OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Santa Rosa, California/City Council
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Board of Building Regulations Appeals Meeting – October 28, 2026

City Council — Wednesday, October 28, 2026
BodySanta Rosa, California
SessionCity Council
DateWednesday, October 28, 2026
StatusNEW · FILED
Video Record
0:00 / 32:27

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Speaker 1

4:04

And then that's the

Speaker 2

4:07

best.

4:11

So I'm like the fun team, and they call it what they call it.

Speaker 3

4:16

So if you're not

Speaker 2

4:17

on the

Speaker 3

4:17

team at the

Speaker 2

4:18

end of the way, you do have to be similar to that.

4:20

So it's cool.

4:22

I'm covering something tomorrow.

Speaker 1

4:38

Oh, yeah.

4:40

You're on your own.

4:41

No,

Speaker 2

4:42

thank you

Speaker 1

4:42

both.

4:43

Appreciate the conversation too.

Speaker 2

4:45

Thank

Speaker 1

4:45

you.

4:45

I think I'm gonna win this year.

Speaker 2

4:48

Well, I wasn't there to

Speaker 1

4:49

go.

4:52

I did not.

Speaker 3

4:54

She said she would be here.

4:55

Right.

4:56

Yes, she did.

4:57

Okay.

4:57

She confirmed.

Speaker 1

4:58

Okay.

5:00

Does she know here is here?

5:01

Here.

Speaker 3

5:02

She did reply to the email of Catherine saying reminder, it's here

Unassigned speaker

5:06

at

Speaker 3

5:07

Finley, which thank you.

5:08

There were plenty of reminding.

5:10

You never know, honestly, to change a location can just do um.

5:14

Do we know why we changed?

5:17

Um, so part of the property land swap that we're doing um with the city hall is that the chamber building was the first building that needed to be vacated.

5:27

Uh so all of the board meetings that were held in there are being moved to the Finley Center.

5:32

Um RIT guys were very very supportive on getting this room updated with new equipment update with the equipment that we'll need to have successful meetings.

5:42

So they will be here moving forward until their direction is provided.

5:49

Right.

Speaker 2

5:50

Yeah,

Speaker 3

5:50

it's fine.

Speaker 4

5:51

I did notice we were at the bra meeting.

Speaker 1

5:55

Is that what was that for us?

6:00

We're all meeting.

6:01

What it says is that we'll be O R B.

Speaker 3

6:04

Okay.

Speaker 5

6:04

Yeah, did they start out that we know?

Speaker 1

6:10

I don't know.

Speaker 2

6:11

Amazing.

6:12

Okay.

Speaker 1

6:14

We might get more people to show up.

Speaker 2

6:16

Really holding things together.

6:17

Yeah.

6:19

Should you start a curiosity?

Speaker 4

6:23

She just explained it.

6:24

Oh, I'm

Speaker 1

6:24

sorry.

6:24

I missed that.

6:26

It's trying to be late.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Code Enforcement█████████████████████████████████████████████70%
Procedural███████████████24%
Public Comment████6%
Summary of Proceedings

Board of Building Regulations Appeals Meeting – October 28, 2026

The Board of Building Regulations Appeals met on October 28, 2026 (note: the agenda and minutes list the meeting date as October 21, 2026; this summary uses the date provided in the instructions). The sole item was a hearing on an appeal of a Notice and Order to Vacate for 960 Russell Avenue. The appeal was denied unanimously, and the city's enforcement action was upheld.

Call to Order and Roll Call

  • Chair David Cooper called the meeting to order at 4:02 PM. All five board members were present: Chair Cooper, Vice Chair Craig Lawson, and Board Members Janeen Casebeer, John Gordon, and Eric Miller.

Discussion Items

  • Appeal of Administrative Notice and Order to Vacate – 960 Russell Avenue (APN 015-082-046)
    • Supervising Code Enforcement Officer Cassidy Anderson presented on behalf of Code Enforcement Officer Lizette Marquez, who was absent.
    • The appeal was filed by property owner Benjamin E. Mares Sr. (the appellant). The city requested that the board deny the appeal and uphold the September 2, 2026 Notice and Order to Vacate.
    • Staff detailed a history of code violations beginning in August 2022, including unpermitted demolition of the roof, interior walls, bathroom, and front portion of the dwelling (including the kitchen); lack of required building permits for electrical system modifications; and discontinuation of water service due to non-payment (later restored on September 15, 2026).
    • The notice to vacate was issued based on multiple violations of Santa Rosa City Code (Sections 18-20.301.2, 18-20.111.1.3, 18-16.105.1) and California Health and Safety Code Section 17920, including lack of hot and cold water, lack of cooking facilities, unsafe electrical conditions, and structural hazards.
    • Staff responded to board questions, clarifying that the order to vacate does not prevent repairs, and that permits and inspections could allow reoccupancy.
    • The appellant did not appear at the hearing; board members noted his absence and closed the opportunity for his presentation.
    • No public comments were received, either in person or submitted in advance.

Key Outcomes

  • Motion: Board Member Miller moved, seconded by Board Member Casebeer, to deny the appeal and uphold the city's Notice and Order to Vacate.
  • Vote: The motion carried 5-0 (Cooper, Lawson, Casebeer, Gordon, Miller all voting yes).
  • Effect: The Chief Building Official's decision stands; the property at 960 Russell Avenue remains subject to the order to vacate. The meeting adjourned at 4:25 PM.

Meeting Transcript

And then that's the best. So I'm like the fun team, and they call it what they call it. So if you're not on the team at the end of the way, you do have to be similar to that. So it's cool. I'm covering something tomorrow. Oh, yeah. You're on your own. No, thank you both. Appreciate the conversation too. Thank you. I think I'm gonna win this year. Well, I wasn't there to go. I did not. She said she would be here. Right. Yes, she did. Okay. She confirmed. Okay. Does she know here is here? Here. She did reply to the email of Catherine saying reminder, it's here at Finley, which thank you. There were plenty of reminding. You never know, honestly, to change a location can just do um. Do we know why we changed? Um, so part of the property land swap that we're doing um with the city hall is that the chamber building was the first building that needed to be vacated. Uh so all of the board meetings that were held in there are being moved to the Finley Center. Um RIT guys were very very supportive on getting this room updated with new equipment update with the equipment that we'll need to have successful meetings. So they will be here moving forward until their direction is provided. Right. Yeah, it's fine. I did notice we were at the bra meeting. Is that what was that for us? We're all meeting. What it says is that we'll be O R B. Okay. Yeah, did they start out that we know? I don't know. Amazing.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com