OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Washington, District Of Columbia/Council of the District of Columbia
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Oversight Roundtable on Eligibility Determination at Virginia Williams Family Resource Center – October 8, 2026

Council of the District of Columbia — Thursday, October 8, 2026
BodyWashington, District Of Columbia
SessionCouncil of the District of Columbia
DateThursday, October 8, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 5:18:09

Transcript — VerbatimClick a line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Speaker 1

4:34

Recording in progress.

Speaker 2

4:36

Good morning.

4:37

I'm Matt Freeman, Ward Three Council member and chairperson of the Committee on Human Services.

4:43

Today is October eighth, twenty twenty-six.

4:47

We are meeting in room five hundred of the John A.

4:51

Wilson building, and on Zoom on the Zoom virtual platform.

Unassigned speaker

5:01

I

Speaker 2

5:01

believe I'm joined online by Councilmember TRAYON White.

5:07

Thank you very much for joining.

5:10

Today we are conducting an oversight round table on the eligibility determination process at the Virginia Williams Family Resource Center, operated by the Department of Human Services, or DHS.

5:24

Virginia Williams is the central intake center for families applying to enter the district's homeless services system.

5:31

Staff at Virginia Williams have some of the hardest jobs in the district government.

5:37

They must quickly make complex and fact intensive determinations about shelter eligibility, decisions with life changing consequences for families.

5:49

No system of determining eligibility will be perfectly perfect.

5:55

Unfortunately, the committee has heard years of concerns from residents whose access to shelter was delayed or denied because of burdensome document requirements and avoidable mistakes.

6:07

Families in litigation against landlords for operating substandard housing have been asked to produce letters from those landlords saying the apartments are uninhabitable.

6:18

Families living in their vehicles have been denied shelter because DHS staff determined the cars did not show enough evidence of being slept in.

6:29

Families have been asked to provide leases from relatives they stayed with years ago.

6:34

Just as concerning families who are denied shelter may be referred to a program that does not always provide support needed to prevent a return to homelessness.

6:44

The homelessness prevention program, or HPP, offers services like mediation and flexible financial assistance to prevent homelessness.

6:55

Families can receive HPP if they are otherwise eligible for homeless services, but have a safe place to stay on the night they present at Virginia Williams.

7:06

According to DHS, by offering targeted services and flexible supports, HPP works to stabilize families before they enter the shelter system.

7:17

And the agency has leaned into the potential benefits of prevention.

7:22

In FY25, more than twice as many families were referred to HPP as entered shelter.

7:29

Unfortunately, most HPP participants returned to Virginia Williams within two years.

7:38

More than half of fiscal FY25 participants have since presented at Virginia Williams a second, third, or fourth time.

7:48

Today we will be discussing the process behind and the consequences of the decisions made at Virginia Williams, including the decision to refer a family to HPP.

8:00

We will be examining whether DHS decisions accurately reflect families' eligibility, are fair and consistent, and set families up for long-term housing stability.

8:12

I look forward to hearing from today's witnesses, and I'm grateful to Director Pierre for joining us today.

8:21

Before I turn to colleagues, I will say that I was disappointed by DHS's failure to respond to requests for documents we made several weeks ago.

8:37

The committee asked for the following documents.

8:40

All currently applicable regulations, written policies, written procedures, employee handbooks, employee training materials, former formal and informal employee guidance, and any similar documents available to the agency describing, governing or relating to the process of deciding the family services administrations, interventions for which a family is or is not eligible at Virginia Williams, including the family assessment mapping form and all eligibility scripts.

9:14

DHS did not provide any of the documents because distributing its eligibility scripts in particular could lead to disruptions of DHS's operational processes.

9:25

As the committee said in the letter it sent with its prehearing questions, DHS must provide what the committee requested under DC Code 1-301.44C.

9:40

No agency can withhold documents or information from the council unless a few narrow exceptions apply.

9:47

DHS acknowledged that none apply here.

9:51

When the committee renewed its request, DHS continued to refuse without giving a reason.

Unassigned speaker

10:00

Just this morning received only a few client-facing documents and no eligibility scripts.

Speaker 2

10:06

At the same time, we received data we had requested nearly a month ago documenting the outcome of assessments at Virginia Williams.

10:14

This basic information DHS should already be tracking and that should be easy for it to produce.

10:21

As I said earlier in my remarks, we are approaching today with a spirit of openness and a desire to learn more about the agency's work.

10:29

When we asked for foundational information and documents, we the foundational information and documents we requested.

10:37

We did so in that spirit.

10:39

The agents agencies' reluctance to disclose, however, is disappointing and concerning.

10:45

We must work together to ensure our processes are fair, consistent, and follow the law.

10:50

I look forward to receiving all of the documents requested last month so we can continue that work.

10:57

And I will say the context here, this is a very tricky business.

11:02

And what DHS has been doing, which is trying to find alternatives to shelter, is a policy that I agree with.

11:13

I think that shelter is not the best solution, oftentimes.

11:17

And if there are other ways to address a family's needs, then we should be taking advantage of those other needs as much as possible.

11:26

So we have a shared view of what is trying to be accomplished.

11:33

No system is going to be perfect, but when something is imperfect here, you have a family and perhaps a child sitting on a bench waiting to find a place to stay that night late into the night.

11:49

The stakes are high.

11:50

And so working together to make sure that we're doing this as well as possible is a really important project, and that's what this is about.

12:01

Fundamentally, it is not from my perspective questioning the goals that DHS has sent, including the goals to find alternatives to shelter for as many people as and families as possible.

12:17

But it's all about implementation, and we need to be transparent and work together to identify the places where implementation is wanting.

12:28

And that is what we're trying to do here, and I think it is the goal for DHS.

12:33

We want to be a partner in that.

12:36

With that, um I'm going to turn to my colleague Traon White, who I see on camera and Councilmember White, if you have any opening remarks.

12:46

I do, Chairman.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Homelessness█████████████████████████████████████████████58%
Domestic Violence Services██████████13%
Public Engagement█████7%
Public Benefits█████6%
Affordable Housing██3%
Public Safety██3%
Procedural██2%
Data Privacy█1%
Community Engagement█1%
Summary of Proceedings

Oversight Roundtable on Eligibility Determination at Virginia Williams Family Resource Center – October 8, 2026

The Committee on Human Services, chaired by Councilmember Matt Freeman (Ward 3), held an oversight roundtable on the eligibility determination process at the Virginia Williams Family Resource Center, operated by the Department of Human Services (DHS). The meeting examined barriers families face when accessing homeless services, including documentation requirements, the Homelessness Prevention Program (HPP), and treatment of domestic violence survivors. Chairperson Freeman expressed disappointment that DHS failed to provide requested documents, including eligibility scripts, citing operational concerns. Councilmember Trayon White also offered opening remarks emphasizing the need for equitable services.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Domestic Violence Survivors and Advocates: Multiple witnesses from the DC Coalition Against Domestic Violence (Michaela Deming, Dawn Dalton, Teresa Poor) testified that survivors face barriers including ID requirements, lack of trauma-informed care, inappropriate diversion to unsafe living situations, and failure to properly screen for domestic violence. They reported that only 4% of families seeking services at Virginia Williams were referred to DASH (domestic violence services) in FY26, and that DHS has not implemented past recommendations. Jasmine Ferguson (Community Family Life Services) noted that her transitional housing program does not receive referrals from Virginia Williams and that the SPADAT assessment tool is not used effectively to connect clients to housing.
  • Families and Legal Advocates: Lejuan Brooks (Washington Legal Clinic for the Homeless) described families being asked for impossible documentation (e.g., former landlord letters, friend's lease) and denied shelter despite having no safe place to stay. He noted that legal services are no longer on-site at Virginia Williams, and that the clinic's flyers were removed from the building security desk. Tamika Kennedy, Monique Jackson, Charmaine Brown, and Jasmine Waters shared personal stories of repeated denials due to lack of documents, being told to stay with unsafe relatives, or having to prove homelessness by showing vehicles. Ms. Kennedy was only placed after advocacy from the Legal Clinic. McKenna Osborne (Children's Law Center) raised concerns about HPP operating as a shelter denial without appeal rights, lack of transparency and regulations, and that 50% of HPP participants return to Virginia Williams within two years.
  • Additional Virtual Witnesses: Shoney Jones (Family Voices DC) stated HPP is misused as a barrier, funding is limited to three months (six if leaving DC), and that a public data dashboard is needed. Joanny Enriquez (DC SAFE) stressed the need for safety-centered diversion and consistency. Robin Swanson (Volunteer Legal Advocates) highlighted that survivors often do not self-identify and that intake scripts remain secret, preventing verification of trauma-informed screening. Other witnesses (Tamisha Lawrence, Michael Campbell, Keisha Briscoe, Dineta Lewis, Britt Ruffin, Charisse Lew) testified to being denied shelter despite having no safe place, being asked for multiple contacts, and experiencing hostile treatment. Charisse Lew (Washington Legal Clinic) called the 75% shelter denial rate unlawful and urged amendment of the Homeless Services Reform Act (HSRA).

Discussion Items

  • Director Pierre's Testimony: DHS Director Rachel Pierre stated that eligibility follows HSRA criteria (residency, family definition, homelessness). She emphasized prevention and diversion, noting that shelter is a last resort. She reported that in FY26, 4,672 assessments were completed, with 52% referred to HPP and 14% entering shelter. She stated that interim eligibility is used when documents are lacking, and that staff are trained to serve families with compassion. Director Pierre noted that HPP regulations are in development and should be published next year.
  • Documentation and Interim Eligibility: Chairperson Freeman pressed on why families are denied for lack of documents when HSRA prohibits denial solely for inability to prove residency or homelessness. Director Pierre responded that interim eligibility is available and that staff have flexibility to verify through data systems. She acknowledged that customer service issues may occur and that she would review cases.
  • HPP Transparency and Effectiveness: Councilmembers questioned the high rate of HPP referrals and lack of appeal rights. Director Pierre argued that HPP prevents homelessness and that only 2.5% of HPP families return to shelter. She stated that shelter is provided if a family has no safe place to stay. The committee discussed the need for clear HPP regulations and data on outcomes.
  • Domestic Violence Training and Screening: Witnesses and Councilmember White raised concerns about DHS staff training on domestic violence. Director Pierre stated that DASH provides monthly training and that the assessment form (FAM) was developed with DASH input. She denied cuts to DASH training funding and noted that a co-located DASH team is available. She agreed to review the percentage of DV identifications dropping from 10% to 4%.
  • Access to Legal Services: Brooks and others requested a reinstated presence of the Washington Legal Clinic at Virginia Williams. Director Pierre explained that the lease restricts non-provider organizations and that space is limited, but the clinic's information is included in denial notices and she is open to continued meetings.
  • Data and Transparency: Chairperson Freeman suggested a public dashboard similar to DOB's, and Director Pierre said she would explore the idea. The committee also discussed publishing HPP regulations, providing definitions of safe housing, and tracking outcomes by intervention type.

Key Outcomes

  • DHS committed to providing outstanding documents, including the evidence-based assessment tool (WestAT), following the hearing.
  • DHS will work to publish HPP regulations within the next year, including eligibility criteria and transparency measures.
  • Director Pierre agreed to review individual cases mentioned in testimony and to improve customer service training.
  • The committee will follow up on proposals for a public data dashboard and a consumer advisory group.
  • No formal votes were taken; the record will remain open until 5 p.m. on Thursday, October 22, 2026 for written testimony.

Meeting Transcript

Recording in progress. Good morning. I'm Matt Freeman, Ward Three Council member and chairperson of the Committee on Human Services. Today is October eighth, twenty twenty-six. We are meeting in room five hundred of the John A. Wilson building, and on Zoom on the Zoom virtual platform. I believe I'm joined online by Councilmember TRAYON White. Thank you very much for joining. Today we are conducting an oversight round table on the eligibility determination process at the Virginia Williams Family Resource Center, operated by the Department of Human Services, or DHS. Virginia Williams is the central intake center for families applying to enter the district's homeless services system. Staff at Virginia Williams have some of the hardest jobs in the district government. They must quickly make complex and fact intensive determinations about shelter eligibility, decisions with life changing consequences for families. No system of determining eligibility will be perfectly perfect. Unfortunately, the committee has heard years of concerns from residents whose access to shelter was delayed or denied because of burdensome document requirements and avoidable mistakes. Families in litigation against landlords for operating substandard housing have been asked to produce letters from those landlords saying the apartments are uninhabitable. Families living in their vehicles have been denied shelter because DHS staff determined the cars did not show enough evidence of being slept in. Families have been asked to provide leases from relatives they stayed with years ago. Just as concerning families who are denied shelter may be referred to a program that does not always provide support needed to prevent a return to homelessness. The homelessness prevention program, or HPP, offers services like mediation and flexible financial assistance to prevent homelessness. Families can receive HPP if they are otherwise eligible for homeless services, but have a safe place to stay on the night they present at Virginia Williams. According to DHS, by offering targeted services and flexible supports, HPP works to stabilize families before they enter the shelter system. And the agency has leaned into the potential benefits of prevention. In FY25, more than twice as many families were referred to HPP as entered shelter. Unfortunately, most HPP participants returned to Virginia Williams within two years. More than half of fiscal FY25 participants have since presented at Virginia Williams a second, third, or fourth time. Today we will be discussing the process behind and the consequences of the decisions made at Virginia Williams, including the decision to refer a family to HPP. We will be examining whether DHS decisions accurately reflect families' eligibility, are fair and consistent, and set families up for long-term housing stability. I look forward to hearing from today's witnesses, and I'm grateful to Director Pierre for joining us today. Before I turn to colleagues, I will say that I was disappointed by DHS's failure to respond to requests for documents we made several weeks ago. The committee asked for the following documents. All currently applicable regulations, written policies, written procedures, employee handbooks, employee training materials, former formal and informal employee guidance, and any similar documents available to the agency describing, governing or relating to the process of deciding the family services administrations, interventions for which a family is or is not eligible at Virginia Williams, including the family assessment mapping form and all eligibility scripts. DHS did not provide any of the documents because distributing its eligibility scripts in particular could lead to disruptions of DHS's operational processes. As the committee said in the letter it sent with its prehearing questions, DHS must provide what the committee requested under DC Code 1-301.44C. No agency can withhold documents or information from the council unless a few narrow exceptions apply. DHS acknowledged that none apply here. When the committee renewed its request, DHS continued to refuse without giving a reason. Just this morning received only a few client-facing documents and no eligibility scripts. At the same time, we received data we had requested nearly a month ago documenting the outcome of assessments at Virginia Williams. This basic information DHS should already be tracking and that should be easy for it to produce. As I said earlier in my remarks, we are approaching today with a spirit of openness and a desire to learn more about the agency's work. When we asked for foundational information and documents, we the foundational information and documents we requested. We did so in that spirit. The agents agencies' reluctance to disclose, however, is disappointing and concerning. We must work together to ensure our processes are fair, consistent, and follow the law. I look forward to receiving all of the documents requested last month so we can continue that work. And I will say the context here, this is a very tricky business. And what DHS has been doing, which is trying to find alternatives to shelter, is a policy that I agree with. I think that shelter is not the best solution, oftentimes. And if there are other ways to address a family's needs, then we should be taking advantage of those other needs as much as possible.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com