Saint Paul Planning Commission Meeting – January 19, 2024
STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
Saint Paul Planning Commission Meeting – January 19, 2024
Note: The agenda and transcript indicate this meeting occurred on February 2, 2024, but the provided instruction specifies the date as January 19, 2024. This summary uses the required date.
The meeting covered approval of prior minutes, chair and director announcements, a public hearing on the Saint Paul Bicycle Plan, committee reports (Zoning, Transportation, Comprehensive & Neighborhood Planning, Communications & Nominations), and adoption of the 2024 Preliminary Work Program.
Consent Calendar
- Approval of minutes from the January 19, 2024 Planning Commission meeting (recorded as approved).
Public Comments & Testimony
- Bicycle Plan Public Hearing (IV): Numerous speakers testified.
- Support for the plan, especially separated bike lanes: Annie Singer (2103 Berkeley Ave) supported the plan but requested better connections to the Capitol, downtown, and the I-35E trail. Melissa Wenzel (349 Michigan St) strongly supported off-street infrastructure. Hugo Brugman (1920 Princeton Ave) argued planning is about investing in the future. Dan Neifeld (1895 Ashland Ave) emphasized safety on major routes for meeting climate goals. Nick Suhan (543 Michigan St) noted car cost savings would boost local economy. Sherry Johnson (820 Osceola Ave) highlighted benefits for people with disabilities and climate. Tim Moorhead (1932 Baird Ave) criticized the plan's cost-benefit analysis and impact on parking and trees. Michelle Molstead (702 Holly Ave) stressed safety after a near-miss. Ted Madison (1116 Hyacinth Ave) applauded improved east side connections. Paul Seisel (400 Daily St) noted the need for better downtown connections. Mary Morris Marty (214 Exeter Pl) called the plan forward-looking. Zed Stein (3rd Street) asked for Smith Avenue connections. Alex (149 Stevens St) expressed excitement. Jamie (1190 Summit Ave) opposed a raised path on Summit Avenue due to historic district and safety concerns. X Farrell (600 Summit Ave) supported separated lanes for winter safety. Christine Danielson (1710 Palace Ave) supported pedestrian safety aspects.
- The public hearing was closed, and the matter referred to the Transportation Committee with the record open for written comments until 4:30 p.m. on February 5, 2024.
Discussion Items
- Zoning Committee (V): No new business; next meeting February 8, 2024.
- Transportation Committee (VI): Reported upcoming items (5-year capital plan, regional solicitation projects); next meeting February 5, 2024.
- Comprehensive & Neighborhood Planning Committee (VII): Two items:
- East Grand Avenue Overlay District (EGAD): Spencer Miller Johnson presented proposed amendments to replace restrictive size/height limits with context-sensitive design standards (entry setbacks, established building line, branch element). The committee released the study for public review and set a public hearing date of March 29, 2024.
- The Heights Comprehensive Plan Amendment: Luis Pereira presented a map amendment to align the comprehensive plan with the master plan (expanding mixed-use and industrial areas) to facilitate a sewer access permit. The committee released the amendment for public review and set a public hearing date of March 15, 2024.
- Communications and Nominations Committee (VIII):
- Presentation of the 2023 Planning Commission Annual Report (digital and print).
- Presentation of the 2024 Preliminary Work Program, including updates on the Hamms Brewery site, SEER site, downtown plan update, climate resilience plan, HUD consolidated plan, and various zoning studies. The work program was discussed but no formal vote taken.
Key Outcomes
- Motion to close the public hearing on the Saint Paul Bicycle Plan, refer to Transportation Committee, and keep record open until February 5, 2024 – Passed (voice vote).
- Motion to release the East Grand Avenue Overlay District zoning study for public review and set public hearing for March 29, 2024 – Passed (voice vote).
- Motion to release the Heights Comprehensive Plan Amendment for public review and set public hearing for March 15, 2024 – Passed (voice vote).
- No other formal votes were taken.
- The meeting adjourned after Old Business, New Business, and Adjournment.
Meeting Transcript
Um I'm a bike rider. I ride in the streets, but I never ride on the sidewalks. I follow lights and follow signs. I'm at the pants of right. And then hit twice. Um I agree with bike lanes. I ride in them, but I'm not happy when they put them on major roads. I don't think they need to be on a major road. As a chest invite people who are afraid to ride on a major road, even though there's a bike lane. I write some, and I I never had a problem with sunlight. But obviously, people do, but I'm not in favor of a separate lane. I think that's just the wrong way to go. There are other streets that can go. Jefferson has bike lanes all the way down. Why do we have to have another set? Um, I'm just not happy with that. Um but you know, the big thing is not everybody can write a bike. And I'm giving the impression that everybody wants the world to go to bikes. Not everybody can ride a bike. Um, some of its age, some of its physical disabilities. And so you cut those people, you know, the people that need a car, you cut those people out. So you know, I'm not real happy with that. Um, I mean, like I said, there are other streams with less traffic. I I write other streams that run the same way as selling, but I never write unstelling. Snowing's crazy. Um, I mean, you have to think about where you want to put these bike lanes and what they do how they affect the people that live there, especially parking. You can park on all of a sudden you can't park in front of your own home. I don't think that's the answer either. But I am a rider, and and I I enjoy riding my bike, but I'm extremely defensive. Um, and one person was talking about revenue. Why don't bicycle riders have to have a license just like a car? Just a lot, you know. So thank you again for listening to all of us that are here, and I hope you make good decision. Thank you. Next up is Annie Singer. My name's Anne Singer. I live at 2103 Berkeley Avenue in St. Law. And I overall I really support this plan. I think it's good. I appreciate that it incorporated many of the suggestions that people, including myself, provided for earlier drafts. Here are a few specific things that I like and a couple changes I would make. I like the plan's statement about a policy of next best bikeway. On page 85, I like that you included using lower cost or short-term materials and included jersey barriers as an option. Of the standalone projects, I really like Pennsylvania, uh, the university segment, um, the southern part of Caesar Chavez and the Lafayette Payne Mini Haha, all of these will be super useful. Um as for changes, um, I would echo a previous person who said that uh uh we need more connections or a connection with the Capitol, uh, either via Cedar or via a Wabacho or something. Um there's currently no connection to Broadway Street, Prince, Swede Hollow, uh Lafayette or the Third Street Kellogg Bridge. Uh essentially there's no way to bike east uh to the east side from Kellogg. Um, and I see a line on the map on Kellogg, but it shows a future connection either on the deck of Union Depot, which is kind of useless, um, or on the south side sidewalk, which isn't wide enough to accommodate bikes. Um, so it seems like either a lane of Kellogg uh between Sibley and Broadway has to be taken, or something needs to be built on 4th Street.
openpublica.com