City of Tualatin Council Work Session – November 10, 2025
City of Tualatin Council Work Session – November 10, 2025
The Tualatin City Council held a work session on November 10, 2025, to discuss proposed increases to private property impound (PPI) rates, hear the city manager’s report, and receive updates from council members. No votes were taken; the council reached consensus to maintain current rates and not pursue the requested increases at this time.
Discussion Items
- Private Property Impound Rates: Don Hudson, Assistant City Manager/Finance Director, and William Sullivan, Management Analyst, presented the item. The current PPI rates were adopted in October 2013 via TMC 8-5 and have not been updated. Beaverton Towing submitted a letter requesting a rate review; Protow also sent a letter. Staff surveyed 11 neighboring/comparator cities and found that most do not regulate PPI fees; Tualatin is one of four (along with Portland, Gresham, and Fairview) that do. The proposed rates from Beaverton Towing were substantially higher than current rates and higher than Portland’s (e.g., Class A hookup fee: current $175, Portland $196, proposed $250+). Council members expressed a range of positions:
- Council President Pratt and Councilor Gonzalez opposed any increase, citing the current rates as reasonable and protective of residents from price gouging.
- Councilor Sacco supported keeping regulation but was open to small adjustments for heavier vehicles (Classes B and C) with justification.
- Councilor Ray (Reyes) opposed increases, noting they were exorbitant compared to 2013 rates.
- Councilor Hillinger (Hillier) opposed increases for Class A, but was open to minimal increases for larger vehicles if data showed a problem with tow availability for businesses.
- Councilor Gonzalez and Councilor Pratt also emphasized that only one towing company had requested the increase and that no businesses had complained about difficulty obtaining towing services.
- The council concluded that staff should not spend further time on the issue; if the towing company wishes to propose a more reasonable request with justification (especially for heavier vehicles), they may return. The consensus was to maintain current rates and revisit only if business concerns arise.
- City Manager’s Report: City Manager reported on attending the International City Managers Conference (Tampa), including sessions on water quality, economic development, and youth engagement. Also noted successful passage of the library levy and public safety levy in the recent election, final stages of hiring a planning manager, and upcoming Veterans Day and yard debris drop-off events.
- Council Round Table: Council members reported on various meetings attended:
- Councilor Sacco: Attended Metro Westside meeting, State of the County (Clackamas), Veterans Breakfast, and the Community Action Committee (CAC) meeting reviewing Michelle/Savills’ presentation (results to be presented December 8).
- Councilor Hillinger: Attended League of Oregon Cities fundamentals training and Veterans Breakfast.
- Councilor Ray: No formal meetings (on vacation).
- Council President Pratt: Attended Metro Regional Partners Workshop on garbage/recycling fees, Metro Creating Our Shared Future forum, CAC meeting, CCIO meeting with DAs on retail theft, emergency meeting on ICE activities (noting concerns and advice for community members), Veterans Breakfast, and C4 meeting in Canby (housing and transit). Also noted new role as vice chair of the Community That Cares key leaders committee.
Key Outcomes
- No change to PPI rates: The council directed staff not to pursue the proposed rate increases. Staff may inform Beaverton Towing that a revised, more justified request (particularly for heavier vehicles) could be considered, but the council does not want significant staff time spent on this.
- No formal vote: Consensus was reached to maintain current rates and not dedicate further staff resources at this time.
- Other: Council noted the passage of the library and public safety levies, and the upcoming CAC presentation on December 8.
Meeting Transcript
10th City of Twalton uh council work session. Uh we start up the session tonight with uh private property impound rates discussion uh led by Don Hudson, our finance director, and William Sullivan, who were is a management analyst here in the city. Welcome to you both. Thank you, Mayor Bubinick, members of the council. My name is Don Hudson. I'm the assistant city manager and finance director here with the city, and with me this evening is our management analyst in finance, William Sullivan. So back in October of 2013, council adopted TMC 8-5, towing from private property, which requires tow companies to get a license to be able to tow off a private property and follow certain rules. Uh in addition, there are maximum rates that they can charge the vehicle owners for any vehicles that are towed. Those rates have not been updated since the ordinance went into effect in 2013. Back this last summer, we received a letter from Beaverton Towing asking to review the rates because they have not been changed. That letter is attached for your review. Back on September 8th, we met in work session presenting this information to you. And at that point, you directed staff to go back, do some research of what neighboring cities and other local uh municipalities in our area were charging and regulating for private property tows. Uh after that meeting, I received a letter from Protow, which I've also attached to your staff report this evening. William conducted the research that you asked for, so I'm gonna turn it over to him to summarize the information he found out. Thank you. Uh Assistant City Manager Finance Director Don Hudson. Uh, and good evening, council. It's great to be with you this evening. Um so uh as mentioned, I got to do some of the research around private property uh impoundment, uh, which we're gonna talk a little bit more about this evening. Um so I went ahead and reviewed uh municipal codes of several uh neighboring and comparator cities, um, which showed that most cities do not regulate private property impoundment uh in the ways that Tualeton does. Uh however, Tweleton is not alone in that. So before I go any further, I just want to uh remind council of of I keep using this uh term private property impoundment. So this refers to uh tows that are uh ordered by a private uh entity, generally uh maybe something like a parking garage owner, manager, um, or a parking lot uh owner um towing uh private vehicles from their property. Um so we reviewed uh 11 neighboring and uh neighboring and comparator cities uh and found that they do not regulate private uh parking impoundment fees. Uh those include cities like Tiger, Beaverton, and Lake Oswego, um, as well as several others, and you'll find those in table two of the staff report. Um however, as I mentioned, um well, most cities do not regulate private private property impoundment. Uh Tualton is one of four that do. So the other three that do are the city of cities of Portland, of Gresham, and of Fairview. Um, and you'll find information on their rates there in table one. Um, and I'll take a moment just to orient uh folks that table uh briefly. So uh if you want to take a look at table one there, um you'll notice that the types of fees that are charged uh are listed in the leftmost column. Um those fees include hookup fees, which include dispatch and labor involved in hooking up a vehicle to a tow truck, uh involves towed mileage fees covering transportation of a towed vehicle to a tow lot, uh lien filing fees, which are generally charged after a vehicle has been stored by a towing company for five days or more, uh release at scenes or drop fees, some jurisdictions call them drop fees, uh, and those cover fees if a uh vehicle has been hooked up, um, but the towing didn't actually begin. Uh storage fees covering the tow company's costs to store the vehicle, um, as well as additional fees, which for the city of Tualton uh includes an after hours release fee uh for vehicles released outside of business hours. Uh you'll also note there that uh you'll see some fees are divided by class. That uh is based upon the gross uh vehicle weight uh of the vehicle being towed. Most vehicles fall in class A, so that's up to 10,000 pounds in gross vehicle weight. Um Class B is 10 to 20,000, and class C is 20,000 and above. Um as you look at table one, uh you'll notice we have Portland, Gresham, Fairview, and Twalaton moving left to right, and the truth the rates that are proposed by Beaverton towing uh on the far right there. Um so that's what we have for the council. Um I want to see if the council has any questions or follow-ups. Okay, questions. Council President Pratt. Um I want to understand why um there's only this four cities that impose these rates. What's the the logic behind imposing these rates as opposed to all the other cities that don't to start? I I think we'd we'd have to bring some further research back to council on that. Um but I can't say other cities have more to do with parking um where they might have a parking division, whereas we rely more on uh private private. I was on council when we did this. It was to protect the residents of Twalton from being gouged on PPI tows, which are private property tows. Those cities that don't have regulations, the towers decide what the rates are.
openpublica.com