The West Linn City Council held a work session on Monday, February 3, 2025, at 1:00 PM in Council Chambers. The meeting covered a wide range of topics including a Black History Month proclamation, a proposed ordinance on feeding wild animals, a presentation from Metro Councilor Christine Lewis, a discussion on Flock Safety cameras, the 2025 Public Works project calendar, and the council's 2025 priorities. The session was informational, with no formal votes taken on most items, but direction was given to move several items forward.
Call to order this meeting of the Western City Council. It's a Monday, February 3rd, 2025. It is a work session. And the first item of business as always is to approve the agenda for the day. So I would entertain a motion. Thank you, Mayor. I move to approve the agenda for our February 3rd work session. Okay, it has been moved and seconded by Councillor Growner to approve the agenda for the Monday February 3rd, 2025 City Council work session. Any discussion? Seeing none, we can uh call the roll. Councilor Bonington. Yes. Councilor Groner. Yes. Council President Bon? Yes. Council Councillor Brick. Yes. Mayor Staski. Yes. The emotion passes unanimously and good job calling the role for the first time there. Thank you. That takes us to public comments. Bo Janelle. Bo, welcome. Are you talking about flocks cameras, correct? Would you like to go right now or wait until two o'clock? Okay. Sounds good. Well, thank you for being here. And just state your name and city residents and fountain West Lynn. The U.S. Constitution's Fourth Amendment protects people from unreasonable searches and seizures. According to the U.S. Supreme Court, the amendment's purpose is to safeguard the privacy and security of individuals against arbitrary invasions by government. In 1967, the court expanded Fourth Amendment protections holding in CAPS versus the U.S. that the Fourth Amendment protects people, not places. However, there has long been hints that the trafficking vehicles movement could, under some circumstances, trigger Fourth Amendment concerns. As far back as 1979, the Supreme Court declared an individual operating or traveling in an automobile does not lose all reasonable expectations of privacy simply because the automobile and its use are subject to government regulation. While ALPR scans also indiscriminately collect data about every car that passes by a license plate reader, regardless of the driver's connection to criminal activity. Just as the only way to avoid generating data on your phone would be to turn it off. The only way to avoid this data collection would be to give up driving altogether or keep a vehicle away from the range of a license plate reader. I would have driven past two just to get here today. They found that 37% of all ALPR hits from fixed readers were wrong. Sorry, my notes. Nevertheless, these jurisdictions hold on to these scans for 90 minutes or indefinitely. These types of surveillance have usually been used to focus on minority communities, black and brown communities, Muslim communities, LGBT communities. It's a problem. I am venomely against these cameras. Thank you for uh measured.