit Operations Program (LCTOP) funds for Fiscal Year 2025-26 Cycles A and B to support the UR Free youth fare program. (Unanimous)
  • 13.4: Adopted Resolution RES-2026-115 authorizing application for $1,467,000 in One Bay Area Grant Cycle 4 funding for the Zero-Emission Bus Rollout Plan Implementation: Bus Fleet Resiliency Project, with required nonfederal match from Transit Development Act Article IV funds. (Unanimous)
  • 13.5: Adopted Resolution RES-2026-116 authorizing applications for Federal Transit Administration Formula and Surface Transportation Program funds for Federal Fiscal Years 2027–2031, committing approximately $12,701,317 in local matching funds. (Unanimous)

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Study Session (4.1): Duane De Witt suggested board and commission members receive similar training on bond disclosure.
  • Recology Presentation (7.2): Michael Hilber raised concerns about fines for overfilled cans, noting that homeless individuals may add trash without permission. Duane De Witt advocated for textile recycling and praised the reuse bazaar (41,000 pounds diverted in 2026).
  • Economic Development Update (8.1): Duane De Witt urged the council to look beyond downtown and include Roseland businesses; Michael Hilber criticized the proposed sales tax increase to 10.5%; Fred Allebach urged consideration of a triple bottom line (economy, environment, society).
  • Community Empowerment Plan (8.2): Duane De Witt promoted the upcoming Make a Difference Day on October 24 and highlighted a new Roseland Rotary Club.
  • Public Comment on Non-Agenda Matters (14): A dozen speakers—including members of the North Bay Organizing Project—spoke in opposition to Flock cameras, citing privacy violations, civil liberties, and a federal judge's ruling on warrantless location data searches. Speaker Camille noted a community event where a Flock representative evaded a question from a Black and Latina former official, which she called anti-black. Duane De Witt suggested the council place the issue on a future agenda.
  • Public Hearing 16.2 (Del Valle Drive-Thru):
    • Opponents: Colleen O'Neal (44-year Kenmore Lane resident) cited lack of sidewalks and safety; Kathy Pooler (47-year resident) argued the studies ignored Kenmore Lane impacts; Scott Robinson noted dangerous U-turns and inadequate street lighting; Howard Leyton described hazardous left turns onto Sebastopol Road; Ken Davis argued the project violates zoning codes (sections 20-52F and 20-20.10) and would dump hundreds of cars onto a narrow residential street; Samantha Chance Colton (owner of three Kenmore Lane properties) stated her disabled veteran father would be directly affected by headlights, noise, and exhaust.
    • Supporters: Nahom, Ana Diaz, Hector Velasquez, Raul Barragan (President, Roseland Business Association), Jesus Martinez, Alan Martinez, Diana Martinez, Roy Cabrera, Anthony, and an unidentified speaker expressed support for the locally owned family business, citing job creation, tax revenue, and the opportunity for a small business to compete with nearby corporate chains. Roy Cabrera asked the council to find a way to approve the project. Jim Fain (civil engineer) clarified Kenmore Lane would only be used for egress, not ingress.
  • Final Public Comment (18): Betty Andrews spoke about flood risk from aging downtown culverts, citing FEMA studies; Jacob Gill urged approval of the ALPR study session, quoting a federal judge's opinion against dragnet surveillance; Jason Newman (author of "Deflock the Country") stated the song had over 10,000 streams and asserted community opposition to mass surveillance.

Discussion Items

  • 4.1 Study Session – Municipal Bond Issuance and Disclosure: Scott Wagner (CFO), Chris Lynch (Jones Hall), and Craig Hill (NHA Advisors) presented training on federal securities laws, disclosure obligations, and the city's debt policy. Council Members Fleming, Bañuelos, and MacDonald discussed timing, interest rates (approx. 4% for general obligation), and the city's upgraded Moody's rating. Fleming asked why bonds were not issued sooner; MacDonald queried about capacity for additional debt. The session was informational with no action taken.
  • 7.1 Proclamation – Domestic Violence Awareness Month: Council Member Bañuelos read the proclamation. Madeline Keegan O'Connell (CEO, YWCA Sonoma County) noted the organization operates the county's only confidential safe house and 24/7 crisis hotline, receiving over 3,000 calls last year; 80% of clients are female, over 50% Hispanic/Latinx, 13% children, 7% seniors. Police Chief John Cregan reported a five-year average of 724 domestic violence incidents per year reported to SRPD.
  • 7.2 Recology 2026 Update: Andy Fulton (Interim GM) and Celia Furber (Community Relations Manager) presented operational improvements, including a bike lane sweeper and new recycling/compost routes. Furber reported 1,300 accounts worked with, 847 site visits, 2,500 audits, 125 presentations, and a 99% SB 1383 compliance rate. The reuse bazaar in September 2026 collected 41,000 pounds of material with 84% landfill diversion. Their Trash Art program and children's museum exhibit were highlighted. Santa Rosa's landfill tons decreased from 90,000 in 2019 to 81,000 in 2025 (10% reduction).
  • 8.1 Economic Development Update: Scott Adair (Chief Economic Officer) listed numerous completed initiatives, including gap analyses, broker forums, a new economic dashboard, and a one-stop shop business portal. Dr. Robert Eyler (Sonoma State) presented on national and local economic conditions: national real GDP growth forecast modulated, unemployment near 4-5%, inflation at 3.3% (core PCE) in 2026 with recession probability at 15-20%. Santa Rosa's hotel occupancy was around 62% (12-month moving average through July 2026). Key growth sectors: healthcare, hospitality, construction; agriculture and manufacturing forecasted to fall. Dr. Eyler noted lower to middle income households face persistent pressure from inflation.
  • 8.2 Community Empowerment Plan Update: Ana Horta (Community Engagement Manager) highlighted upcoming events: October 14 municipal election education meeting, October 15 and 22 e-bike safety meetings, and October 29 trunk-or-treat.
  • 11.2.1 Council Reports: Council Member Rogers suggested including a Roseland School Board representative on the Violence Prevention Partnership. Council Member Alvarez moved to agenda a study session on automatic license plate readers (ALPR) before any contract renewal, seconded by Council Member Fleming; the motion will be voted on at the next meeting (October 27). Council Member MacDonald requested a future item reviewing the city's farm animal ordinance; staff will review. Council Member Okrepkie reported on community town hall and subcommittee meetings. Mayor Stapp reported on a gun buyback that brought in nearly 600 firearms, a joint city council-school board meeting (first since 2019), and the fifth annual Faith and Blue outreach reaching 5,000 people across 36 congregations.
  • Appointment to Zero Waste Sonoma: Council voted unanimously to appoint Council Member MacDonald as the primary representative to the Zero Waste Sonoma Agency Board of Directors.

Key Outcomes

  • Consent Items (13.1–13.5): All approved unanimously.
  • Public Hearing 16.1 – PLHA Funds: Council adopted Resolution RES-2026-117 authorizing submittal of an application to the California Department of Housing and Community Development for formula allocations of $487,369 (2024) and $522,044 (2025), as part of a potential five-year allocation of up to $3,046,056, and adopting the 2024–2028 PLHA Plan. The motion carried 7-0.
  • Public Hearing 16.2 – Del Valle Drive-Thru Appeal: Council adopted Resolution RES-2026-118 granting the appeal, reversing the Planning Commission's denial, and approving a Conditional Use Permit for a drive-through at 2000 Sebastopol Road. The vote was 6-1 (Council Member Fleming abstained). The resolution includes condition 10 for operating hours 7 a.m. to 10 p.m. and requires a queue management plan that keeps queuing off public streets; the CUP can be revoked if conditions are not met.
  • Flock Camera Study Session: Councilmember Alvarez's motion to schedule a study session on ALPR will be voted on at the October 27, 2026 meeting.
  • Farm Animal Ordinance: Council directed staff to review the existing ordinance.
  • Minutes of September 29, 2026: Approved as submitted, with Council Member Rogers abstaining.
  • Next Meeting: The next regular meeting is scheduled for October 27, 2026.

Meeting Transcript

Good afternoon. I'd like to ask the interpreter currently on the Spanish channel to commence interpretation of the meeting. For those just joining the meeting, live interpretation in Spanish is available, and members of the public or staff wishing to listen in Spanish can join the Spanish channel by clicking on the interpretation icon in the Zoom toolbar. It looks like a globe. You're on your cell phone or tablet, locate the three dots, top them lightly, and put a check mark on your preferred language. Click done to activate and begin the interpretation. Once you join the Spanish channel, we recommend you shut off the main audio so you only hear the Spanish interpretation. Claudia, will you please restate this in Spanish? Yes. Thank you very much. Back to you. Welcome everyone. The time is three o'clock and we'll call this meeting to order. Madam City Click, Clerk, would you please call the role? Thank you, Mayor. Councilmember Rogers. Councilmember McDonald. Here. Councilmember Fleming. Councilmember Ben Wellows. Here. Councilmember Alvarez. Present. Vice Mayor O'Krepki. Here. Mayor Stapp. Here. Let the record show that all council members are present. Thank you very much. All right, we will jump right to item 4.1, our study session on the issue issuance of municipal bonds and disclosure responsibilities under federal securities laws. It's been 13 years since we issued a general obligation bond of the city. So it's a good time to have a refresher. And you've heard from the city manager and myself that the debt strategy and structuring of the city is something that we're looking at. We're seeing throughout the city a lot of deferred maintenance needs. So we're gonna break this into two parts. We'll spend a little bit of time kind of talking about public finance or bonds one-on-one, and then we'll turn into some of the actual disclosures and obligations that you and the city will have going forward if and when any bonds are actually issued. So as Scott mentioned, uh the impetus for this is really that we've got a project coming forward that is going to need to have a substantial amount of funding that will require the issuance of bonds. The wastewater enterprise fund, and as you know, is its own business, is looking as part of the rate study to need about 35 million dollars. Uh we anticipate and have been working to draft the necessary documents, including the disclosure documents for that. Um again, this is not a general fund obligation. This is an obligation that will be on the wastewater enterprise fund. Um, as part of this, we've really looked at the whole enterprise fund obligations and considered whether or not it made sense to do any restructuring of the existing debt and/or pay down some of the debt to make the overall comprehensive debt service lower, um, benefiting obviously the ratepayers within the system. Next slide. So let's talk a little bit about what municipal finance is or what bond finance is. As Scott mentioned, it's been a while since the city's actually issued any publicly offered debt. Um, as you all know, the city has the ability to issue debt differently than how you or I would go out and get a mortgage for buying a house. Uh that the debt it has the benefit of being what's considered tax exempt. So it comes in at lower interest rates than you or I would have and in looking at something like the mortgage market. We also use them and focus on using municipal bonds to primarily fund capital projects. So this is not a budget solution strategy.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com