OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Syracuse Industrial Development Agency Special Board Meeting - March 24, 2026

Public MeetingsTuesday, March 24, 2026
BodySyracuse, New York
SessionPublic Meetings
DateTuesday, March 24, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record

STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE

Transcript — Verbatim
7:36

Good morning.

7:37

Good morning, and thank you all very much for attending this special board meeting of the Syracuse Industrial Development Agency.

7:46

Appreciate everybody's response and quick date arranging.

7:51

Um, I'd like to call the meeting to order.

7:54

I'll start with the roll call of the board.

7:55

I'm Kathy Murphy.

8:00

Steve Thompson.

8:01

Thank you all very much.

8:03

Proof of notice was properly served.

8:05

We have one item on the agenda for this meeting.

8:08

It is a new business item with Towers Realty Susan.

8:12

Good morning, everyone.

8:14

You may recall uh I think all of you were on the board at the time, although maybe not, but um in or around twenty eighteen, twenty nineteen, twenty twenty that time frame, the agency entered into a leash transaction with Towers Realty, which is the owner of what will may be known as the AXA towers.

8:42

And the lender commenced a foreclosure action with respect to those defaults.

8:54

It triggers a default, in other words, under our documents.

9:09

But I received information last week that they actually were going to sell the building, that the lender was going to do a short sale, which means you take it out of foreclosure and you sell it.

10:00

But at this point, I it is in the agency's best interest, in my legal opinion, to declare the default and collapse the structure.

10:06

So you said you're welcome.

10:10

Questions?

10:10

Comment what would it do to what they've received already?

10:17

Anything?

10:18

No.

10:23

Okay.

10:24

It's the two towers.

10:25

One of the two towers.

10:26

Towers one and two.

10:28

So do you know how far along in the foreclosure proceedings they are?

10:33

It's been pending for a couple of years.

10:36

So I think they're probably close to the end or could be.

10:40

To be honest with you, mid-stream, they appoint they got a receiver appointed, so a receiver stepped in and started collecting rents.

10:48

That happened about a year ago.

10:52

For what it's worth, at some point they amended their complaint and named the city of Syracuse as a defendant as well, because there is a convoluted history about the garage that sits beneath the towers.

11:05

So at one point in time, the garage, which is subterranean under both, under the entire plaza.

11:14

It spans the plaza.

11:14

It spans the whole block under the plaza.

11:17

Half of it was owned by the city of Syracuse.

11:21

Half of it was owned by the owner of the towers.

11:25

I didn't live here when that happened.

11:29

I do not know, but that was the structure.

11:31

And at some point it made sense for whatever was happening there.

11:36

Um as you might imagine over years and years and years, the um plaza leaked, causing damage in the garage.

11:47

There was an argument about who was responsible for maintaining it, et cetera, et cetera.

11:52

So there was a huge it spanned multiple years.

11:56

Kristen Smith was corp counsel at the time, and I was outside counsel helping her deal with this garage issue.

12:05

Ultimately, it was resolved through a settlement.

12:08

Um the lender amended their complaint to include the city because they claimed that the city engaged in uh violation of the debtor and creditor law.

12:21

I'm sitting here today telling you I don't believe they ever would have been successful in that.

12:26

They put a pin in that cause of action while they continued to litigate against the owner of the tower, but that's hanging out there.

12:33

Um should resolve all of that anyway, but it's it's a separate matter.

12:43

Oh, so what do you suggest we we do here?

12:46

I I think we should terminate our leases and the and the pilot agreement, and then the the towers will go back on the tax rolls and will go forward and they can do with it what they want.

12:59

Uh I do believe if everything goes as I've heard it's going to, it will transfer hands the end of this week or the beginning of next week.

13:09

But we'll be removed from any and all foreclosure encumbrances with the lease terminated and we meaning CITA, yes, we meaning the city, no, not until the case gets dismissed.

13:20

But okay, yeah.

13:21

And CIDA was not named in the foreclosure.

13:24

Site is mentioned in the foreclosure because you have a leasehold interest.

13:29

So we don't believe we were formally named.

13:34

Eric so why would we not?

13:42

I guess the simplest question.

13:44

Why would we do what I'm recommending?

13:46

Yeah.

13:47

There is no reason for you not to take my advice on this matter.

13:51

I mean, seriously, there's no like I don't they've had an opportunity to work it out.

13:56

The fact that I am hearing from reliable sources that it is going to change hands tells me they're not able to work it out.

14:04

So that is a big breach for us because we vetted the applicant owner when they came for benefits, they did the renovation, they have a tax break that goes for several more years.

14:19

They don't get to keep that when they breach.

14:23

It does not transfer.

14:26

It is a non-assignable right unless they get the board's permission first, and they did not come here to get your permission.

14:32

They didn't even tell me about it.

14:34

I heard it somewhere else.

14:36

What is our exposure?

14:38

In the foreclosure?

14:39

Yeah.

14:39

None.

14:40

So we're only talking about getting property back on the tax rules.

14:44

Correct.

14:44

Because the current because of the current default.

14:47

Correct.

14:48

That is exactly right.

14:58

Yes.

14:59

Right.

15:00

This is public.

15:01

This was posted.

15:01

It's open to the public.

15:03

Information is out there previously.

15:06

Oh, the com the foreclosure complaint is filed with the Supreme Court on Daga County.

15:11

Anyone can go look at it.

15:12

It is very public.

15:15

So yes, it is all.

15:18

Yes.

15:21

Yes.

15:21

It was filed.

15:23

Well, this is the amended one.

15:24

It was filed in sometime in 2023.

15:31

Any other questions?

15:32

Can comments?

15:38

Thank you.

15:39

Is there a second?

15:41

A second.

15:41

Ricky, thank you.

15:43

Last call for questions or comments.

15:45

All in favor, please say aye.

15:47

Aye.

15:48

Opposed abstention.

15:49

Motion carries.

15:50

Thank you, Sue.

15:51

Thank you.

15:52

Is there a motion to adjourn?

15:54

Take a motion.

15:54

Made by Steve.

15:56

Second by Ricky.

15:57

All in favor, please say aye.

15:59

Aye.

16:00

Opposed abstention.

16:01

Motion carries.

16:02

Thank you all very much.

16:03

See you in a few weeks.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Pending Litigation█████████████████████████████████████████████48%
Property Disposition██████████████████████████████████████40%
Procedural███████████12%
Summary of Proceedings

Syracuse Industrial Development Agency Special Board Meeting - March 24, 2026

This special meeting of the Syracuse Industrial Development Agency (SIDA) was called to address a single agenda item regarding a default by Towers Realty, owner of the AXA towers. The board voted unanimously to terminate the existing lease and PILOT agreement, following legal advice that the owner’s failure to cure default and pending short sale warranted removal of SIDA from the foreclosure proceedings, returning the property to the tax rolls.

Discussion Items

  • Default and Termination of Towers Realty Agreement: Agency counsel Susan reported that SIDA entered into a lease and PILOT agreement with Towers Realty around 2018-2020 for what are known as the AXA towers. The lender commenced a foreclosure action due to defaults, and a receiver was appointed about a year ago. The lender planned a short sale to transfer the property, likely within the week. Counsel recommended declaring default and terminating the lease and PILOT agreement because the owner had breached the non-assignable agreement without seeking board permission, and the agency had no exposure in the foreclosure. Terminating would remove SIDA from encumbrances and return the towers to full taxation. Board members Kathy Murphy (chair), Steve Thompson, and Ricky discussed the foreclosure timeline and the city’s tangential involvement via a garage dispute. They confirmed no downside to the recommendation.

Key Outcomes

  • Motion to Terminate: The board voted unanimously (3-0) to approve the motion to declare Towers Realty in default, terminate the lease and PILOT agreement, and collapse the SIDA structure for the AXA towers. The action effectively ends the tax abatement and returns the property to the tax rolls, pending the court dismissal of the foreclosure case against the city. The meeting was adjourned immediately thereafter.

Meeting Transcript

Good morning. Good morning, and thank you all very much for attending this special board meeting of the Syracuse Industrial Development Agency. Appreciate everybody's response and quick date arranging. Um, I'd like to call the meeting to order. I'll start with the roll call of the board. I'm Kathy Murphy. Steve Thompson. Thank you all very much. Proof of notice was properly served. We have one item on the agenda for this meeting. It is a new business item with Towers Realty Susan. Good morning, everyone. You may recall uh I think all of you were on the board at the time, although maybe not, but um in or around twenty eighteen, twenty nineteen, twenty twenty that time frame, the agency entered into a leash transaction with Towers Realty, which is the owner of what will may be known as the AXA towers. And the lender commenced a foreclosure action with respect to those defaults. It triggers a default, in other words, under our documents. But I received information last week that they actually were going to sell the building, that the lender was going to do a short sale, which means you take it out of foreclosure and you sell it. But at this point, I it is in the agency's best interest, in my legal opinion, to declare the default and collapse the structure. So you said you're welcome. Questions? Comment what would it do to what they've received already? Anything? No. Okay. It's the two towers. One of the two towers. Towers one and two. So do you know how far along in the foreclosure proceedings they are? It's been pending for a couple of years. So I think they're probably close to the end or could be. To be honest with you, mid-stream, they appoint they got a receiver appointed, so a receiver stepped in and started collecting rents. That happened about a year ago. For what it's worth, at some point they amended their complaint and named the city of Syracuse as a defendant as well, because there is a convoluted history about the garage that sits beneath the towers. So at one point in time, the garage, which is subterranean under both, under the entire plaza. It spans the plaza. It spans the whole block under the plaza. Half of it was owned by the city of Syracuse. Half of it was owned by the owner of the towers. I didn't live here when that happened. I do not know, but that was the structure. And at some point it made sense for whatever was happening there. Um as you might imagine over years and years and years, the um plaza leaked, causing damage in the garage. There was an argument about who was responsible for maintaining it, et cetera, et cetera. So there was a huge it spanned multiple years. Kristen Smith was corp counsel at the time, and I was outside counsel helping her deal with this garage issue. Ultimately, it was resolved through a settlement. Um the lender amended their complaint to include the city because they claimed that the city engaged in uh violation of the debtor and creditor law. I'm sitting here today telling you I don't believe they ever would have been successful in that. They put a pin in that cause of action while they continued to litigate against the owner of the tower, but that's hanging out there. Um should resolve all of that anyway, but it's it's a separate matter. Oh, so what do you suggest we we do here?

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com