STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
Speaker numbers apply only to this recording. Names come from transcript evidence. “Possibly” marks uncertain attribution.
The Waconia City Council held its regular meeting on December 22, 2025, at 6:00 PM. The council conducted public hearings on proposed franchise fees and the annual fee schedule, approved the 2026 final budget and tax levy of $13,914,617, and failed a motion to increase mayoral and council salaries. A law enforcement update was provided, and the council reviewed the city administrator's performance evaluation.
The council approved 26 consent agenda items in a single motion, removing item 8 (Right-of-Way Ordinance) and item 19 (Financial Policy Amendment) for separate discussion. Approved items included: approval of prior minutes and current expenditures; expenditures for Safari Island Community Center and the Ice Arena; change orders for Water Treatment Plant 3; resolutions for street lighting and 2026 capital projects; appointment of a utility maintenance worker; donation acceptance for the Waconia Fire Relief Association; sale of surplus equipment; investment portfolio diversification for unspent bond proceeds; grant applications for source water protection and contamination cleanup; 2026 law enforcement and joint assessment contracts; lighting retrofit and asset management agreements; equipment replacement; property purchase agreement for 401 13th Street East; authorization for a Small Area Plan for 801 Highway 284; a steep slope permit; park board appointments; and license renewals for tobacco, liquor, waste haulers, and recyclers.
Good evening, everyone, and welcome to our Monday, December twenty second, two thousand and twenty-five City Council meeting. Thanks for being here. Thanks for those that are watching online tonight as well. And again, thank you for being here, and we wish all of you a happy holidays and merry Christmas. You're able, if you would, please, and join us in the Pledge of Allegiance. Councilmember Colman, thank you. Second by Councilmember Siddons. Thank you. All in favor. Aye. Aye. Opposed. Very good. We have an agenda. This evening we have two public hearings that we will have for the public. Those public hearings are number one public information meeting on franchise fees. And the second public hearing will be on an ordinance amendment. Do I have a motion to open up our first public hearing on franchise fees? So I'll move. Councilmember Grangs, thank you. Second. Second. Councilmember Coleman, thank you. All in favor. Very good. Our public hearing is open on franchise fees. Mr. Mayor, I just have a very short presentation just to kind of talk about franchise fees and what the city council has been talking about. But of course, this is isn't my time to talk about this, and the council is well versed in this, but I want to allow time for the public to speak as well. So just want to give a quick update here on franchise fees and what the city has with that. If you haven't seen any of the communications that have been out there via our website or social media or the newsletter. So just a quick quick update here, and then we'll open it up for the public to speak as well. Very good. Thank you. So about franchise fees. So many cities in Minnesota have a franchise agreement with each utility company, gas and electric companies for the use of publicly owned right-of-way for their business purpose. The right of way is public property located adjacent to roadways for utilities, construction access and snow storage. By law, Minnesota State Statute 216B-36, cities may charge utility companies a fee to manage the use of the publicly owned right-of-way to deliver service. This fee is then passed through to the customer. So franchise fees are another way in which a local government can pay for specific programs or projects in their jurisdiction. The city is proposing with this change a $5 per utility per month fee as part of the franchise fee program, and that would be for residential properties. So commercial and industrial properties would be different just based on their meter size.