Good evening.

Like call to order the Thursday, June 5th, 2025, meeting of the Shoreline Landing Commission.

First up is roll call.

Carl.

Thank you.

Commissioner Lynn.

Here.

Commissioner Kay.

Here.

Commissioner Mosier.

Yeah.

Vice Chair.

Commissioner Fratt?

Here.

Commissioner Povick.

Here.

And Commissioner Hadley.

Thank you.

Excellent.

Thank you.

Oh, I'm sorry.

Um, Commissioner Brenton or Chair Brimson is absent with notice.

Thank you.

Thank you.

All right.

Next up, I'll prove the approval of the agenda.

Um any changes in amendments otherwise.

Nope.

Super.

Um, how about approval of our minutes for my last meeting?

May first any changes.

Excellent.

Um brings this to public comment.

Colin, do we have anybody signed up this evening?

No public comment this evening.

Thank you.

Excellent.

Thank you.

That brings us to our study item.

Uh development code amendments to eliminate parking minimums citywide.

All right, thank you.

I will um go through these relatively quick the slides, and then we'll have time for discussion and questions.

Um if you have any.

So uh tonight we'll just do some follow-up from our May 1st discussion meeting, review the additional changes um that are contained in your packet tonight.

Um, have some discussion and then um uh provide some direction for actually that's for um a July our next uh meeting in July.

So uh uh there were two uh follow-up um items from uh last meeting which had to do with parking and setbacks and the maximum number of parking uh vehicles parked outdoors.

Um so there was a uh figure provided in your staff report um to provide some clarification about this provision um where parking on a residential lot is with in on the driveway and within setbacks.

So to provide some clarification for this one, it is um is recommending that the um proposal be um deleted, but the commission can discuss that.

But this is an example of where driveways are located within setbacks and you can park there, but parking is not look allowed in setbacks, so it just to get that uh code provision um clarified in some way.

Um and then the second question was the um the commission had um questions about the number of cars allowed outside and um and you were concerned about you know without some limit or um outdoor vehicle storage um that someone could you know essentially have a parking lot on their residential pro property and then calling out specific housing types was uh providing um some challenges with our new um and our one, two, and three middle housing um dwellings.

Um in order to provide so the staff did follow up with um our code enforcement team, and they do use this provision quite often about um you know um junk vehicles, unlicensed vehicles, and and providing um that support for whatever they do in in code enforcement um including the storage of our views and boats as well.

So um staff has proposed some um clarified language um uh about not providing more than six vehicles associated with a dwelling unit, um you know, out uh wholly parts um outside um excluding um the number of ND2 boats or or um RVs or trailers that just you know gives some clarification and then puts up puts some parameters on that.

Um moving on to the new amendments in your packet, which is attachment B, and I won't go through all these one by one, but um just going through 2020, which is our definition section.

So these are just some administrative cleanups for those um four definitions that refer to parking in in some way.

So these are just some administrative cleanups for those um four definitions that refer to parking in some way.

Um the amendments in um SMC 2030, which is our procedures and administrative section of the code, these again are are largely administrative.

Um they do per they do list special parking conditions for sif different types of applications like conditional uses when that would trigger you know additional review um when you know you you and then parking in a master plan area, it currently requires that you do a minor amendment to that plan.

So um the section?

I I thought it was good thing.

Oh sorry.