Joint Public Safety and Finance Committee Meeting on Automated Enforcement Program – May 28, 2026
Joint Public Safety and Finance Committee Meeting on Automated Enforcement Program – May 28, 2026
This joint meeting of the Public Safety and Finance committees, chaired by Councilor Donna Moore, received an update on the city's automated enforcement programs (school bus stop arm, red light, and school speed zone cameras) and discussed proposed legislation to allow booting of vehicles for unpaid automated enforcement tickets. Presenters included Craig Whitmer (Office of Analytics, Performance and Innovation) and Leah Whitmer (Director of the Municipal Violations Bureau), with representatives from vendor Genoptic available for questions.
Discussion Items
- Program Update (November 2025 – April 2026): Craig Whitmer reported a 46% decline in the most dangerous speeders (from ~1,300 violations per school day to ~575), representing 55 fewer violations per school day. 41% of tickets went to non-city residents (about 33% to suburbs/central NY, 8% out-of-state, a significant portion of those to rental car companies). City residents' share of citations dropped from 60% in November to 55% in April, suggesting possible behavior change. Total revenue collected: $3.8 million, with the city's share at $2.4 million. About $2 million in tickets are eligible for collections, with a 35% pay rate. Data is preliminary; a full school-year analysis will be available in July/August.
- Summer School and Camera Adjustments: Enforcement will continue during summer school sessions, with hours aligned with the school district's schedule. The city is finalizing location changes for speed and red light cameras due to infrastructure issues. Officials noted that flashing lights at some schools are controlled by DPW and operate 7 a.m. to 6 p.m. on school days; no tickets are issued outside those hours even if flashers are on.
- Continuous Improvement and Side-Street Concerns: Councilor Marty Nave raised that drivers are cutting through the Hazard Library parking lot to avoid a red light near a school, endangering pedestrians. Craig Whitmer acknowledged this as a continuous improvement issue and agreed to discuss speed bumps with DPW and engineering.
- Legislation to Allow Booting for Automated Enforcement Tickets: Leah Whitmer introduced a proposal to amend the local parking violations law to allow booting for one unpaid school bus ticket ($250) or any combination of three unpaid automated enforcement or parking tickets. She argued that without a collection mechanism, tickets will remain uncollected, and that the ability to boot (even if not used immediately) is necessary to recover past-due tickets. She noted that the city's contract with Paylock is expiring, necessitating action.
- Council Concerns About Timing and Process: Councilor Rashida Caldwell expressed strong concern that the city is moving too fast, less than a year into the program, with a backlog of about 4,000 hearings (including parking tickets). She argued that the city should first fix process gaps (e.g., ticket mailing timelines, hearing delays, errors) before adding booting, which would disproportionately affect low-income city residents. Councilor Helen Hudson questioned whether traffic studies were conducted before rollout and suggested understanding behavioral changes before punitive measures. Councilor Caldwell also noted that the city cannot boot out-of-state drivers, so the burden falls on locals. Councilor Petrona Jones Rouser asked about staffing, learning that only two positions were created for the program.
- Other Issues: A suggestion was made to educate the public about alternate routes to avoid school zones. Councilor Helen Hudson raised that residents cannot pay tickets by check in person; payments must be mailed to Atlanta or paid by credit card/cash at City Payment Center. Leah Whitmer said she is open to discussing the legislation's details and invited councilors to observe hearings.
Key Outcomes
- No formal vote was taken on the proposed legislation. The administration will continue to explore collection options, including a potential RFP for collection agencies, and will engage with council members on the booting proposal's details.
- The city will finalize summer school enforcement plans and communicate with the public.
- DPW and engineering will be asked to assess speed bumps at the Hazard Library location.
- A full data analysis for the school year is expected in July/August 2026, which will inform future decisions on collections.
Meeting Transcript
1030, so we'll get started. Um, my name's Donna Moore. I am chair of public safety, and this is a joint meeting between public safety and the finance committee. I have joining with me today uh counselors Marty Nave, Councillor Rashida Caldwell, Counselor Helen Hudson, and Councilor Petrona Jones Rouser. And if you guys want to introduce yourselves. Good morning, counselors. Craig Whitmer with the Office of Analytics Performance and Innovation. And Leah Whitmer, the director and chief administrative law judge of the municipal violations bureau. Okay. Um I'll let you guys start. Thank you so much, Counselor. So we have prepared a sort of general moment in time presentation that will provide uh some kind of summary data points, try to give an update of uh where the program's at so far, recognizing that we're not going to be able to provide full data until the school year is done to be able to really inform uh high-level decision making or anything like that. So uh we're hoping that we can kind of give a general overview, um have a few discussion points to raise and kind of ask questions to you on how uh being involved in different components going forward will be best, um, and then answer any questions. Okay. So uh agenda for today, we're gonna provide a little bit of background history, uh, talk about program exact objectives, run through the timeline a little bit, talk to some summary data points, then talk about next steps. I do want to also point out that we have um our vendor here, uh, representatives from Genoptic who will be able to speak to um some more specific pro uh questions for the program if they come up. So a little bit on the background of this. So this is a program that was started under the Walsh administration, the goal being uh to ensure student and resident safety. If you recall um when this was initially brought to the council and approved, there was a significant uptick in the number of students who are being injured uh in and around school zones, uh in and around uh Syracuse and the central New York region. Uh overall, this is looking to uh meet the mark on Vision Zero. So that's the goal of zero fatalities in streets, and then over the long term, uh the goal of this program is not just to be able to kind of uh automate enforcement in school zones and the surrounding areas, but um understand what does continuous improvement look like. If we are uh monitoring enforcement um on certain streets, if there is um speedsters, for example, that are being driven to side streets, does it make sense to implement safety measures like uh speed bumps there? Uh we've had some discussions about that, but uh overall trying to uh improve over time. You said it doesn't make sense or it makes sense. Does it make sense? Trying to understand what is continuous improvement uh in automated enforcement look like over time. Gotcha. So just for a timeline um between and this is when it was approved between 2023 and 2024. Really, there's a little bit more that happened in 2019, but for the programs that we're going to discuss today, that's uh school bus stop arm, red light cameras, and school speed zone cameras, New York State authorized city-level demonstration programs for automated enforcement between 2023 and 2024. Um here locally, between September of 2023 and 2024, we go through the process of uh RFP's bid and contract award for all three programs. Um, and good to keep in mind that we went from not doing any form of automated enforcement to doing uh three programs, the the first municipality in the state to do that. Uh the school bus stop our morning period began in May. Um, and then between September and October of 2025, we did a warning period for um speed and red light. Uh, there was probably an uptick in the number of calls everyone received. Uh, if you recall, we had about 180,000 warnings issued, uh, mostly for uh speed cameras, but again, we chose to do a 60-day warning period uh because we knew that this was going to be such a tremendous shift, um, and because we really wanted to ensure that um the community uh understood that we were taking um ensuring residents knew what was going on seriously. So September 17th, uh I'm sorry, I made an error here. It should be September 17th, 2025. Uh, we had a special committee meeting here with all of you to discuss. We engaged in a pretty significant conversation then, and um November 3rd, 2025. Again, my apologies, the dates are wrong here. Um, ticketing began um two months into the school year of 2025. So what have we kind of achieved over the last few months? So if you look at the data from November to April, so that's when we started enforcing uh these numbers look a little bit different if you were to count the warning period, but because it's SKUs so heavy, we wanted to focus on uh November and April. Um you're seeing about 55 fewer violations per school day. So you've dropped from about 1300 to about 575. Um that 46% decline in the most dangerous speeders uh going from November through April. So we're talking about folks that are driving uh what is that, a 66 and a 30, something like that. Um the the real threats to uh life and limb. Um, you know, 41% of the tickets, and there will be a slide about this next, about 41 of those percent of those tickets are going outside of the city of Syracuse. So we're talking about a third of that.
openpublica.com