OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Topeka, Kansas/Planning Commission
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Topeka Planning Commission Meeting Summary for September 16, 2025

Planning Commission — Tuesday, September 16, 2025
BodyTopeka, Kansas
SessionPlanning Commission
DateTuesday, September 16, 2025
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:50:26

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it
0:18

Good evening and welcome to the City of Topeka's Planning Commission meeting.

0:22

We are a commission appointed by the mayor and city council to plan for the orderly growth and development of the community, to hold public hearings, and to make recommendations to the governing body on planning items.

0:34

Please note that the governing body rules state that public hearings for planning cases shall be conducted solely by the planning commission.

0:42

No additional public hearings will be conducted by the governing body.

0:46

Tonight's cases are tentatively scheduled to be heard by the governing body next month.

0:55

Agendas can be found on Topeka.org.

0:58

Some of tonight's cases involve public hearings.

1:01

For those cases, the procedure will be as follows.

1:05

First, the planning staff will summarize the case.

1:09

Next, we will hear from the applicant or their representative.

1:13

Then we will receive public testimony.

1:16

Comments are limited to four minutes.

1:18

For agenda items that do not involve public hearings, public comment is allowed provided that the person has signed up on Topeka speaks or has notified staff prior to 5 p.m.

1:28

today.

1:29

Comments are limited to four minutes.

1:31

Finally, at the end of regular business, the commission will entertain general comment regarding matters relating to the commission business, provided the person is signed up on Topeka speaks or is notified staff prior to 5 p.m.

1:45

today.

1:46

Again, comments are limited to four minutes.

1:49

Amanda, please take the roll.

1:53

Mr.

1:54

Lolly.

1:54

Here.

1:55

Miss Nelson.

1:57

Here.

1:58

Miss Heron.

2:00

Here.

2:01

Mr.

2:01

Burks.

2:02

Here.

2:03

Mr.

2:03

Cow?

2:04

Here.

2:05

Mr.

2:06

Nager?

2:07

Here.

2:08

Miss Pearson?

2:09

Here.

2:10

Ms.

2:10

Hannon.

2:11

Here.

2:12

We have enough for a quorum.

2:15

Next is uh any consideration of our minutes from the last meeting.

2:21

I do know that we receive a public comment with a couple corrections on our minutes of spelling of name and things like that.

2:29

Yes.

2:29

Thank you, Mr.

2:30

Chairman.

2:30

I have two corrections if I could.

2:32

I'd like I need to be listed in the members present at the meeting if you at the staff if uh Amanda would add that.

2:40

And then on page four of the minutes, the first paragraph, uh paragraph at the top of the page, the uh fourth line.

2:48

It um it talks about uh said I would be delighted if it meaning the proposal resulted in five or ten new duplexes in Topeka.

2:58

Uh I believe the testimony was that or my statement was that five or ten new duplexes a year.

3:04

Or over my lifetime, well, whichever comes first.

3:08

So but I'd I'd like to have it say five or ten new duplexes a year.

3:14

All right.

3:15

Any other things that people got I would take a motion to approve with all those edits that we talked about.

3:29

So move.

3:31

Second.

3:32

Any discussion?

3:36

Go ahead and take the vote.

3:40

Ms.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Housing And Development███████████████████████████████████35%
Community Engagement████████████████████20%
Zoning Regulations████████████████16%
Procedural████████8%
Engineering And Infrastructure████████8%
Affordable Housing██████6%
Personnel Matters███3%
Historic Preservation██2%
Transportation Safety█1%
Summary of Proceedings

Topeka Planning Commission Meeting Summary for September 16, 2025

The City of Topeka Planning Commission met on September 16, 2025, to consider a preliminary and final plat for Ardmore Walk Edition, a related annexation, and a proposed text amendment to the zoning code regarding multifamily housing. The commission approved the plat and annexation and deferred a decision on the text amendment to allow for further discussion and public input. The meeting also included recognition of Commissioner Jim Kaup for his service.

Consent Calendar

  • Minutes Approval: The commission approved the minutes from the prior meeting with two corrections: (1) adding Commissioner Kaup to the members present, and (2) correcting a statement to reflect "five or ten new duplexes a year" instead of simply "five or ten new duplexes." The motion passed unanimously.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Ardmore Walk Edition: No public comments were received.
  • Multifamily Housing Text Amendment: Multiple residents spoke in opposition to the proposed changes, requesting more neighborhood engagement and a slower process. Key points included:
    • A representative from Elmhurst expressed concern over limited notification for conditional use permits and the speed of the process, questioning whether the change would produce the desired housing outcomes.
    • A College Hill resident presented data showing that existing home prices in her neighborhood already meet the target affordable range ($150,000 average sale price), arguing that the change is unnecessary.
    • A resident from Potwin Place stated that neighborhoods should vote on such changes rather than a commission of 13.
    • A Collins Park resident called the public engagement process disingenuous and opposed any form of upzoning (by right, CUP, or administrative), noting a unified coalition of neighborhoods forming to oppose the proposal.
    • A representative from Historic Old Town NIA cautioned about unintended consequences, drawing parallels to past policy decisions that harmed community fabric.
    • Multiple speakers cited the need for neighborhood-by-neighborhood engagement and suggested "pumping the brakes."

Discussion Items

  • P2508 – Preliminary and Final Plat for Ardmore Walk Edition: Staff presented a proposal to subdivide 25.28 acres into 42 lots, public roads, and stormwater detention, with three phases. The property is contiguous to city limits and requires annexation. Staff recommended approval. Commissioner Brooks raised concerns from a neighboring property owner about stormwater runoff and traffic. The applicant's engineer responded that a stormwater management plan would reduce post-development flows to pre-development levels, and a traffic impact study showed minor increases (37 AM peak, 48 PM peak trips). Commission discussion added a note that staff's finding of conformance to the comprehensive plan is subject to construction of planned infrastructure. The plat was approved unanimously with that condition.
  • Annexation for Ardmore Walk Edition: Staff explained that the property is contiguous and the owner consents. The planning commission's role is to determine consistency with the comprehensive plan. Staff recommended finding the project consistent. The commission voted unanimously to approve the consistency finding.
  • Text Amendment Regarding Multifamily Housing (Duplexes, Triplexes, Quadplexes): Staff presented a memo recommending a public hearing and deferral to a future meeting. The housing committee currently recommends allowing these uses by conditional use permit (CUP) in R1 and R2 districts. Staff noted that over 20 other non-single-family uses are already allowed in those districts by CUP. The CUP process includes neighborhood notification, public hearing, and a development plan. Staff argued that this approach is context-sensitive and avoids arbitrary treatment of neighborhoods. Commissioners discussed the need for more time to consider written comments, including a 13-page submission from former planning director Bill Feander. Commissioner Brooks expressed support for new construction duplexes (especially replacing blighted homes) but had concerns about conversions and triplexes/quadplexes regarding parking and density. Commissioner Nelson supported the CUP approach and noted the need for affordable housing. Commissioner Kaup, in his final meeting, emphasized that the expected impact is modest (single-digit or small double-digit new units per year) and that the housing crisis warrants action. Several commissioners noted the significance of the issue and the need to carefully weigh input. The commission voted to defer the item to the October meeting for further discussion.

Key Outcomes

  • P2508 Plat Approval: Motion to approve the preliminary and final plat for Ardmore Walk Edition, subject to staff conditions and the added condition that conformance to the comprehensive plan is subject to construction of planned infrastructure. Passed unanimously (8-0).
  • Annexation Consistency Finding: Motion to find that the annexation is consistent with the comprehensive plan. Passed unanimously (8-0).
  • Text Amendment Deferral: Motion to defer consideration of the text amendment to the October 2025 meeting. Passed unanimously (8-0). The commission will discuss and potentially vote at that time.

Recognition

  • Commissioner Jim Kaup was recognized for his 12 years of service on the Planning Commission. Staff and fellow commissioners praised his expertise, detailed questions, and commitment to addressing the city's housing crisis. Commissioner Kaup thanked the commission and staff, emphasizing the importance of the planning commission's work in balancing private property rights with community interests.

Meeting Transcript

Good evening and welcome to the City of Topeka's Planning Commission meeting. We are a commission appointed by the mayor and city council to plan for the orderly growth and development of the community, to hold public hearings, and to make recommendations to the governing body on planning items. Please note that the governing body rules state that public hearings for planning cases shall be conducted solely by the planning commission. No additional public hearings will be conducted by the governing body. Tonight's cases are tentatively scheduled to be heard by the governing body next month. Agendas can be found on Topeka.org. Some of tonight's cases involve public hearings. For those cases, the procedure will be as follows. First, the planning staff will summarize the case. Next, we will hear from the applicant or their representative. Then we will receive public testimony. Comments are limited to four minutes. For agenda items that do not involve public hearings, public comment is allowed provided that the person has signed up on Topeka speaks or has notified staff prior to 5 p.m. today. Comments are limited to four minutes. Finally, at the end of regular business, the commission will entertain general comment regarding matters relating to the commission business, provided the person is signed up on Topeka speaks or is notified staff prior to 5 p.m. today. Again, comments are limited to four minutes. Amanda, please take the roll. Mr. Lolly. Here. Miss Nelson. Here. Miss Heron. Here. Mr. Burks. Here. Mr. Cow? Here. Mr. Nager? Here. Miss Pearson? Here. Ms. Hannon. Here. We have enough for a quorum. Next is uh any consideration of our minutes from the last meeting. I do know that we receive a public comment with a couple corrections on our minutes of spelling of name and things like that. Yes. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I have two corrections if I could. I'd like I need to be listed in the members present at the meeting if you at the staff if uh Amanda would add that. And then on page four of the minutes, the first paragraph, uh paragraph at the top of the page, the uh fourth line. It um it talks about uh said I would be delighted if it meaning the proposal resulted in five or ten new duplexes in Topeka.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com