Syracuse Landmarks Preservation Board Public Hearing on Islamic Society Expansion, May 14, 2026
Syracuse Landmarks Preservation Board Public Hearing on Islamic Society Expansion, May 14, 2026
The Syracuse Landmarks Preservation Board held a public hearing on May 14, 2026, to consider a certificate of appropriateness for a proposed expansion of the Islamic Society of Central New York’s mosque at 1515 Comstock Avenue in the Berkeley Park Historic District. The proposal included a 3,600-square-foot addition, expanded parking from 22 to 27 spaces, a 40-foot dome, and significant paving and tree removal. The board heard extensive testimony from the applicant and from neighbors in opposition, then voted to hold the application open pending additional information.
Public Comments & Testimony
- Applicant’s Presentation (Ed Kaplinger, site planner; Ben Larson, architect): Described the scope: a 3,600-square-foot addition, one-way circulation, expanded parking to 27 spaces (zoning requires 67), lot coverage of 38–39% (max 20%), and a six-foot fence with landscaping. The addition would be under height limits, use similar materials, and be largely screened by existing trees. The applicant stated the need for a proper funeral service facility, as the current building cannot accommodate women and seniors. Friday prayers have been moved to a new site in Jamesville, but funerals must remain at Comstock due to religious requirements for immediate burial and historic connection to the adjacent cemetery.
- Speakers in Favor (Mohammed, president of Islamic Society; Abdulaziz Shifa, faculty at Syracuse University; Mohammed Qater, longtime member): Emphasized the historical significance of the mosque as the first in Syracuse, its community service role, and the critical need for a dignified funeral space. They noted that the expansion is solely for funerals, not for weekly prayers, and that the community is working to shift Friday attendance to the Jamesville site. They expressed openness to modification and pledged to address neighbor concerns about rats, lights, and dumpster noise.
- Speakers in Opposition (seven neighbors, including Deborah Bandolin, Rex Jardine, Jody Upton, Mike Stanton, Stephanie Bartling, Don Peters, Chris Capella Peters, Matt Kisling, Gary Engelhart, and others): Raised numerous concerns: the building’s mass and scale would dwarf adjacent historic homes, the 40-foot dome would loom over backyards, the loss of 18+ old-growth trees and vegetation would destroy privacy and noise mitigation, and the proposed paving (40% lot coverage) would turn the site into a parking lot, eroding the historic district’s park-like character. They cited traffic and parking chaos on Fridays (300–400 cars on neighborhood streets), safety hazards, stormwater runoff, light intrusion, noise, and precedent of unapproved expansions. Many noted that the mosque has already outgrown the site, that the Jamesville property could accommodate cemetery and funeral needs, and that the current plan violates the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Historic Preservation. Several neighbors acknowledged positive relations with the mosque but urged rejection of the current proposal or a scaled-back version.
Discussion Items
- Board members discussed the volume of public opposition, noting it was unprecedented in their experience. They identified scale, massing, lot coverage, and tree removal as primary concerns. One member questioned whether a smaller addition (e.g., an elevator) was considered. The applicant’s president responded that the expansion is necessary for women’s comfort and funeral services but expressed willingness to scale back and work with neighbors.
- Board member Kate Oeter requested a photo montage or streetscape elevation to better assess the building’s massing relative to the district. The applicant agreed to provide that.
- The board clarified that the public hearing remains open, and the public will have opportunity to respond to revised proposals.
Key Outcomes
- The board voted to hold the application open pending additional information from the applicant. The motion carried with two abstentions (Nicole Fragnito and Julia Marshall).
- The board directed staff to communicate specific concerns to the applicant: scale, massing, lot coverage, tree preservation, lighting, and the need for visual context (photo montage).
- The public hearing remains open; future revisions will be subject to further public comment.
- No decision on the certificate of appropriateness was made.
Meeting Transcript
Is this working? Can people hear me or no? Yes, through the microphone. Good morning, thank you. One minute in here. Okay. Copies of the letters that were submitted? I do. I got an addition. I have six last night. So I have copies. And I do have copies. Oh, okay. Do you want to have the chance? 830. Uh good morning. Uh this is the Syracuse Landmarks Preservation Board meeting of May 14th, 2026. Present at the meeting area. Hello. Howard Trish, Robert's hearing. Nicole Fragnito. Kyle Gregory. Julia Marshall. Jeff Romano. Hillary Donahue. The attorney. And Kate Oeter. Preservation order. May I have a motion to accept the minutes of April 23rd, 2026? So moved. Is there a second? I second. Any modifications to the minutes? All in favor uh of the minutes is submitted. I any opposition, any abstentions? The minutes are adopted. We will now be um conducting a public meeting, and I will be recusing myself from the public meeting. And Jeff Romano will be leading. I will also be recusing myself from the good morning, everybody. Uh the board will now conduct a public hearing on today's agenda. First, the applicant or the applicant's representative will be invited to describe the proposed scope of work and to present any material or documentation regarding the proposal to the board. Next, persons wishing to speak in favor of the proposal will be given the opportunity to address the board. Then persons who wish to speak in opposition to the proposal will be allowed to address the board. Following public comment, the board may vote to approve, approve with conditions, or deny the application as heard. The board may also decide to hold its decision until the next public hearing. If the hearing is closed, no additional information will be allowed into the record except for the information the board may request. That information will be available for public review with the board staff. Staff will now introduce the first application. It's a certificate of appropriateness. With me is representing all of the standard second.
openpublica.com