OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Santa Rosa, California/Planning Commission
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Santa Rosa Planning Commission Meeting - September 10, 2026

Planning Commission — Thursday, September 10, 2026
BodySanta Rosa, California
SessionPlanning Commission
DateThursday, September 10, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 2:15:41

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it
0:45

Yes.

1:57

Thank you all for joining us.

1:59

I'd like to ask the interpreter currently on the Mandarin channel to commence interpretation of the meeting.

2:05

For those just joining the meeting, live interpretation in Mandarin is available in person and virtually.

2:12

Members of the public or staff who are on Zoom wishing to listen in Mandarin can join the Mandarin channel by clicking on the interpretation icon in the Zoom toolbar.

2:22

It looks like a globe.

5:06

Could we have the interpreters repeat the following statement on the channel for us to test the council chamber headsets?

5:19

We are translating this meeting in Mandarin over Zoom and in person.

6:26

Interpreters, could you please repeat the following statement?

6:30

We are translating this meeting to Mandarin over Zoom and person.

6:47

For those of you who are just joining us, we are working on our interpretation channel.

6:53

Please give us one moment.

7:54

Okay, we're gonna test one more time.

7:56

Would the interpreters currently on the Mandarin channel please repeat the following statement?

8:03

We have this meeting translated into Mandarin on Zoom and in the room.

8:11

Okay, it looks like corrections have been made.

8:14

I will turn it over to our chair to start today's meeting.

8:31

Sorry.

8:32

Okay, welcome everybody.

8:34

This toasty Thursday afternoon.

8:36

I'd like to call to order the uh September tenth, twenty twenty sixth meeting of the Planning Commission.

8:44

If we could have roll, please.

8:46

Thank you, Chair.

8:47

Commissioner Carter.

8:50

Commissioner Sisko.

8:51

Here.

8:52

Commissioner Horton.

8:53

Here.

8:54

Commissioner Pardot?

8:55

Here.

8:56

Commissioner Sanders.

8:58

Vice Chair Duggan?

8:59

Here.

9:00

Chair Weeks.

9:00

Here.

9:01

Let the record reflect that all commissioners are present.

9:04

Okay, thank you.

9:05

We have no remote participation.

9:08

We have one set of minutes from August 13th.

9:11

Are there any changes, corrections, additions?

9:15

Okay, so then since we have none, uh, no changes on that, they will be approved as submitted.

9:23

Uh, we'll go on to public comment on non-agenda matters.

9:28

So we're now taking public comments on item four, which is non-agenda matters.

9:33

This is the time when any person may address the commission on matters not listed on this agenda, but which are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the commission.

9:43

If you are in the chambers and wish to make a comment, please make your way to the podium and please state your name for the record, and you'll have up you'll have three minutes for your comment and a countdown timer will show on the screen.

10:00

Is there anybody who would like to make their way to the podium for comments on non-agenda matters?

10:06

Okay.

10:07

Seeing no one, we will go ahead and close the public comment period.

10:12

Um our statement of purpose is that we are charged with carrying out the California planning and zoning laws in the city of Santa Rosa.

10:20

Duties include implementation of plans, ordinances, and policies relating to land use matters, assisting in writing and implementing the general plan and area plans, holding public hearings, and acting on proposed changes to the zoning code, zoning map, general plan, tentative subdivision maps, and undertaking special planning studies as needed.

10:42

And before we proceed, I'd like to briefly go over the Brown Act meeting procedures.

10:47

As each item is introduced, the public will have an opportunity to speak during the public comment or public hearing portion of that item.

10:56

Each speaker may comment once per item for up to three minutes.

11:01

During the public comment period, the commissioners do not engage in back and forth discussion with the speakers.

11:07

After everyone who wishes to speak has had an opportunity to do so, I will close the public comment period for that item.

11:15

Once public public comment is closed, there will not be another opportunity for comments or questions from the public on that same item.

11:25

Any further discussion or deliberation will be limited to the commissioner staff and the project applicants.

11:32

So with that, we'll move on to commissioner reports.

11:34

Are there any commissioner reports?

11:37

Okay, no commissioner reports, and we have no other.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Planning And Zoning████████████████████20%
Massage Regulation██████████████14%
Wildfire Management█████████████13%
Public Hearing█████████9%
Procedural███████7%
Housing██████6%
Traffic Safety██████6%
Public Safety█████5%
Urban Planning███3%
Summary of Proceedings

Santa Rosa Planning Commission Regular Meeting - September 10, 2026

Chair Karen Weeks called the meeting to order at 4:32 p.m. All seven commissioners were present. The meeting included approval of minutes, two public hearings, and unanimous decisions on both agenda items.

Consent Calendar

  • Approval of Minutes: The draft minutes from August 13, 2026, were approved as submitted without changes.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Non-agenda items: No public comments were made.
  • Highway 12 Massage Appeal: The appellant's representative, attorney Richard Freeman, argued that business owner Weihong Hu did not control or know about illicit advertisements placed by a third-party marketer, and that she took over operations only in September 2025, not earlier. Staff maintained that Hu was responsible for the actions of her hired marketer and that the business had been linked to the property since 2023.
  • Emerald Isle CCRC: Three members of the public spoke:
    • Mike Lopez expressed support, stating the project addresses a critical need for senior housing and should not be blocked by NIMBYism.
    • Brian Minoin opposed, citing evacuation concerns from the 2017 Tubbs fire and questioning whether cumulative traffic and density increases in the Fountain Grove area had been fully assessed.
    • Dianna Segall opposed, raising concerns about parking adequacy, emergency access roads crossing the golf course, and the need for a detailed evacuation plan rather than general descriptions.
    • Gary Sol expressed concern about evacuation safety, noting traffic congestion on Thomas Lake Harris Drive and the risk of being trapped.

Discussion Items

11.1 - Highway 12 Massage Establishment Certificate Denial Appeal

  • Staff presented evidence that illicit advertisements for the business appeared on websites such as Adultlook.com and Skipthegames.com between 2024 and 2026. The denial was based on gross violations of the city's Massage Ordinance (Section 20-62).
  • The appellant (Weihong Hu, owner of Hongyuan LLC and co-owner of the property with husband Louis Lacaban) argued she did not place the ads and only assumed operation in September 2025. She stated she hired a third-party marketer without knowledge of the websites used.
  • Commissioners asked clarifying questions about the timeline of ownership, the definition of "cause to occur" in the ordinance, and the consequences of denial (immediate closure, two-year property restriction, permanent prohibition on Hu operating in Santa Rosa).
  • No public comments were made during the hearing.
  • After deliberation, all commissioners agreed that the evidence supported staff's findings and that ignorance or lack of intent was not a valid defense.

11.2 - Emerald Isle Continuing Care Retirement Community (CCRC) at 2021 Gullane Drive and 0 Thomas Lake Harris Drive

  • Staff and applicant (Gallher Companies) presented a proposed 82-unit CCRC on a 12.57-acre hillside site. The project includes a three-story main building (63 independent living units, underground parking), 18 single-story casitas, and a single-story assisted living/memory care building (9 beds).
  • Key features: 47.75-foot main building height, 258 parking spaces, two emergency access routes (primary on Gullane Drive, secondary apparatus road to Thomas Lake Harris Drive), and an emergency preparedness and evacuation plan coordinated with Santa Rosa Fire Department.
  • The project requires a CEQA Addendum to the 2019 Mitigated Negative Declaration, a Minor Use Permit (for the CCRC use and building height), and a Major Hillside Development Permit (due to slopes averaging 21.81%). A separate Major Design Review will be handled by the Design Review and Preservation Board.
  • The traffic study estimated 308 daily trips, with studied intersections operating at acceptable levels. Parking was calculated based on industry experience, not the minimum .5 spaces per unit allowed under state density bonus law.
  • The applicant emphasized the project's compliance with the Housing Accountability Act and state density bonus law, and noted that it is not requesting additional density beyond the 82 units allowed by a 2016 density transfer.
  • Commissioner questions focused on parking counts, employee staffing levels (daytime 10–30, nighttime 7–10, not 250 as suggested by a commenter), emergency generator coverage for casitas, and the secondary access road's design (improved roadway, not across fairways).
  • The fire marshal confirmed that the secondary access meets city requirements and can be used for evacuation when safe, and that the evacuation plan incorporates lessons from the 2017 fires, including early notification, contracted buses, and shelter-in-place options.
  • All commissioners expressed support, noting the project is well-designed, superior to the prior 2019 approval, and meets all required findings for the three resolutions.

Key Outcomes

  • Resolution PC-RES-2026-022 (Highway 12 Massage): Unanimous vote (7-0) to deny the appeal and uphold the Planning Director's denial of the Massage Establishment Certificate. The business must cease operations immediately; the property cannot be used for massage for two years; and Weihong Hu is permanently barred from operating a massage business in Santa Rosa.
  • Resolution PC-RES-2026-023 (CEQA Addendum): Unanimous vote (7-0) to adopt the Addendum to the 2019 Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration.
  • Resolution PC-RES-2026-024 (Minor Use Permit): Unanimous vote (7-0) to approve the Minor Use Permit for the Emerald Isle CCRC, including the proposed main-building height.
  • Resolution PC-RES-2026-025 (Major Hillside Development Permit): Unanimous vote (7-0) to approve the Major Hillside Development Permit.
  • All decisions are final unless appealed to the City Clerk within 10 calendar days.

Meeting Transcript

Yes. Thank you all for joining us. I'd like to ask the interpreter currently on the Mandarin channel to commence interpretation of the meeting. For those just joining the meeting, live interpretation in Mandarin is available in person and virtually. Members of the public or staff who are on Zoom wishing to listen in Mandarin can join the Mandarin channel by clicking on the interpretation icon in the Zoom toolbar. It looks like a globe. Could we have the interpreters repeat the following statement on the channel for us to test the council chamber headsets? We are translating this meeting in Mandarin over Zoom and in person. Interpreters, could you please repeat the following statement? We are translating this meeting to Mandarin over Zoom and person. For those of you who are just joining us, we are working on our interpretation channel. Please give us one moment. Okay, we're gonna test one more time. Would the interpreters currently on the Mandarin channel please repeat the following statement? We have this meeting translated into Mandarin on Zoom and in the room. Okay, it looks like corrections have been made. I will turn it over to our chair to start today's meeting. Sorry. Okay, welcome everybody. This toasty Thursday afternoon. I'd like to call to order the uh September tenth, twenty twenty sixth meeting of the Planning Commission. If we could have roll, please. Thank you, Chair. Commissioner Carter. Commissioner Sisko. Here. Commissioner Horton. Here. Commissioner Pardot? Here. Commissioner Sanders. Vice Chair Duggan? Here. Chair Weeks. Here. Let the record reflect that all commissioners are present. Okay, thank you. We have no remote participation. We have one set of minutes from August 13th. Are there any changes, corrections, additions? Okay, so then since we have none, uh, no changes on that, they will be approved as submitted. Uh, we'll go on to public comment on non-agenda matters. So we're now taking public comments on item four, which is non-agenda matters. This is the time when any person may address the commission on matters not listed on this agenda, but which are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the commission. If you are in the chambers and wish to make a comment, please make your way to the podium and please state your name for the record, and you'll have up you'll have three minutes for your comment and a countdown timer will show on the screen. Is there anybody who would like to make their way to the podium for comments on non-agenda matters? Okay. Seeing no one, we will go ahead and close the public comment period. Um our statement of purpose is that we are charged with carrying out the California planning and zoning laws in the city of Santa Rosa. Duties include implementation of plans, ordinances, and policies relating to land use matters, assisting in writing and implementing the general plan and area plans, holding public hearings, and acting on proposed changes to the zoning code, zoning map, general plan, tentative subdivision maps, and undertaking special planning studies as needed.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com