OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Stanford Planning Board Meeting Summary - November 19, 2025

Planning BoardWednesday, November 19, 2025
BodyStamford, Connecticut
SessionPlanning Board
DateWednesday, November 19, 2025
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 3:03:05

Transcript — Verbatim
0:02

I have you know we can see Chet, thank you.

0:06

Okay, that is so weird.

0:07

That is so weird.

0:09

So I started the meeting, and then that allowed you to see Chet and Bill, even though Robbie, you're a presenter, and here's Bill is calling me.

0:18

Hold on.

0:24

Maybe Ravi, I was um in the lobby with everyone else.

0:30

Yeah.

1:40

Okay.

1:41

So Bill is leaving and rejoining.

1:46

Um and Jennifer will be joining shortly.

1:53

So uh for folks who are on, uh just give us a couple minutes for our chair to to log in.

2:26

Okay.

2:28

So now we have uh Jennifer has joined.

2:34

There it looks like you're getting your video on.

2:46

Looks like she may be having some video difficulties.

2:55

Hi, can you hear me?

2:57

Hi, yes, we can hear you, but it looks like the video is not working.

3:02

Uh I can't hear you, but I think it's because I turned off a setting.

3:13

All right.

3:14

That should work now, I think.

3:16

Can you hear me?

3:17

Yes, yes, I can.

3:19

Okay, cool.

3:19

Great.

3:20

Um, so we do have a quote for um.

3:24

Um Ravi Chet.

3:26

Well, now that you're on, Ravi and Chet are on and we have a quorum.

3:30

Bill um is having difficulties joining, but he can't unmute himself or get his uh camera on.

3:37

So I will work on that in the background if you want to start the meeting.

3:42

Yes.

3:43

Okay.

3:44

Yep.

3:45

Go ahead and get started.

3:47

All right.

3:47

Um evening.

3:48

This is the November 18th meeting of the Stanford Planning Board, a regular meeting.

3:55

Um our first item on the agenda is uh the planning board minutes, uh meeting minutes from November 5th, which was a capital budget uh meeting, a quite long capital budget meeting.

4:10

Um are there any um questions or amendments uh from the members about the minutes.

4:19

Okay.

4:20

Um seeing hearing none.

4:22

Uh do I have a motion for the minutes.

4:27

Hey, Jen, I cannot cannot vote on this because I left in the middle.

4:31

So oh, right.

4:34

Uh we might need to table this then because we don't have quorum to vote on the minutes.

4:42

Well, I think uh Bill was not on the meeting.

4:47

Right.

4:47

Well, I think we need Yeah Okay.

4:50

Right.

4:51

It was only you, Jen and me.

4:53

Then I mean Robbie, you were there, but you just left early.

4:57

Yeah, right.

5:00

Um, I mean, I guess that's a procedural question for Lindsay.

5:04

Because I mean, I think I I will say that the um at the point that you had hopped off.

5:11

Um, the minutes really just continue to describe the departments that presented.

5:16

And other than that, there's really no substantive uh items within the minutes um from the period of 9 30 to 11 um because there's not detail um uh so I I think unless I hear otherwise from Lindsay, I think it should be fine for you to vote on the minutes.

5:36

I have no problem with that.

5:38

Okay.

5:38

All right, that's thank you for having us.

5:40

Then I'll move uh approval of the minutes.

5:43

I think uh move approval from chat, second from Robbie.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Planning and Zoning█████████████████████████████████████████████52%
Procedural█████████10%
Religious Institutions█████████10%
Daycare██████7%
Urban Design████5%
Community Engagement███3%
Parking███3%
Environmental Protection███3%
Transportation Safety██2%
Summary of Proceedings

Planning Board Meeting - November 19, 2025

The Stanford Planning Board convened on November 19, 2025, to review administrative updates, a two-lot subdivision application, and three zoning board referrals. The Board successfully voted to approve the minutes from the November 5th meeting and adopted the 2026 meeting schedule with an amendment to avoid conflicts with school holidays. The meeting featured significant deliberation on a zoning map change for 27 High Ridge Road, resulting in a recommendation against approval due to concerns regarding tree removal and parking demand, while other referrals including a house of worship and a daycare facility received favorable recommendations or unanimous approval.

Consent Calendar

  • Minutes Approval: The Board unanimously approved the minutes from the November 5th, 2025, capital budget meeting. Although Board Member Robbie had departed early, the Chair and staff confirmed that the missing portion of the minutes contained only administrative listings of department presentations, satisfying the quorum requirement for approval.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Neighbor Opposition (27 High Ridge Road): Members of the public, represented by neighbors and land use attorney Mario Mussilli, submitted a high volume of letters expressing strong opposition to the commercial rezoning proposal. They argued that the grading and tree removal required for the proposed parking lot would result in significant environmental and visual impacts, and they questioned the necessity of the additional parking spaces.
  • Applicant Response: The applicant, representing the property owners (including the Smith family), acknowledged the neighbors' concerns and the volume of opposition. They emphasized their commitment to preserving the community and presented a revised landscape plan with invasive tree removal and native species planting, though they noted that a final agreement on all details (such as fence types and tree screening) had not yet been reached with all neighbors.

Discussion Items

  • Subdivision (4059, 188 Emory Drive): Applicant Len DeAndrea presented a proposal to subdivide a single family home lot into two parcels. Board members questioned specific setback distances and the delineation of lot lines relative to the wetland. The applicant confirmed the project was conceptual, designed to meet zoning requirements, and included a conservation easement. Board members expressed no objection, with the applicant noting that neighbors had been consulted and agreed to screening and fencing mitigations.
  • Zoning Map Change (27 High Ridge Road): This item was extensively debated regarding the conflict between the proposed Commercial Neighborhood (CN) zoning and the new Mixed-Use Urban (MU3) comprehensive plan category.
    • Applicant Position: The applicant argued the site is inconsistent with its current R20 residential designation and requires rezoning to accommodate needed parking for the adjacent shopping center. They highlighted that over half the existing trees are invasive and that the site lacks a walkable streetscape under current zoning.
    • Opposition Position: Board Members Bill, Jennifer, and Ravi expressed strong opposition. They argued that the proposal would destroy a steep, visible treed ridge, that the need for additional parking had not been sufficiently demonstrated, and that the proposal (surface parking lot) conflicts with the MU3 plan's goals of walkability, active streetscapes, and reduced vehicle reliance.
    • Chair/Staff Perspective: Chair Lindsay noted the zoning code and comprehensive plan are currently misaligned. She suggested that shared parking agreements and improved circulation between adjacent parcels might better solve the parking issue without requiring a zone change or significant deforestation, though members countered that such a solution goes beyond a simple shared parking agreement.
  • Special Permit (80 Lockwood Avenue): Applicant Peter Sakora proposed converting a former firehouse into a mosque.
    • Member Concerns: Board Member Ravi raised concerns about the lack of sufficient parking (26 spaces for 104 capacity) in a neighborhood with street-side parking saturation and potential noise pollution.
    • Applicant & Staff Response: The applicant stated the space was designed based on the available parking and that the fire marshal would enforce a 7 sq. ft. per person code. They argued the building's heavy masonry construction ensures noise levels comparable to a previous club use with no alcohol or parties. Staff clarified that religious institutions have a specific parking ratio requirement (one space per four seats) which the proposal meets.
  • Zoning Text Amendments (225-4-1 & 225-4-2): Staff presented two amendments: one to clean up duplicative language and update notice requirements (e.g., for online meetings), and another to update all references to replace "Master Plan" with "Comprehensive Plan" and update land use categories. Board members confirmed that fire code requirements supersede zoning regarding operable windows and that the updates align with the city's current goals.
  • Zoning Map Change (115 Summer Street): Applicant Ray Mazio requested a change from C1 (Intermediate Commercial) to CG (General Commercial) to facilitate converting an office building's lower levels to a child daycare center. Board members raised concerns about traffic congestion from staggered drop-offs and pickups, but the applicant explained that the facility would utilize staggered hours and off-site staff parking. Staff clarified that the planning board's purview is on the alignment of the zone change with the comprehensive plan, not the specific site plan or traffic mitigation, which will be reviewed by the Zoning Board.

Key Outcomes

  • Subdivision Approval: Motion to approve the subdivision for 188 Emory Drive passed unanimously (3-0-0).
  • Zoning Map Change (27 High Ridge Road) - Denial: Motion to recommend that the Zoning Board NOT approve the rezoning passed by a vote of 3-1 (Jen abstained or vote was not cast; transcript indicates 3 for denial, 1 against).
    • Rationale: The Board recommended denial because the project requires significant grading and tree removal without a demonstrated immediate need for the additional parking, and the proposed surface parking lot is incompatible with the MU3 comprehensive plan category's goals for walkability and active streetscapes.
  • Special Permit (80 Lockwood Avenue) - Approval: Motion to recommend approval passed by a vote of 3-1 (Ravi abstained).
  • Zoning Text Amendment 225-4-1: Motion to approve passed unanimously (4-0-0).
  • Zoning Text Amendment 225-4-2: Motion to approve passed unanimously (4-0-0).
  • Zoning Map Change (115 Summer Street): Motion to approve passed unanimously (4-0-0).
    • Note: The Board approved the zone change based on its alignment with the Mixed-Use Urban plan, while reminding the applicant and future reviewers to address traffic and parking concerns in the subsequent site plan phase.

Meeting Transcript

I have you know we can see Chet, thank you. Okay, that is so weird. That is so weird. So I started the meeting, and then that allowed you to see Chet and Bill, even though Robbie, you're a presenter, and here's Bill is calling me. Hold on. Maybe Ravi, I was um in the lobby with everyone else. Yeah. Okay. So Bill is leaving and rejoining. Um and Jennifer will be joining shortly. So uh for folks who are on, uh just give us a couple minutes for our chair to to log in. Okay. So now we have uh Jennifer has joined. There it looks like you're getting your video on. Looks like she may be having some video difficulties. Hi, can you hear me? Hi, yes, we can hear you, but it looks like the video is not working. Uh I can't hear you, but I think it's because I turned off a setting. All right. That should work now, I think. Can you hear me? Yes, yes, I can. Okay, cool. Great. Um, so we do have a quote for um. Um Ravi Chet. Well, now that you're on, Ravi and Chet are on and we have a quorum. Bill um is having difficulties joining, but he can't unmute himself or get his uh camera on. So I will work on that in the background if you want to start the meeting. Yes. Okay. Yep. Go ahead and get started. All right. Um evening. This is the November 18th meeting of the Stanford Planning Board, a regular meeting. Um our first item on the agenda is uh the planning board minutes, uh meeting minutes from November 5th, which was a capital budget uh meeting, a quite long capital budget meeting. Um are there any um questions or amendments uh from the members about the minutes. Okay. Um seeing hearing none. Uh do I have a motion for the minutes. Hey, Jen, I cannot cannot vote on this because I left in the middle. So oh, right. Uh we might need to table this then because we don't have quorum to vote on the minutes. Well, I think uh Bill was not on the meeting. Right. Well, I think we need Yeah Okay. Right. It was only you, Jen and me. Then I mean Robbie, you were there, but you just left early.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com