The St. Paul Planning Commission convened on July 7, 2023, at 14:30 UTC. The main agenda included a public hearing on proposed electric vehicle (EV) charging zoning code amendments, followed by reports from the Zoning Committee and the Comprehensive and Neighborhood Planning Committee. The commission also welcomed two new staff members and addressed administrative items.
I think we could start the meeting. Okay. Good morning. Three tabs. I heard our four taps. Good morning. Greetings. We're here today for our planning commission. Meeting on July 7th. Okay. Approval or the minutes. Yeah. Okay. Now we definitely have a quorum. Okay, next on our agenda. Okay, we're uh we're gonna have an approval of the minutes from June 9th and June 23rd. Hopefully everybody had a chance to read them. Now I will ask for a motion. Okay, is there second? Second. Thank you, Commissioner Riley. Minutes have been uh moved and seconded. Is there any um questions? Corrections. Did I call for the vote? All in favor, any nays any abstentions? See none uh minutes for from June 9th and June 23rd. We're here today too um for a public hearing on the electric vehicle charging zone zoning study, but before we take public hearing, there is a presentation by our PED staff Bill who's getting ready and set up set up. Thank you, Chair Commissioners. Um since we don't have a large crowd, I will give the very brief update rather than reviewing what uh we already talked about last time. So um we do have draft code amendments out to the public. You release those for review on May 12th. Um so that was actually a longer than minimum uh review time. We did the standard engagement um with the public notice to the email list to the district councils and published in the pioneer press. Um we also reached out to update the the four developer contacts that I'd connected with earlier and our friends from Sherling Associates are one of them, they they came to give the comments. We invited the other folks to give their comments as well. Um I talked with a few organs as well who are really interested in the sustainability and equity interface. Uh I don't think they're gonna comment on this in particular. Uh we actually ended up talking about what needs to come after this more than the actual uh amendments themselves. Um we also uh director Panera just since we've sent a written brief to the co-chairs of the business review council as well. Um sort of ship short notice, so I don't imagine that they will weigh in on on the record unless we extend the time, which is something that we're we're recommending at least so BRC could weigh in. Um normally we close the public hearing on the on Monday, but uh we'll suggest that you leave it open at three days from today. Uh we take a little more time with this because there's not a deadline to it, and I will allow that business input. Um at least in written form. So we've got public hearing today, and then the uh it would come back to committee and then planning commission, and then there'll be another city council hearing at some point in the future. So if you were to leave this open for a month, we'd probably come back to committee in August and then planning commission and either August or September and then on to City Council. Uh and there's no reason from a staff point of view that that timeline wouldn't be problematic. A reminder that you had put out some questions to the public. These were those questions essentially did we get it right with regard to a few specific details of uh what is in the draft ordinance. So just a reminder of what those are, including the thresholds for kicking in at 15 spaces and uh you know all the other details up there on the screen.