South San Francisco Planning Commission Regular Meeting - November 19, 2020
STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
South San Francisco Planning Commission Regular Meeting - November 19, 2020
The South San Francisco Planning Commission held a virtual regular meeting on November 19, 2020, at 7:00 PM. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the meeting was conducted via teleconference in accordance with Governor’s Executive Order N-29-20. Commissioners present: Alan Wong (Chair), Michele Evans (Vice Chair), Norm Faria, Alex Tzang, and Sam Shihadeh. Commissioners JulieAnn Murphy and Robert Bernardo were absent. The meeting covered approval of minutes, three public hearings (a commercial conversion, a cannabis cultivation operation, and a large office/R&D project), and administrative business.
Consent Calendar
- Approved the regular meeting minutes from May 21, June 18, July 2, July 16, August 6, September 17, and October 15, 2020, unanimously without discussion.
Public Comments & Testimony
- Item 2 (324 Grand Ave conversion): No public comments were received.
- Item 3 (349 Littlefield Ave cannabis cultivation): Michael Saba (California Compliance Security Services) commented on the security plan. John Drager (Drager's Supermarkets, a nearby property owner) expressed concerns about security, potential looting, the concentration of cannabis businesses in the area, and the 24/7 operation. Police Sergeant Mike Rudis responded that the location would be unmarked, that security plans are comprehensive, and that the operation is not a retail dispensary, reducing risk.
- Item 4 (499 Forbes Blvd project): No public comments were received.
Discussion Items
-
324 Grand Avenue – Commercial Conversion and Parking Reduction: The applicant proposed converting ~9,446 square feet of existing storage into three commercial tenant spaces with exterior modifications, requesting a parking reduction of nine spaces (from 10 required to 1 existing garage space). The project is in the Grand Avenue Core (GAC) district. Staff recommended approval with a condition that future tenants obtain monthly/yearly parking permits or show alternative transportation. Commissioners expressed support but emphasized parking mitigation; a condition was added requiring up to nine parking permits in the nearby Miller Street garage, or proof of alternative commuting. The motion passed 5-0 (Commissioners Murphy and Bernardo absent).
-
349 Littlefield Avenue – Indoor Cannabis Cultivation (Tender Harvest Collective): The applicant sought a five-year conditional use permit for indoor cannabis cultivation and processing in a 9,446 sq ft unit within the Mixed Industrial (MI) zone. The operation would be unmarked, with 24/7 cultivation but weekday office/processing hours (9:00 AM – 5:00 PM, Monday–Friday). No retail sales. The police department approved the security plan. Staff noted compliance with zoning (600-foot buffer from sensitive uses) and a $5,000 annual community benefit for drug/alcohol education. Commissioners had questions about the cultivation process, odor control (two-tiered air filtration), waste disposal, and security. The applicant team (including owner Jason Latano and security consultant Mike Saba) answered. Commissioner Evans asked about monitoring and inspections. The motion passed 4-0 (Commissioners Shihadeh, Murphy, Bernardo absent; Commissioner Shihadeh lost connection and did not vote).
-
499 Forbes Boulevard – Office/R&D Building and Parking Structure: The project proposes a 128,000 sq ft, five-story office/R&D building with a 322-space parking structure on a 2.96-acre site (former Columbus Salami building). The project includes a 28% parking reduction (from 415 required to 322 supplied, ratio 2.5 spaces per 1,000 sq ft), a TDM plan targeting 35% non-single-occupant-vehicle mode share, and public realm improvements (new bike lanes, crosswalks, and a segment of the Rails-to-Trails path). The final Environmental Impact Report identified a significant unavoidable transportation impact due to vehicle miles traveled (VMT), requiring a Statement of Overriding Considerations. Staff and the design team (Woods Baggett Architects, Studio 5 Design Landscape Architects) presented. Commissioners praised the design and public benefits. Vice Chair Evans sought commitment on shuttle service; TDM consultant Elizabeth Hughes confirmed the plan includes participation in existing shuttle programs (e.g., Commute.org or Genentech shuttles). The Commission approved two separate resolutions:
- Resolution certifying the EIR (including the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and Statement of Overriding Considerations) – passed 5-0.
- Resolution approving the design review, use permit, and preliminary TDM plan – passed 5-0.
-
Administrative Business – Extension of Community Advisory Committee (CAC) Terms: Staff requested extending the terms of CAC members for the General Plan update for an additional two years, expiring December 17, 2022. Chair Alan Wong, Commissioner Sam Shihadeh, and Commissioner JulieAnn Murphy (absent but confirmed willingness) would continue. The motion passed 5-0.
Key Outcomes
- Consent Calendar: Unanimously approved minutes.
- Item 2 (324 Grand Ave): Approved with added condition requiring up to nine parking permits or alternative transport assurance; vote 5-0.
- Item 3 (349 Littlefield Ave): Approved indoor cannabis cultivation use permit for five years; vote 4-0-3 (Shihadeh, Murphy, Bernardo absent).
- Item 4 (499 Forbes Blvd): Two resolutions approved — (1) EIR certification and (2) project entitlements (design review, use permit, TDM plan); both votes 5-0.
- Item 5 (CAC extension): Approved 5-0.
- Staff Items: Announced cancellation of the December 3, 2020 meeting. Commissioners wished each other a safe Thanksgiving.
Note: Commissioner Sam Shihadeh temporarily lost connection during Item 3 and was marked absent for that vote; he rejoined for Item 4.
Meeting Transcript
Commissioner Shahade. Yes. Vice Chair Evans. Yes. Chair Wong. Yes. Commissioners Murphy and Bernard are absent this evening. Motion passes. All right. Thank you. Moving on to a public hearing. Can we please have a reading of item number two, please? Yeah. Report regarding consideration of a class one section 15301 categorical exemption under CIQA and a use permit and design request for the conversion of an existing storage space into commercial tenant space and a parking reduction of nine spaces at 324 Grand Avenue in the Grand Avenue Core Zoning District in accordance with the Title 20 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code. All right, thank you. I'll open up the public hearing and ask for a staff report, please. Thank you. Can everyone hear me? Yep. Great. Good evening, Chair, Vice Chair, and Commissioners. My name is Stephanie Skingus, associate planner with the planning division. Tonight before you, we have a request to convert existing storage space within an existing building located at 324 Grand Avenue into commercial tenant space. This request includes a design review permit for exterior modifications as well as a conditional use permit to allow for a parking reduction of nine spaces. Next slide, please. The project site is located at 324 Grand Avenue. The site is a through lot extending from Grand Avenue to fourth lane. There is an existing two-story building on the site with full lot coverage on the first floor. Within the existing building, there is an existing bakery with retail counter, kitchen and storage on the first floor towards Grand Avenue. At the rear, there's additional storage with a one-car garage facing fourth lane. And the second floor consists of a single family residential unit facing Grand Avenue and another vacant storage area facing fourth lane. Next slide, please. The applicant is proposing to convert the existing storage space on the first and second floors of the existing building along the fourth lane facade into three new commercial tenant spaces. And those are the areas highlighted in yellow, as well as the existing one-car garage will remain, it will be slightly decreased in staff in size, but will still accommodate one parking space. Again, the proposal includes exterior modifications along the fourth lane facade. Next slide, please. To note, the existing building was part of a historic resource inventory that was completed by the city in 1986 and identified as a potential historic resource due to its architecture and economic significance. The applicant did provide a resource historic resource evaluation of the project site to analyze the historic significance of the building. It was determined that the existing Grand Avenue facade of the building is of more important potential historic significance. And as you can see in this photo, it's the JJ Bakery. Next slide. Since the proposal is for renovation and exterior modification of the fourth lane facade and not the Grand Avenue facade. Next slide, please. The project site is located within the Grand Avenue Core subdistrict of the downtown station area specific plan. Per the zoning code, a variety of commercial uses are allowed either by right or with the approval of a use permit. The proposed commercial tenant spaces currently do not have a specific use in mind. So a condition of approval has been recommended by staff that requires that any potential commercial uses for the new tenant spaces be evaluated for zoning consistency during the business license process or interior tenant improvement process with the building permit. Next slide. An addition of some additional large windows, a relocation of some doors and openings. The facade presents an improvement over the present conditions and is compatible with the design guidelines for the downtown station area specific plan as well as current development standards.
openpublica.com