OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Stamford, Connecticut/Zoning Board
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Stamford Zoning Board Meeting: Public Hearings and Approvals – September 15, 2026

Zoning Board — Tuesday, September 15, 2026
BodyStamford, Connecticut
SessionZoning Board
DateTuesday, September 15, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 2:08:24

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it
0:00

Is Elena?

0:01

It's a little hard to read.

0:03

That's I'm assuming that's I95 there.

0:06

Yes, it's I95.

0:08

It's very hard to read.

0:10

I I apologize, but when you go into PowerPoint, that's how it looks.

0:15

It's just sure.

0:18

So this is I-95, this is Hamilton Avenue, and this is our lane.

0:26

And the location is really very nice because you could walk to the beaches, and the end of the barrel lane is kind of very private.

0:38

Here is some of the neighborhood shots.

0:42

As you see from uh across the street, there are going to be condominiums along the street.

0:51

There are some private homes.

0:53

There are two family homes, there is a um uh big nursing home, uh kind of facing the neighborhood.

1:04

Uh so uh, but it's it's separated by a lot of greenery, so really nobody can see it.

1:12

Uh the property is very interesting because originally the barrel lane was uh a part of uh large uh property, and it had a mansion of one of the uh most prominent families in Stanford that was uh Eve's web property.

1:40

Uh it was built approximately in the beginning of 1900.

1:46

Um eventually the property was subdivided, the main mansion that you see here was lost, and the only part of the property that was remaining was uh cottage that was occupied by a gardener, but also served kind of like a gatehouse into the whole property because it was located near the entry into the property.

2:18

So the structure was very simple, but even though it was very simple, it had a very ornate front door.

2:28

There were, I'm sure there were other details that are lost now because the house is covered with vinyl siding, it has vinyl windows, it has vinyl suffits.

2:41

Uh, there is very little detail left, but um, as I will show you, we are trying to do something a little nicer with it.

2:52

Um, if you're looking at the way it looks right now, you will see that there are two windows in the front of the kind of that long side wall.

3:05

Um and we believe that location of these two windows is the original location.

3:13

Then there are two windows and a door in the front, which we also believe are original.

3:20

We believe that starting from somewhere here, the rest is addition, the windows that are located so close together in the rear portion of that you know, long wall, uh, do not look original.

3:37

This is not how windows would be located in the beginning of 20th century.

3:43

Uh, they would be located much further apart.

3:46

So basically, where you see this line, this is where we are cutting off the edition, and we are taking down the rest of the like the later, even later edition on the back, and um and the shed.

4:04

Um so the property is going to have a bit of a space in a bear.

4:10

Now, if we were doing development as of right, um, this would be the wall that's facing uh the uh the barrel lane, and this would be the development.

4:24

It might actually be longer, but something of that nature.

4:28

Uh if my uh client is not allowed to add this 0.45 units to the property, his financing will be very, very difficult, and therefore the materials used in the building would be much less um of much of a lesser quality um than what we are proposing.

4:54

Now, if you look at this blank wall and you look at the condominium across the street, it's basically what you see there.

5:02

Uh, we do not want to repeat that.

5:05

We want to be better.

5:07

So this is what we were going to propose that we were proposing to you a year ago.

5:17

And as you see, historic house here was replaced with uh uh with critical reconstruction, and we were doing quite a big larger, taller uh addition in the back with much more complex um uh with much more complex roof lines.

5:40

Uh we were going to have dormers, and dormers were providing uh another room, a family room for each of the of the unit uh of the units.

5:53

Now what we are doing is historical house.

5:58

Uh it's going to be preserved by my client.

6:03

The roof on it is not as tall as what we were going to do here.

6:09

We were going to actually lift it because the house, the way it is right now, has a ceiling on the first floor at seven feet.

6:18

Of course, we cannot do a nice uh renovation and leave a seven uh seven foot tall uh ceiling.

6:28

So what we are proposing to do now is to remove that floor and open the house completely.

6:37

In the original scheme, we had a bedroom on top of it.

6:41

Now this window is just another light into one big open space.

6:47

We will reinforce it by having some ties and roof, but it will be one tall big living room.

6:55

Therefore, we lost one of the bedrooms that was here, and um this is uh going to be kind of our uh compromise to to make the house look um to to preserve the existing house the way it is.

7:14

Now, if you look here, we are adding uh all um uh to all the windows, we are adding a detail with uh uh with a panel and um crown molding uh above each window.

7:32

The windows are going to be a historic uh look windows.

7:36

We do not have original windows, but it will be six over one, and we will be consistent in doing the same thing here.

7:46

We will be using much more expensive materials, including hardy plank siding, which um in many cases was approved for historic preservation because it it has a look of real um uh historic looking uh wood siding.

8:06

It has the same proportions and the shadow line, uh but it lasts considerably longer, and we will use architectural shingles on all the roofs, uh we will provide a fence separating us from the other property and the trees.

8:25

We will provide more trees than is required.

8:28

Um we will uh landscape the entire property, we will have private gardens for each of the um of the units, and you see all this green here.

8:42

This is what's between our property and the nursing home.

8:47

There is really nobody looking at the other side of our house.

8:51

This is the view from the street, and you could see some of the uh private patios and gardens, and again, this is all the greenery between us and the nursing home.

9:08

Do you have a view from the back of the back?

9:11

Yes, I will show it.

9:13

Oh yes, we'll get to it.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Zoning█████████████████████████████████████████████48%
Historic Preservation█████████████████████████27%
Planning and Zoning████████9%
Public Engagement████4%
Fencing███3%
Procedural███3%
Parking██2%
Harbor Management██2%
Stormwater Management█1%
Summary of Proceedings

Stamford Zoning Board Meeting: Public Hearings and Approvals – September 15, 2026

The Stamford Zoning Board held a public hearing on three applications: a historic density bonus for a Barrel Lane property, a rezoning of Pacific Street to the VC2 district, and a related text change. The board also approved several coastal site plan applications and discussed administrative items. The meeting began on September 14, 2026, and continued into September 15.

Public Hearing – Application 226-11: Historic Density Bonus for 23 Barrel Lane

  • Applicant's Presentation: James Lunny and Elena Kalman proposed to preserve a historic cottage (the only remaining structure from the Eva Weber Hoyt estate) by retaining at least 50% of the original structure, removing later additions, and adding two new units. They requested a 0.45 density bonus (one additional unit beyond the 2.55 allowed as of right) to make the project financially viable. They argued the bonus would allow higher-quality materials (HardiePlank siding, architectural shingles, historic-style windows) and preserve the building.
  • Board Questions: Member Keith asked if the house would be demolished if the bonus were denied. Lunny replied it would likely be knocked down. Member Roseanne inquired about side-yard setbacks and a fence; the applicant clarified that a projection on the west side would be removed, resulting in a 10-foot setback. Member Bill expressed doubt about historic significance but said he could live with the plan.
  • Public Testimony: Sue Halburn read a letter from June Norinski (president of the Historic Neighborhood Program) supporting the project for preserving a piece of Stamford history. Karen Thompson (38 De Barrel Lane, across the street) voiced opposition due to parking congestion and traffic, noting her association had submitted a statement of opposition. No other speakers were heard.
  • Applicant's Response: Lunny argued that the proposed project includes on-site parking (2 garages + 3 surface spaces) and that under new state law, as-of-right 2-unit development would not require parking, making this a better project. He emphasized the rental units (two 4-bedroom, one 2-bedroom) would provide needed larger family rentals.
  • Outcome: The public hearing was closed. The board will vote on the application at a future meeting.

Public Hearing – Applications 226-12 and 226-13: Pacific Street Rezoning to VC2 and Commercial Street Designation

  • Presentation by Ralph Blessing (Land Use Bureau Chief): The rezoning would change sections of Pacific Street from RMF (multi-family) and CB (community business) to VC2 (village commercial). The goals were to clean up non-conforming uses, create a “Main Street” for the South End, and implement the South End Neighborhood Study. The accompanying text change (226-13) would designate Pacific Street between Atlantic and Dock Streets as a commercial street, allowing ground-floor retail. Blessing showed a soft-site analysis predicting approximately 230 additional units over time, with more design controls, wider sidewalks (15 ft along commercial streets), and parking requirements for developments over 16 units (under new state law). The planning board had unanimously recommended approval, but suggested modifying the boundary to keep historic residential structures on Pacific and Henry Streets in the RMF zone.
  • Board Questions: Bill asked about density – Blessing described the VC2 FARs (1.75 commercial, 1.5 residential) as moderate. Roseanne asked about the planning board’s recommendation; Blessing explained that the historic buildings are already overbuilt and unlikely to be redeveloped, so the rezoning does not materially increase risk. Keith asked if any developer was lined up; Blessing noted only a previously approved historic preservation project at 500 Pacific Street.
  • Public Testimony: Sue Halpern (Elmcroft Road, 40-year South End resident) expressed concern about loss of historic properties (over half of the original 449 historic properties in the district are gone), adverse impacts on residential properties abutting VC2 without side setbacks, and parking and infrastructure strain, citing recent flooding. Gary Michael (Harbor Point) echoed parking concerns, noting no spare spaces in area garages and that free on-street parking exacerbates the problem. Dave Adams (Glenbrook Road) asked for clarification on parking requirements and the vision; he described the area as a walking community and worried about over-concentrating commercial activity. Blessing responded that the VC2 zone is a mixed-use district with parking accommodated within buildings, and that parking management is a separate issue. He also noted that the zone encourages historic preservation through a density bonus.
  • Outcome: The public hearings were closed. The board will vote on both applications at a future meeting.

Consent Calendar

  • None (all items were discussed individually).

Regular Business – Minutes and Coastal Site Plan Approvals

  • Minutes: The board approved minutes from July 2, 2026, and July 6, 2026, without changes (motions carried unanimously).
  • CSPR 1235 – 2331 Door Street (William Guardiano): Coastal site plan approval for demolition of a two-family dwelling and construction of five detached dwellings with garages, patios, etc. The property is within the Coastal Area Management (CAM) boundary. Staff noted the project is as-of-right but required CAM review. Conditions include a fee-in-lieu for sidewalks (no sidewalk on that street), street trees, and standard EPB and engineering conditions. Approved unanimously.
  • CSPR 1236 – 203 Ocean Drive West (Landauer): Coastal site plan approval for a new dock at a residence. Approved with conditions from DEP, EPB, and Harbor Management Commission. Unanimous.
  • CSPR 1237 – 2236 Chipan Avenue (Shatman): Coastal site plan approval for a garage addition and driveway modifications. The project reduces impervious surfaces. Approved with conditions. Unanimous.

Administrative Review

  • Consolidation of PNL escrow agreements was deferred as still under discussion.
  • Approval of the use of $125,000 in funds from the development at 860 Canal Street for a feasibility study of the Casky Usville Park boat ramp (Phase 2), proposed by the Harbor Management Commission, with half from the state and half from harbor management. Discussion was noted but no action taken.

Key Outcomes

  • Public hearings for applications 226-11, 226-12, and 226-13 were closed; board votes will occur at a subsequent meeting.
  • Coastal site plan approvals CSPR 1235, CSPR 1236, and CSPR 1237 were all approved unanimously with conditions.
  • Minutes from July 2 and July 6 were approved.

Meeting Transcript

Is Elena? It's a little hard to read. That's I'm assuming that's I95 there. Yes, it's I95. It's very hard to read. I I apologize, but when you go into PowerPoint, that's how it looks. It's just sure. So this is I-95, this is Hamilton Avenue, and this is our lane. And the location is really very nice because you could walk to the beaches, and the end of the barrel lane is kind of very private. Here is some of the neighborhood shots. As you see from uh across the street, there are going to be condominiums along the street. There are some private homes. There are two family homes, there is a um uh big nursing home, uh kind of facing the neighborhood. Uh so uh, but it's it's separated by a lot of greenery, so really nobody can see it. Uh the property is very interesting because originally the barrel lane was uh a part of uh large uh property, and it had a mansion of one of the uh most prominent families in Stanford that was uh Eve's web property. Uh it was built approximately in the beginning of 1900. Um eventually the property was subdivided, the main mansion that you see here was lost, and the only part of the property that was remaining was uh cottage that was occupied by a gardener, but also served kind of like a gatehouse into the whole property because it was located near the entry into the property. So the structure was very simple, but even though it was very simple, it had a very ornate front door. There were, I'm sure there were other details that are lost now because the house is covered with vinyl siding, it has vinyl windows, it has vinyl suffits. Uh, there is very little detail left, but um, as I will show you, we are trying to do something a little nicer with it. Um, if you're looking at the way it looks right now, you will see that there are two windows in the front of the kind of that long side wall. Um and we believe that location of these two windows is the original location. Then there are two windows and a door in the front, which we also believe are original. We believe that starting from somewhere here, the rest is addition, the windows that are located so close together in the rear portion of that you know, long wall, uh, do not look original. This is not how windows would be located in the beginning of 20th century. Uh, they would be located much further apart. So basically, where you see this line, this is where we are cutting off the edition, and we are taking down the rest of the like the later, even later edition on the back, and um and the shed. Um so the property is going to have a bit of a space in a bear. Now, if we were doing development as of right, um, this would be the wall that's facing uh the uh the barrel lane, and this would be the development. It might actually be longer, but something of that nature. Uh if my uh client is not allowed to add this 0.45 units to the property, his financing will be very, very difficult, and therefore the materials used in the building would be much less um of much of a lesser quality um than what we are proposing. Now, if you look at this blank wall and you look at the condominium across the street, it's basically what you see there. Uh, we do not want to repeat that. We want to be better. So this is what we were going to propose that we were proposing to you a year ago. And as you see, historic house here was replaced with uh uh with critical reconstruction, and we were doing quite a big larger, taller uh addition in the back with much more complex um uh with much more complex roof lines. Uh we were going to have dormers, and dormers were providing uh another room, a family room for each of the of the unit uh of the units. Now what we are doing is historical house. Uh it's going to be preserved by my client. The roof on it is not as tall as what we were going to do here. We were going to actually lift it because the house, the way it is right now, has a ceiling on the first floor at seven feet. Of course, we cannot do a nice uh renovation and leave a seven uh seven foot tall uh ceiling. So what we are proposing to do now is to remove that floor and open the house completely. In the original scheme, we had a bedroom on top of it. Now this window is just another light into one big open space. We will reinforce it by having some ties and roof, but it will be one tall big living room. Therefore, we lost one of the bedrooms that was here, and um this is uh going to be kind of our uh compromise to to make the house look um to to preserve the existing house the way it is. Now, if you look here, we are adding uh all um uh to all the windows, we are adding a detail with uh uh with a panel and um crown molding uh above each window. The windows are going to be a historic uh look windows. We do not have original windows, but it will be six over one, and we will be consistent in doing the same thing here.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com