OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Walnut Creek, California/City Council
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Walnut Creek Transportation Commission Meeting - September 17, 2026

City Council — Thursday, September 17, 2026
BodyWalnut Creek, California
SessionCity Council
DateThursday, September 17, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 2:41:53

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it
16:38

Good evening.

16:38

Welcome to the Walnut.

16:40

Thank you.

16:41

Good evening.

16:41

Welcome to the Walnut Creek Transportation Committee meeting September 17th, 2026.

16:57

Commissioner Ash.

16:59

Present.

17:00

Commissioner Guerrero.

17:02

Present.

17:03

Commissioner McMahon.

17:05

Present.

17:06

Commissioner Patch is absent.

17:08

Chair Crowling.

17:10

Present.

17:11

All right, thank you.

17:12

So we will now move on to public communications.

17:15

This portion of public communications is for anyone who wishes to address the commission within our transportation area on topics that are not on tonight's agenda.

17:27

So if you wish to speak on any of the two topics that are on tonight's agenda, there will be a public comment period for those agenda items.

17:37

So do we have anybody from the public who wishes to speak on general transportation comments to the commission?

17:45

And are we uh are we taking Zoom now?

17:48

No.

17:49

Okay.

17:50

We have no members of the public uh waiting to provide.

17:53

All right.

17:54

Thank you.

17:55

We'll close this portion of public comment.

17:59

All right.

18:00

Next item is our consent calendar.

18:02

The only thing on our consent calendar are the meeting minutes of the May 21st meeting.

18:07

We did not have a July meeting.

18:10

So I'm just gonna ask if anybody on the commission has any edits or corrections to those minutes.

18:19

Commissioner Ash.

18:22

Holding wonderful.

18:27

Uh I move to accept the minutes.

18:33

Sorry.

18:34

Commissioner McMahon.

18:37

Yeah, nothing to add.

18:39

And Commissioner Guerrero.

18:41

No edits.

18:42

Okay.

18:42

And the chair has none.

18:43

Would you like to make your motion again, Commissioner Ash?

18:46

Now I'm busy now.

18:49

Get your own show.

18:52

So moved.

18:54

All right.

18:54

We have a motion.

18:56

Do we have a second?

18:58

Second.

18:59

All right.

18:59

Motion made and seconded.

19:00

Will the secretary do we take a roll call vote for the minutes?

19:05

Or no?

19:06

It's a consent item.

19:07

We can just accept it as is.

19:18

Yeah, why I didn't poll Commissioner Zellan.

19:20

Uh Commissioner Ash.

19:23

I uh Commissioner Guerrero.

19:26

Hi.

19:26

Commissioner McMahon.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Active Transportation████████████████████████████████████████40%
Traffic Management██████████████████████22%
Engineering And Infrastructure█████████████████17%
Public Engagement███████████11%
Procedural██2%
Public Safety██2%
Education██2%
Transportation Safety█1%
Parks and Recreation█1%
Summary of Proceedings

Walnut Creek Transportation Commission Meeting - September 17, 2026

The Walnut Creek Transportation Commission met on September 17, 2026, from 6:02 PM to 8:27 PM in the Council Chamber at City Hall. Commissioners present were Chair Charles Kreling, Jared Asch, Edward Guerrero, Ryan McMahon, and Student Commissioner Adam Zelin. Vice Chair Laura Patch was absent. The meeting focused on two major bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure projects: the Newell Avenue Bicycle and Pedestrian Infrastructure Projects (Phase 1 funded, Phase 2 conceptual) and the Parkside Drive Cycle Track Improvements. The commission provided feedback to staff; no binding votes were taken on these items.

Consent Calendar

  • Approval of Minutes (May 21, 2026): Motion by Jared Asch, seconded by Edward Guerrero, carried unanimously (4-0, with Vice Chair Patch absent). The minutes were approved without edits.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Item 4a (Newell Avenue Projects): Three speakers addressed the commission:
    • Michael Vecchio (resident, member of Walk Bike Walnut Creek) expressed strong support for the project, raising concerns about adequate signage to separate bicyclists from pedestrians on the raised bike lane, signal operations to prevent right turns during the scramble phase, and the potential for bicyclists to continue using the roadway instead of the new facility.
    • Tony Phillips (resident of Parkmead neighborhood) supported the project and requested that speed limits be reduced to 25 mph on Newell Avenue before the underpass to improve safety for cyclists.
    • Tony Almeida (resident on Newell Avenue, Parkmead area) emphasized the need for protected right-turn signals to prevent “right hook” collisions between cars and cyclists, and noted a design inconsistency where a bike lane buffer disappears near a bus stop.
  • Item 4b (Parkside Drive Cycle Track): One speaker:
    • Michael Vecchio supported the project, noting that Parkside Drive is currently unsafe for children walking or biking to school (Buena Vista Elementary and Walnut Creek Intermediate) and that a better east-west connection to BART could be achieved further north on Ygnacio Valley Road.
  • No public comments were received on items not on the agenda.

Discussion Items

  • 4a. Newell Avenue Bicycle and Pedestrian Infrastructure Projects

    • Staff Presentation: Austin Pato (Assistant Engineer) presented Phase 1 (Broadway to Capwell) and Briana Byrne (Associate Engineer) presented Phase 2 (Capwell to city limits). Phase 1 is funded through the One Bay Area Grant (OBAG) Cycle 3: $7 million in federal funds, of which $4.5 million is dedicated to the Newell/Broadway intersection, plus $600,000 in local traffic impact fee match. Phase 2 is unfunded, estimated at $7.8 million for a sidewalk-grade cycle track or $6.3 million for an at-grade buffered bike lane.
    • Key Design Features: A pedestrian scramble (all-pedestrian phase) at Newell and Broadway, raised bike lanes (Phase 1), curb extensions to reduce crossing distances (from ~100 ft to ~70-80 ft), diagonal crosswalk with decorative theme (horse/horseshoe motif), and removal of a southbound vehicle lane on Broadway to add metered parking. Phase 2 would extend buffered bike lanes to city limits, including a mid-block crosswalk with a rectangular rapid-flashing beacon (RRFB) near Kaiser Permanente.
    • Traffic Analysis: At most, average vehicle delay increases by 17-23 seconds during peak hours at the Newell/South Broadway intersection; all intersections operate at LOS D or better. Queue lengths are expected to increase at some locations.
    • Timeline: Environmental clearance received August 2026; 65% design plans reviewed; right-of-way clearance anticipated November 2026; final plans and construction funding expected January 2027; construction targeted for summer 2028.
    • Commissioner Feedback: Commissioners expressed strong support for the intersection improvements and scramble, but some (Commissioner Guerrero, Chair Kreling) questioned whether the bicycle traffic volume justified the corridor-wide investment in Phase 2. Commissioner McMahon noted that safer facilities would encourage more use. Commissioners requested clearer before-and-after overlays and more detailed cyclist/pedestrian count data. The student commissioner suggested coordinating with Los Lomas High School on bike-to-school days.
  • 4b. Parkside Drive Cycle Track Improvements

    • Staff Presentation: Briana Byrne presented the project, which aims to add a protected bikeway along Parkside Drive between San Juan Avenue and Civic Drive. The project is funded by the Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities (AHSC) grant, tied to the 93-unit 100% affordable housing project at 699 Ygnacio Valley Road (under construction). Cost estimate is less than $1 million.
    • Alternatives: Alternative 1 (recommended) – a two-way cycle track on the south side of Parkside Drive, retaining one westbound vehicle lane; Alternative 2 – one-way cycle tracks on both sides, requiring removal of one lane in each direction. Alternative 1 reduces conflict points from 47 to 30, while Alternative 2 reduces to 37. Operational analysis showed LOS D or better for both, with some stop-controlled approaches exhibiting LOS F (but overall intersection LOS A).
    • Constraints: Parkside Drive carries 14,000 vehicles per day (9,000 westbound, 5,000 eastbound), with a posted speed limit of 30 mph. Existing pavement width of 24 ft cannot accommodate standard bike lanes without removing travel lanes. Heavy trucks use the corridor to access I-680.
    • Commissioner Feedback: All commissioners preferred Alternative 1. Concerns were raised about the impact on auto dealerships (loading needs) and the need for ongoing outreach. Commissioner McMahon noted that the reduction in conflict points is a key safety benefit. Commissioner Ash asked about displaced parking (under the BART overpass); staff indicated those spaces are used by commuters walking to BART. Commissioners supported moving forward with design.

Key Outcomes

  • Consent Calendar: Approved minutes of May 21, 2026 (unanimous).
  • Newell Avenue Projects: Staff will incorporate commissioner feedback (e.g., clearer overlays, consideration of bicycle traffic data) into further design. No formal motion was made; the item was for feedback only.
  • Parkside Drive Cycle Track: Staff will advance Alternative 1 (two-way cycle track on south side) to a 10% concept design, incorporating feedback from businesses and the public. The commission expressed clear support for this alternative.
  • Commissioner Announcements:
    • The Walk and Roll program (presented in January 2026) received a Fan Favorite award from Sustainable Contra Costa.
    • Safe Routes to School maps are available on the city website.
    • Staff are pursuing multiple grant opportunities (CCTA, HSIP, Sustainable Communities).
    • The General Plan Workshop will be held on September 24, 2026, at Civic Park from 5-7 PM.
    • An update on Woodlands neighborhood improvements is pending due to limited funding; staff are determining the best scaled-back approach.

Meeting Transcript

Good evening. Welcome to the Walnut. Thank you. Good evening. Welcome to the Walnut Creek Transportation Committee meeting September 17th, 2026. Commissioner Ash. Present. Commissioner Guerrero. Present. Commissioner McMahon. Present. Commissioner Patch is absent. Chair Crowling. Present. All right, thank you. So we will now move on to public communications. This portion of public communications is for anyone who wishes to address the commission within our transportation area on topics that are not on tonight's agenda. So if you wish to speak on any of the two topics that are on tonight's agenda, there will be a public comment period for those agenda items. So do we have anybody from the public who wishes to speak on general transportation comments to the commission? And are we uh are we taking Zoom now? No. Okay. We have no members of the public uh waiting to provide. All right. Thank you. We'll close this portion of public comment. All right. Next item is our consent calendar. The only thing on our consent calendar are the meeting minutes of the May 21st meeting. We did not have a July meeting. So I'm just gonna ask if anybody on the commission has any edits or corrections to those minutes. Commissioner Ash. Holding wonderful. Uh I move to accept the minutes. Sorry. Commissioner McMahon. Yeah, nothing to add. And Commissioner Guerrero. No edits. Okay. And the chair has none. Would you like to make your motion again, Commissioner Ash? Now I'm busy now. Get your own show. So moved. All right. We have a motion. Do we have a second? Second. All right.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com