OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Cultural Heritage Board Regular Meeting - December 7, 2022

Planning CommissionWednesday, December 7, 2022
BodySanta Rosa, California
SessionPlanning Commission
DateWednesday, December 7, 2022
StatusFILED
Video Record

STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE

Transcript — Verbatim
1:13

Okay, I guess we'll go ahead and get started if uh all board members could go ahead and turn their video on.

1:57

Board member Fennel.

1:59

Um, we can't see you, we just see a black screen.

2:10

And I'm not saying board member um either.

2:17

There you go.

2:24

Okay, I'd like to welcome everybody to the December seventh uh cultural heritage board.

2:30

Uh person to government code section five four nine five three, subset E.

2:38

And the recommendations for the health officer of the county of Sonoma Cultural Heritage Board members will be participating in this meeting via Zoom webinar.

2:46

Members of the board are members of the public can participate virtually at WWW Zoom US forward slash join or by toll free telephone.

3:04

I'm sorry, eight seven seven eight five three, five two five seven using meeting ID eight four zero four one nine four seven nine zero.

3:32

Uh srcity dot org board slash cultural heritage board.

3:38

The meeting will be live streamed at uh Santa Rosa dot legislar.com forward slash calendar.

3:48

Click on the end process link to view meeting can also be viewed on Comcast Channel Twenty Eight at YouTube.

4:02

Say that again.

4:20

Um so let's call the order and uh Miss Pontoya, if we could have a roll call.

4:27

Yes, thank you.

4:28

Let the record reflect that all board members are present.

4:37

Chair Muser.

4:38

We um can we take a couple of minutes?

4:40

I'd like to try to uh figure out what's going on with board member Fennel's uh camera.

4:46

Because if her camera's off, she can't participate.

4:49

Absolutely.

4:50

Um let's take a uh about a five minute pause.

4:54

That would be great.

4:55

Thank you very much.

7:06

Board member Fennel, I just spoke with our on-site um IT person, and they suggested first to make sure that nothing's covering the lens, but um the second step would be for you to exit Zoom and then restart Zoom to see if that fixes the issue.

8:08

Board member Fennel, do you want to try your camera again for us?

8:23

We can see you now.

8:25

We just can't hear you.

8:29

Can you hear me now?

8:30

We can.

8:31

We can hear and see you.

8:32

Thank you so much.

8:33

Thank you.

8:34

I'm so sorry.

8:41

Okay, Chair Muser.

8:42

Um, we it looks like we're all back.

8:45

We can stop sharing screen and you can reconvene when you're ready.

8:51

Okay, so reconvening the December seventh Cultural Heritage Board meeting.

8:55

If all board members can turn their cameras back on, be great.

9:04

Okay, moving on to item two, approval of minutes.

9:07

We don't have any minutes to approve tonight.

9:09

Um item three, public comments.

9:13

So this is the time when any person may address matters not listed on this agenda, but which are within the subject matter of the jurisdiction.

9:24

The public may comment on agenda items when the item is called.

9:29

Uh each speaker is allowed three minutes.

9:32

So, Ms.

9:32

Montoya, if we could uh see if we have any members of the public who'd like to speak to the culture letters board.

9:40

Yes, thank you.

9:42

I am not seeing any hands raised at this time.

9:45

Okay, with that, I'm gonna go ahead and close the public comment period.

9:50

Move on to item number four, uh, board business.

9:54

Um this opportunity then for board members to make any reports or if they have any business they would like to share.

10:03

So I'll be looking for hands.

10:06

Chair Me, sir, if you could please start by first reading the statement of purpose for us.

10:13

Okay, yeah, and do that.

10:16

Okay, so statement of purpose 4.1.

10:19

Uh principal duties of the board include undertaking and updating historic inventories and or surveys, recommending designation of landmarks and preservation districts, reviewing proposed alterations to historic buildings and promoting public awareness of preservation issues.

10:39

If you are in a historic district or would like more information regarding historic districts, please see processing review procedures for owners of historic properties.

10:50

Okay, now I'll move to four-point two board member reports.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Historic Preservation█████████████████████████████████████████41%
Code Enforcement██████████████████████22%
Procedural██████████████14%
Planning And Zoning████████████12%
Public Comment█████5%
Parks and Recreation████4%
Public Engagement██2%
Summary of Proceedings

Cultural Heritage Board Regular Meeting - December 7, 2022

The Santa Rosa Cultural Heritage Board held a virtual regular meeting on Wednesday, December 7, 2022, beginning at 4:30 p.m. Chair Meuser called the meeting to order at 4:32 p.m. and briefly recessed to resolve a technical issue with a board member's camera, reconvening at 4:38 p.m. All board members participated via Zoom. The meeting included a code enforcement presentation, a vote to place a future discussion about unpermitted work in preservation districts, and a concept review for a new single-family dwelling at 912 McDonald Avenue in the McDonald Preservation District. No minutes were approved. The meeting adjourned at 5:58 p.m.

Consent Calendar

  • None.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • No public comments were made during the public comment periods at the start of the meeting, for the code enforcement presentation, or for the 912 McDonald Avenue item.

Discussion Items

  • Code Enforcement Presentation (Item 8.1): Senior Code Enforcement Officer Cassidy Anderson and Staff Liaison Susie Murray presented an overview of the code enforcement process. The presentation covered the division's responsibilities, common violations, exclusions (e.g., civil disputes, mobile home parks, creeks), and examples of minor versus major landmark alteration permits. Staff explained exemptions from Landmark Alteration Permits, such as repairs with the same materials, repainting, rain gutters, skylights not visible from the public right-of-way, air conditioning units, demolition of non-historic buildings, similar re-roofing, and window/door replacements meeting established criteria. They also detailed enforcement tools, including courtesy/notice of violation letters, failure to abate letters, notices of noncompliance, administrative citations ($100–$500), administrative hearings, assessment liens, abatement, and judicial remedies. Board members asked about the frequency of preservation-related complaints and discussed the need for better public education. Board Member Fennell proposed creating a brochure or acknowledgment for property owners and realtors in historic districts; staff acknowledged the idea without making a commitment.
  • Motion to Add Future Agenda Discussion (Item 8.2): The board considered adding a discussion about changes to properties and structures within Santa Rosa’s preservation districts without benefit of permits to a future agenda. This followed a June 1, 2022 motion that initiated a three-step process. Board Member Fennell moved to add the discussion, and Board Member Garrett seconded the motion. Board members expressed strong support for continuing the conversation, citing examples of unpermitted alterations and the need for education. The motion passed unanimously 6–0.
  • Concept Landmark Alteration Permit – 912 McDonald Avenue (Item 8.3): Project Planner Christian Candelaria and applicant representatives presented a concept review for a proposed new 1,873-square-foot, three-bedroom, 2.5-bath single-family dwelling with a detached 648-square-foot two-car garage, a 98-square-foot well pump house, and a 500-square-foot covered outdoor area on a 0.26-acre lot in the McDonald Preservation District. The applicant explained that the parcel was a vacant former community garden and that the home was designed to complement the neighborhood, with alley access for the garage, a covered front porch, and Craftsman-style architecture using a painted Hardie product, composition shingle roof, and fiberglass-clad windows. The neighborhood meeting the prior week generated two comments about front street trees and the use of the existing well for irrigation only. Board members provided design feedback: Board Member Garrett preferred wood windows, had concerns about the proposed crepe myrtle street trees, the curved rock walls, the covered patio material, and the building setback, and requested clarification on the front triple window group. Board Member Huang also preferred wood windows, wanted more rectilinear hardscaping, and suggested white picket fencing. Board Member Praetzellis appreciated the alley access and encouraged a more historic shingle pattern. Board Member Boren said filling the vacant lot would be an asset to the neighborhood. The applicant thanked the board and said the comments would be incorporated into the design. No formal action was taken on the concept review.

Key Outcomes

  • The board voted unanimously (6–0) to add a discussion regarding work in preservation districts without permits to a future Cultural Heritage Board agenda.
  • The board provided design direction for the 912 McDonald Avenue project; the applicant will revise the proposal and return for further review.
  • Staff Liaison Murray reported on Fremont Park: due to contracting delays, a draft historic report is expected by the end of January or early February 2023, at which point it will be brought back to the board.
  • The meeting adjourned at 5:58 p.m.

Meeting Transcript

Okay, I guess we'll go ahead and get started if uh all board members could go ahead and turn their video on. Board member Fennel. Um, we can't see you, we just see a black screen. And I'm not saying board member um either. There you go. Okay, I'd like to welcome everybody to the December seventh uh cultural heritage board. Uh person to government code section five four nine five three, subset E. And the recommendations for the health officer of the county of Sonoma Cultural Heritage Board members will be participating in this meeting via Zoom webinar. Members of the board are members of the public can participate virtually at WWW Zoom US forward slash join or by toll free telephone. I'm sorry, eight seven seven eight five three, five two five seven using meeting ID eight four zero four one nine four seven nine zero. Uh srcity dot org board slash cultural heritage board. The meeting will be live streamed at uh Santa Rosa dot legislar.com forward slash calendar. Click on the end process link to view meeting can also be viewed on Comcast Channel Twenty Eight at YouTube. Say that again. Um so let's call the order and uh Miss Pontoya, if we could have a roll call. Yes, thank you. Let the record reflect that all board members are present. Chair Muser. We um can we take a couple of minutes? I'd like to try to uh figure out what's going on with board member Fennel's uh camera. Because if her camera's off, she can't participate. Absolutely. Um let's take a uh about a five minute pause. That would be great. Thank you very much. Board member Fennel, I just spoke with our on-site um IT person, and they suggested first to make sure that nothing's covering the lens, but um the second step would be for you to exit Zoom and then restart Zoom to see if that fixes the issue. Board member Fennel, do you want to try your camera again for us? We can see you now. We just can't hear you. Can you hear me now? We can. We can hear and see you. Thank you so much. Thank you. I'm so sorry. Okay, Chair Muser. Um, we it looks like we're all back. We can stop sharing screen and you can reconvene when you're ready. Okay, so reconvening the December seventh Cultural Heritage Board meeting. If all board members can turn their cameras back on, be great. Okay, moving on to item two, approval of minutes. We don't have any minutes to approve tonight. Um item three, public comments. So this is the time when any person may address matters not listed on this agenda, but which are within the subject matter of the jurisdiction. The public may comment on agenda items when the item is called. Uh each speaker is allowed three minutes. So, Ms. Montoya, if we could uh see if we have any members of the public who'd like to speak to the culture letters board. Yes, thank you. I am not seeing any hands raised at this time.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com