West Linn Planning Commission Work Session on CDC Clean-Up and Waterfront Briefing - June 18, 2025
West Linn Planning Commission Work Session and Briefing - June 18, 2025
The West Linn Planning Commission met on Wednesday, June 18, 2025, at 6:00 PM in a hybrid format. The meeting featured a work session on proposed Community Development Code (CDC) cleanup amendments and a briefing on the West Linn Waterfront Project. No public comments were made on non-agenda items. The meeting adjourned at approximately 7:17 PM.
Discussion Items
Work Session: Proposed CDC Clean-Up Amendments
- Staff (Mr. Weiss) presented four amendment topics aimed at increasing clarity and objectivity in the code, and compliance with recent state legislation (ORS 197.015 and 197.195, amended by Senate Bill 1537).
- Topic 1: Minimum and Maximum Density Calculations – Proposed new definitions for developable gross and net area, a new measurements section in Chapter 5, and a step-by-step calculation process. This does not change existing density standards but codifies them to reduce ambiguity.
- Topic 2: Partition Minimum Density Exemption – Clarifies that the exemption for land divisions of three lots or less applies after the minimum density calculation. Staff cited recent conflicts with developers interpreting the current language to allow very large lots (e.g., a 5-acre property divided into three 1.5-acre lots) without meeting the 70% minimum density requirement of the Metro urban growth management functional plan.
- Topic 3: Shape of Newly Created Lots – Proposes requiring rectilinear lot lines unless impractical (due to existing lines, street curves, or natural features). A proposed section limits changes in direction to 10% and defines a segmented lot/parcel line. Staff noted two recent applications with irregular lots that prompted this amendment.
- Topic 4: Limited Land Use Decisions – Brought forward per city attorney recommendation to comply with new state law (SB 1537). The law now mandates that certain land use decisions (tentative subdivision plans, design review of permitted uses, etc.) be decided by staff with a 14-day comment period and 100-foot written notice, eliminating quasi-judicial public hearings before the Planning Commission.
- Commissioners expressed significant concern about the loss of public participation. Commissioner Gary stated, “the community should be really concerned… this pretty much wipes out public comment on most things.” Commissioner Evans proposed that appeals of staff decisions might better go to the Planning Commission rather than directly to City Council, to preserve a body with land use expertise. Staff noted that the current appeal path is to City Council, and that changing it would need council consideration.
- Staff acknowledged several edits needed (e.g., removing subdivision authority from Planning Commission in the code, clarifying Historic Review Board’s role). A revised package will be brought to the July 16 meeting.
Briefing: West Linn Waterfront Project
- Staff (Teresa) provided an update on the Waterfront Vision Plan, which began in 2016 with community engagement. The project is divided into three districts: Historic City Hall, Cultural Heritage, and Pond. A consultant team developed a draft vision plan in January 2024, refined through public events, surveys, stakeholder interviews, and a council-appointed working group. An online survey from December 18, 2024 to January 31, 2025 gathered feedback on the plan.
- The final draft vision plan will be presented at a working group meeting on July 10, followed by two open houses (July 24 at the Adult Community Center, July 31 at the Library Community Room). The plan is scheduled for a Planning Commission work session in August, a public hearing in September for a recommendation to City Council, and council adoption in November. Adoption would be by resolution (not a legislative land use action), setting the vision for future zoning and code changes.
- Commissioner Whatney raised concerns about tribal involvement and a pending lawsuit by tribes against PGE regarding control of the Willamette Falls. Staff responded that the vision plan is high-level; detailed tribal consultation and environmental review will occur in later phases when zoning and project-specific proposals emerge.
Key Outcomes
- No formal votes were taken. The work session on CDC amendments is a preliminary review; staff will return with a revised code amendment package on July 16. A public hearing is tentatively scheduled for August 6.
- The Waterfront Project update was informational; the next formal planning commission action will be a work session on August 20, followed by a public hearing in September.
- Staff announced a celebration of the McLean House listing on the National Register of Historic Places on June 28 at 11:00 AM.
- The July 2 meeting was cancelled; additional meeting added on July 9 for Vision 43 design standards.
Meeting Transcript
Meeting for Wednesday, June 18th, 2025. I will now call the meeting to order and ask Mr. Vice to call the roll. All right, Commissioner Evans. Here. Commissioner Watten. Here. Vice Chair Wolvotney. Here. And Chair Metlin. Here. And just to note, uh, Commissioner Jones just ran home real quick. He'll he should be back any moment now. Thank you. All right. Do we have any public comment related items not on the agenda? We do not. Okay. All right. Then let's move in to one of our two main items for tonight, which is the work session on the proposed CDC cleanup amendments. Mr. Weiss. All right. Thank you, Chair. Uh Teresa's gonna pull up a short presentation I've got for this item. Uh just want to set it up a little bit. Uh you know, we've the planning planning staff have been collecting uh issues with the code over the years, and we try to do code cleanup projects every couple of years to get the the code into come into uh one compliance with state statute and also just to make it more clear and objective so everyone has an understanding of what the expectations are. Uh so we were bringing we're planning on bringing these uh uh a couple of these code amendments forward, and then also we've tagged on uh uh uh recent state change in uh legislation around limited land use decisions. So we're going to uh make the changes with that as we we go through this uh short process. Uh there's a there's a bigger code cleanup process going on, uh which we'll probably start with the planning commission in the fall, where we're really gonna do a pretty deep dive into the into the code and and do cleanups and again uh make changes where state statute is changed, and we have just been implementing the statute directly and not gotten it into the code yet. So that that'll come later, but we felt that we needed to attack these uh immediately because we've been having issues with them recently. All right, so in your in your packet, there was a memo with the four topics, which are minimum maximum density calculations, uh the partition minimum density exemption, uh a newly newly created lots and parcels, which these are all uh currently in the in the code or partially in the code. We just want to clean up the language, and then the limited land use decisions, which again is recent state legislation that we need to uh implement now. And then the uh the second component was the proposed code amendment. So it was uh again I divided the code amendments into the four topics. Uh there's uh see about six chapters in involved in it. Uh once we once we bring it forward for the public hearing, it'll all get put into one package, but I thought it'd be easier for you to follow along if it was broken out into the topics as we as we talked about them. So I'm just gonna go through each topic uh individually, and uh if you have any questions, feel free to interrupt me and and ask them at any time. So the first one is minimum and maximum density calculations. So in uh pretty much every city's code, you know, there's there's uh parameters around whatever the zoning is here in the city. We use lot size. So for instance, a 10,000 uh R 10 zoning has a 10,000 square foot minimum lot size, and so you can only get however many 10,000 square foot lots you can onto a property. Uh and then and then there's a minimum density requirement that is was brought forth as part of the uh metro urban growth management functional plan. Uh it's requirements that the city has to comply with also, just like state standards, and that and that requires uh the city to set a mini minimum density standard, and for the city of West Lynn, that is 70 percent. So whatever the maximum density is, you have to meet 70 percent. So the so the issue in our code is there's a there's a lack of clarity. It's not found in one location how you calculate minimum maximum density. It's it's sort of an individual criteria in a couple of different chapters. Uh in most cities uh around the region have a have a uh dedicated uh section in the chapter that clearly outlines how you get to a maximum density and then the minimum density. Uh that makes it very clear and objective clear and objective.
openpublica.com