Speaker numbers apply only to this recording. Names come from transcript evidence. “Possibly” marks uncertain attribution.
The Tualatin City Council held a work session on October 26, 2026. Staff presented the draft five-year Climate Action Plan work plan, outlined a proposed eviction prevention grant program, reviewed the upcoming council agenda, and heard council roundtable updates. No agenda or minutes were included with the transcript; the regular council meeting was scheduled to follow the work session.
Good evening and welcome to the October 26, 2026 12 to City Council work session. First item on our agenda tonight is the Climate Action Plan, five-year work plan of development. Amanda, welcome. All right, is that working? Yep. All right. Good evening, Mayor and Counselors. My name is Amanda Watson. I'm the city's climate action program manager. I'm gonna share an update today on the development of our five-year work plan for the climate action plan. And I'll start with just a quick reminder of where we are in the development process. And as a reminder, our plan itself, the climate action plan has over well over a hundred actions that are focused on preparing our community for the impacts of climate change that we're already experiencing, and then achieving net zero carbon emissions by 2050. So this spring we pulled together a cross-departmental working group of city staff, and we also heard from advisory committees and met with you all in uh April, I believe it was. I should have written the date down here, but earlier this spring, um, to talk about the criteria that we wanted to use to select which actions actions in our plan we should prioritize to implement over the next five years. So that would be 2026 to 2031 period. Um and we are now looking at this reviewing results phase here. Uh see if this clicker works. There we go. Whoop. Um, so the prioritization criteria, we did um we scored actions in two rounds. The first round looked at the climate impact of each action, co-benefits, so things like you know the economic benefits or environmental or health and safety, um, whether or not an action aligned with council goals and/or other adopted city plans, and then opportuneness or timeliness. This had to do with whether an action in our climate action plan aligned with other projects we had going on at the city, um, external partner projects and/or funding opportunities. And then we took, after we did the scoring for those first four criteria, we took the highest scoring actions and we scored them on the next round of criteria. So the round two one looked at feasibility. This is really this set of criteria is about sort of the city implementation of it. So feasibility looked at staff capacity, whether or not we had existing staff capacity to do an action. Um, it looked at whether or not we knew anything about community support for one of the actions in our plan, um, funding availability and other kind of enabling conditions for an action. We looked at implementation cost, kind of rough estimates, right? Because of a lot of it we don't have budget details yet, but implementation cost for each action, and then whether or not there was an opportunity for long-term cost savings for the city. Um, and so after that second round of criteria, we had a short list of actions and the highest scoring actions make up that draft work plan action list that we're going to be reviewing today. Um, so in addition to the prioritization criteria, we had a few other things we wanted to take into account when we looked at that list of actions as a whole. Um, first, we wanted to make sure that we were making progress across all of the different focus areas in our climate action plan. So, both adaptation actions and mitigation, um addressing all of our major climate hazards, um, so heat, flooding, wildfire smoke, um, and then also addressing all of the major sources of emissions in our community, right? From buildings to transportation, etc. Um we also wanted to look at so while the scoring looked at uh staff capacity for each individual action, we also wanted to look across the body of work as a whole represented by the list so that we could make sure to balance work that was in progress on ongoing with the new initiatives we take on in the next five years, and balancing short-term actions with longer-term actions. Um so one of the things that I heard from the all of you this spring was was really an interest in um finding those opportunities to demonstrate progress quickly on our climate action plan, right? How can we show the community what this looks like?