OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Planning Commission Regular Meeting - October 19, 2023

Planning CommissionThursday, October 19, 2023
BodySouth San Francisco, California
SessionPlanning Commission
DateThursday, October 19, 2023
StatusFILED
Video Record

STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE

Transcript — Verbatim
0:11

Yeah, you need the album, which is like this data.

0:14

That's cool.

0:16

I would agree.

0:18

No, my movie is on the next one.

0:21

He does.

0:21

He goes, I'll go with you on the guy.

0:27

And people are all in there too.

0:28

Right.

0:30

Everyone was up dancing.

0:48

Let's get tailored to the case.

1:02

Okay.

1:04

We'll have to start pretty soon.

1:05

Yeah.

1:06

It's 701.

1:07

Yep.

1:08

We'll give you a little bit of audio program.

1:57

Do you click on it?

2:24

As soon as I see a thumbs up, I'm I'm gonna start.

2:27

But I know you're trying to make a recording or something.

2:29

You should give it a thumbs up.

2:31

Okay.

2:32

Thumbs up at it.

2:34

Welcome to Thursday uh regular meeting of South San Francisco Planning Commission.

2:40

This meeting is being held in person at the municipal services building, but online participation is available to the public.

2:48

To provide a comment during the meeting, please fill out a speaker card if you are in the meeting chambers.

2:59

Please note that all commission time limits and rules of the quorum will apply to public comments.

3:05

This meeting of the South San Francisco Planning Commission is hereby called to order.

3:15

I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands.

3:39

Chair Zhang.

3:41

Yes.

3:42

Vice Chair Faria?

3:43

Here.

3:44

Commissioner Evans.

3:46

Here.

3:47

Commissioner Baker.

3:48

Here.

3:50

Commissioner Funes Osturk.

3:52

Here.

3:52

Commissioner Shahade?

3:54

Here.

3:54

And Commissioner Pamaku is absent.

3:57

Thank you.

3:59

Are there any changes to the agenda?

4:02

No changes to the agenda.

4:04

Thank you.

4:05

Um are there any items or announcements from staff?

4:10

And I do have one announcement, but no items from staff, thank you.

4:13

Okay.

4:14

So I do want to make this announcement first and I will make it again at the very very end.

4:18

So next meeting, November 2nd, we will be no longer meeting at this municipal uh uh building, but we'll be meeting across the street at the new LPR building.

4:31

So it will still be seven o'clock Thursday, uh November 2nd.

4:35

Uh and if you want the address, 91 campus drive.

4:40

Is that nine oh one Civic Center Drive?

4:43

Oh jeez.

4:44

Sorry.

4:44

Do it one more time, officially.

4:46

Nine oh one civic campus way.

4:50

Uh drive across uh the street.

4:54

Yeah.

4:54

So if you accidentally come to this building, just park it and walk across the street.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Land Use Planning█████████████████████████████████████████████50%
Procedural█████████████14%
Transportation Safety█████████10%
Parks and Recreation█████5%
Affordable Housing███3%
Public Engagement███3%
Environmental Protection███3%
Public Works Recognition███3%
Parking Management██2%
Summary of Proceedings

Planning Commission Regular Meeting – October 19, 2023

The South San Francisco Planning Commission held a hybrid regular meeting on Thursday, October 19, 2023, at 7:00 PM in the Municipal Services Building Council Chambers. The meeting was called to order at 7:01 PM. Commissioners present: Alex Tzang (Chair), Norman Faria (Vice Chair), Michele Evans, Sam Shihadeh, Sarah Funes, John Baker. Commissioner Aysha Pamukcu was absent. The meeting included a consent calendar, two public hearings, and administrative business.

Consent Calendar

  • The Commission unanimously approved the draft minutes from the September 21, 2023 Planning Commission meeting (motion passed 6-0).

Public Comments & Testimony

  • No public comments were made on any agenda item during the meeting. The City limited public comment to in-person attendance only.

Discussion Items

Item 2 – 573 Forbes Boulevard (8-Story Office/R&D Building)

  • Staff Report (Stephanie Skangos, Associate Planner): Proposed demolition of an existing warehouse and construction of an 8-story office/R&D building (137 ft, rooftop elements to 171 ft) with a detached 8-story parking garage (85 ft, 470 stalls) on a 2.83-acre parcel at 573 Forbes Boulevard in the BTP-H Zoning District. The project seeks a 2.0 FAR, a Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Plan achieving 40 points, and a CEQA determination that the project is within the scope of the 2040 General Plan EIR. The parking garage is designed with solar panels on the top level. The site includes a rails-to-trails connection.
  • Applicant Presentation (Mike Sanford, Vigilant Holdings/Smart Labs; Niall Malcolmsen, DGA Architects; Gary Levis, DGA; Rich Sharp, Studio 5 Design): The project accommodates life science tenants, features balconies, a wind-protected courtyard, and ground-level amenity space. The parking garage is nestled into a 40-ft hill to minimize visibility. The design emphasizes a classic base-middle-top articulation, with curtain wall and metal panels. Landscape includes a “front porch,” central plaza, and connection to the rails-to-trails.
  • Commission Questions: Addressed bike parking (24 short-term + 24 long-term), retractable bollards (flush for ADA/fire), fire access (26-ft drive aisle), excavation volume (off-haul planned), flood mitigation (site 9 ft above mean high tide), left-turn lane traffic study (condition of approval), and TDM monitoring (annual surveys).
  • Commissioner Comments: Commissioner Shihadeh praised the design and circulation. Commissioner Evans liked the balcony features and the use of the odd-shaped site. Commissioner Baker expressed concern about four stories visible to the north and recommended outreach to the USDA neighbor; also noted the east side air pollution burden (95th percentile statewide) and supported less parking. No public testimony was heard.
  • Votes: Two resolutions were adopted unanimously (6-0):
    • Resolution 2a: CEQA determination (project consistent with 2040 GP EIR).
    • Resolution 2b: Approval of Design Review and TDM Plan.

Item 3 – Vantage Healthpeak Life Sciences Campus (420-490 Forbes Boulevard)

  • Staff Report (Christy Usher, Senior Planner): The applicant seeks entitlements for a master plan and precise plan to redevelop an existing 19-acre commercial site into a 1.65 million square foot life science research campus (six buildings, three parking garages) in the BTP-H Zoning District. The project includes previously approved Buildings A and B (under construction) and an amenity building. Phase two (precise plan) includes two new lab buildings and two parking structures. A conditional use permit is requested to exceed the maximum allowable parking (requesting 3,701 spaces vs. code maximum of 2,422 – a 1,279-space increase). Public benefits include dedication of a one-acre parcel for a potential future fire station, an estimated $25 million in community benefits, and circulation improvements. The project is subject to a TDM plan requiring a 50% reduction in single-occupancy vehicle trips and a trip cap.
  • Applicant Presentation (Scott Bowen, Healthpeak; Philip Rom, Flad Architects; David Fletcher, Fletcher Studio Landscape Architecture): Healthpeak has owned and developed in South San Francisco for 30 years. The campus design creates a pedestrian-friendly street edge along Forbes Boulevard, with buildings rising from east to west (Building C at 12 stories). The amenity building (open to public) includes food and beverage, conference space, and an amphitheater. Landscape features a promenade, sunken garden, windscreens, and connections to the rails-to-trails. The parking structures are designed with facades that mimic the buildings to reduce visual impact.
  • Commission Questions: Addressed parking justification (market demand, speculative building, TDM compliance), design articulation of buildings D, E, F (pedestrian-scaled base, upper terraces), parking structure massing (staggered, different facade treatments), and the interim use of the fire station parcel (construction staging, not a functioning parking lot).
  • Commissioner Comments:
    • Commissioner Funes supported the project but noted the extra parking as a concern and requested EV parking proportionality.
    • Commissioner Evans praised the shuttle-to-ferry concept and the overall design.
    • Commissioner Shihadeh commended the applicant and supported the project.
    • Commissioner Baker strongly opposed the parking exception, citing environmental concerns (east side air pollution, emissions from extra spaces) and stated it would set a bad precedent.
    • Commissioner Zhang noted the parking exception is a negotiation for City Council and supported the project with a recommendation for EV parking proportionality.
  • Votes: Two resolutions were adopted 4-2 (Commissioners Funes and Baker dissenting):
    • Resolution 3a: CEQA determination (project within scope of 2040 GP EIR).
    • Resolution 3b: Recommendation to City Council to approve the planning entitlements (Master Plan, Precise Plan, Design Review, Use Permit, Development Agreement, TDM Plan, Vesting Tentative Map).

Key Outcomes

  • Consent Calendar: Approved unanimously.
  • 573 Forbes Boulevard: Both resolutions approved 6-0; project moves forward with Design Review and TDM Plan.
  • Vantage Healthpeak Campus: Both resolutions approved 4-2; recommendation will go to City Council. The Council will consider the conditional use permit for extra parking and the Development Agreement, including the fire station land dedication.
  • Administrative Business: The Commission announced that future meetings will be held at 901 Civic Campus Drive (the new LPR building) starting November 2, 2023.

Meeting Transcript

Yeah, you need the album, which is like this data. That's cool. I would agree. No, my movie is on the next one. He does. He goes, I'll go with you on the guy. And people are all in there too. Right. Everyone was up dancing. Let's get tailored to the case. Okay. We'll have to start pretty soon. Yeah. It's 701. Yep. We'll give you a little bit of audio program. Do you click on it? As soon as I see a thumbs up, I'm I'm gonna start. But I know you're trying to make a recording or something. You should give it a thumbs up. Okay. Thumbs up at it. Welcome to Thursday uh regular meeting of South San Francisco Planning Commission. This meeting is being held in person at the municipal services building, but online participation is available to the public. To provide a comment during the meeting, please fill out a speaker card if you are in the meeting chambers. Please note that all commission time limits and rules of the quorum will apply to public comments. This meeting of the South San Francisco Planning Commission is hereby called to order. I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands. Chair Zhang. Yes. Vice Chair Faria? Here. Commissioner Evans. Here. Commissioner Baker. Here. Commissioner Funes Osturk. Here. Commissioner Shahade? Here. And Commissioner Pamaku is absent. Thank you. Are there any changes to the agenda? No changes to the agenda. Thank you. Um are there any items or announcements from staff? And I do have one announcement, but no items from staff, thank you. Okay. So I do want to make this announcement first and I will make it again at the very very end. So next meeting, November 2nd, we will be no longer meeting at this municipal uh uh building, but we'll be meeting across the street at the new LPR building.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com