OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Santa Rosa Planning Commission Regular Meeting - August 11, 2022

Planning CommissionThursday, August 11, 2022
BodySanta Rosa, California
SessionPlanning Commission
DateThursday, August 11, 2022
StatusFILED
Video Record

STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE

Transcript — Verbatim
0:11

Additions.

0:13

Okay.

0:14

So seeing none, those will stand as submitted.

0:18

And we'll move on to item three public comments.

0:21

So I will now open the public comment for any item not included in this meeting's agenda.

0:26

If you wish to make a comment via Zoom, please select the raise hand button.

0:30

If you are dialing in via telephone, please dial star nine to raise your hand.

0:37

And each speaker has three minutes.

0:39

A countdown timer will appear for the convenience of the speaker and the viewers.

0:42

And please make sure to unmute yourself when you're invited to do so.

0:46

And at the end of the three minutes, your microphone will be muted.

0:50

So with that, we'll see if we have any.

0:55

So once again, this public comment period is for items not on the agenda tonight.

1:01

We do have a caller.

1:04

Caller Al P.

1:06

You've been given permission to speak if you would let us know if you're able to see the timer and introduce yourself if you so choose.

1:15

Okay, I'm speaking.

1:17

Are you hearing me?

1:18

We are.

1:19

Thank you.

1:20

Okay.

1:21

Well, now that's all I wanted to find out.

1:23

How do I get on the picture?

1:26

You you will you don't.

1:29

Okay.

1:30

As an attendee, not a panelist in via Zoom.

1:33

So okay.

1:35

So I okay.

1:36

Um I'll just wait for my anyway.

1:38

You can't hear me.

1:39

Okay.

1:40

Thank you.

1:44

Okay, thank you.

1:45

Um, so are there any other comments um by the public for items not on the agenda?

1:51

We have no additional.

1:52

Oh, I apologize.

1:53

Uh oh.

1:54

Uh Alice still had his hand raised, but uh, we have no additional hands raised at this time.

2:00

Okay.

2:01

Um Mr.

2:02

Petrie, could you please uh take your hand down and then put it back up during the public?

2:06

Thank you.

2:07

Thank you so much.

2:09

So okay, so with that, I'll go ahead and go to the public comp public comment period um and take it on to item four planning commissioners report and uh item 4.1 is a statement of purpose.

2:24

The planning commission of plans, ordinances, and policies relating to land use matters, assisting in writing and implementing the general plan and area plans, holding public hearings, and acting on proposed changes to the zoning code, zoning map, general plan, tentative subdivision maps, and undertaking special planning studies as needed.

2:52

So with that, we'll move on to um 4.2.

2:55

Are there any committee reports from the subdivision or waterways advisory committee?

3:02

Okay, seeing none.

3:04

Uh 4.3 commissioner reports.

3:06

Are there reports by any of my fellow commissioners?

3:11

Okay, seeing none.

3:14

Um we'll move on to um department report.

3:18

Um, Ms.

3:18

Hartman.

3:21

Good afternoon.

3:22

Can you hear me okay?

3:23

Okay, excellent.

3:26

Um, just a quick update on a couple of uh fun activities happening in planning and economic development.

3:33

Um first, I'd like to say that we are essentially staffed up, which is phenomenal.

3:40

Yeah, so we we have a couple uh positions to backfill because we did have some internal promotions.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Planning And Zoning█████████████████████████████████████████████62%
Procedural████████████17%
Environmental Protection████5%
Public Comment████5%
Public Engagement2%
Affordable Housing2%
Water And Wastewater Management1%
Public Transportation1%
Parks and Recreation1%
Summary of Proceedings

Santa Rosa Planning Commission Regular Meeting - August 11, 2022

The Santa Rosa Planning Commission met virtually on August 11, 2022, at 4:30 PM. The commission considered three major items: a subdivision of Kerry Ranch Parcel A into five residential lots, a proposed expansion of Recess Storage (Phase II), and an appeal of the Elm Tree Station subdivision approval. The commission voted unanimously to approve the Kerry Ranch project, voted 6-0 to continue the Recess Storage project to a date uncertain, and voted 5-0 to deny the appeal and uphold the Subdivision Committee's approval of the Elm Tree Station parcel map waiver.

Consent Calendar

  • None.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Al Petrie spoke during the public comment period on items not on the agenda, and later during the Kerry Ranch public hearing he expressed opposition, citing issues with the tentative map process and bike lane concerns.
  • Marsha Chevalier (Northwest Santa Rosa Neighborhood Association) spoke in opposition to the Kerry Ranch project, arguing that the parcel A was originally designated as a stormwater retention basin and that the development would wipe out 15 years of neighborhood efforts to preserve a vernal pool and wetlands.
  • Elyse (resident on Calway Drive) spoke in opposition to the Recess Storage Phase II project, raising concerns about noise, potential archaeological resources near the creek, construction impacts on the Santa Rosa Creek Trail, and parking congestion.
  • Woody Hastings (Co-coordinator of the Coalition Opposing New Gas Stations, CONGAS) presented the appeal of the Elm Tree Station subdivision, arguing that the Subdivision Committee did not account for significant policy changes (climate urgency, updated CEQA guidelines, health impacts) and that the parcel map waiver was inappropriate.

Discussion Items

  • Kerry Ranch – Parcel A (Project Planner Susie Murray): Proposal to subdivide a 0.65-acre parcel into five single-family residential lots (approx. 4,322 to 8,047 sq. ft.). Required an Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND), a Conditional Use Permit for a small lot subdivision, and a Tentative Map. Staff noted that the original stormwater detention function of Parcel A had been shifted to individual lots in earlier public hearings. Applicant representatives (Jean Kapolchok, Dan Morgan) presented, emphasizing design compatibility and single-story units. Commissioners discussed the history of the parcel, the removal of the stormwater feature, and the existing bike lane on San Miguel Avenue. All commissioners stated they could make the required findings and voted to approve all three resolutions (7-0).
  • Recess Storage Phase II (Project Planner Susie Murray): Proposal to construct a 3-story self-storage building at 4465 Streamside Drive and two single-story buildings at 4480 Streamside Drive, adjacent to residential uses and the Santa Rosa Creek Trail. Required an Addendum to MND, a Variance (for reduced setbacks), a Hillside Development Permit, and a Conditional Use Permit. Staff explained the challenging site conditions (creek path, sewer trunk line, odd parcel shapes) and the need for a variance. Applicant (Larry Tom, Reed Hamilton) highlighted their cooperation with the city (adding housing, granting well easement) and extensive landscaping plans. Commissioner Cisco expressed concern about making the variance findings, noting the hardship was self-created. Commissioner Duggan seconded a motion to continue the item to a date uncertain for redesign. Motion carried 6-0 (Commissioner Holton absent). The applicant expressed frustration and financial burden.
  • Elm Tree Station Appeal (Project Planner Mike Wixon): Appeal of the Subdivision Committee's December 12, 2019 approval of a Parcel Map Waiver and Certificate of Compliance to create two parcels (0.73 acres and 0.25 acres) to facilitate a future gas station, electric charging station, neighborhood market, and park. The appellant (Woody Hastings) argued that the Subdivision Committee did not consider significant changes since 2013 (climate crisis, CEQA updates, health impacts), that the staff report contained errors, and that the waiver was used to create a buffer between a gas station and residentially zoned land. Staff and applicant (Jean Kapolchok) countered that the parcel map waiver was appropriate, that the 2013 environmental document remained valid, and that the project's use permit and design review would be subject to further public hearings. After discussion, the commission voted to deny the appeal and uphold the Subdivision Committee's approval (5-0, with Chair Weeks abstaining and Commissioner Holton absent).

Key Outcomes

  • Kerry Ranch – Parcel A: Approved by unanimous 7-0 votes on all three resolutions: (1) Addendum to MND, (2) Tentative Map, (3) Minor Conditional Use Permit. The action is final unless appealed within 10 calendar days.
  • Recess Storage Phase II: Continued to a date uncertain by a 6-0 vote (Commissioner Holton absent). The commission directed the applicant to redesign the project to eliminate the need for a variance. The action is final unless appealed within 10 calendar days.
  • Elm Tree Station Appeal: Denied by a 5-0 vote (Chair Weeks abstained, Commissioner Holton absent). The commission upheld the Subdivision Committee's approval of the Parcel Map Waiver and Certificate of Compliance. This action is final and not appealable. The Conditional Use Permit and Design Review applications for the project will proceed to future public hearings.

Department Reports

  • Staff Liaison Hartman reported that the department is fully staffed, announced a cost of services and fee update process (starting with a community survey), noted ongoing developer roundtables, highlighted the City Council's adoption of six goals on August 9, and previewed upcoming housing dashboards and a pending development report to be launched by end of August.

Meeting Transcript

Additions. Okay. So seeing none, those will stand as submitted. And we'll move on to item three public comments. So I will now open the public comment for any item not included in this meeting's agenda. If you wish to make a comment via Zoom, please select the raise hand button. If you are dialing in via telephone, please dial star nine to raise your hand. And each speaker has three minutes. A countdown timer will appear for the convenience of the speaker and the viewers. And please make sure to unmute yourself when you're invited to do so. And at the end of the three minutes, your microphone will be muted. So with that, we'll see if we have any. So once again, this public comment period is for items not on the agenda tonight. We do have a caller. Caller Al P. You've been given permission to speak if you would let us know if you're able to see the timer and introduce yourself if you so choose. Okay, I'm speaking. Are you hearing me? We are. Thank you. Okay. Well, now that's all I wanted to find out. How do I get on the picture? You you will you don't. Okay. As an attendee, not a panelist in via Zoom. So okay. So I okay. Um I'll just wait for my anyway. You can't hear me. Okay. Thank you. Okay, thank you. Um, so are there any other comments um by the public for items not on the agenda? We have no additional. Oh, I apologize. Uh oh. Uh Alice still had his hand raised, but uh, we have no additional hands raised at this time. Okay. Um Mr. Petrie, could you please uh take your hand down and then put it back up during the public? Thank you. Thank you so much. So okay, so with that, I'll go ahead and go to the public comp public comment period um and take it on to item four planning commissioners report and uh item 4.1 is a statement of purpose. The planning commission of plans, ordinances, and policies relating to land use matters, assisting in writing and implementing the general plan and area plans, holding public hearings, and acting on proposed changes to the zoning code, zoning map, general plan, tentative subdivision maps, and undertaking special planning studies as needed. So with that, we'll move on to um 4.2. Are there any committee reports from the subdivision or waterways advisory committee? Okay, seeing none. Uh 4.3 commissioner reports. Are there reports by any of my fellow commissioners?

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com