OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Warwick City Council Finance, Public Safety, Intergovernmental, and Full Council Meetings - June 15, 2026

City Council MeetingsMonday, June 15, 2026
BodyWarwick, Rhode Island
SessionCity Council Meetings
DateMonday, June 15, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 2:12:16

Transcript — Verbatim
6:46

Interactions.

6:46

I don't want to direct those old people and laugh like that.

7:54

Good afternoon, everyone.

7:56

Let the record indicate it is five oh three PM.

8:00

And the Warwick City Council Finance Committee is called to order.

10:01

Sorry for the delay.

10:04

We will start by getting the finance committee agenda.

10:13

Let's see.

10:13

Do we have any minutes?

10:15

We do not have any minutes.

10:18

Okay.

10:21

Um, starting with item number one on page one, 2027 zero sixty-one.

10:28

Purchase 10 laser platform.

10:32

Five year agreement.

10:33

Good afternoon, Major.

10:36

Uh good afternoon, Councilman.

10:37

Uh Robert Hart for the uh police department.

10:41

Uh good evening.

10:41

The work police department is requesting approval for a new five-year contract with Axon beginning October 1st, 2026 for replacement of our current Taser 7 conducted energy weapons.

10:56

Uh the contract will upgrade our officers to the latest Taser 10 platform, which provides uh enhanced performance, improved officer safety, uh expanded lessal lethal capabilities.

11:09

It will also expand our virtual reality training program, allowing officers to receive more frequent and realistic scenario-based training in de-escalation, decision making in use of force situations.

11:23

The total cost of the contract for five years is 795,004 seven dollars and eighty-eight cents.

11:32

And this includes the devices, holsters, charging equipment, licensing fees, uh instructor certifications, uh, etc.

11:42

And that'll be funded through budget code 3340 service contracts.

11:50

Thank you for that, Major.

11:52

And also thank you for reaching out to me over the weekend with a couple of heads ups.

11:58

Um, and I did ask you a series of questions yesterday via email, and you provided them timely this morning.

12:05

Thank you.

12:06

So I'm going to read those into the record as well as your answers.

12:09

What was the cost of the previous contract for tasers?

12:13

Answer.

12:14

The current contract included several add-ons and edits over the span and ultimately ultimately ended up costing approximately 40,000 per year of the contract.

12:27

Question two.

12:40

Next question.

12:41

Are the current tasers still operational in support by Axon?

12:45

Am I pronouncing that correctly?

12:47

Correct, sir.

12:47

Um Taser 7 is still operational, but are at end of product life and out of warranty as of 10-1 2026.

12:56

Taser recommends a five-year usable life for their weapon systems.

13:01

After five years, they believe that electrical connections in various parts are more prone to failure since these weapons undergo daily wear and tear, exposure to temperature, extremes, humidity, etc.

13:15

etc.

13:17

Note the cost to retain the taser sevens for another five-year contract would rise to approximately 153,000 per year compared to the Taser 10s at approximately 156,000 per year for a much newer and capable product as indicated below.

13:38

Before I go further, can you explain to us why this increase from 40,000 a year to 150,000 a year?

13:47

You know, um short answer is no.

14:02

And they're a sole source.

14:14

Well, they provide uh an outstanding product.

14:17

They have the research that backs it up, they have the legal teams to support you.

14:21

Uh they have a ton of support.

14:23

Their training is top notch.

14:24

So they're a very good company, and they charge a premium for their services.

14:29

Okay.

14:31

Next question, a follow-up to question three.

14:34

If so, why is it necessary to upgrade at this time?

14:38

Answer the Taser 10 provides significant upgrades.

14:41

One greater standoff distance, 45 feet compared to 25 feet.

14:47

This allows for more time and distance to de-escalate, provides an area of safety, and affords and avoids immediate hands-on techniques which can reduce injuries.

15:01

Two taser tens provide a larger capacity, allowing for more deployments, 10 compared to two.

15:08

The new taser program includes an enhanced virtual reality training suite that use VR headsets and tablets for realistic training.

15:17

Four the program offers better integration with our body worn cameras, internal event evidence software, and now include an analytics program to track deployments and assist the officers training and use of the device.

15:34

Next question.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Procedural██████████████████████22%
Water And Wastewater Management████████████████16%
Engineering And Infrastructure██████████████14%
Public Safety███████████11%
Pending Litigation██████████10%
Budget Equity Analysis██████6%
Community Engagement█████5%
Technology and Innovation████4%
Racial Equity████4%
Summary of Proceedings

Warwick City Council Committee and Full Council Meetings - June 15, 2026

The Warwick City Council convened multiple committees and a full council meeting on June 15, 2026, starting at 5:03 PM and adjourning at 7:07 PM. The Finance Committee, Public Safety Committee, Intergovernmental Committee, and Public Properties Committee met sequentially, followed by the full council. Key actions included approval of a $795,004.88 Taser 10 contract for the police department, a $150,229 compressor and pump replacement for city arenas, and several resolutions regarding Greenwich Avenue paving and traffic studies. A claim for $950 related to fire apparatus damage was denied. The full council also approved an appointment to the Land Trust Commission and a Pride Month resolution.

Finance Committee (5:03 PM - 6:06 PM)

  • Item 1: Purchase of Taser 10 Platform (5-year agreement, $795,004.88) – Police Major Robert Hart requested approval for a new contract with Axon to replace current Taser 7 devices. The cost increased from approximately $40,000 per year to about $156,000 per year. Major Hart explained the Taser 10 offers a 45-foot standoff distance (vs. 25 feet), 10 deployments (vs. 2), enhanced virtual reality training, and better integration with body cameras. The alternative is returning to traditional batons and hands-on tactics. The committee approved the item.
  • Item 2: Rebuild Compressor and Replace Three Pumps at Thayer and Warburton Arenas ($150,229) – DPW Director Eric Earls requested a $566 exemption for Environmental Systems Inc. (ESI) to perform work beyond the existing maintenance bid. The compressor rebuild cost is $96,556.39, and the three pump replacements cost $53,673. The total was requested from the FY27 capital budget. Discussion focused on the age of the equipment (installed 2003) and ESI's five-year familiarity with the system. The committee approved.
  • Item 3: Asphalt Concrete and Hot Mix Bid ($90,000 cap) – DPW recommended awarding to all six bidders for a one-year period from September 15, 2026 to September 14, 2027. Councilman Sinapi questioned why cold patch is more expensive and asked about usage of a hot box machine. The item was approved.
  • Item 4: Post-Type Fire Hydrants ($65,000) – DPW recommended awarding to four vendors for a one-year period from August 19, 2026 to August 18, 2027. Approved.
  • Items Under $50,000 (Consent Calendar) – Several items were approved. Two items were pulled:
    • Item 11: Firewall Maintenance Support (PCR 72-26) – IT Director Phil Carlucci requested adding Ocean Inc. as an additional vendor. The committee approved the amendment and then the item as amended.
    • Item 16: Workers' Compensation Self-Insured Third-Party Administrator (PCR 73-26) – Councilman Ricks recused himself. The committee approved the item.
    • Item 15: Vehicle Body Repair and Painting – Account number was changed to 76-358. No further action needed.

Public Safety Committee (6:07 PM - 6:23 PM)

  • PCR 62-26: Claim for Whedon ($950) – The claim was for damage to a lawn and road during a fire rescue. The resident declined the city's offer to repair and instead hired a vendor. The resident did not attend the meeting. Councilman Lattiser expressed that the city should bear responsibility due to the narrow road design, while Councilman DeLuise and others noted the lack of attendance and insufficient documentation. The committee voted to deny the claim (motion by Councilman Muto, seconded).

Intergovernmental Committee (6:23 PM - 6:36 PM)

  • Appointment to Land Trust Commission (Ward 2) – Earl Simpson was appointed to fill the vacancy left by the late Mike Zaram. Simpson, a 45-year resident and retired Rhode Island College employee, has been active with the Audubon Society and local land conservation. The committee recommended favorable action, and the full council later confirmed the appointment unanimously (8-0).
  • PCR 66-26: Resolution to RIDOT Requesting Paving and Engineering Review of Greenwich Avenue – Council President Sinapi explained the state's runaround on paving a distressed section. The resolution also requests review of a recurring sinkhole near Crown Plaza. Approved.
  • PCR 70-26: Resolution to RIDOT State Traffic Commission Requesting Traffic Study of Greenwich Avenue at Lancaster Avenue and Brianna Lane – Requested due to a long distance between crosswalks after a road diet. Approved.

Public Properties Committee (6:37 PM - 6:41 PM)

  • PCR 69-26: Resolution in Observance of Pride Month – Approved unanimously (8-0).

Full Council (6:41 PM - 7:07 PM)

  • Public Comment
    • Rob Cody (Ward 7) – Provided an update on his First Amendment lawsuit against the city, criticizing former councilwoman Travis (convicted criminal) and Council President Sinapi, citing negative public comments about Sinapi's behavior.
    • David DeRosa (48 Draper Avenue) – Raised concerns about the Rhode Island Alternative Academy at the old Green Elementary School, citing disruptive student behavior, lack of supervision, and unprofessional interactions with school administration. Urged the council to seek changes before the next school year.
  • Consent Calendar (PCR 71-26) – Approved.
  • Separated Items
    • PCR 72-26 (firewall maintenance) as amended approved (8-0).
    • PCR 73-26 (workers' compensation) approved (7-0-1, Ricks recused).
  • Unfinished Business – PCR 62-26 (claim for Whedon) denied (7-0-1, Ricks recused).
  • New Business
    • PCR 66-26 (Greenwich Avenue paving resolution) approved.
    • PCR 69-26 (Pride Month resolution) approved.
    • PCR 70-26 (Greenwich Avenue traffic study) approved.
  • Moment of Silence – Observed for a 7-year-old boy who drowned in Conimicut Point on the previous Friday.
  • Docketing – Councilman DeLuise requested docketing of an ordinance regarding e-bikes and a resolution regarding Conimicut Beach safety. Both were assigned to the appropriate committees.

Key Outcomes

  • Approved Contracts:
    • Taser 10 contract with Axon (5 years, $795,004.88).
    • Compressor and pump rebuild for arenas ($150,229) from FY27 capital budget.
    • Asphalt concrete and hot mix bid ($90,000 cap).
    • Fire hydrant bid ($65,000).
    • Firewall maintenance with new vendor Ocean Inc. (PCR 72-26).
    • Workers' compensation third-party administrator (PCR 73-26).
  • Denied Claim: PCR 62-26 (Whedon claim for $950) denied by committee and full council.
  • Resolutions Passed:
    • Request for RIDOT paving and engineering review of Greenwich Avenue.
    • Request for traffic study at Greenwich Avenue intersections.
    • Pride Month observance resolution.
  • Appointment: Earl Simpson confirmed to the Land Trust Commission.
  • Next Steps: Councilman DeLuise to docket an e-bike ordinance and a Conimicut Beach safety resolution.

Meeting Transcript

Interactions. I don't want to direct those old people and laugh like that. Good afternoon, everyone. Let the record indicate it is five oh three PM. And the Warwick City Council Finance Committee is called to order. Sorry for the delay. We will start by getting the finance committee agenda. Let's see. Do we have any minutes? We do not have any minutes. Okay. Um, starting with item number one on page one, 2027 zero sixty-one. Purchase 10 laser platform. Five year agreement. Good afternoon, Major. Uh good afternoon, Councilman. Uh Robert Hart for the uh police department. Uh good evening. The work police department is requesting approval for a new five-year contract with Axon beginning October 1st, 2026 for replacement of our current Taser 7 conducted energy weapons. Uh the contract will upgrade our officers to the latest Taser 10 platform, which provides uh enhanced performance, improved officer safety, uh expanded lessal lethal capabilities. It will also expand our virtual reality training program, allowing officers to receive more frequent and realistic scenario-based training in de-escalation, decision making in use of force situations. The total cost of the contract for five years is 795,004 seven dollars and eighty-eight cents. And this includes the devices, holsters, charging equipment, licensing fees, uh instructor certifications, uh, etc. And that'll be funded through budget code 3340 service contracts. Thank you for that, Major. And also thank you for reaching out to me over the weekend with a couple of heads ups. Um, and I did ask you a series of questions yesterday via email, and you provided them timely this morning. Thank you. So I'm going to read those into the record as well as your answers. What was the cost of the previous contract for tasers? Answer. The current contract included several add-ons and edits over the span and ultimately ultimately ended up costing approximately 40,000 per year of the contract. Question two. Next question. Are the current tasers still operational in support by Axon? Am I pronouncing that correctly? Correct, sir. Um Taser 7 is still operational, but are at end of product life and out of warranty as of 10-1 2026. Taser recommends a five-year usable life for their weapon systems. After five years, they believe that electrical connections in various parts are more prone to failure since these weapons undergo daily wear and tear, exposure to temperature, extremes, humidity, etc. etc. Note the cost to retain the taser sevens for another five-year contract would rise to approximately 153,000 per year compared to the Taser 10s at approximately 156,000 per year for a much newer and capable product as indicated below. Before I go further, can you explain to us why this increase from 40,000 a year to 150,000 a year? You know, um short answer is no. And they're a sole source. Well, they provide uh an outstanding product. They have the research that backs it up, they have the legal teams to support you. Uh they have a ton of support. Their training is top notch. So they're a very good company, and they charge a premium for their services.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com