The Spokane Valley City Council held a regular meeting on Tuesday, July 21, 2026, at 6:00 p.m. at City Hall. The council considered four action items, received two administrative reports, and heard public comments on a range of topics including automated license plate readers, voter integrity, traffic safety, and transportation planning. All action items were approved unanimously.
Mayor Patton, it's six o'clock when you're ready. Thank you very much. So the uh BoCan Valley City Council regular meeting, formal format B for Tuesday, July 21st, 2026, is now called to order. Uh we do not have an invocation tonight, so if you'd like to stand and we can say the pledge. I pledge allegiance to the flag. And we call it just saying the visible liberty trust. If the clerk would call them the roll, please. Certainly. Mayor Padden here. Deputy Mayor Hattenberg? Here. Councilmember Haley? Here. Councilmember Yeager? Here. Councilmember Wick? Here. And I have an absent uh Councilmember Kelly and Councilmember Merkel. Okay. Second. All those in favor? Aye. Opposed, they are excused. Thank you. We have the approval of an amended agenda. Move to approve of the amended agenda. Second. All those in favor? Aye. Aye. Opposed? It is approved. There are no special guests or presentations. No proclamations. So that brings us to the general public comment opportunity. This is an opportunity for the public to speak on any subject except agenda action items as public comments will be taken on those items where indicated. Please keep comments to matters within the jurisdiction of the city government. This is not an opportunity for questions or discussion. Diverse points of view are welcome, but please keep remarks civil. Remarks will be limited to three minutes per person. If a person engages in disruptive behavior or makes individual personal attacks regarding matters unrelated to city business, then the council andor mayor may end that person's public comment time before the three minute mark. Is there anyone on Zoom? There is not this evening. First, safety. ALPR cameras became popular with the promise of catching more criminals. However, Cynthia Lum in the Journal of Experimental Criminology found that all ALPRs, quote, do not generate either a general or offense-specific deterrent effect. Jonathan Hofer from the Independent found that, quote, there's not even a moderate degree of correlation between ALPRs and stolen vehicle recoveries. Flock's promise of safety and protection is unobstance unsubstantiated, and their cameras have no effect on this valley's safety. Second, security. Flock claims that their cameras will only be used by the right people for the right things.