The Sitka Planning Commission met on Wednesday, July 16, 2025, at 7:00 PM in Harrigan Centennial Hall to consider three major items: a land sale request at Bahovec Court, a conceptual minor subdivision at Sawmill Creek Road, and a conditional use permit for a distillery manufacturing operation on Lincoln Street. The commission also received the Planning Director’s report on ongoing projects and heard public comments.
The meeting was adjourned. The next regular meeting is scheduled for August 2025.
Yes, Chair Windsor. Present. Vice Chair Riley's excuse. Commissioner Mudre. Commissioner Alderson. Here. Commissioner Sherman. Here. Assembly agent tour Christians not here. Staff is Amy Ainsley, Kim Davis, and Ariadne Well. Thank you. Can I get a consideration of last minutes minute meeting minutes? I move to approve the June 18th, 2025 meeting minutes. Move to second, all in favor. Okay, are there any persons out there tonight to be heard? That's not on tonight's agenda. Seeing none, we'll come back to the planning director's report, please. Yes, Mr. Chair. A couple of items to give you some updates on. The tourism commission did a review of the um draft our our current progress on the cruise ship dock um zoning text amendment. Um their primary feedback was around the number of zones in which it's uh the use is currently proposed as conditional. Um their their recommendation was to have the use either be prohibited in all zones or to significantly narrow the selection so that the you know provisions for the conditional use permit would be in the code, but um a you know consideration of additional cruise ship docks would have to um go through a a zoning text amendment first for you know for the majority of zones. Um and so um we will be working to get that drafted into ordinance format for your for your review in August. Um, and at that time I think that's kind of where we can have uh that more focused discussion around the the number of zones that are currently identified with the use as conditional. Um similar topic regarding zoning tax amendments. Um some of you may recall um uh a couple of years ago um we kind of started on the process of working on converting the Gary Paxton special district, um which is the zoning designation for the Gary Paxson Industrial Park or GPIP such that it would function more like a regular zone. Um and so now that the haul out has developed more and we have a better sense of the properties that will be used in conjunction with the haul out. Um we're kind of revisiting that that zoning change. Um and so we're gonna be reviewing that tomorrow with the GPIP board at their their meeting, and so um again in the following couple of months here, we will also be at this um commission reviewing um uh zoning text change for uh for the GPIP zone. And then last update for you on the land study. Um our uh goal is at your next meeting to have an update on the progress of the study that will include um the results of our preliminary site investigations, the um environmental review that's been done, as well as the sort of high-level um utility infrastructure review that's been done for those areas. Um and our our hope and kind of the goal of that review with the commission will be to get your guidance as to which of the areas that are in the you know currently in the study should potentially be narrowed down for more intensive study, which would be uh which would include um actual on-the-ground wetlands delineation um before um winter comes uh this year, um, as well as a a more uh kind of starting to get into more detailed um preliminary design for potential um road and utility expansion. So looking forward to getting that in front of you next month. That's any questions. Um I recall though a few years ago when we were talking about the Gary Paxon. At that time it was just that we're just gonna turn it back over to the city, drop the board, turn it back over to the city. They didn't talk anything about it. Uh zone change. There are there are some ongoing conversations about um the GPIP board and potentially um having a broader kind of ports and harbors commission that encompasses the GPIP board functions into one body as opposed to having two. Um now that because the you know primary intent of the um, you know, the purpose of the board was to really guide the um kind of land sale and lease process. Um, and so now that the majority of the the properties are either lease sold or being retained by the city for either city functions or for the haul out. Um that's why we're kind of working on the transition of having it work more like a regular zoning district, um, and then potentially thinking about how the the board um could could merge with ports and harbors. So um, no, not necessarily the imminent plans for that to happen, but it is it's an ongoing conversation. Okay. Yeah. Gotcha. Any other questions? Okay, thank you. All right, so we'll get on with this evening's business.