OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/West Linn, Oregon/City Council & Planning Commission
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

West Linn City Council Work Session - September 15, 2026: Noise Exemption Repeal and Public Concerns

City Council & Planning Commission — Tuesday, September 15, 2026
BodyWest Linn, Oregon
SessionCity Council & Planning Commission
DateTuesday, September 15, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:08:29

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it
3:28

It's dinner time, but we'll get there in a couple in an hour or two.

3:32

Good evening, everybody.

3:35

It is Tuesday, September fifteenth, twenty twenty-six.

3:43

So with that, I'll call to order this work session of the City Council.

3:49

And with that, I'd entertain a motion to approve the agenda.

4:01

Second.

4:31

Yes.

4:32

Thank you.

4:33

So the motion passes, and that takes us to public comments.

4:37

And I think we have one on Oppenlander and oh, two.

4:42

Two, okay, sweet.

4:44

Thank you.

4:44

We'll take those two comments, then we'll get to the next item.

4:48

Dean, sir.

4:54

And I have to say, great work on uh Friday with the nine eleven event.

5:00

We really enjoyed that somber day.

5:01

And before you start my clock, I would like to acknowledge the city and thank the city for uh their work and their support and your good words at that event.

5:08

I have a challenge coin for the John for the John manager for the for Mr.

5:13

Williams, our city manager, um, that maybe he can display or share with staff or whatever.

5:17

But a lot of your staff did some nice things for us in prep for that, uh, all behind the scenes.

5:22

Um and my one word on Abernathy is it's Abernethy N-E-T-H-Y.

5:28

So as you have your discussions tonight, we should be respectful of the history of that bridge.

5:32

Um my comments on Oppenlander.

5:34

I'm Dean Sir.

5:35

Um live here uh on Miles Drive.

5:38

Uh I've spoken to you several times on Oppenlander, and I've never been to a work session, so I don't know how the dynamic is similar or different here or how we converse.

5:47

But uh several times uh myself and and neighbors in the RSNA and so on have come before you asking questions and for some support, and the clock just keeps ticking.

5:57

I think everybody's intentions are good.

5:59

Uh the responses are friendly, but we're not making progress.

6:03

We know the developer is uh working on their uh application and they want to submit an application that is done.

6:10

That is a green light that's not my understanding is not asking for variances or any of those sorts of things.

6:15

So at that point it becomes too late to have some of these conversations.

6:20

So um a couple of key questions.

6:22

Um uh the Miles Gate uh draw miles drive gate question and the definitive answer on the stub street to nowhere with a private flaglop versus a cul-de-sac, those are planning commission discussions.

6:34

We need access to the planning commission and paying 400, 500 to get access to our city codes and understand them just doesn't seem reasonable to us.

6:43

Um we've done some work on uh wetland.

6:46

We don't know if miles if excuse me, if Oppenlander has a wetland or multiple wetlands, it's at the top of two different drainage basins.

6:53

We don't know it's been it has a history of being soggy and it still is soggy.

6:57

Um and that's a study that uh my understanding is that the city requests and or requests of the developer to undertake, and we don't understand that process or can't make that happen.

7:10

And continuing uh the discussion on parks and SDCs.

7:14

Um the city uh and and I for that matter have a long history of trying to preserve Oppenlander as a park and then as a partial park, and now is even a thumbnail piece of preserved park and trees and so on.

7:28

And uh there are a lot of SDC funds, uh up to three-quarters of a million dollars, I understand, and we know that those aren't assigned directly to that development, but potentially um that would be consistent with the city's focus on parks and the emphasis on that.

7:43

So we do we just really want to get engaged and involved in those questions, and our sense is that the city council can instruct staff to open some of those doors for us, not to answer questions, but to open the open the doors.

7:56

So that's our ask.

8:00

Thank you.

8:01

Thank you for your comments.

8:02

Mr.

8:02

Williams, do you have any thoughts on that from the staff side on how to not to put you on the spot though?

8:08

Um thank you, Dean.

8:12

Um at the meeting last week, uh Friends of Oppenlander came and requested a work session.

8:17

Uh so I think the um the primary question that requires some council consideration is the is the idea of um uh delving the project to delve into the STC methodology and project list if we wanted to make an uh project on Openlander uh eligible for STCs.

8:37

And I um the wetlands question, I think that's right.

8:39

The wetland study is usually performed by a developer using the base maps and uh information is provided to the to the city as part of the review process.

8:48

Um I think it's primarily the SDC.

8:51

I've had some conversations with folks in this in this area.

8:54

Um we would need to do uh probably some consultant work to um to look at the uh eligibility of this property and to add it in uh if we wanted to be able to use SDCs as a particular funding source for a park in that area.

9:12

Council, as as Dean points out, council has uh uh had conversations with different parties in the past about a park on this property.

9:19

Um but we haven't had specific conversations about using SDCs to to pay for a park.

9:25

So I think that would be a that would be a different thing.

9:28

Is that something we should we would talk about as a city council at a I think that would probably be on the agenda?

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Noise Pollution█████████████████████████████████████████████49%
Public Safety█████████████████████23%
Procedural██████████████15%
Transportation Safety██████6%
Strategic Planning█████5%
Community Engagement██2%
Summary of Proceedings

West Linn City Council Work Session - September 15, 2026

The West Linn City Council held a work session on Tuesday, September 15, 2026, at 6:00 p.m. The meeting covered public comments on the Oppenlander development and Bolton School parking issues, a detailed discussion on repealing the noise exemption for ODOT's Abernethy Bridge project, and consideration of the League of Oregon Cities legislative priorities. Council took steps to repeal the blanket noise exemption and scheduled a special meeting for September 22, 2026.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Dean Sir (Miles Drive resident, representing neighbors and the RSNA) expressed frustration over lack of progress on the Oppenlander development, specifically regarding the Miles Gate question, the stub street design, wetland studies, and SDC (System Development Charges) funding. He requested city council instruct staff to open discussions for community engagement. City Manager Williams noted that Friends of Oppenlander had requested a work session, and council agreed to add it to an upcoming agenda. Dean Sir also thanked the city for its September 11 event and corrected the spelling of “Abernethy.”
  • Wendy Gorski (Buck Street, Bolton neighborhood resident) reported that the Clackamas ESD program now occupying the former Bolton Primary School has 97 staff members but only 42 approved parking spots, causing overflow into Hammerley Park and adjacent streets, creating traffic hazards and trapping residents for up to 40 minutes. She stated the Bolton Neighborhood Association filed code enforcement case LP 26042037 and requested the city clear Hammerley Park parking, stop traffic on Parent Street, and conduct a change of use review. Council committed to investigate conditional use requirements and follow up with school district leaders.
  • Jonathan Barton (neighborhood resident) thanked the council for its advocacy on the ODOT nighttime noise issue, noting the city's responsiveness and transparency. He urged repeal of the noise exemption and a comprehensive overhaul of the noise ordinance, having reviewed codes of other cities. He asked council to make this a priority.
  • Rachel (resident) reiterated gratitude for the council's work but reported that when neighbors called the ODOT hotline the night before, they were told the neighborhood had agreed to work until 12 a.m., which was false.
  • Josh (Bolton neighborhood resident, living directly under the bridge) described light trespass from bright stadium-style lights pointed at his home after midnight, which were turned off following complaints but then turned back on 30 minutes later. He reported loud scraping and banging noise at 1 a.m., causing his house to shake, and that work continued until 4:30 a.m. He questioned why work could not be done during the day when the site was often empty. Council expressed sympathy and concern.

Discussion Items

  • Ordinance 1775 – Noise Exemption: Mayor Rory read a statement recounting the history of the Abernethy Bridge project, ODOT's failure to adhere to its own commitments (e.g., promising loud work would stop by midnight but continuing after midnight on September 11), and the need for accountability. He noted that ODOT had that day offered to reimburse affected residents for hotel accommodations and attempt 24-hour notice, but called for a reliable system rather than attempts. Council members (Groner, Bonnington, Bright) expressed strong frustration with ODOT's actions and supported repealing the blanket exemption. City Manager Williams and City Attorney Kaylee presented a draft ordinance that removes the blanket exemption and establishes a special permit process, with the city manager as the deciding authority. Key points: adding a provision allowing citation of entities authorizing noise violations; a six-month exemption for state agency construction projects (though Councilor Groner questioned the need for a time limit); a 30-business-day timeline for city manager decisions on permits; and an emergency effective date. Council agreed to the ordinance changes and scheduled a special meeting on September 22 for first and second readings and a vote. Chief Rollins expressed sympathy for residents and noted the police department would support enforcement but preferred an organizational solution.
  • League of Oregon Cities Priorities & Legislative Strategy Session: City Manager Williams explained that the deadline for LOC priority submissions is September 25, and council had previously asked for more time. He suggested council members send their top five priorities individually, then finalize at the September 22 special meeting. A draft legislative advocacy plan (by city lobbyist Doug Riggs, who could not attend) was included in the packet, proposing an outreach strategy including legislative breakfasts and coordination with Clackamas County. Council agreed to revisit last year's priorities and provide input. Councilor Binner noted that the LOC fall meeting will require a voting representative; Councilor Groner was the only one signed up to attend.
  • City Manager Report: City Manager Williams briefly reviewed upcoming meetings: a special meeting on September 22 (with consent IGA item and noise ordinance), a work session on October 6 (council priorities update, possibly with Doug Riggs), and a business meeting in October featuring an annexation on Killarney Drive and a sub-regional transit study update. Councilor Bonnington and the mayor highlighted the quick replacement of a downed stop sign at Lancaster and Cornwall, noting excellent staff response.

Key Outcomes

  • Council directed staff to proceed with repealing the blanket noise exemption for ODOT and creating a special permit process. First and second readings of Ordinance 1775 are scheduled for the special meeting on September 22, 2026, with an intended immediate emergency effective date.
  • Council agreed to add a work session on Oppenlander development (including SDC funding for a potential park) to a future agenda; City Manager Williams will coordinate with Dean Sir.
  • Council will follow up on the Bolton School parking and traffic issues, including reviewing the conditional use waiver and working with school district and ESD leaders.
  • Council members will submit their top five legislative priorities to the city manager by September 25 for finalization at the September 22 special meeting.
  • Mayor announced that ODOT has agreed to reimburse affected residents for hotel accommodations during nighttime work and will attempt to provide 24-hour notice; further details will be communicated to neighbors.

Meeting Transcript

It's dinner time, but we'll get there in a couple in an hour or two. Good evening, everybody. It is Tuesday, September fifteenth, twenty twenty-six. So with that, I'll call to order this work session of the City Council. And with that, I'd entertain a motion to approve the agenda. Second. Yes. Thank you. So the motion passes, and that takes us to public comments. And I think we have one on Oppenlander and oh, two. Two, okay, sweet. Thank you. We'll take those two comments, then we'll get to the next item. Dean, sir. And I have to say, great work on uh Friday with the nine eleven event. We really enjoyed that somber day. And before you start my clock, I would like to acknowledge the city and thank the city for uh their work and their support and your good words at that event. I have a challenge coin for the John for the John manager for the for Mr. Williams, our city manager, um, that maybe he can display or share with staff or whatever. But a lot of your staff did some nice things for us in prep for that, uh, all behind the scenes. Um and my one word on Abernathy is it's Abernethy N-E-T-H-Y. So as you have your discussions tonight, we should be respectful of the history of that bridge. Um my comments on Oppenlander. I'm Dean Sir. Um live here uh on Miles Drive. Uh I've spoken to you several times on Oppenlander, and I've never been to a work session, so I don't know how the dynamic is similar or different here or how we converse. But uh several times uh myself and and neighbors in the RSNA and so on have come before you asking questions and for some support, and the clock just keeps ticking. I think everybody's intentions are good. Uh the responses are friendly, but we're not making progress. We know the developer is uh working on their uh application and they want to submit an application that is done. That is a green light that's not my understanding is not asking for variances or any of those sorts of things. So at that point it becomes too late to have some of these conversations. So um a couple of key questions. Um uh the Miles Gate uh draw miles drive gate question and the definitive answer on the stub street to nowhere with a private flaglop versus a cul-de-sac, those are planning commission discussions. We need access to the planning commission and paying 400, 500 to get access to our city codes and understand them just doesn't seem reasonable to us. Um we've done some work on uh wetland. We don't know if miles if excuse me, if Oppenlander has a wetland or multiple wetlands, it's at the top of two different drainage basins. We don't know it's been it has a history of being soggy and it still is soggy. Um and that's a study that uh my understanding is that the city requests and or requests of the developer to undertake, and we don't understand that process or can't make that happen. And continuing uh the discussion on parks and SDCs. Um the city uh and and I for that matter have a long history of trying to preserve Oppenlander as a park and then as a partial park, and now is even a thumbnail piece of preserved park and trees and so on. And uh there are a lot of SDC funds, uh up to three-quarters of a million dollars, I understand, and we know that those aren't assigned directly to that development, but potentially um that would be consistent with the city's focus on parks and the emphasis on that. So we do we just really want to get engaged and involved in those questions, and our sense is that the city council can instruct staff to open some of those doors for us, not to answer questions, but to open the open the doors. So that's our ask. Thank you. Thank you for your comments. Mr. Williams, do you have any thoughts on that from the staff side on how to not to put you on the spot though? Um thank you, Dean. Um at the meeting last week, uh Friends of Oppenlander came and requested a work session.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com