OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Winter Park, Florida/City Commission
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Winter Park City Commission Work Session: Arts Grants and Sponsorship Policy, October 23, 2025

City Commission — Thursday, October 23, 2025
BodyWinter Park, Florida
SessionCity Commission
DateThursday, October 23, 2025
StatusFILED
Video Record
Meeting Thumbnail
⇩ GET FROM SOURCE

STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE

Original source
Transcript — Verbatim

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Speaker 1

0:52

Recording in progress.

1:00

Calling to order the city commission work session of October 23rd, 2025.

1:05

Welcome everyone.

1:11

First on the agenda is the arts and cultural nonprofit grant program.

1:15

Peter, take it away.

Speaker 2

1:22

Thank you, everyone.

1:23

Appreciate you uh having me here today.

1:25

Um I've handed you all a packet that will look suspiciously similar to the one you may have seen in uh in March, because I have not changed it since then.

1:34

So if you remember, we brought forward this proposal for what to do with what used to be the former funding allocation for DPAC, which was $100,000 a year, to consider creating a competitive nonprofit grant round annually that would award up to $10,000 per applicant through pretty much like a selection process.

1:52

We were gonna have board members from our different uh already established advisory boards, so they would be used to things like uh our city and all the things than the way how to be a board member, uh, and then they would meet twice and then would evaluate proposals.

2:05

Um at the time when we met as a as a commission to talk about this.

2:08

Um we kind of tabled this for about six, seven months to bring back later.

2:13

I think the intent was we don't know what the budget's going to look like, we don't know what that process's gonna look like.

2:17

There's a lot of uncertainty out there.

2:19

So this is why it is coming back to you now.

2:23

However, all that being said, um I will say we still have a lot of uncertainty.

2:31

Um, and if you're asking my personal opinion uh on where we're looking going forward over the next couple of years, I'm not super positive.

2:39

I was actually I wasn't Jubs joking, I was real.

2:41

Um waking up all night long last night thinking about man, if property

Speaker 3

2:45

taxes go

Speaker 2

2:45

away,

Speaker 3

2:46

what does it look like

Speaker 2

2:46

for for municipal services and county service?

2:49

Like I don't even under I can't even comprehend how we would wrap our brain around how that would even work.

2:53

But there's what five different proposals being batted around right now, which makes me think something is going to end up on a ballot, and something is going to affect our revenues.

3:03

Either it will drop them drastically or it's going to hurt how we're allowed to grow them.

3:08

And as you're aware, 44% of our general fund revenue, uh, which is about 40 million bucks a year, comes from property taxes.

3:16

And so that is a huge hit.

3:18

It's also our only revenue that we can control how we want our city to look.

3:24

You know, when we have representative democracy, you're allowed to say, hey, I want more things, I want a higher millage rate.

3:30

I want less things, I want a lower millage rate.

3:31

And that's the right of every citizen when they elect their officials be able to choose how that should look.

3:36

So that has me nervous.

3:38

Um I haven't been taking it seriously, and I'm I'm gonna start paying a little more attention because I'm a little worried about where that goes.

3:44

We also have the the political issues related to Doge and state audits.

3:49

Um my opinion is this is the kind of thing that could get picked up in a news article and talked about on something like that.

3:55

I'm not sure we want to deal with that at this time.

3:58

Um but more I think more importantly, when we look at issues for us, it's issues of priorities.

4:04

So as we were talking about this last budget cycle, you know, we're we're still in negotiations over public safety pay.

4:11

Um we've got um, you know, we could only hold constant our funding for doing increased road repair and resurfacing in the city.

4:20

I know we've got a survey effort we're looking at here in the near future that will hopefully give us some insight.

4:25

My thought is you might want to conserve a little bit of firepower still to see where does all that land when you're looking at how do we want to fund things.

4:34

All that being said, we are perfectly willing and able to implement this and put this in place.

4:40

Um I just don't see any change in our landscape right now that makes me go, yeah, I feel really comfortable that we've got a lot of flexibility.

4:48

Um I'm happy to go over any of the program elements with you all, but like I said, it's suspiciously similar to last time.

4:53

I don't think I've changed anything.

4:55

Um, but happy to go over that uh if you want.

4:58

So that's that is all I've got for you guys.

5:00

So happy to answer any questions.

Speaker 1

5:03

Thank you, Peter.

Unassigned speaker

5:05

Um I would concur with you because I'm very concerned about what the state what the state is going to do on tax reform.

Speaker 1

5:13

Um I know a couple of our commissioners had thought about next year, even this year, raising our millage rate a little

Unassigned speaker

5:22

bit.

Speaker 1

5:22

We may not be able to now because we may not have any property taxes to raise it on,

Unassigned speaker

5:26

but

Speaker 1

5:27

we're gonna continue to give to the current charities that we do.

5:31

We're gonna be reallocating money from the charities.

5:33

For example, DePew, which we give um $24,000 a year.

5:38

They're no longer so we can use that money and reallocate it within that group.

5:42

Choose new ones, use this format to choose new charities.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Community Engagement████████████████████████████28%
Parks and Recreation███████████████████████23%
Fiscal Sustainability██████████████████████22%
Arts And Culture███████████11%
Advertising███████7%
Public Safety██2%
Procedural██2%
Grant Funding██2%
Budget Equity Analysis██2%
Summary of Proceedings

Winter Park City Commission Work Session: Arts Grants and Sponsorship Policy, October 23, 2025

The Winter Park City Commission held a work session on October 23, 2025, from 3:30 p.m. to 4:44 p.m. in City Hall Commission Chambers. Mayor Sheila DeCiccio presided, with Commissioners Marty Sullivan, Craig Russell, Kris Cruzada, and Warren Lindsey present. The session included two discussion items: the proposed Arts & Culture Non-Profit Grant Program and a City of Winter Park Sponsorship and Marketing Policy. No formal votes were taken; the Commission provided consensus direction for staff.

Discussion Items

Arts & Culture Non-Profit Grant Program

  • Peter Moore, Office of Management & Budget Division Manager, presented a proposal to repurpose the former $100,000 annual DPAC allocation into a competitive grant program for local arts and cultural nonprofits. The program would award grants of up to $10,000 per applicant, with applications reviewed by a panel drawn from existing city advisory boards.
  • Mr. Moore noted the proposal had been tabled earlier in the year due to budget uncertainty. He expressed concern about pending state property tax reform proposals, stating that 44% of the city's general fund revenue, about $40 million per year, comes from property taxes. He also cited ongoing public safety pay negotiations, limited flexibility for road repairs, and uncertainty about federal grants, including a $500,000 grant for the Plymouth that was approved but has not yet been received.
  • Mayor DeCiccio shared these concerns, saying the city would continue supporting current charities but could reallocate funds from DePugh, previously $24,000 per year, and Blue Bamboo, another $12,000, if needed. She noted contingency funds were needed for urgent infrastructure issues such as Howell Branch and a recent stormwater pipe collapse.
  • Several commissioners agreed with the cautious approach, citing concerns about a potential property tax referendum, the state legislature's impact on municipal revenues, bond market implications, and the need to prioritize public safety and infrastructure.
  • Discussion also addressed program timing. The proposed timeline would open applications in May, with review panels in July and August and recommendations to the Commission in September as part of budget adoption, making it a fiscal year 2027 expenditure. Staff noted a decision would be needed by April 2026 before advertising the program.
  • The Commission reached consensus to continue refining the program scope and revisit it in spring or April 2026, once the city's financial outlook and any state legislative actions were clearer. This was framed as a contingency-driven approach rather than canceling the program.

City of Winter Park Sponsorship and Marketing Policy

  • Jason Seeley, Director of Parks and Recreation, explained that the discussion was intended to obtain Commission direction on exploring sponsorships and partnerships with local businesses, emphasizing partnerships rather than broad advertising.
  • The presentation outlined four sponsorship categories: special event sponsorships, programming sponsorships, facility sponsorships, and third-party organizations. Examples included banner sponsorships, golf course scorecard sponsorships, digital advertising on golf carts, facility naming or adoption opportunities, and sponsorships for events such as Weekend of the Arts, Fourth of July, and Dinner on the Avenue.
  • Commissioners and staff discussed existing examples, including Weekend of the Arts sponsor Advent Health at $20,000, the carousel plaque courtesy of Hill Gray, and the Advent Health presence at the Tunnel of Lights. Clarissa, from the arts and culture team, noted some sponsorships are already handled at staff level and that developing a formal policy would create consistency.
  • The Commission emphasized that sponsorships should reflect true partnerships that add community value, be tasteful and consistent with city branding, and not imply city endorsement. Commissioners expressed support for a structured, transparent approval process, with staff approval for smaller sponsorships and City Commission approval for larger or naming-rights sponsorships.
  • The Commission also stressed that fundraising efforts, especially for local nonprofits and youth groups, should be supported and kept distinct from city sponsorships. Discussion included concerns about exclusivity conflicts with third-party leases and the need to review agreements with organizations such as Rollins College, Mead Botanical Garden, OCPS/Winter Park High School, and Blue Dolphins as they come up for renewal.

Key Outcomes

  • Staff were directed to develop a formal sponsorship policy defining approval processes, sponsorship levels, and the distinction between sponsorship acknowledgment and city endorsement.
  • The Arts & Culture Non-Profit Grant Program was not approved or canceled; staff will refine the program scope, eligibility rules, criteria, and structure, and return in spring 2026 with a go/no-go recommendation based on the city's financial outlook.
  • The Commission directed staff to review existing third-party leases for consistency with future sponsorship policies and to bring new or upcoming agreements with Rollins College and OCPS/Winter Park High School to the city's attention.
  • Neither discussion item resulted in a formal vote; decisions were recorded as consensus direction for staff.

Meeting Transcript

Recording in progress. Calling to order the city commission work session of October 23rd, 2025. Welcome everyone. First on the agenda is the arts and cultural nonprofit grant program. Peter, take it away. Thank you, everyone. Appreciate you uh having me here today. Um I've handed you all a packet that will look suspiciously similar to the one you may have seen in uh in March, because I have not changed it since then. So if you remember, we brought forward this proposal for what to do with what used to be the former funding allocation for DPAC, which was $100,000 a year, to consider creating a competitive nonprofit grant round annually that would award up to $10,000 per applicant through pretty much like a selection process. We were gonna have board members from our different uh already established advisory boards, so they would be used to things like uh our city and all the things than the way how to be a board member, uh, and then they would meet twice and then would evaluate proposals. Um at the time when we met as a as a commission to talk about this. Um we kind of tabled this for about six, seven months to bring back later. I think the intent was we don't know what the budget's going to look like, we don't know what that process's gonna look like. There's a lot of uncertainty out there. So this is why it is coming back to you now. However, all that being said, um I will say we still have a lot of uncertainty. Um, and if you're asking my personal opinion uh on where we're looking going forward over the next couple of years, I'm not super positive. I was actually I wasn't Jubs joking, I was real. Um waking up all night long last night thinking about man, if property taxes go away, what does it look like for for municipal services and county service? Like I don't even under I can't even comprehend how we would wrap our brain around how that would even work. But there's what five different proposals being batted around right now, which makes me think something is going to end up on a ballot, and something is going to affect our revenues. Either it will drop them drastically or it's going to hurt how we're allowed to grow them. And as you're aware, 44% of our general fund revenue, uh, which is about 40 million bucks a year, comes from property taxes. And so that is a huge hit. It's also our only revenue that we can control how we want our city to look. You know, when we have representative democracy, you're allowed to say, hey, I want more things, I want a higher millage rate. I want less things, I want a lower millage rate. And that's the right of every citizen when they elect their officials be able to choose how that should look. So that has me nervous. Um I haven't been taking it seriously, and I'm I'm gonna start paying a little more attention because I'm a little worried about where that goes. We also have the the political issues related to Doge and state audits. Um my opinion is this is the kind of thing that could get picked up in a news article and talked about on something like that. I'm not sure we want to deal with that at this time. Um but more I think more importantly, when we look at issues for us, it's issues of priorities. So as we were talking about this last budget cycle, you know, we're we're still in negotiations over public safety pay. Um we've got um, you know, we could only hold constant our funding for doing increased road repair and resurfacing in the city. I know we've got a survey effort we're looking at here in the near future that will hopefully give us some insight. My thought is you might want to conserve a little bit of firepower still to see where does all that land when you're looking at how do we want to fund things. All that being said, we are perfectly willing and able to implement this and put this in place. Um I just don't see any change in our landscape right now that makes me go, yeah, I feel really comfortable that we've got a lot of flexibility. Um I'm happy to go over any of the program elements with you all, but like I said, it's suspiciously similar to last time. I don't think I've changed anything. Um, but happy to go over that uh if you want. So that's that is all I've got for you guys. So happy to answer any questions. Thank you, Peter.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com