Joint Public Safety & Economic Development Committee on Axon LPR Contract - February 6, 2026
Joint Public Safety & Economic Development Committee Meeting on Axon License Plate Reader Contract - February 6, 2026
On February 6, 2026, the joint committee of Public Safety and Economic Development met in the afternoon to discuss the terms of a new contract with Axon for license plate readers (LPRs). The meeting was attended by Councillor Nave, Counselor Moore, Counselor Williams, President Paniagua, Joe Barry, Sue Katzov, and Chief Trudeau. The discussion focused on the capabilities, data ownership, privacy safeguards, and community concerns related to the proposed 26 LPRs.
Discussion Items
- Overview of LPR System: Chief Trudeau explained that SPD seeks 26 LPR readers (currently 13) for public safety and investigations. The cameras read multiple lanes of traffic at various speeds, compiling data into a system that allows SPD to search and assist in solving crimes. The data is solely owned and accessed by SPD, not the vendor. The system is closed, meaning only SPD has the data.
- Use of LPR Data: LPR data is used reactively, not for live monitoring. Officers search the data after a crime is reported, using partial plates or locations to find leads. Chief Trudeau noted that almost all homicides involve a vehicle, and Axon estimates 70% of crimes nationally involve a vehicle. The LPR data is fact-based and helps generate leads for investigations.
- Data Retention Policy: Bulk data not used in investigations is retained for 30 days, per SPD policy. Data that becomes evidence is archived and retained per state law based on the severity of the crime (e.g., indefinitely for homicides, shorter for misdemeanors).
- Data Sharing with Other Agencies: SPD currently does not share LPR data with federal agencies absent a court order or subpoena. For local law enforcement, SPD may enter future memoranda of agreement (MOAs) to share data with guardrails, ensuring data is not further shared. The system is opt-in, not opt-out, preventing accidental sharing.
- Community Concerns: Council members raised concerns about doing business with companies that also work with ICE. Chief Trudeau noted that many top law enforcement technologies are used by federal agencies, and limiting SPD's options would hinder public safety. The data is hosted on Axon's cloud, and liability for data breaches would be discussed in executive session.
- Geographic Dispersion: The 26 LPR locations are spread across all quadrants of the city, focusing on major intersections and on/off ramps. A list of locations will be provided to the council. There is no correlation with Vision Zero data, though Chief Trudeau acknowledged that could be explored.
Key Outcomes
- The committee moved into executive session to receive legal advice on the contract terms. The motion was made, seconded, and approved by all present. No final decision on the contract was made during the open session.
- The council requested and received assurance that the data is not shared with federal agencies without legal process, and that SPD is committed to privacy safeguards. Future discussions on inter-agency data sharing will involve further council review.
Note: The meeting did not include public comments or testimony, and no votes were taken on the contract itself.
Meeting Transcript
This is a joint committee meeting of public safety and economic development. We're here to discuss the uh terms of the new axon contract for license plate readers. I am joined by Councillor Nave, Counselor Moore, Counselor Williams, President Paniagua, Joe Barry, Sue Katzov, and Chief Trudeau. Um so who wants to start, Chief, you want to start? Yeah. Okay. I'll start. Oh, first of all, thanks for uh having us here. Also want to thank the council for uh working with us on this so we don't have a gap in uh LPR service between our current existing LPRs and going to Axon. It's very important to us, so thank you. Um so I thought we'd kick it off by going over the uh the axon um terms. Um I think I think what we want to do um because the terms until we actually sign a contract are not uh for public dissemination, it would be considered attorney client privilege. Let's just talk about in general what the product provides for SPD. Okay. So uh what we what we'd like is uh you know, these 26 uh LPR readers um for public safety and for investigations. Um basically what the product does um depending on the uh the install, it goes on a light pole or it goes on a fixed pole. Um it uh has a camera that's uh reads multiple lanes of traffic, it reads um cars going at uh various speeds, highway speeds, traffic speeds, and then compiles that data into a system that allows the police department to go back and based on criminal investigations search that data to assist us in you know solving crime. So that's the the basic uh premise behind the LPRs and and what SPD's looking for uh in their use. And I would like to know because I think there are a few points that are um vitally important for this body and the public to understand. Um the data that is collected as a result of the installation of LPRs is data that is solely owned and accessed by SPD in the city. It is not owned or controlled by the vendor. They provide a clo what's called a closed system, so that only the data is only being uh transmitted to SPD for their use. So I think that that is an important feature um that may be of import. So they can't share data because they don't have data to share. The data only lives within SPD. Thanks for sharing that. So that that is a huge concern in our community. So thank you. Um one question I do have, Deputy Chief, is um with our crime rates. Um how many crimes do you estimate that we're solving because of these cameras? You took my question. Oh, I'm so sorry. I stole this question. So percentage-wise, I can't, I don't have a number percentage-wise. That'd be an anecdotal number. But for our major crimes, there's almost any no homicides at all that don't happen to have a vehicle involved in them. So I can tell you that for our major crimes, they're used frequently. I think Axon put a number at 70% of crimes overall, their number is a vehicle is involved in the crime. Um so you know, for our major crimes, the percentage is high, and I think overall that that number is is pretty accurate, you know, based on that. And thinking about evidence and closing cases. I imagine that in order to you know go to a prosecutor, you have to have a number of different points of evidence. How critical would LPR data be compared to all of the other data that you would bring to a prosecutor? And what does that look like? Yeah, so I mean, I think I think you know, there's gonna be witness victim statements, all right. And we all know how how those identifications are witness statements can go in terms of that. I think this LPR data is fact-based, right? It takes a review by an officer, right? I mean, we're not just going by the read. We have to go into the system, but we're actually looking at that plate, we're looking at that car, we know that car was there. And I think what it does is it opens us up to additional leads.
openpublica.com