OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Tualatin, Oregon/City Council
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Tualatin City Council Work Session: Climate Action Plan and Eviction Prevention (October 26, 2026)

City Council — Monday, October 26, 2026
BodyTualatin, Oregon
SessionCity Council
DateMonday, October 26, 2026
StatusNEW · FILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:23:30

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording. Names come from transcript evidence. “Possibly” marks uncertain attribution.

Speaker 1

0:06

Good evening and welcome to the October 26, 2026 12 to City Council work session.

0:12

First item on our agenda tonight is the Climate Action Plan, five-year work plan of development.

0:18

Amanda, welcome.

Unassigned speaker

0:22

All

Speaker 2

0:22

right, is that working?

Speaker 1

0:23

Yep.

Speaker 2

0:24

All right.

0:24

Good evening, Mayor and Counselors.

0:26

My name is Amanda Watson.

0:28

I'm the city's climate action program manager.

0:30

I'm gonna share an update today on the development of our five-year work plan for the climate action plan.

0:36

And I'll start with just a quick reminder of where we are in the development process.

0:40

And as a reminder, our plan itself, the climate action plan has over well over a hundred actions

Unassigned speaker

0:46

that

Speaker 2

0:46

are focused on preparing our community for the impacts of climate change that we're already experiencing, and then achieving net zero carbon emissions by 2050.

0:56

So this spring we pulled together a cross-departmental working group of city staff, and we also heard from advisory committees and met with you all in uh April, I believe it was.

1:08

I should have written the date down here, but earlier this spring, um, to talk about the criteria that we wanted to use to select which actions actions in our plan we should prioritize to implement over the next five years.

1:19

So that would be 2026 to 2031 period.

Unassigned speaker

1:23

Um

Speaker 2

1:23

and we are now looking at this reviewing results phase here.

Speaker 3

1:30

Uh

Unassigned speaker

1:32

see if this

Speaker 3

1:33

clicker works.

1:34

There we go.

1:35

Whoop.

Speaker 2

1:36

Um, so the prioritization criteria, we did um we scored actions in two rounds.

1:41

The first round looked at the climate impact of each action, co-benefits, so things like you know the economic benefits or environmental or health and safety,

Unassigned speaker

1:51

um,

Speaker 2

1:51

whether or not an action aligned with council goals and/or other adopted city plans, and then opportuneness or timeliness.

1:57

This had to do with whether an action in our climate action plan aligned

Unassigned speaker

2:01

with

Speaker 2

2:01

other projects we had going on at the city, um, external partner projects and/or funding opportunities.

Unassigned speaker

2:07

And

Speaker 2

2:07

then we took, after we did the scoring for those first four criteria, we took the highest scoring actions and we scored them on the next round of criteria.

2:16

So the round two one looked at feasibility.

2:19

This is really this set of criteria is about sort of the city implementation of it.

2:23

So feasibility looked at staff capacity, whether or not we had existing staff capacity to do an action.

2:29

Um, it looked at whether or not we knew anything about community support for one of the actions in our plan, um, funding availability and other kind of enabling conditions for an action.

2:39

We looked at implementation cost, kind of rough estimates, right?

2:42

Because of a lot of it we don't have budget details yet, but implementation cost for each action, and then whether or not there was an opportunity for long-term cost savings for the city.

2:53

Um, and so after that second round of criteria, we had a short list of actions and the highest scoring actions make up that draft work plan action list that we're going to be reviewing today.

Unassigned speaker

3:06

Um,

Speaker 2

3:06

so in addition to the prioritization criteria, we had a few other things we wanted to take into account when we looked at that list of actions as a whole.

3:14

Um, first, we wanted to make sure that we were making progress across all of the different focus areas in our climate action plan.

3:20

So, both adaptation actions and mitigation, um addressing all of our major climate hazards, um, so heat, flooding, wildfire smoke, um, and then also addressing all of the major sources of emissions in our community, right?

3:32

From buildings to transportation, etc.

3:36

Um we also wanted to look at so while the scoring looked at uh staff capacity for each individual action, we also wanted to look across the body of work as a whole represented by the list so that we could make sure to balance work that was in progress on ongoing with the new initiatives we take on in the next five years, and balancing short-term actions with longer-term actions.

Unassigned speaker

3:58

Um

Speaker 2

3:58

so one of the things that I heard from the all of you this spring was was really an interest in um finding those opportunities to demonstrate progress quickly on our climate action plan, right?

4:07

How can we show the community what this looks like?

4:09

Where can we find those sort of lower hanging fruit or quick start actions?

4:13

Um, but how can we also make progress in some of those longer-term actions and goals that will take more effort or more time?

4:19

And so the list also balances those kind of shorter term actions with initial steps for the longer term ones too.

Unassigned speaker

4:26

So

Speaker 2

4:26

we'll see a mix of things like education and outreach, which can be a kind of quicker start, lighter lift in some cases, with a policy actions that can take longer time to develop and implement.

4:39

And then finally, we wanted to make sure to leave room for new opportunities and emerging priorities.

4:44

Five years is a fairly long planning horizon, right?

4:46

For for a work plan, and we know that things change and opportunities come up.

4:50

And so when we looked at the list of actions as a whole, we wanted to make sure it was a reasonable number.

Unassigned speaker

4:55

We were had a lot of at work in there, but we weren't overcommitting so that we can still adjust as we need to going on.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Climate Action Planning█████████████████████████████29%
Public Engagement████████████████████████████28%
Eviction Prevention████████████████16%
Parks and Recreation█████5%
Public Health Awareness████4%
Affordable Housing███3%
Water And Wastewater Management███3%
Technology and Innovation██2%
Urban Planning██2%
Summary of Proceedings

Tualatin City Council Work Session: Climate Action Plan and Eviction Prevention (October 26, 2026)

The Tualatin City Council held a work session on October 26, 2026. Staff presented the draft five-year Climate Action Plan work plan, outlined a proposed eviction prevention grant program, reviewed the upcoming council agenda, and heard council roundtable updates. No agenda or minutes were included with the transcript; the regular council meeting was scheduled to follow the work session.

Climate Action Plan Five-Year Work Plan

  • Amanda Watson, climate action program manager, said the Climate Action Plan includes more than 100 actions to prepare for climate impacts and reach net zero carbon emissions by 2050. The draft work plan covers 2026-2031 and was developed with a cross-departmental staff group, advisory committees, and earlier council feedback.
  • Actions were scored in two rounds. Round 1 considered climate impact, co-benefits, alignment with council goals and adopted plans, and opportuneness. Round 2 considered feasibility, staff capacity, community support, funding, rough implementation cost, and long-term cost savings.
  • The draft list balances adaptation and mitigation, all major hazards (heat, flooding, wildfire smoke) and emission sources, ongoing versus new work, and short-term versus longer-term efforts, while leaving room for emerging opportunities.
  • Highlighted draft actions include: heat-focused communications and tree canopy efforts, Emerald Ash Borer response under the Tualatin River watershed action, wildfire preparedness and air filtration outreach, flood reduction and stormwater work tied to downtown and Nyberg Creek, building energy efficiency incentives, home energy scores, EV charging and R99 renewable diesel policies, consumer choice and multifamily recycling initiatives, and a facilities master plan that integrates climate goals.
  • Councilors offered suggestions: Councilor Brooks asked about measuring emissions and suggested public-friendly projections; Councilor Gonzalez asked to emphasize reduce/reuse before recycling, explore cool/white roofs, and support dry-season walkability; Councilor Sacco asked about partnerships with the IDEA Committee and the Grand Ronde Tribe and multilingual emergency preparedness resources; Council President Pratt asked for housing variety/ADU connections, confirmed extreme weather shelters are in place, and asked about CERT evacuation workshops and heat-resource maps.
  • Watson said the next GHG inventory update will measure community-wide progress, some individual actions can be quantified while education actions are indirect, and staff could investigate cool roofs, reuse partnerships, and community walking/carpooling events.

Eviction Prevention Grant Program

  • Robin Doty, interim deputy city manager, introduced the item and Megan Cohen, homelessness liaison, presented the proposal. The program would use supportive housing services funds to prevent homelessness before eviction, focusing on Tualatin renters with one-time arrears caused by short-term job loss, medical emergencies, or similar situations.
  • The proposed partner is Family Promise of Tualatin Valley, which operates a 70-bed family shelter and already has dedicated eviction prevention staff. They would handle household income verification, light-touch case management, direct payments to landlords, and coordination with other agencies. The program would target renters, not homeowners.
  • Funding would be $35,000 per year beginning in FY 2026-27, using roughly $105,000 in homeless liaison intergovernmental agreement funds to cover three years: $30,000 for direct assistance and $5,000 for administration. Family Promise would report twice a year and present outcomes to the council.
  • Complementary programming includes Community Action utility assistance for Tualatin water bills at multifamily properties, a Community Action staff liaison at the Tualatin library one day a week and at the Tigard library one day a week, possible on-the-spot utility assistance and navigation, and advocacy during the 2027 legislative session.
  • Megan Cohen noted Washington County Supportive Housing Services ended the fiscal year with roughly $14 million in unspent funds; the county commission was expected to vote in mid-November on allocating those funds, with additional eviction prevention recommended and largely managed by Community Action.
  • Councilor Brooks asked about supports for people on disability and benefits renewals. Megan cited SSI/SSDI navigation gaps, mentioned the Assist organization, and said the library liaison could generally refer people but not provide full casework. Council President Pratt asked Megan to repeat the organization name. Another councilor said it was reassuring that eviction help would be available in Tualatin after hearing many Tualatin residents seek help in other cities. The mayor called it good news but acknowledged it was not enough, while noting it would help several families over three years.

Agenda Review and Council Roundtable

  • Council reviewed the regular meeting agenda, including the pledge, a Native American Heritage Month proclamation with IDEA Committee members, and a consent calendar item adopting the City of Tualatin Investment Policy. Councilor Brooks raised a transparency question, but staff clarified the policy must be approved annually by state law and no changes were recommended this year, so the item remained on consent.
  • City Manager Lombos reported a national website award, a record-breaking city booth at the Pumpkin Regatta with at least 1,000 items given out, an initial Pumpkin Regatta attendance estimate of about 27,000, a winning pumpkin at Pints and Pumpkins weighing 1,563 pounds, winter program registration opening November 9, the lowest lead and copper sampling results since testing began, two new grant-funded electric city vehicles, and an asset management day with 40-50 participants.
  • Council roundtable updates included attendance at League of Oregon Cities and ICMA conferences, Councilor Sacco's re-election to the women's caucus board, an LOC exceptional service award for Sherilyn, a Willamette River Water Coalition update that 82% of Oregon is in drought and the Willamette basin snow water equivalent was at 4%, IDEA Committee and community events, and Council President Pratt noting the housing forum highlighted that only 1% of people who reach out for help actually receive it.

Key Outcomes

  • No formal votes were taken during the work session.
  • Climate Action Plan staff will incorporate council feedback, finalize the draft action list, create rough fiscal-year timelines, develop performance measures, and report annually; staff said a final plan would likely return before the end of the year.
  • The eviction prevention grant program received broadly supportive feedback. Staff will continue developing the Family Promise partnership, utility assistance, library liaison, and related wraparound services, with more details to come.

Meeting Transcript

Good evening and welcome to the October 26, 2026 12 to City Council work session. First item on our agenda tonight is the Climate Action Plan, five-year work plan of development. Amanda, welcome. All right, is that working? Yep. All right. Good evening, Mayor and Counselors. My name is Amanda Watson. I'm the city's climate action program manager. I'm gonna share an update today on the development of our five-year work plan for the climate action plan. And I'll start with just a quick reminder of where we are in the development process. And as a reminder, our plan itself, the climate action plan has over well over a hundred actions that are focused on preparing our community for the impacts of climate change that we're already experiencing, and then achieving net zero carbon emissions by 2050. So this spring we pulled together a cross-departmental working group of city staff, and we also heard from advisory committees and met with you all in uh April, I believe it was. I should have written the date down here, but earlier this spring, um, to talk about the criteria that we wanted to use to select which actions actions in our plan we should prioritize to implement over the next five years. So that would be 2026 to 2031 period. Um and we are now looking at this reviewing results phase here. Uh see if this clicker works. There we go. Whoop. Um, so the prioritization criteria, we did um we scored actions in two rounds. The first round looked at the climate impact of each action, co-benefits, so things like you know the economic benefits or environmental or health and safety, um, whether or not an action aligned with council goals and/or other adopted city plans, and then opportuneness or timeliness. This had to do with whether an action in our climate action plan aligned with other projects we had going on at the city, um, external partner projects and/or funding opportunities. And then we took, after we did the scoring for those first four criteria, we took the highest scoring actions and we scored them on the next round of criteria. So the round two one looked at feasibility. This is really this set of criteria is about sort of the city implementation of it. So feasibility looked at staff capacity, whether or not we had existing staff capacity to do an action. Um, it looked at whether or not we knew anything about community support for one of the actions in our plan, um, funding availability and other kind of enabling conditions for an action. We looked at implementation cost, kind of rough estimates, right? Because of a lot of it we don't have budget details yet, but implementation cost for each action, and then whether or not there was an opportunity for long-term cost savings for the city. Um, and so after that second round of criteria, we had a short list of actions and the highest scoring actions make up that draft work plan action list that we're going to be reviewing today. Um, so in addition to the prioritization criteria, we had a few other things we wanted to take into account when we looked at that list of actions as a whole. Um, first, we wanted to make sure that we were making progress across all of the different focus areas in our climate action plan. So, both adaptation actions and mitigation, um addressing all of our major climate hazards, um, so heat, flooding, wildfire smoke, um, and then also addressing all of the major sources of emissions in our community, right? From buildings to transportation, etc. Um we also wanted to look at so while the scoring looked at uh staff capacity for each individual action, we also wanted to look across the body of work as a whole represented by the list so that we could make sure to balance work that was in progress on ongoing with the new initiatives we take on in the next five years, and balancing short-term actions with longer-term actions. Um so one of the things that I heard from the all of you this spring was was really an interest in um finding those opportunities to demonstrate progress quickly on our climate action plan, right? How can we show the community what this looks like?

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com