OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Shoreline, Washington/Planning Commission
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Shoreline Planning Commission Regular Meeting - March 5, 2026

Planning Commission — Thursday, March 5, 2026
BodyShoreline, Washington
SessionPlanning Commission
DateThursday, March 5, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:11:15

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it
0:13

I didn't get a warning.

0:15

Good evening.

0:16

I would like to call to order the Shoreline Planning Commission meeting for Thursday, March 5th.

0:22

Haley, will you roll call, please?

0:27

Yes.

0:28

Vice Chair Mosier.

0:30

Here.

0:31

Commissioner Fry.

0:33

Here.

0:33

Commissioner Lynn?

0:35

Here.

0:35

Commissioner Cabe.

0:37

Here.

0:37

Commissioner Povick.

0:39

Here.

0:39

Commissioner Hadley.

0:41

Here.

0:41

And Chair Brinson.

0:43

I'm here.

0:43

Thank you.

0:45

All right.

0:46

Approval of the agenda.

0:49

We are approved.

0:51

Meeting amendment.

0:53

Approval of the meeting minutes.

0:55

This is going to go really well, y'all.

0:57

Good.

0:58

All right.

0:58

We're approved.

1:00

Haley, do we have any public comments this evening?

1:03

We do have two people signed up for public comments.

1:06

And we have Xanna Satterwhite and Kathleen Russell and Zanna, you can go first.

1:13

And if I may, first.

1:15

Public comments are limited to three minutes per person.

1:18

Public comment period will be no more than 30 minutes.

1:21

That's probably not going to happen with only two.

1:25

Go ahead and proceed.

1:26

Okay, thanks.

1:28

Hi, I'm Xanna Satterwhite, resident of Shoreline.

1:32

Hello, Commissioners.

1:34

As a public comment relating to agenda item 6A, Save Shoreline Trees has emailed you a letter with two attachments in consideration of the ongoing Shoreline Tree Code update.

1:46

It speaks to the tree canopy as it relates to our neighborhoods.

1:50

The first attachment from the 2023 tree canopy assessment in one map shows the percentages of canopy by census block group.

1:59

The lower map shows the percent of increase or decrease in the canopy.

2:05

Over 50% of the groups experienced a loss, and blocks with the largest percent losses were confined to the eastern side of the city.

2:14

This does not take into account trees removed for the development that has occurred since 2021.

2:21

The second map, which is page 48 from the PROSAP plan, shows heat islands and social inequity rankings, and they point out the imbalance and heat stress to our most vulnerable neighborhoods.

2:34

In preparing the CAP plan, climate justice and equity were considered non-negotiable by the community.

2:41

We agree tree loss and the resulting heat islands must be reduced.

2:47

Thank you.

2:50

Thank you.

2:55

Kathleen Russell, resident of Shoreline.

2:58

Good evening, Commissioners.

3:01

My comment pertains to the tree code update.

3:05

Safe Shoreline Trees has tracked tree removal since 2019, including tree removals by public works, sound transit, and trees removed by private property permits.

3:17

We also track future tree removals that are planned by public works.

3:22

Currently, our count totals the removal of 4,860 trees.

3:29

While trees are removed from all neighborhoods, a large number of the trees have been removed in neighborhoods east of Aurora, with the exception of Richmond Highlands, as mentioned in my email.

3:41

Tree removal totals by neighborhoods, not including all public works projects, are as follows.

3:48

Parkwood, 357 trees, plus the removal of 317 trees for the North 145th and I-5 construction projects.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Tree Preservation█████████████████████████████████████████████91%
Procedural██5%
Community Engagement█3%
Personnel Matters█1%
Summary of Proceedings

Shoreline Planning Commission Regular Meeting - March 5, 2026

The Shoreline Planning Commission held a regular meeting on Thursday, March 5, 2026, from 7:00 p.m. to 8:11 p.m. in the Council Chamber at Shoreline City Hall. The primary focus was the first briefing on the Tree Code Update, including staff presentation and commissioner discussion. Two members of the public testified, and the commission recognized outgoing commissioners and canceled the March 19 meeting.

Consent Calendar

  • The agenda and the minutes from the February 5, 2026 regular meeting were approved as presented.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Zannah Satterwhite, Shoreline resident, expressed concern about tree canopy loss and heat islands, referencing maps from Save Shoreline Trees. She urged that tree loss and resulting heat islands must be reduced, especially in vulnerable neighborhoods east of Aurora.
  • Kathleen Russell, Shoreline resident and member of Save Shoreline Trees, detailed tree removal totals tracked by the organization since 2019, including 4,860 trees removed citywide. She provided neighborhood-specific counts (e.g., Parkwood 357, Richmond Highlands 308, Meridian Park 213) and emphasized retaining established trees east of Aurora to combat heat islands.

Discussion Items

  • Tree Code Update Briefing #1 (Study Item 6A): Senior Planner Sierra Carson presented the Tree Code Update, including project goals (support canopy, balance with housing, user-friendly code, reasonable exemptions), community engagement results (125 fall questionnaire responses, 1,000 responses to the Code Recommendations survey, 12-member advisory group), and five initial policy directions:
    1. Replace "significant" with "regulated" tree and regulate trees over 6 inches DBH (excluding invasive/noxious species).
    2. Define "exceptional trees" (over 24 inches DBH) with a regulatory pathway for retention.
    3. Update "hazard" and "nuisance" tree definitions to align with arboriculture standards (hazard: defect + target; nuisance: healthy but causing property damage).
    4. Implement a Tree Density Credit Method: assign credit values based on tree diameter, with required density scaled by zone and lot size (more credits required in lower-density zones).
    5. Revise standards for planting, maintenance, and monitoring.
  • Commissioners discussed the proposed credit system, definitions of trees vs. shrubs, species-specific values, requiring arborist assessments for complex projects, retention vs. replacement, and ensuring long-term viability of new plantings. The advisory group is supportive of the credit method but details are still being worked out.

Key Outcomes

  • No formal votes were taken.
  • Commissioners directionally supported the policy directions presented, emphasizing retention of large trees, clarity in definitions, and incorporating incentives for stewardship and education.
  • The commission agreed to cancel the March 19, 2026 meeting. The next regular meeting is scheduled for April 2, 2026, which will include swearing in new commissioners and selecting a chair and vice chair.
  • Recognized Commissioner Mei-shiou Lin and Commissioner Colt Fry for their service on their last meeting with the commission. City Council will formally recognize them on March 30 and appoint/reappoint commissioners on March 23.
  • The annual Planning Commission retreat is tentatively set for May 7, 2026 (starting at 5:45 p.m.).

Meeting Transcript

I didn't get a warning. Good evening. I would like to call to order the Shoreline Planning Commission meeting for Thursday, March 5th. Haley, will you roll call, please? Yes. Vice Chair Mosier. Here. Commissioner Fry. Here. Commissioner Lynn? Here. Commissioner Cabe. Here. Commissioner Povick. Here. Commissioner Hadley. Here. And Chair Brinson. I'm here. Thank you. All right. Approval of the agenda. We are approved. Meeting amendment. Approval of the meeting minutes. This is going to go really well, y'all. Good. All right. We're approved. Haley, do we have any public comments this evening? We do have two people signed up for public comments. And we have Xanna Satterwhite and Kathleen Russell and Zanna, you can go first. And if I may, first. Public comments are limited to three minutes per person. Public comment period will be no more than 30 minutes. That's probably not going to happen with only two. Go ahead and proceed. Okay, thanks. Hi, I'm Xanna Satterwhite, resident of Shoreline. Hello, Commissioners. As a public comment relating to agenda item 6A, Save Shoreline Trees has emailed you a letter with two attachments in consideration of the ongoing Shoreline Tree Code update. It speaks to the tree canopy as it relates to our neighborhoods. The first attachment from the 2023 tree canopy assessment in one map shows the percentages of canopy by census block group. The lower map shows the percent of increase or decrease in the canopy. Over 50% of the groups experienced a loss, and blocks with the largest percent losses were confined to the eastern side of the city. This does not take into account trees removed for the development that has occurred since 2021. The second map, which is page 48 from the PROSAP plan, shows heat islands and social inequity rankings, and they point out the imbalance and heat stress to our most vulnerable neighborhoods. In preparing the CAP plan, climate justice and equity were considered non-negotiable by the community. We agree tree loss and the resulting heat islands must be reduced. Thank you.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com