OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Syracuse School District Meeting – March 26, 2026: PLA Study Adoption and Project Updates

Public MeetingsThursday, March 26, 2026
BodySyracuse, New York
SessionPublic Meetings
DateThursday, March 26, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record

STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE

Transcript — Verbatim
5:28

No order.

5:30

Uh acceptance of the February twenty-sixt uh minute meetings.

5:37

Motion and second.

5:39

All approved.

5:40

Aye.

5:41

No abstentions, no objections.

5:44

So moved.

5:45

Thank you.

5:46

Report of the secretary.

5:48

Yes, good morning, Mayor and Board members.

5:51

Um I guess uh first of all I'd like to take the opportunity to introduce our new interim fi finance commissioner, Diane Mastery is here.

6:01

Yeah, she's uh brought the the paperwork to make sure we get all our payments in order as as usual.

6:08

Um then uh moving forward uh the RFP process uh uh for the construction managers is well underway.

6:18

I'll let the program manager elaborate on the current status.

6:22

And uh finally the most important thing I think for today is um if you as you as you've seen through previous correspondence, the final report of the project labor agreement benefit analysis.

6:34

Okay.

6:34

And this is the prerequisite to under state law for the board to approve to consider entering into a PLA.

6:43

It it does not mandate a PLA, it just um makes the determination that a PLA would be of uh economic benefit.

6:52

Yes.

6:52

So if the board's inclined to approve it, the next step would be to work with our outside council and the JSCB staff and program manager to enter into negotiations with the trades and then bring a uh a draft project labor agreement back to the board for consideration.

7:11

Okay, thank you.

7:13

Yeah, yes.

7:15

That completes my report.

7:17

Thank you.

7:18

Welcome.

7:19

Report of the program manager.

7:24

Good morning.

7:25

Morning.

7:26

Um we've started uh design on all three projects with the architects.

7:32

Um we conducted kickoff meetings, uh, we held three public input sessions at each of the buildings, received some pretty good feedback on that.

7:41

Uh some of the feedback we received of things that needed to be repaired in the building were like toilet rooms, uh windows, temperatures in the building, air conditioning, uh security improvements, traffic, uh at arrival and dismissal, taking a look at the traffic patterns as part of the design.

8:03

Um and then curb appeal just to kind of generalize some of the categories and items that were uh Sean, before you move on, when you talk about um public heat to be public meetings, how did you advertise that?

8:15

How did you get that information out there?

8:17

And were the public meetings uh attended well?

8:26

Good morning.

8:26

Um we I'm Rob DeFoy, I'm the chief of operations for the Syracuse City School District.

8:31

We had our communications department uh post on our website as well as send out messages to our parents square uh software and um to have people come with the Nottingham one was pretty well attended.

8:46

The Webster one, a lot of staff showed some parents and Seymour was mostly staff.

8:53

Okay.

8:54

Thank you.

8:55

One other uh question for me, the suggestions you were getting were any were the majority of them already um incorporated in the the pre-planned design, or did you get anything that was oh we wouldn't didn't have that already included?

9:12

I think mostly uh most items were captured in the initial concepts.

9:18

Um there are some onesie twosies for program specifics that were kind of enlightening off the top of my head.

9:25

I can't remember what those were, but there was good feedback received.

9:30

And I would just think that um just for consideration ideas that were specific that came up in a school around programming that would enhance programming, taking a look across the schools, whether or not that's something that should be included as well.

9:44

Yes.

9:45

Yeah, thank you.

9:47

Um we've also begun program meetings with district staff uh to look at specific programs and then building wide programs with principals.

9:56

Um so those meetings have started and are ongoing and will continue throughout the design phase.

10:02

Our plan is to have SD submission, which is a really our first check-in with the state at um July time frame.

10:11

So we're on schedule for that, which is good.

10:13

Um CM procurement.

10:15

We did receive uh proposals earlier this month.

10:18

The selection committee did interview a couple firms earlier this week.

10:22

Um we anticipate having selections uh in April and then looking to award contract in uh second quarter.

10:32

Uh we do continue to meet monthly with SED just to talk about designs as we progress, and hopefully um we'll continue to do that.

10:42

Uh project labor agreement.

10:45

Um, I think it's under review with the board right now, and then upon approval of the board, we would start negotiations on the PLA.

10:53

Awesome.

10:54

And we continue to look at the schedule recovery on the delay we had with um plan approval.

11:04

Yeah.

11:06

We're able to recover.

11:08

Hopefully.

11:09

We're early in the design phase and we're actively seeking opportunities to advance design, but again, we're early in the process.

11:20

Any other questions, comments?

11:24

Thank you.

11:25

Thank you.

11:29

We have resolutions.

11:30

Yes.

11:31

Um, we have resolution number eight, which would be authorize our monthly payments to the JSCB contractors for the month of March.

11:42

Second?

11:43

Second.

11:43

All in favor?

11:45

Aye.

11:46

So moved.

11:48

Thank you.

11:50

Enjoy them right now because they will get longer.

11:54

Yes.

11:56

Resolution number nine.

11:58

Yes, uh resolution number nine is uh a proposal to adopt the findings of a final project labor agreement feasibility study as completed by Sealer Engineering.

12:10

Uh the board has seen several drafts of this, and then the final version was distributed.

12:16

Uh I think it's important to note for the record that the uh the report concludes that the estimated labor cost and um Wickslog exemption cost benefits could exceed 15.3 million dollars.

12:36

Then there are several non-economic uh considerations, one being labor harmony, uh the other being in light of the many projects going around in central New York now, um including uh I-81, uh, a big project at Cornell uh in Ethica.

12:58

And uh of course, the biggest one, the micron uh work up in Cicero, that having a PLA it's concluded will uh give greater assurance of a labor supply.

13:12

And finally, an item that I know is important to this board, uh the the study concludes that having a PLA will uh potentially uh again because it has to be reflected in the PLA, but potentially enhance uh diversity um opportunities and training uh opportunities for the local workforce.

13:36

Thank you, Joe.

13:37

You're welcome.

13:38

Any questions from anyone?

13:42

Uh entertain a motion, second.

13:46

All approved?

13:47

Aye.

13:48

Item is passed.

13:51

Anyway, that concludes our resolutions for today.

13:54

All righty, and yet negotiations will begin uh as soon as we can line up the appropriate folks.

14:01

Motion to adjourn.

14:03

Second, adjourned.

14:06

All right.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Procedural█████████████████████████████████████████████50%
Procurement█████████████████████████████████████████████50%
Summary of Proceedings

Syracuse School District Meeting – March 26, 2026

The meeting began with approval of prior minutes, followed by reports from the Secretary and Program Manager on project status, public input, and procurement. The Board adopted the findings of a Project Labor Agreement (PLA) feasibility study, which estimates $15.3 million in labor cost and Wicks Law exemption savings, and authorized monthly payments to JSCB contractors.

Consent Calendar

  • Approval of Minutes: The Board approved the minutes from the February 26 meeting unanimously (aye, no abstentions, no objections).

Discussion Items

  • Secretary's Report:
    • Introduced new interim Finance Commissioner Diane Mastery.
    • Reported that the RFP process for construction managers is well underway.
    • Presented the final report of the Project Labor Agreement benefit analysis, which is a prerequisite under state law for the Board to consider entering into a PLA. The report determines that a PLA would be of economic benefit, but does not mandate it. If approved, the next step is to work with outside counsel, JSCB staff, and the program manager to negotiate with trades and bring a draft PLA back to the Board.
    • Board members asked about the public input sessions for school projects (advertising and attendance).
  • Program Manager's Report:
    • Design has started on all three projects with architects. Three public input sessions were held at each building, receiving feedback on needed repairs (toilet rooms, windows, temperature/AC, security, traffic, curb appeal).
    • Most suggestions were already in initial concepts; some program-specific ideas were new and will be reviewed for inclusion across schools.
    • Program meetings with district staff and principals are ongoing.
    • SD submission (first check-in with the state) is planned for July; project is on schedule.
    • CM procurement: Proposals received, interviews conducted, selections anticipated in April, contract award expected in second quarter.
    • Monthly meetings with SED continue; schedule recovery from early delay is being addressed.
    • Upon Board approval of the PLA feasibility study, negotiations on the PLA would begin.
  • Resolutions:
    • Resolution #8: Authorized monthly payments to JSCB contractors for March. Passed unanimously.
    • Resolution #9: Proposed adoption of the final Project Labor Agreement feasibility study completed by Sealer Engineering. The study concludes that estimated labor cost and Wicks Law exemption benefits could exceed $15.3 million. Non-economic benefits include labor harmony, assurance of labor supply in light of other major regional projects (I-81, Cornell, Micron), and enhanced diversity/training opportunities for the local workforce. Approved unanimously.

Key Outcomes

  • The Board adopted the PLA feasibility study findings, authorizing the start of negotiations with trades to bring a draft Project Labor Agreement back for consideration.
  • Monthly contractor payments for March were approved.
  • Design and procurement timelines remain on track for July SD submission and second quarter contract awards.

Meeting Transcript

No order. Uh acceptance of the February twenty-sixt uh minute meetings. Motion and second. All approved. Aye. No abstentions, no objections. So moved. Thank you. Report of the secretary. Yes, good morning, Mayor and Board members. Um I guess uh first of all I'd like to take the opportunity to introduce our new interim fi finance commissioner, Diane Mastery is here. Yeah, she's uh brought the the paperwork to make sure we get all our payments in order as as usual. Um then uh moving forward uh the RFP process uh uh for the construction managers is well underway. I'll let the program manager elaborate on the current status. And uh finally the most important thing I think for today is um if you as you as you've seen through previous correspondence, the final report of the project labor agreement benefit analysis. Okay. And this is the prerequisite to under state law for the board to approve to consider entering into a PLA. It it does not mandate a PLA, it just um makes the determination that a PLA would be of uh economic benefit. Yes. So if the board's inclined to approve it, the next step would be to work with our outside council and the JSCB staff and program manager to enter into negotiations with the trades and then bring a uh a draft project labor agreement back to the board for consideration. Okay, thank you. Yeah, yes. That completes my report. Thank you. Welcome. Report of the program manager. Good morning. Morning. Um we've started uh design on all three projects with the architects. Um we conducted kickoff meetings, uh, we held three public input sessions at each of the buildings, received some pretty good feedback on that. Uh some of the feedback we received of things that needed to be repaired in the building were like toilet rooms, uh windows, temperatures in the building, air conditioning, uh security improvements, traffic, uh at arrival and dismissal, taking a look at the traffic patterns as part of the design. Um and then curb appeal just to kind of generalize some of the categories and items that were uh Sean, before you move on, when you talk about um public heat to be public meetings, how did you advertise that? How did you get that information out there? And were the public meetings uh attended well? Good morning. Um we I'm Rob DeFoy, I'm the chief of operations for the Syracuse City School District. We had our communications department uh post on our website as well as send out messages to our parents square uh software and um to have people come with the Nottingham one was pretty well attended. The Webster one, a lot of staff showed some parents and Seymour was mostly staff. Okay. Thank you. One other uh question for me, the suggestions you were getting were any were the majority of them already um incorporated in the the pre-planned design, or did you get anything that was oh we wouldn't didn't have that already included? I think mostly uh most items were captured in the initial concepts. Um there are some onesie twosies for program specifics that were kind of enlightening off the top of my head. I can't remember what those were, but there was good feedback received. And I would just think that um just for consideration ideas that were specific that came up in a school around programming that would enhance programming, taking a look across the schools, whether or not that's something that should be included as well. Yes. Yeah, thank you. Um we've also begun program meetings with district staff uh to look at specific programs and then building wide programs with principals. Um so those meetings have started and are ongoing and will continue throughout the design phase. Our plan is to have SD submission, which is a really our first check-in with the state at um July time frame.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com