Syracuse Common Council Meeting - April 20, 2026
STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
Syracuse Common Council Meeting - April 20, 2026\n\nThe Syracuse Common Council met on April 20, 2026, for a regular meeting. A public hearing was held on a Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) budget amendment, but no public testimony was offered. The council then voted on a series of legislative items, passing most unanimously. One item faced a single opposing vote, and several items were held for later consideration.\n\n### Public Hearing on CDBG Budget Amendment\n- The council opened a public hearing for agenda item 24, an ordinance to amend the CDBG budget for Year 51 (HUD fiscal year 2025-2026) by $967,782. No members of the public spoke in favor or against, and the hearing was closed after the required three calls. The item was later adopted unanimously.\n\n### Committee Reports\n- The Parks Committee reported a tree ordinance meeting held on April 6, 2026 at 1:30 PM.\n- The Neighborhood Preservation Committee reported on the annual Land Bank report meeting held on April 7, 2026 at 11:00 AM.\n\n### Discussion Items\n- Councillor Williams, on behalf of Councillor Hudson, introduced and urged adoption of items 16 and 17. During discussion on item 17, Councillor Williams encouraged city departments to seek cost sharing for the upcoming SRE contract negotiation when the RFP comes next year, suggesting partnering with SMTC and other agencies.\n\n### Key Outcomes\n- Item 9A (local law by Councillor Majok): Adopted unanimously.\n- Item 10 (resolutions on appointments): Adopted unanimously.\n- Item 11 (introduced by Councillor Majok): Adopted unanimously. Items 12 and 13 were held (tabled).\n- Item 14 (introduced by Councillor Majok): Adopted unanimously.\n- Item 15 (introduced by Councillor Aaron): Adopted unanimously.\n- Items 16 and 17 (introduced by Councillor Williams for Hudson): Both adopted unanimously.\n- Item 18 (broadband program additional funds, introduced by Councillor Jones Rousser): Adopted unanimously.\n- Item 19 (acceptance of a gift from Hubert Brewer Construction for an exterior sign at the new public safety building, introduced by Councillor Moore): Passed 8-1, with one councilor (Councillor Williams or Monto, per transcript) opposing.\n- Item 20: Held (tabled).\n- Items 21 and 22 (introduced by Councillor Williams): Adopted unanimously. Item 23 was held.\n- Items 24, 25, 26 (CDBG amendment and related items, introduced by Councillor Jones Rousser): All adopted unanimously. Item 27 was held.\n- Item 28 (introduced by Councillor Monto): Introduced and tabled.\n- Meeting adjourned by motion.
Meeting Transcript
Please stand for the Pledge of Allegiance. Amen and I pledge allegiance of the United States of America. It's the Republic for which you say one nation under God. And please continue standing. We want to welcome Reverend Nola Anderson. Let us pray. Holy one, as we got her in this space, called sacred even before the city was named. We ask that democracy would never be silenced, that each voice would be heard and respected, that the needs of all may be addressed, and that your holy presence will fill each heart and fill this space. In your holy name we pray. Amen. Amen. Thank you. Would the clerk please call the roll? Yes, Madam President. Counselor Cartwell. Present. Councilor Machok here. Counselor Aaron. Councilor Hudson. Councilor Nabe. Here. Counselor Moore. Here. Counselor Williams. Here. Counselor Jones Browser. Present. Counselor Mato. Here. Uh president with exception. Counselor Hudson. Okay. Um, may I have a motion to approve the minutes for March 23rd? So moved. Second. All in favor. Opposed. All right. Now we're gonna move into our public hearing relative to agenda item number 24 to amend ordinance for 17 2025. The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 2526, Year 51, Community Development Block Grant, C D B D Budget by 967 782 as detailed in the legislation. Do we have any comments? Coming in. Is there anyone here to speak in favor of the proposal? Please state your name or address. Seeing none, is there not if there is is there any one more chance? Okay, so moving on. Anyone here to speak against the proposal? Okay, thank you. Is there anyone else here to speak regarding this proposal?
openpublica.com