South San Francisco City Council Regular Meeting – February 28, 2024
STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
South San Francisco City Council Regular Meeting – February 28, 2024
The South San Francisco City Council held a regular meeting on February 28, 2024, beginning at 6:30 PM. The meeting included presentations, public comments, consent calendar approvals, public hearings on nuisance abatement, and several administrative business items. A significant portion of the evening was devoted to public testimony calling for a ceasefire resolution in Gaza, and council members expressed willingness to agendize the matter at a future meeting.
Presentations
- Downtown and Old Town Lighting Study (Item 2): Senior Engineer Jeffrey Chou and lighting expert Daniel Cunningham presented findings. Key statistics: only 35% of Grand Avenue commercial areas met desired lighting levels, 19% of commercial alleys, 62% of residential avenues, and 60% of residential lanes. Total cost for all options estimated at $5.1 million. Council directed staff to prioritize using a phased approach, including pilot study blocks, and to explore grant funding (e.g., Peninsula Clean Energy) and use of the PBID. Councilmember Nagales emphasized starting with Grand Avenue and Linden Avenue due to safety and destination appeal. Staff will return with a funding request for the upcoming budget cycle and potential grant opportunities.
Consent Calendar
- Approved unanimously (3-0; Mayor Coleman left early due to medical reasons after this item, but quorum remained): Items 3–9 including approval of February 14, 2024 minutes; acceptance of Measure W Oversight Committee report for FY 2022-23; acceptance of Hillside Boulevard Road Diet Improvements; amendments to consulting agreements for Mission Road Underground Utilities (additional $134,718) and Sewer Master Plan (additional $360,792); two-year extension for plan check/inspection services agreements; and a five-year banking services agreement with J.P. Morgan Chase.
Public Comments & Testimony
- Ceasefire Resolution: 54 speakers signed up, and 11 written comments were submitted. The vast majority of speakers urged the Council to agendize a resolution calling for a permanent, bilateral ceasefire in Gaza, unrestricted humanitarian aid, and release of hostages. Speakers included Palestinian American residents, students, healthcare workers, and community organizers. Many referenced the deaths of 14,000 children and over 38,000 total casualties, comparing the population of South San Francisco (63,000) to the death toll. Several speakers also expressed support for preserving the Municipal Services Building (MSB) at 33 Arroyo and opposed its demolition.
- Other Comments: A few speakers addressed the lighting study, suggesting tree pruning and bulb replacement before major investment.
- Councilmembers acknowledged the public's advocacy. Mayor Coleman, Vice Mayor Flores, Councilmember Addiego, and Councilmember Nicolas each expressed empathy, commitment to dialogue, and openness to agendizing a ceasefire resolution at a future meeting. Councilmember Nagales noted the city's history of standing with Ukraine and affirmed that the council would consider the matter.
Discussion Items
- Nuisance Abatement – 146 Gardiner Avenue (Item 11): The property at 146 Gardiner Avenue (APN 012-094-160) had unpermitted work, defective smoke detectors, and unsanitary conditions. Despite citations, no corrections were made. Total fines and penalties: $46,859.16. A representative of the owner requested a 30-day continuance, which was denied. Council approved the resolution confirming the cost report and authorizing a special assessment on the property. (Vote: 3-0)
- Nuisance Abatement – 308 Susie Way (Item 12): Similar conditions plus relocation assistance costs. Total: $146,811.29. Council also denied a continuance and approved the resolution. (Vote: 3-0)
- Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Construction Contract (Item 13): Awarded to Wickman Development and Construction (Oakland) in the amount of $34,790,000, with a total project budget of $38,269,000. The new center will include two pools, locker rooms, and a veterans memorial. Construction expected 18 months, with pool opening in summer 2025 and full completion in fall 2025. (Vote: 3-0)
- Utah Avenue Overcrossing Project and Grants (Item 14): Approved a consulting services agreement with AECOM (up to $8,000,000) for PS&E, and accepted two San Mateo County Transportation Authority grants: $2,700,000 for the Utah Avenue Overcrossing (with $300,000 local match) and $1,486,790 for the Junipero Serra Boulevard & I-280 Westborough Pedestrian & Bicycle Connectivity and Safety Project. Council emphasized robust community engagement during design. (Vote: 3-0)
- FY 2023-24 Mid-Year Financial Report (Item 15): Finance Director Karen Chang presented the mid-year update. Key adjustments: general fund revenue decrease of $2.8 million (due to sales tax decline and lower license/permit revenue), but offset by property tax increase of $1.3 million. Expenditure highlights: overtime in fire department (80% of budget used, partly reimbursable for mutual aid). Total reserves and surplus: $63 million. Council approved the resolution accepting the mid-year update and budget appropriations. (Vote: 3-0)
- Legal Services Agreement – Redwood Public Law LLP (Item 16): Approved a new agreement with Redwood Public Law LLP for City Attorney Sky Woodruff to continue serving; rates remain unchanged. (Vote: 3-0)
Key Outcomes
- Ceasefire Resolution: Council committed to agendizing a future resolution; no vote taken at this meeting.
- Nuisance Abatement: Resolutions passed for both properties, imposing special assessments.
- Aquatic Center: Contract awarded; construction to begin in spring 2024.
- Utah Overcrossing: Design phase contract awarded; grant funds accepted.
- Mid-Year Budget: Approved with adjustments.
- City Attorney: Contract renewed with new firm.
- Mayor Coleman left early due to a medical issue (car accident); remaining three council members continued and achieved quorum for votes.
- Preceding Councilmember Addiego noted the efficient work of the three-member quorum.
Meeting Transcript
I'm gonna ask her for public comment. But then if you say 42, what's enough to say 52 or 62? I think I'll be all right. Hello everyone, good evening. We have a full house and a full agenda. So I would like to make sure that we're all prepared and moving through the agenda quickly. So I would like to call the meeting to order for the city council meeting of February 28th. Could we get a roll call, please? Councilmember Adiego. Here. Councilmember Nogales. Here. Councilmember Nicholas. Present. Vice Mayor Flores. Present. Mayor Coleman. Here. Thank you. Now can we please stand for the Pledge of Allegiance led by our assistant city manager Richley? I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands. Thank you. Agenda review. Thank you. And do we have any announcements from staff? Good evening, Mayor, Vice Mayor, Councilmember Scott Campbell, your chief of police. This event will include an in-depth discussion about public safety in our city and provide an opportunity for any questions. Hope to see you there. Thank you. That is all. Thank you. And do we have any questions or moving on to our next presentation? Item number two is a presentation on the downtown and old town lighting study. Good evening Mayor, Vice Mayor, City Council members. My name is Jeffrey Chow, you're a senior civil engineer. With the direction of City Council, staff has prepared a uh a lighting study to be the existing lighting conditions around the downtown and Ltown area and options for improvements. I have here tonight with me Daniel Cunningham from SWA who is our lighting expert and designer and he'll be presenting the findings of the study. All right good evening mayor, vice mayor, city council Daniel Cunningham with SWA group worked with city city staff and engineering on this project and here to talk to you tonight about something related to design that not a lot of people think about which is lighting. Do I have oh here's my clicker all right so the particular area of focus on this project in this study area was the old town district which encompasses Grand Avenue, Linden Avenue and the residential districts adjacent to downtown South San Francisco. So specifically within this area the study encompassed Grand Avenue from Airport all the way to Spruce Linden from Baden all the way to Armour and then the residential streets that are north of Grand Avenue as well as the lanes that abut the back side of Grand Avenue. So there's some differences between these types of streets of course Grand Avenue and Linden are commercial streets so the type of lighting that we're looking at on those are different from those types that we would recommend for residential streets. The alleys are the small alleys that again are the back side of the businesses so these typically don't get a lot of use in the evening so the lighting again there is different from what we would recommend for residential. So there's about 60 feet between building faces within those within those streets and then there's the residential lanes and these are the the smaller streets where there's only about 22 feet of right away between those buildings so specifically there's lots of different types of lighting zones but specifically what we're looking to achieve and what the baseline for these types of streets are there's two. So lighting zone one is what you'd like to see ideally in a residential type of atmosphere. Lighting zone two is what we'd like to see ideally in a commercial zone. And the lighting zones continue higher and higher for different types of uses but these are the two specifically for the types of streets and uses that we have within these districts so starting specifically with the historic commercial so this encompasses Grand and Linden. And so this team we chose typical blocks within this entire study district within inside this entire district and we studied the lighting levels that exist today. So literally went out there with light meters and mapped the light of these these streets to give you an accurate idea of what the lighting levels are out there today. So Grand Avenue the historic commercial is in is generally only 35% of the studied area is with only 35% of the areas meeting the levels that we'd expect to see in a commercial district. So there's one thing to consider is you know with lighting there's a lot of nuance but there's additional light that that hits the meter that comes from businesses.
openpublica.com