Sitka Assembly Special Meeting: Annual Evaluations for Administrator and Attorney - April 21, 2026
Sitka Assembly Special Meeting: Annual Evaluations for Administrator and Attorney - April 21, 2026
The City and Borough of Sitka Assembly held a special meeting on April 21, 2026, at 6:00 PM to conduct annual evaluations for Municipal Administrator John Leach and Municipal Attorney Rachel Jones. The meeting included a public evaluation for Leach and an executive session for Jones. The assembly issued exemplary evaluations to both employees.
Discussion Items
-
Annual Evaluation for Municipal Administrator John Leach (Public): Assembly members provided comments expressing appreciation for Leach's leadership, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic, his implementation of asset management and strategic planning, staff development, and organizational systems. Members noted his six-year tenure and his request to extend his departure to December 2026. Assembly member Kevin Mosher highlighted his confidence in Leach, and others praised his calm demeanor, action orientation, and support for staff. Mayor Steven Eisenbeisz confirmed an exemplary rating. Leach requested no pay increase, citing a recent salary bump for interim duties. The assembly agreed to forgo a pay increase, consistent with the January 13, 2026 amendment to his employment agreement.
-
Annual Evaluation for Municipal Attorney Rachel Jones (Executive Session): A motion was made by Mosher to enter executive session under statutory categories (prejudice reputation, adverse financial effect). The motion passed 7-0. The assembly met from 6:45 PM to 8:54 PM, with Jones invited in from 7:30 PM to 8:30 PM. The assembly reconvened at 8:54 PM. Mayor Eisenbeisz announced that the assembly issued an exemplary review for Jones and that future pay and benefits would be negotiated.
Key Outcomes
- Municipal Administrator John Leach received an exemplary evaluation.
- No pay increase for Leach, at his request and due to a recent salary adjustment.
- Municipal Attorney Rachel Jones received an exemplary evaluation.
- Future pay and benefits for Jones will be negotiated by the Mayor.
- Meeting adjourned at 8:55 PM.
Meeting Transcript
All right, welcome everybody. Uh, we will call to order the special meeting of Tuesday, April 21st, 2026. Please join me for a flag salute. I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands. One nation, under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. The Assembly of the City and Borough of Sitka would like to respectfully acknowledge the traditional first people of Sheetka. With gratitude, we proceed on Klinkitani. Sarah Rollcall, please. Mayor Isenbeis. Present. Mr. Pike. Here. Miss Carlson. Here. Miss Riley. Here. Mr. Christensen. Here. Mr. Mosier. Here. And Mr. Slain. Yes, here. I can hear it all of our voices. We're excited to be starting four nights of meetings tonight, aren't we? Uh thank you. Uh so tonight we're gathered to do our annual evaluations for our two employees, our municipal administrator and our municipal attorney. Uh this evening, uh, John Leach has requested his evaluation be in public. And then uh our attorney, uh Rachel Jones has requested that her evaluation be held in executive session. Uh, any questions from the assembly before we go forward in this process? We'll be starting with John Leach this evening. Great. Um, so we will move into the annual evaluation for a municipal administrator. Uh this one, although I think we do need to give a good recap of the previous year for our administrator. Um, obviously, he's on his way out, and he's hoping we get him uh a little bit quicker on his way out. So yeah, I would go through the the same process as normal assembly on this um if you have any feedback from the previous year and uh kind of what you're looking forward to in the next uh next little bit. Um Kevin, you mind starting us out? We'll just go around the room. Sure, no problem, Mr. Mayor. Uh thank you. Uh John, I'll just make my comments brief. Uh it's interesting because originally when you put in your notice, you were going to be ending your time next month. So, and then the assembly did ask you to extend until December, which you agreed to. So it seems kind of surproof surperfluous. I don't know if that's the right word to do this, but we are doing it because it's the the process. Um, and the fact that we did ask you to stay longer, I think says a lot.
openpublica.com