OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Washington, District Of Columbia/Council of the District of Columbia
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Public Hearing on RFK Campus Master Plan and Future Land Use Map Amendments – September 30, 2026

Council of the District of Columbia — Wednesday, September 30, 2026
BodyWashington, District Of Columbia
SessionCouncil of the District of Columbia
DateWednesday, September 30, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 7:10:41

Transcript — VerbatimClick a line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Speaker 1

0:08

I'm calling to order this hearing.

0:10

This is a public hearing of the committee of the whole of the Council of the District of Columbia.

0:14

I'm Phil Mendelssohn, Chair of the Council and Chair of the Committee of the Whole.

0:18

Today is Wednesday, September 30th, 2026.

0:21

The time is 1052 in the morning, and we are in room 412 of the John A.

0:26

Wilson building.

0:28

The subject of this hearing is legislation regarding the RFK stadium campus site.

0:38

Specifically, I'm looking at the hearing notice of the Robert F.

0:43

Kennedy Memorial Stadium Campus Redevelopment, the Robert F.

0:47

Kennedy Campus Master Plan, Small Area Plan, Amendment to the Future Land Use Map of the District Elements of the Comprehensive Plan.

0:55

And although I don't think this was mentioned explicitly in the hearing notice Bill 26-6, which was entitled the RFK Campus Small Area Plan Amendment Act.

1:06

We had a hearing on that bill earlier in the year, but it's all related to the same thing, which is the RFK campus.

1:25

The Robert F.

1:26

Kennedy Campus Master Plan was initiated by the Office of Planning in February 2026.

1:32

A draft was made public in June 30th, 2026.

1:36

The uh there was a mayoral hearing held on August 1st, 2026, and the deadline for public comment in that process was August 14, 2026.

1:47

The revised plan has been officially submitted to the council, and that is uh PR 26-810, entitled the Robert F.

1:58

Kennedy Campus Master Plan Approval Resolution of 2026.

2:03

Um, and uh has been submitted to the Council for its approval as a small area plan.

2:09

The purpose of the small area plan is to provide a development framework and design guidelines for the redevelopment of the Robert F.

2:15

Kennedy campus, consistent with the Robert F.

2:18

Kennedy Campus Redevelopment Amendment Act for 2025, uh which was adopted by the council last year and is now known as DC Law 26-54.

2:30

Once approved, the small area plan will provide supplemental guidance to the zoning commission and other district agencies in facilitating the development of the site.

Unassigned speaker

2:40

In

Speaker 1

2:40

addition to the draft master plan, a request to amend the future land use map of the district elements of the comprehensive plan was submitted by the mayor to the council on August 21st, 2026.

2:50

That proposed amendment is consistent with the master plan as well as DC Law 26-54, which again is the RFK uh stadium legislation that we adopted that the council adopted last year.

3:04

Um of this is available on the council's uh legislative information management system on the website, the council's website.

3:13

Uh the purpose of today's hearing is to allow the public an opportunity to provide testimony to the council regarding the master plan and regarding the proposed amendment to the comprehensive plan pursuant to the Home Rule Act uh and the hearing notice sites the code uh title 1-204-23.

3:33

Uh the record in this matter will be open for two weeks.

3:38

That is directly will close at 5 p.m.

3:41

on Wednesday, October 14th, 2026.

3:44

What does that mean?

3:45

Uh the council rules require that hearings have a hearing record, and so we have to have a cutoff date for that.

3:53

As a political body, of course, we get comments right up to second reading, uh, which will be uh at some point later this fall.

4:00

I want to emphasize that the elements of this hearing are um I would say first and foremost, uh the mayor's proposed amendment to the land use uh to land use map, future land use map, and second, the uh small area plan for the RFK campus, and third, although not explicitly noticed in the hearing notice for today, uh Bill 26-6, which also relates to uh proposed redevelopment of the RFK campus site.

4:31

So I expect that we're gonna get lots of testimony on lots of issues, all of which I hope is related to the RFK campus.

4:39

We have 67 witnesses.

4:41

So we will try to move through this as quickly as we can.

4:45

This hearing is a joint hearing, and it is being jointly held with the subcommittee on local business development, which is chaired by Councilmember Wendell Felder.

4:55

Councilmember Felder, do you have any remarks?

Unassigned speaker

4:58

Uh well, good morning, everyone, and thank you, Mr.

Speaker 2

5:01

Chairman.

5:01

I'm excited to co-host today's joint public hearing on the RFK campus redevelopment, the RFK Master Plan, Small Area Plan, and the amendment of the future land use map of the district elements of the comprehensive plan.

5:16

I'm Wendell Felder and I have the pleasure of serving as a Ward 7 Council member as well as the chair of the subcommittee on local business development.

5:24

I want to thank and acknowledge all of the residents who are here in person and who are tuning in with us virtually.

5:33

It is no secret that the redevelopment of the RFK campus is a major opportunity for the district and the land use decisions we make today need to align with the development we envision for the future.

5:47

When we talk about a master plan, we are not simply talking about lines on a map or deciding where buildings, roads, parking garages, or open space to go.

5:59

We are establishing the framework that will guide the future of our community for decades to come, which is why we have to get this right.

6:09

As city leaders, we have a responsibility to make sure community input is more than a box we check during the planning process.

6:17

Residents deserve to know that their voices were heard, their concerns were considered, and their input help shape the final plan.

6:26

If we get the master plan right, the redevelopment of the RFK campus can generate jobs, create opportunities for small and local businesses, bring neighborhood serving amenities to the community, and help stimulate our local economy.

6:41

But if we get the master plan wrong, the consequences could last for decades.

6:46

Poorly coordinated land use and transportation decisions could make future development more difficult, limit economic opportunities, and undermine the very neighborhood benefits this project has the potential to deliver.

7:00

This is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to help shape the future of Ward 7, the district, and the region.

7:08

And while the questions we ask today are important, I do not want us to find ourselves in a situation 30 years from now asking ourselves, did we get this right?

7:19

Did we listen enough to residents?

7:21

Did we strike the right balance between parking and transit improvements?

7:26

Did we create the conditions that will help prevent displacement, or did we unintentionally contribute to it?

7:33

Did we create enough opportunities for small and local businesses, or did we make it so difficult for them to participate that they were forced to look for other opportunities outside of the district?

7:45

These are the questions we should be asking now, not 30 years from now.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Land Use Planning████████████████████20%
Energy Policy███████████11%
Public Engagement█████████9%
Transportation Safety█████████9%
Environmental Protection████████8%
Parks and Recreation████████8%
Affordable Housing████████8%
Community Engagement█████5%
Public Transit█████5%
Summary of Proceedings

Public Hearing on RFK Campus Master Plan and Future Land Use Map Amendments – September 30, 2026

The Committee of the Whole of the Council of the District of Columbia, jointly with the Subcommittee on Local Business Development, held a public hearing on September 30, 2026, to receive testimony on the Robert F. Kennedy Memorial Stadium Campus Master Plan, Small Area Plan, and related amendments to the District's Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map. The hearing was chaired by Council Chair Phil Mendelson and co-chaired by Councilmember Wendell Felder. Sixty-seven witnesses registered to testify, addressing a wide range of concerns including parking garages, energy generation, transportation, housing affordability, displacement, and recreational facilities. The record remained open until October 14, 2026.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Energy and Fossil Fuels: Multiple witnesses, including Mark Rodifer (Sierra Club), Barbara Briggs (Friends Meeting of Washington), Matthew Gravat, Carol Spring, and others urged the council to explicitly prohibit combustion of fossil fuels on the RFK campus, citing DC laws (Clean Energy DC Act, Greener Government Buildings Act) and public health impacts. They expressed concern about a potential gas-fired combined heat and power plant, arguing it would violate existing laws and harm air quality, especially in Wards 7 and 8 which already have high asthma rates. Some called for battery storage and geothermal alternatives.
  • Parking Garages: A central theme was opposition to the massive G2 parking garage (3,600 spaces, 110 feet tall) in Kingman Commons. Witnesses from Kingman Park Civic Association (Alexis Pasmino, Ebony Payne), Committee of 100 (Laura Richards, Shelley Rep), and others argued that the garage is too large, too close to the neighborhood, lacks ground-floor retail, and should be moved or reduced. They proposed swapping G2 with G1 (located near the riverfront) or reducing parking counts. Testimony noted that eight thousand total parking spaces are planned, with only 6,000 in structures but the legislation allows up to 8,000. Councilmember Allen emphasized that the garages are five times larger than the structured parking at Nationals Park.
  • Displacement and Neighborhood Protections: Laura Richards and other witnesses called for concrete anti-displacement measures, including prohibiting eminent domain in surrounding census tracts and providing property tax relief for long-term homeowners. The master plan’s language on displacement was criticized as weak.
  • Transportation and Transit: Many witnesses supported the Gold Line Bus Rapid Transit but criticized the plan’s reliance on cars. Suggestions included an infill Metro station near Oklahoma Avenue, a transit plaza close to the stadium, and dedicated bus lanes. Some questioned the feasibility of center-running bus lanes on H Street.
  • Recreation and Pickleball: Representatives from DC Pickleball League (Maya Ben David, Eileen Doherty, Jesse Abraham) requested at least 24 dedicated pickleball courts with lighting and indoor capacity, noting that only four courts are currently shown in renderings. They highlighted the sport's rapid growth and community benefits.
  • Housing and Affordability: Witnesses emphasized the need for homeownership opportunities, mixed-income housing, and timely delivery of affordable units. Commissioner Alfred Swales (Black Business Task Force) called for binding requirements for local hiring and retail space for black-owned businesses.
  • Other Topics: Testimony also addressed the need for a veteran service center (Lenetia Shelton), universal design for hearing accessibility (Neil Snyder), preserving the Langston Golf Course (Vincent Orange), and the potential use of the DC Armory for a sportsplex and community uses (Dennis Chestnut, Ebony Payne).

Discussion Items

  • Government Presentation: Brian Hanlon (Director, Department of Buildings and RFK Project Management Office) and Anita Cozart (Director, Office of Planning) presented the master plan. They noted over 30 community engagement events, 3,100 comments from 1,200 participants, and revisions based on feedback. The plan envisions six districts: Stadium, Plaza, Riverfront, Kingman Commons, Recreation, and Anacostia Commons. It includes up to 6,500 new homes (30% affordable), 30% open space, an expanded stadium, and new transportation connections. Key design guidelines address building heights (up to 130 feet in Riverfront), parking garages, and sustainability.
  • Parking Garage Debate: Councilmembers questioned the location and size of G2. Officials cited vehicular flow studies, utility constraints (Metro tunnel), and cost as reasons for the current placement. They stated that underground parking is not feasible due to the water table and WMATA infrastructure, and that ground-floor retail could be added through future zoning but not immediately due to legal exemptions. Councilmembers expressed frustration with inflexibility.
  • Energy Master Plan: Mr. Hanlon confirmed that an energy master plan contract was awarded about four weeks ago to SETI Engineers and is underway. The study will evaluate all options (solar, geothermal, battery storage, gas) and is expected to conclude with an RFP for an energy developer in late 2026. He stated that PEPCO can supply baseline electricity but that redundancy for NFL requirements (likely a redundant feed) is needed, possibly by 2030. Exemptions from the Green Building Advisory Committee may be sought, but no timeline was given. Councilmembers pressed for transparency and noted that a 26 MW peak demand for the stadium seemed high compared to other new NFL stadiums (10-12 MW).
  • Transit and Housing Timelines: The plan incorporates the Gold Line BRT and stadium armory metro expansion, but an infill metro station was deemed not feasible. Housing delivery: the commanders must meet development milestones starting three years after zoning is effective (estimated 2028), meaning housing likely won’t appear until 2031-2035. The district-owned Kingman Commons parcel has no set timeline. Councilmembers expressed concern about the gap between stadium opening (2030) and housing delivery.
  • Floodplain and Environmental: Mr. Hanlon acknowledged the riverfront district lies in a 100-year floodplain and that fill will be used to elevate buildings, but promised no increased flood risk. Several witnesses urged a full-site stormwater management plan.

Key Outcomes

  • No votes were taken; the hearing was for public testimony and council discussion.
  • The record remains open until 5 p.m. on October 14, 2026. Written comments will be accepted.
  • Councilmembers indicated they would consider amendments to the Comprehensive Plan and the Small Area Plan resolution. Key areas for potential action include: limiting fossil fuel combustion on site, reducing parking garage sizes, improving transit connections, and strengthening displacement protections.
  • The council expects to receive the executed energy master plan contract and the parking garage lease from the administration.
  • Further hearings may be scheduled before a final vote on the master plan and land use map amendments later in fall 2026.

Meeting Transcript

I'm calling to order this hearing. This is a public hearing of the committee of the whole of the Council of the District of Columbia. I'm Phil Mendelssohn, Chair of the Council and Chair of the Committee of the Whole. Today is Wednesday, September 30th, 2026. The time is 1052 in the morning, and we are in room 412 of the John A. Wilson building. The subject of this hearing is legislation regarding the RFK stadium campus site. Specifically, I'm looking at the hearing notice of the Robert F. Kennedy Memorial Stadium Campus Redevelopment, the Robert F. Kennedy Campus Master Plan, Small Area Plan, Amendment to the Future Land Use Map of the District Elements of the Comprehensive Plan. And although I don't think this was mentioned explicitly in the hearing notice Bill 26-6, which was entitled the RFK Campus Small Area Plan Amendment Act. We had a hearing on that bill earlier in the year, but it's all related to the same thing, which is the RFK campus. The Robert F. Kennedy Campus Master Plan was initiated by the Office of Planning in February 2026. A draft was made public in June 30th, 2026. The uh there was a mayoral hearing held on August 1st, 2026, and the deadline for public comment in that process was August 14, 2026. The revised plan has been officially submitted to the council, and that is uh PR 26-810, entitled the Robert F. Kennedy Campus Master Plan Approval Resolution of 2026. Um, and uh has been submitted to the Council for its approval as a small area plan. The purpose of the small area plan is to provide a development framework and design guidelines for the redevelopment of the Robert F. Kennedy campus, consistent with the Robert F. Kennedy Campus Redevelopment Amendment Act for 2025, uh which was adopted by the council last year and is now known as DC Law 26-54. Once approved, the small area plan will provide supplemental guidance to the zoning commission and other district agencies in facilitating the development of the site. In addition to the draft master plan, a request to amend the future land use map of the district elements of the comprehensive plan was submitted by the mayor to the council on August 21st, 2026. That proposed amendment is consistent with the master plan as well as DC Law 26-54, which again is the RFK uh stadium legislation that we adopted that the council adopted last year. Um of this is available on the council's uh legislative information management system on the website, the council's website. Uh the purpose of today's hearing is to allow the public an opportunity to provide testimony to the council regarding the master plan and regarding the proposed amendment to the comprehensive plan pursuant to the Home Rule Act uh and the hearing notice sites the code uh title 1-204-23. Uh the record in this matter will be open for two weeks. That is directly will close at 5 p.m. on Wednesday, October 14th, 2026. What does that mean? Uh the council rules require that hearings have a hearing record, and so we have to have a cutoff date for that. As a political body, of course, we get comments right up to second reading, uh, which will be uh at some point later this fall. I want to emphasize that the elements of this hearing are um I would say first and foremost, uh the mayor's proposed amendment to the land use uh to land use map, future land use map, and second, the uh small area plan for the RFK campus, and third, although not explicitly noticed in the hearing notice for today, uh Bill 26-6, which also relates to uh proposed redevelopment of the RFK campus site. So I expect that we're gonna get lots of testimony on lots of issues, all of which I hope is related to the RFK campus. We have 67 witnesses. So we will try to move through this as quickly as we can. This hearing is a joint hearing, and it is being jointly held with the subcommittee on local business development, which is chaired by Councilmember Wendell Felder. Councilmember Felder, do you have any remarks? Uh well, good morning, everyone, and thank you, Mr. Chairman. I'm excited to co-host today's joint public hearing on the RFK campus redevelopment, the RFK Master Plan, Small Area Plan, and the amendment of the future land use map of the district elements of the comprehensive plan. I'm Wendell Felder and I have the pleasure of serving as a Ward 7 Council member as well as the chair of the subcommittee on local business development. I want to thank and acknowledge all of the residents who are here in person and who are tuning in with us virtually. It is no secret that the redevelopment of the RFK campus is a major opportunity for the district and the land use decisions we make today need to align with the development we envision for the future. When we talk about a master plan, we are not simply talking about lines on a map or deciding where buildings, roads, parking garages, or open space to go. We are establishing the framework that will guide the future of our community for decades to come, which is why we have to get this right. As city leaders, we have a responsibility to make sure community input is more than a box we check during the planning process. Residents deserve to know that their voices were heard, their concerns were considered, and their input help shape the final plan.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com