Syracuse Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting – September 4, 2025
Syracuse Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting – September 4, 2025
The Syracuse Zoning Board of Appeals met on September 4, 2025, at 4:55 PM to consider two area variance applications. The first involved an enclosed porch addition at a single-family home, and the second concerned a new multi-unit dwelling building length. Both variances were approved with conditions.
Consent Calendar
- The board unanimously approved the minutes from the July 24, 2025 meeting.
Discussion Items & Public Hearings
V2506 – Area variance for enclosed porch at an R2 zone property
- Applicant: Mr. Thomas (homeowner) explained that the enclosed porch would provide accessible storage space, reducing the need to go down to the basement. He noted his age (86) and difficulty using stairs. The porch exceeded the maximum allowed width by six inches.
- Public Comments in Favor:
- Phil Prayne, organizer for Syracuse United Neighbors (address: 1540 South Line), spoke in favor, noting the six-inch issue was minor and the project improved accessibility. He also highlighted Mr. Thomas's long community involvement.
- Walter Dicksey (address: 119 South Air) expressed support, praising the family and the project's benefit to the neighborhood.
- Board Discussion: Members noted the variance was modest (six inches) and the design, while unusual, did not harm neighborhood character. Staff recommended conditions: applicant must obtain a building permit and consult a design professional to comply with fire separation and energy codes.
- Motion: Approved with conditions (fire separation compliance and professional assistance). Board member Otis recited the balancing test: no undesirable change, no feasible alternatives, variance was substantial but not adverse, and self-created difficulty did not outweigh other factors.
- Vote: Unanimous.
V2507 – Area variance to exceed 180-foot maximum building length for a multi-unit dwelling at 680-682 South Ave (MX2 zone)
- Applicant/Representatives: Christian Freeman (Kaplinger Freeman), Kennan Bigby (Build Properties), and a Jubilee Homes representative. The project is part of Jubilee Homes' Connecting the Corridors Initiative, providing mixed-income housing with passive house certification and floodplain mitigation. The building length variance is needed due to floodplain constraints (zone AE) and the need to elevate habitable spaces above the flood level.
- Public Comments in Favor:
- A Jubilee Homes representative (address: 119 Software) spoke in favor, noting the area's revitalization (new supermarket, gas station, seafood restaurant) and the project's mixed-income, three-bedroom units.
- Board Discussion: Members acknowledged the floodplain restrictions made compliance with the 180-foot limit infeasible; the variance was necessary to achieve the desired unit count. Staff recommended three specific conditions (from page 31 of the packet). Board member Liam led the balancing test, concluding the project benefits the neighborhood, alternatives are limited, the variance is substantial but justified, no adverse effects, and the self-created nature does not outweigh other factors.
- Motion: Approved with the three conditions. Board members (two recused due to land bank ties) voted in favor.
Key Outcomes
- V2506: Area variance granted for an enclosed porch that exceeds the maximum width by six inches, subject to obtaining a building permit and hiring a design professional to ensure code compliance.
- V2507: Area variance granted to allow a 680-682 South Ave multi-unit building to exceed the 180-foot maximum length, subject to three staff-recommended conditions (details in packet).
- The meeting was adjourned at approximately 1:29 PM (13:29).
Meeting Transcript
I'm going to call to order the zoning board of appeals meeting of September 4th. Uh first order of business is to approve the minutes from the July twenty-fourth, twenty twenty-five meeting. Uh is there a motion to approve? So moved. Second. Uh all in favor. Uh any against? No? Great. Moving on. Um the board will now conduct the public hearings on today's agenda. First, the applicant or applicant's representative will state the reasons for the requested variants and present any material or documentation which is to be considered regarding the proposal. Next, persons wishing to speak in favor of the proposal will be given the opportunity to address the board. Then persons who wish to speak in opposition will be allowed to address the board. Finally, the applicant or representative will be given the option to make any closing arguments or comments to the board. Following the public hearings this afternoon, the board may make a decision on each application heard. The board may also decide to hold its decision until the next public hearing. If the hearing is closed, no additional information will be allowed into the record except for information that the board may request. That information will be available for public review at the zoning office in one park place, 300 South State Street. Would staff introduce V2506, please. This is in the R2 zone district. And we thought it would be more economical to have a c and closed porch where we could move everything upstairs. The distance that we needed and I didn't know that until we applied for the at my age is not easy for me to go up and downstairs. And at uh at my age is not easy for me to go up and downstairs. Now my wife, we'd have to one of the kids who'll have to go on my wife would have to make our way down there because up and down the stairs is not easy for me. That's why we needed the back porch. And uh being can I um I just have one one question regarding that. So you're saying, just so I'm clear and I'm looking at the photo of of what you're what you started. You're saying instead of going into the basement for the food pantry, it would be limited to just going out the side door and up a couple stairs into the side porch. Is that is that accurate? Say what now? And because it looks like you would still need to walk upstairs to get into this side porch that you want to finish constructing, either from the exterior or from the side door, it's elevated. No, I don't have to walk upstairs. So I woke up two steps to get to the porch from my kitchen. But if that was the question, you're you're saying you're comparing walking up just a couple stairs to the porch instead of the basement, is that what you're saying? Yes. Okay. All right, understood. So the height of this door is not going to change. The side door. On the side of the house. Side door onto the porch there. No, the side door is it's not gonna change. Okay. So there would be some steps up from the side door in two steps up to the okay and then there would be a rear door. Is that what looks like is framing? It would be a real duel. Okay. Excuse me. Now is this going you're calling this a porch?
openpublica.com